reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses admiration for China's ability to quickly transition to green energy due to their "basic dictatorship." The federal government has invoked the Emergencies Act to address blockades and occupations, granting police more power to restore order. Financial service providers can now freeze or suspend accounts without a court order, and crowdfunding platforms are now subject to anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules. The speaker questions the Ontario Provincial Police's monitoring of Facebook groups and their practice of providing information about peaceful protests. They express hope that taxpayer money won't be wasted on such activities.

Truckers peacefully protested financial mandates in Canada, but were labeled extremists. The government used surveillance to freeze their bank accounts, impacting their ability to pay bills. This highlighted the importance of transactional freedom alongside freedom of speech. The incident sparked interest in technology for self-sovereignty.

- GoFundMe records show 88% of donated funds to the Freedom Convoy campaign originated in Canada, and 86% of the donors were from Canada. - The largest donation was $30,000 from a Canadian. - Ottawa police said they do not have any evidence that a recent charge was connected to the convoy, truckers, or vaccine mandates. - Fintrek stated they saw no evidence of terrorist activity in the funding of the protests. - A law enforcement agency stated they did not ask the government to invoke the Emergencies Act. - They reached out to various police agencies when there was talk about some of the authorities within that they were proposing, and, of course, were consulted. - Another official stated they were involved in conversations with partners and political ministries, but didn't make a direct request for the Emergencies Act. - The Emergencies Act was invoked after advice from law enforcement. - There have been no charges laid to date in relations to weapons at the occupation site. - No loaded firearms were found relating to any charges to this point.

A small minority of people with unacceptable views were part of the Freedom Convoy campaign. The majority of donations came from Canada, with the largest donation being $30,000 from a Canadian source. No charges have been laid regarding weapons found at the occupation site. The Ottawa police have stated that the recent charges were unrelated to the convoy. There is no evidence of terrorist activity or funding in relation to the illegal protests and blockades. The speaker criticizes the media's focus on protecting statues in Ottawa while ignoring the tearing down of statues in the country. The police did not request the invocation of the Emergencies Act but were involved in conversations and sought advice before invoking it.

The Canadian government has invoked the Emergencies Act, granting unprecedented power. Financial service providers can now freeze accounts without a court order, and those involved in protests may face financial sanctions and criminal charges. Some banks have already frozen accounts of protesters. A speaker warns of growing authoritarianism and urges people to fight back. The Prime Minister acknowledges the right to protest but criticizes using protests to demand policy changes. He emphasizes the importance of following science to protect freedoms and values. Critics accuse him of admiring China's dictatorship and suppressing citizens' rights. Responsible leaders are urged to consider their stance.

Speaker 0: This is not just a story about violence and chaos; this is a money story. At the Government Accountability Institute, Peter Schweitzer and I followed the money to the top of what we call the protest industrial complex, Riot Inc. We found a network of NGOs—not just the Soros/Open Society network, but also the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash, and other big left-wing funders, including Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland. They’re pouring money into this ecosystem. Here are three money facts about Riot Inc. Number one: Riot Inc. has many divisions like any corporation. It doesn’t just have the Antifa boots on the ground division; it has PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a well-funded legal division to get these boots back on the ground as quickly as possible. It has investors I mentioned. Number two: We have identified dozens of radical organizations—not just decentralized Antifa groups, but dozens of radical organizations—that have received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors. These include lawyer groups and groups that advocate for calling good honest Americans fascists, etc. Number three: More than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to these very groups themselves. There was an event in Atlanta called Stop Cop City; over 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism. These groups received money for that from both the billionaire class and taxpayer money. Additionally, this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms that support Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork (which had links to the ICE facility attack), the Socialist Rifle Association, and others. Even though some groups don’t have LLCs or EIN numbers, they can still get paid. Some funding platforms are funded by this network that we call Riot Inc. Speaker 1: Do you know the name of any of the funders? Do you know the names? Because if you do, I’d like you to give them to Cash or Pam—or Christie? Speaker 0: Absolutely. Speaker 1: Or Christie? Speaker 0: Yes, we’ll do that. Speaker 1: As soon as you can. That’s all of you. Because you probably know the names after a certain period of time, you tend to find out. But these are people that do not have good intention for the country and that’s treasonous probably. So if you could, it would be very important if you could do that, it would be great. Speaker 0: it

In 2025, a Canadian People's Party candidate, Megan Murphy, had her bank account frozen after her candidacy was confirmed. The bank informed her it was done at the government's direction. Murphy is running in Vancouver East and is known for criticizing gender identity ideology and legislation in Canada. This mirrors the trucker convoy situation where donors had their accounts frozen. Another individual recalls being asked by the PPC what would happen if they lost their job or the banks did something with their funding. The PPC stated they ask candidates this because a similar situation occurred during the last election with another candidate, which reportedly went to court.

The speaker defends the decision to freeze bank accounts and credit cards, despite a recent federal court ruling questioning the measures. They emphasize that the government acted to protect Canada's safety and national security, including economic security. The decisions were not taken lightly and involved collaboration with various levels of government. The speaker acknowledges the seriousness of the threat faced by Canada and asserts their confidence in the decision made, both in the past and at present.

