reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Normalized guys wearing nail polish, crop tops, honestly, any clothes they want, dresses, skirts, whatever. Speaker 1: Life's too short to exercise. I'm just gonna be honest. There are so many better things to do than exercise. And this way of thinking is known as fatphobia. Speaker 2: A fat fucking den. Speaker 1: Men are not meant to be dominant. Men are meant to be submissive. Speaker 2: At nighttime, that hurt. You know? Speaker 1: And I think that just that flipped the switch in me where I was like, okay, fuck you. Watch this.

The speaker states they anticipate criticism for their following opinion. They claim that neither Elon Musk nor Donald Trump has ever had consensual sex with a woman, nor sex for which they didn't have to pay, either with money or gifts. The speaker concludes with "Have a great day."

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 for help in the garden, but Speaker 1 refuses. Speaker 2 suggests that Speaker 1 should make some popsicles, to which Speaker 0 sarcastically suggests that Speaker 1 should stick their face in the freezer. Speaker 1 expresses discomfort being alone with a married man, and Speaker 0 responds by saying they would rather kiss an octopus. Speaker 1 claims to have won a contest and demands money, but Speaker 0 denies any knowledge of it. They exchange insults, with Speaker 0 calling Speaker 1 ugly and Speaker 1 calling Speaker 0 a criminal. Speaker 0 mocks Speaker 1's appearance and they part ways.

An extreme, hostile exchange unfolds, filled with insults and explicit sexual references. The participants trade provocations while questioning each other's behavior. "You do. Not gonna happen, dude. Another pussy." "You don't think anal sex is good, do you?" "No. It's not the it's not the purpose." "Have you ever fucked your old lady in the ass? Who would do that? I fucked your old lady That's why you're here with me." "Watch your language." "Hey. Shut your ass." "Shut your ass, you little piece of shit." "Where are you from? These people are out here having a good fucking time, and you're being sick."

Do we need men? No. No? We don't need short men. Oh god. Do we need men to make us stupid? Do women need men in this world? Do we need men? We can be strong independent women. Nobody needs men. Really? We do not need men. Why not? Why do we need men? We don't want men. Why? Yeah. You do need women. Because they're beautiful. Women make us feel compassionate and affectionate. Do we need women? Of course, we do. Do we need women? Yes. Why? Because they're hot. I mean, shit. Unless you're gay. Who's gonna do my dishes?

The speakers engage in a brief exchange about misogyny. Speaker 0 accuses the others of being misogynistic, prompting Speaker 1 to ask for a definition. Speaker 0 then asks if they can leave, but Speaker 1 expresses a desire to continue the conversation.

A person is heard making sexually suggestive comments, inviting someone to "bring that juicy ass over here and hop in daddy's new whip." They then ask if the person wants to "rip off that top and hop on in here." Another person responds that this behavior is "not okay" and that "you don't talk to people" like that. The first person states, "I've never been more ready."

Speaker 0 describes an incident at the WE Spa where a man enters the women's section with his penis exposed, causing fear among women and young girls. “It's not okay. Now I can't even go and put my clothes on because he's down there. Yeah. I don't feel comfortable. We don't feel uncomfortable.” The speaker emphasizes that this behavior happened in the women’s section, with the implication that a man came into an area designated for women and girls, and asserts that “his dick is out. To the campus side? Yeah. His dick is slinging left and right, and we're women in there, and young girls are there.” The speaker challenges the arrangement, stating, “And you allow that. So then you're lying.” They argue that there is a distinction between gender rights and discrimination, claiming that “We cannot discriminate against gender rights. It's not discrimination. It's an impostor. You cannot identify a impostor, someone faking to be a woman just because they feel like they wanna call themselves a woman.” There is a dismissive stance toward the idea of recognizing someone’s gender identity in this context, with a reference to being “pre board” as a test they don’t care about. Speaker 1 interjects with a repetition of “a situation,” emphasizing that there will be consequences or a response: “You gonna have a situation.” Speaker 0 responds with escalating emotion, invoking religious language: “The blood of Jesus. You're gonna have a situation. There’s going to be a situation.” They report being at the WE Spa and witnessing a man slinging his penis, expressing disbelief and stating that some women are afraid to speak up, while they themselves are determined to speak out: “I couldn’t believe what I saw. I couldn’t believe that this man, okay, and these people up here and you got some women scared to say something. Baby, I'm not scared to say a thing.” Speaker 0 asserts a strong stance against a man asserting entrance into the men’s section or a person presenting as a woman while being male, stressing concern for children and mothers present: “The blood of Jesus against this wilding out lion spirit. Sit up here. Gonna bring him to let a man come in here, slinging his penis up in here. No. No. No.” The speaker insists that somebody who identifies as a man cannot enter the women’s area, or that someone claiming to be a woman but possessing male anatomy should be challenged. The speaker ends with a warning that “these people, they about to find out though. Watch.”

