TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccinating children, as it may have epigenetic effects on future generations. They mention that studies on glyphosate have shown such effects in rats, which could potentially be extrapolated to humans. The speaker emphasizes the importance of considering the future and not just one's own generation. They argue that the mRNA messenger injected through vaccines could have unknown effects on future generations if not properly studied. The other speaker agrees, highlighting the unknown consequences of injecting substances without sufficient understanding of their medium and long-term effects. They both oppose mandatory vaccination and express concern about potential suffering and side effects. The speaker mentions the possibility of neurodegenerative effects and the role of prions in modifying natural brain proteins.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccine adjuvants, particularly aluminum, and their potential link to allergies. They highlight the paradox of using inflammation-inducing substances to make vaccines work in a nonspecific way, especially when inflammation is generally considered harmful. The speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should necessitate specific instructions to minimize the risk of triggering reactions to non-pathogens, potentially leading to lifelong reactivity. They claim to have never heard such instructions being provided.

Speaker 1, Kelly, used to strongly advocate for vaccines but has since changed her stance. She believes that the increasing number of vaccines, now up to 72, is overwhelming the human immune system. Kelly argues that the immune system is complex and not well understood, and repeatedly exposing it to foreign proteins through vaccines may be contributing to the rise in autism, autoimmune diseases, and childhood cancers. She questions the necessity of vaccinating against non-lethal illnesses like shingles or the common cold. Kelly emphasizes the need to reevaluate the frequency and intervals of vaccinations and urges caution in the current approach to immunization.

The speaker believes current vaccines and mRNA-based vaccine designs cannot be safe enough. They compare vaccines to television or social media, stating that the business model and methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Upon learning that vaccines use adjuvants to hyperactivate the immune system, the speaker questioned its safety and connection to allergies. They highlight that vaccines are designed to cause inflammation to work. Using aluminum as an example, the speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should require detailed instructions to minimize the risk of triggering the immune system to react to non-pathogens, which could cause lasting reactivity. They state they have never heard of such instructions.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule and labels themselves an anti-vaxxer because no vaccine has been properly tested for safety. They state that, in the book Vax Facts, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and that this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. They acknowledge that death from the vaccine is still a death and “super rare,” but claim you are much more likely to die from the vaccine. They ask which do you want: a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease, noting that for many of these diseases, the risk is zero.

According to the speaker, most vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, resulting in similar side effect profiles between the active vaccine and placebo groups. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data suggests aluminum in vaccines is profoundly toxic. The speaker states that the only true randomized controlled trial involving a vaccine was conducted on sheep with blue tongue disease. The results allegedly showed that the aluminum in the vaccine was toxic, causing the sheep to become sick, unsociable, and, in some cases, die. The speaker concludes that the assumption that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccinating children, as it may have long-term effects on future generations. They mention recent studies showing epigenetic effects of glyphosate, where consuming it can impact future generations. While these studies have been conducted on rats, the speaker believes it can be extrapolated to humans. They emphasize the importance of considering the future and potential unknown effects of mRNA vaccines on future generations. The second speaker agrees, highlighting the lack of knowledge about medium and long-term consequences of injecting substances without sufficient understanding. They argue against mandatory vaccination, stating that while not everyone will die from vaccines, some will suffer adverse effects that are unacceptable. These effects may include unknown side effects and potential generational impacts.

Speaker 0 states his position on vaccines has changed because he learned how they are produced. He had assumed they were produced reasonably, but discovered safety work had not been done. He says that in a book he completed in 2019, he listed vaccination as one of medicine's three great achievements, along with surgery and antibiotics. He now believes the mechanisms used by vaccine manufacturers and the methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Discovering that vaccines use a trick to hyper-activate the immune system to work, he questioned its safety and its connection to allergies. Speaker 0 says injecting aluminum to hyper-activate the immune system should come with instructions about what to avoid eating or seasons to avoid the shot, to minimize the likelihood of triggering the immune system to react to something that is not a pathogen. Speaker 1 summarizes this by saying the vaccine opens up the body so that anything present at the time can trigger an immune response.

The speakers discuss the need for public awareness about the benefits and risks of vaccines. They question the effectiveness of vaccines in eradicating diseases like polio and suggest that autoimmune diseases may be caused by immunizations. They mention the difficulty in getting responses from organizations regarding adverse reactions to vaccines. One speaker expresses frustration about having to fight for the choice not to vaccinate their children. They also mention the different vaccination requirements in certain states. The video ends with a mention of returning after a break.

For the past 23 years, I've focused on raising awareness about vaccine-related issues, asserting that vaccines are unsafe, ineffective, unnecessary, and harmful. Initially, I believed vaccines contained only dead or weakened viruses and saline. However, after reading a package insert in September 2000, I discovered that children receiving the full vaccination schedule are exposed to nearly 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 different chemicals. This revelation shocked me, highlighting that vaccines have never been proven safe. Vaccinating a child means injecting foreign substances into a precious life.