A person is heard making sexually suggestive comments, inviting someone to "bring that juicy ass over here and hop in daddy's new whip." They then ask if the person wants to "rip off that top and hop on in here." Another person responds that this is not okay and that "you don't talk to people" like that. The first person replies, "I've never been more ready."

Speaker 0 asks about balancing the activation of change with permeating patriarchal power structures and whether this is part of the calculation in Speaker 1's art, as well as the reaction to it. Speaker 1 responds that they absolutely like to make men uncomfortable. They state that it is important to be able to look a man in the eyes and have them recognize that Speaker 1 is working to bring something that makes them uncomfortable. They believe discomfort is necessary for men to change their attitudes. It's only when men are uncomfortable and have difficult conversations that they might dislike their reflection and consider that something is wrong with their thinking or how they address issues.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1, a mother of two daughters, about Trump's "grab them by the pussy" comment. Speaker 0 asks if that language makes Speaker 1 feel that Trump is not her guy. Speaker 1 responds that she would "rather be grabbed by the pussy than have a pussy for president" and that she is happy with that language, claiming everyone uses rude language behind closed doors. She then brings up Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Speaker 0 reiterates she is talking about the current president-elect, not the past. Speaker 1 says she is not offended by Trump's comments from 8 years ago and tells Speaker 0 to deal with her own issues. Speaker 0 asks if anyone is remotely concerned about the nature of Trump. Speaker 1 responds that America needed someone with a strong lead who would stand up for white and black people, bring back jobs, allow Americans to have weapons, and ensure a conservative Supreme Court. She states that is why pollsters, broadcasters, commentators, and pundits were wrong.

In this video, the speakers discuss the idea of separating people by gender and whether it will seem strange in the future. Speaker 1 finds it odd that boys and girls are split and unable to compete together. Speaker 0 acknowledges this perspective but points out the significant average differences between males and females. Speaker 1 disagrees, comparing Speaker 0's viewpoint to that of an old man on a porch. They argue that the current system needs modification.

Speaker 0 asks Miss Robinson if she agrees with Miss Gaines about the difference between women and men. Miss Robinson initially avoids answering directly, mentioning NCAA rules. Speaker 0 insists on a yes or no answer, but Miss Robinson continues to evade, mentioning definitions related to biological sex. Speaker 0 then questions why women's sports exist if there is no difference between women and men. Miss Robinson again avoids a direct answer, mentioning the positive benefits of sports. Speaker 0 persists, asking why there is a separate category for women in soccer if there is no difference. The conversation ends without a clear answer.

In this video, the speaker asks how to differentiate between boys and girls. They mention that boys have short hair, but what if both individuals have short hair? The speaker suggests another way to determine gender is by removing their clothes. They also mention being asked explicit and sexual questions that made them uncomfortable, comparing it to how they would feel talking that way to their own child.

Speaker 0 interrupts and apologizes repeatedly before mentioning a story about men dressed as prostitutes reading inappropriate material to children. They point out the presence of a large crowd and express discomfort with someone touching them.

A man identifies as a feminist and expresses his belief that toxic masculinity is destructive. When the waiter assumes he will pay the bill, he is offended and insists the woman pay to prove she is a strong, independent woman. When a man steals her purse, the feminist man refuses to help, stating that he doesn't want to imply she can't defend herself and that gender is a social construct. He declines to call the police because they should be defunded. Another man appears and makes suggestive comments, implying a past sexual relationship with the feminist man. The feminist man states that he is sexually fluid and that men don't need to be heterosexual, even in relationships. The woman reveals she is dating a conservative. The feminist man then leaves with the other man.

Speaker 0 asks about the price, to which Speaker 1 responds with $69. Speaker 1 then asks about the pronouns Speaker 0 goes by. Speaker 0 questions why it matters and Speaker 1 explains they need to attend a gender queer protest. Speaker 0 asks for the protest time, but Speaker 1 gives a vague response. Speaker 0 then asks how many genders there are, and Speaker 1 estimates around 930. Speaker 0 insults Speaker 1, who doesn't care and mentions having Speaker 0's clothes. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 has always lived there, and Speaker 1 explains it's their trans wife's place. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 married a man, and Speaker 1 confirms it. Speaker 0 repeats the question, and Speaker 1 says it's up to interpretation.

Speaker 0 recounts instances of workplace harassment by both men and women, clarifying that not all incidents reach the severity of Harvey Weinstein's actions. One incident involved a woman tweaking his nipples at CNN, which he didn't report due to perceived double standards. Another incident involved a female colleague's harassing behavior outside the office, which he also didn't report initially, fearing potential repercussions. He also recalls the discomfort of unwanted advances at cocktail parties, particularly from men with bad breath. Speaker 0 notes that his personal history of childhood molestation influences his perspective, giving him a sense of control in handling unwanted advances as an adult man. He believes he can reject unwanted advances directly, without needing to involve HR, but acknowledges some people have made a business out of it. Speaker 1 shares a contrasting experience, viewing a woman grabbing his genitals as a sign of "arrival." He also mentions a recent similar incident involving a man.

Speaker 0 mentions using some of the money they will receive from Trump to support women's rights. Speaker 1 responds with humor, suggesting extravagant purchases and trips. They joke about fishing in France for women's rights. Speaker 0 clarifies it was a joke and expresses willingness to do something for women's rights. They conclude with a final question.

The speakers discuss men playing in women's sports, with one speaker stating some people fight to the death for men to play in women's sports, even though some of these sports are very dangerous for women. They claim some people are trying to make new laws allowing men to abuse women in sports, which doesn't make sense. One speaker mentions weightlifting records, saying a man can beat a woman by a hundred pounds, breaking records that haven't been broken in eighteen years. They claim there was a congressman fighting to the death for men to play against women in sports. The other speaker states their country is big in protecting women, and most of their cabinet are women who are great at what they do.

Men don't have a say in women's sex life. Do you think the sexual empowerment of women in any way contributes to their own objectification? No. Does the fact does the fact that porn and OnlyFans exist prove that women are okay being objectified as long as they're getting paid. No. It means that we can use our body the way that we want to without men's control. Do you consider sex work to be real work? Yes. Yes. And if you don't, you suck. Why are women more accepting of women who can sell sex but are less likely to accept a man who can buy it? Because it's empowering to be able to do what you want with your body when you want to be able to do it. Because it's my fucking body. Body mind choice. My body

Hello. Are you okay? Why are you bothering her? So she refused. Yes. But then why force if she refused? But that’s not how you hit on a woman. Okay, but that’s none of your business. Me, it’s none of my business, but stop looking. If he doesn’t like that we’re assaulting women, he can look at me. I like you that way, that doesn’t concern him either. Well, after a while, he’ll stop looking, he’ll intervene. I propose we leave; we’ll leave, it’s at our place, we’re going to leave. And why are you like that? We do what we want, go ahead, please move and end it there. Attention.

Speaker 0 meets an older woman who expresses interest in a sexual encounter. They discuss the price and agree to engage in the act. Speaker 1 encourages Speaker 0 to perform well. Speaker 0 mentions putting his genitals inside her, and Speaker 1 advises him to be gentle. Speaker 0 asks about the woman's age and she reveals she is 78. They plan to meet, but Speaker 0 later calls paramedics, claiming the woman fell on the stairs. Speaker 0 expresses frustration as he didn't expect the encounter to turn violent.

Speaker 0 asks, "What is a woman?" Speaker 1 says they are unsure how to answer the question. Speaker 0 states that a woman is an adult human female and that men cannot become women. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1's party of violence and erasing women, further claiming they don't respect women. Speaker 0 calls Speaker 1 a bigot, misogynist, and sexist.