The speaker claims that no childhood vaccine has ever undergone a safety trial using a double-blind, placebo-based study. They assert that this type of study, involving a saline injection as a placebo, is the only way to determine the safety of a pharmaceutical product. Furthermore, the speaker states that there has never been a study comparing the health outcomes of children who receive the full schedule of 72 (or potentially up to 90) vaccines to those who receive none. Because of the lack of safety studies and comparative data, the speaker chooses not to inject themselves or their children with vaccines. They want evidence that vaccines are safe and make people healthier.

The speaker expresses fear and hesitation about vaccinating their baby due to concerns they have read about the potential long-term effects of introducing foreign microorganisms into their child's bloodstream. They mention various possible consequences, ranging from allergies and asthma to more serious conditions like cancer and sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker questions why children are getting these diseases and emphasizes the need to think twice before vaccinating. The conversation briefly touches on the biochemical legacy of vaccination and the importance of considering the potential effects.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

The speaker states the World Council for Health is calling for a complete moratorium on childhood vaccines, the first international organization to do so. According to the speaker, 1986 US legislation indemnified vaccine manufacturers, stating vaccines have unavoidable harm. The speaker claims that when vaccines are given in multiple rounds, there is a strong signal towards neuropsychiatric disorders like attention deficit disorder, Asperger's, autism, seizures, allergic diseases, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and sudden infant death syndrome. Conversely, the speaker cites papers by Mawson, Hooker, Miller, Thomas, and an older Amish study that allegedly show children with no vaccines have the best outcomes.

Vaccines are neither safe, effective, necessary, nor harmless, and this has been a two-hundred-year indoctrination. No vaccine has ever been proven safe because true placebos aren't used, and subjects aren't followed long enough. Safety is determined by whether the vaccine causes immediate death. Long-term effects like asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, neurological problems, and autoimmune diseases are not monitored. The FDA arbitrarily decided in the early 1990s that side effects appearing more than 72 hours after vaccination are unrelated.

Speaker 0 expresses a belief that adverse events from regular vaccines occur more frequently than people imagine, including things like allergies. They state that their own allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they feel they will never recover. They also mention that one of their sons has seasonal allergies that are significant enough to disrupt daily life, while another son has a dairy allergy that the speaker attributes to an allergy to mother's milk, which the speaker says they did not understand at the time but observed as the baby spit up regularly after breastfeeding. The speaker describes this dairy-related issue as a huge waste of a precious resource and questions whether evolution could be blamed for it, noting the expectation that ancestors would be starving and not surrender such nutrients if food were abundant. The speaker elaborates on their current interpretation by suggesting that the dairy allergy in their child was developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. They use this line of reasoning to illustrate a broader point about their view of vaccines and safety testing. The long, winding explanation leads to the central claim: given the education they have received, if they could do everything again, they would choose not to give any vaccines to their newborn children. They make it clear that they are not asserting that it is impossible that some vaccines are more beneficial than harmful, but they state that they now know they cannot trust the safety testing. In the closing, the speaker asserts that even if there were indications that a vaccine might be net beneficial, they would be compelled to wonder what else they do not know. The overall message emphasizes a deep skepticism about safety testing and a belief that current knowledge is insufficient to justify vaccinating newborns, as presented by Speaker 0.

- There's no proof unvaccinated children start epidemics. Some practitioners claim unvaccinated children are healthier. - Some believe vaccine dangers are becoming clearer, questioning the assumptions of protection and preventing spread. - Breast milk is claimed as sufficient vaccination. - Some vaccines contain egg protein, gelatin from pigs, and human albumin, which could be problematic if the individual is unhealthy or develops antibodies. - Some vaccines contain MRC-5 human diploid cells from aborted fetal tissue. - Human DNA in vaccines is typically fragmented. - Thimerosal, a toxic substance containing mercury, is in some vaccines and can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity. - Some medical professionals were unaware that RhoGAM contained thimerosal or that thimerosal meant mercury. - Injecting aluminum into babies has never been tested for safety. - Mercury, formaldehyde, and antifreeze are claimed to be in vaccines. - These substances allegedly go to the brain, causing encephalopathy. - Over $3.5 billion has been paid in damages to children injured by vaccines. - A doctor describes a large reaction to a vaccine in a child, likely due to aluminum. - A mother shares her son's story of developing hives, joint swelling, fever, seizures, and autism after vaccinations; the vaccine court awarded $55,000. - Some medical professionals were unable to speak out against vaccines due to conflict of interest. - Some believe autism and vaccines are linked, citing a personal experience.

Dr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. believes that vaccines can be unsafe, but he hasn't found a safe one yet. The speaker agrees with this view, stating that all vaccines are suspect. They express concern about the presence of metals and chemicals in vaccines, which they were unaware of until reading a package insert. The speaker is shocked to learn that a child receiving the full vaccine schedule is exposed to around 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 different chemicals. They believe that vaccines have not been proven safe and compare vaccinating a child to injecting foreign matter into a precious little baby.

A film festival featured a documentary about vaccines by Del Bigtree. The speaker mentions an interview where the host tried to shut down a discussion about the documentary. The interviewee has an autistic son and believes there's a link between vaccines and autism. One speaker questions why people can't ask about the potential link between vaccines and autism, noting that an additive was removed from vaccines, though it supposedly had nothing to do with autism. The World Council For Health urges parents to consider a "safer to wait" approach, deferring the childhood vaccine schedule. Five studies allegedly show that unvaccinated children are healthier, with lower rates of food allergies, asthma, dermatitis, need for ear tubes, attention deficit disorder, Asperger's, and autism. The speaker concludes that excessive vaccination is likely harming children.

The speaker claims the whooping cough vaccine increases the lifetime risk of contracting pertussis multiple times. They state the risk of death from pertussis is less than two in a million, while the risk of death from the vaccine is more than one in seventy-six thousand, making the vaccine 30 times more likely to cause death than the disease itself. Because of this information, the speaker would not risk their baby's life with the vaccine. They prefer to boost their child's immune system naturally to fight off any infection, relying on natural, innate immunity rather than a faulty product with no safety testing.

According to the speaker, vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, so the side effect profiles of the active vaccine and placebo groups were the same. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data shows aluminum in vaccines is toxic. The speaker states that the only completely randomized controlled trial was on sheep using a vaccine for blue tongue disease. The speaker claims the aluminum was toxic, the sheep became sick, their behavior changed, and many died compared to the placebo group. The speaker concludes that the presumption that aluminum as an adjuvant is safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

The speaker criticizes the CDC's recommendation of giving newborns vaccines containing aluminum, which exceeds safe levels. They mention the lack of studies on the combined effects of the 28 vaccines given to babies. There has been no official study by the CDC, FDA, or NIH comparing the cumulative effects of these vaccines to unvaccinated children.

Speaker 0 argues that adverse events from regular vaccines are far more common than people imagine, including allergies. They state their personal allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they will never be free. They also point to their children: one son has significant seasonal allergies that interfere with daily life, and another son has an allergy to dairy which they believe goes back to an allergy to mother's milk, noting that he spit up regularly after breastfeeding and that this perplexed them at the time. They describe this as a huge waste of a precious resource and remark that it seems like evolution messed up, especially given that ancestors faced scarcity and would not want to surrender nutrients when food was plentiful. They now think that the dairy allergy developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. In tying these observations together, Speaker 0 uses their education and what they describe as painful education to make a concluding point. If they could start over, they would not give any vaccines to their newborn children. They clarify that they are not claiming it is impossible that some vaccines could be more beneficial than they are harmful, but they now know that they cannot trust safety testing. Therefore, even if there were indications that something might be net beneficial, they would have to wonder what is hidden or not known. Overall, the speaker presents a personal narrative linking vaccines to the development of allergies in themselves and their children, uses this to argue a broader distrust of vaccine safety testing, and concludes that, given their current understanding, they would choose not to vaccinate newborns despite acknowledging that some vaccines might be beneficial in certain scenarios. The emphasis is on perceived higher-than-expected adverse events, potential connections to adjuvants, the impact on allergies, and a strong reevaluation of newborn vaccination decisions based on safety testing concerns.

German summary: Speaker 0 äußert eine ganz konkrete, sehr gewagte These: "ich sage offen, dass ich von Impfungen bei Kindern unter 3 Jahren abrate." Speaker 1 fordert, das Buch zu lesen, das "so geschrieben ist, dass sogar Oberstufenschüler es verstehen", und sagt: "Wenn ein Arzt das liest und das nicht versteht, dann soll er seinen Titel an die Wand hängen." Er behauptet, Impfstoffe seien "lebensgefährlich" und die "größte Gefahr der Menschheit." Begründung: klassische Impfstoffe enthalten Zusatzstoffe wie Aluminiumsalze, die "Gift" seien und in die Blutbahn gelangen; der Unterschied zwischen Injektion und Verzehr sei entscheidend; in Muskeln injizierte Substanzen gelangen in die Blutbahn. Bei Kleinkindern sei die Konzentration nach einer Impfung mit Diphtherie, Tetanus, Patusis "unglaublich hoch." Er schlägt vor, "wartet wenigstens die 3 Jahre ab." Lebendimpfstoffe hält er für problematisch; "niemand hat's wirklich gezeigt, dass die Viren harmlos sind." Er verweist auf Polio, Tollwut und Tetanus und behauptet, "für keinen Impfung ... echte Wirksamkeit nachgewiesen worden" außer Tollwut und Tetanus. English translation: Speaker 0 asserts a very concrete, very bold thesis: "I openly say that I advise against vaccinations for children under 3." Speaker 1 urges reading the book, which is "written in a way that even high school students can understand," and says: "If a doctor reads it and does not understand it, then he should hang his title on the wall." He claims vaccines are "life-threatening" and the "greatest danger to humanity." Reasoning: classical vaccines contain additives such as aluminum salts, which are "poison" and reach the bloodstream; the difference between injection and ingestion is crucial; substances injected into muscle reach the bloodstream. In toddlers, the concentration after a vaccination with Diphtherie, Tetanus, Patusis is "incredibly high." He suggests "wait at least 3 years." He regards live vaccines as problematic; "no one has shown that the viruses are harmless." He references polio, rabies, and tetanus, and claims "for no vaccine has real efficacy been demonstrated" except for rabies and tetanus.