Emergency powers can be abused, as seen in Canada. In early 2022, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked emergency powers during protests against COVID-19 restrictions, allowing him to freeze the bank accounts of protesters without due process. This included taking funds raised through crowdfunding to support the truckers. The Emergencies Act of 1988 granted the government significant authority to act against dissent. Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland warned that financial institutions could freeze accounts without a court order if vehicles were used in protests. This situation highlights the dangers of excessive presidential power, which can target citizens unexpectedly. If such actions can occur in Canada, they could potentially happen in the U.S. as well.

The speaker describes Thailand implementing a biometric-based system that consolidates everything under one roof and ID folder, enabling authorities to “switch you off at the touch of a button.” Suddenly, over 3,000,000 people had their bank accounts shut down, causing a banking crisis as biometric data is used in every facet of life. Every banking transaction is monitored and scrutinized; any perceived discrepancy is flagged as fraud and punished without due process. Regulations overwhelmed the system, resulting in a full-fledged banking crisis. Over 3,000,000 Thai bank accounts were frozen instantaneously without warning. Transactions are denied, and when people contact their bank to understand why payments failed, they learn that their entire account has been frozen. The bank is investigating them for suspicious activity and potential money laundering or fraud, with no warning, no call or letter, and no clarification about which transaction was flagged. People are completely locked out of their accounts, losing the ability to purchase, fill their gas tanks, or buy groceries. They have been removed from the financial system, and there is no indication of when, or if, they will regain access to their funds. This is the reality for millions of people banking in Thailand. The situation caused widespread fear and panic, leading retailers to stop accepting cards and demand cash, as they also worry about being removed from the banking system. Confidence in the government and the entire banking system evaporated. People rationally fear that their accounts will be targeted next without warning. Government overreach backfired, causing people to withdraw from the banking system altogether, and the speaker notes this as a positive development to see people keeping cash alive. The speaker suggests the episode serves as a test case for what digital ID is going to do and as a warning against accepting it. The closing remark states that the controversy over Charlie Kirk is less important than what will be done with this technology. What matters, according to the speaker, is what they’re going to do with it.

The speaker describes a system introduced in Thailand that centralizes biometric data and requires all ID and financial information to be under one roof. They claim this led to an immediate, nationwide disruption: "simultaneously, over 3,000,000 people had their bank accounts shut down." Thailand is framed as a case study for the use of biometric data in every facet of life, with "Every banking transaction [being] monitored and scrutinized." Any perceived discrepancy is said to be flagged as fraud and punished without due process. According to the speaker, regulations overwhelmed the system, resulting in a "full fledged banking crisis." They assert that "Over 3,000,000 Thai bank accounts were frozen instantaneously without warning as a result of government overreach." When people attempt to check why a payment failed, they are reportedly told that their account has been frozen. The claim is that "All of your accounts for that matter" are frozen, and the bank is "investigating you for suspicious activity and potential money laundering or fraud." There is said to be "no warning, call, or letter, and there is no clarification as to what transaction was flagged." The outcome is described as being "completely locked out of your accounts," losing the ability to purchase, fill your gas tank, or buy groceries. The speaker notes that millions are facing this reality in Thailand, and that the situation has "freaked the entire country out." They add that "thousands of accounts are frozen each week" and that panic has ensued. Retailers are no longer accepting cards and are demanding payment in cash as they worry about being removed from the banking system. Confidence in the government and the entire banking system is said to have evaporated, with people "rationally fear[ing] that their account will be targeted next without warning." The speaker asserts that government overreach has backfired, leading people to remove themselves from the banking system entirely, which they describe as "a really good thing to see, folks." The narrative frames this as a backlash that demonstrates the necessity of keeping cash alive and relying less on a digital system. It is presented as a test case for what the digital ID will do, and a warning against accepting it. The speaker contends that many warnings have been issued for a long time, and emphasizes the need for people to see what is happening. In closing, they say, "All everyone's been arguing over whether Charlie Kirk died or whether he didn't. It doesn't matter. What matters is what they're gonna do with it."

In Victoria, there are reports of people having their bank accounts frozen and their money taken away. They are being told to collect their belongings and are being cut off from unemployment benefits. One person's friend called in tears, saying that their money was taken and they were forced to book a vaccination appointment. The government has also provided a QR code that restricts access to their funds and prevents them from making purchases until they are vaccinated.

Three Australian cases illustrate bank overreach amid crypto, Know Your Customer rules and digital-ID talk. A woman known as Mantra Moments says a bank froze her account after a crypto purchase; after a second attempt, staff asked for private information about a friend. “Your restriction stays for two more days,” and “We’re keeping you safe,” she says, leaving her unable to pay rent. In another case, a customer withdrawing cash for construction faced demands for invoices; maximum without proof is $4,000 a day; “we need proof” and “there's a lot of scams... protect you from being reckless.” A third story: Katie McMaster was locked out of HSBC, told to verify identity with “100 points of ID” after no suspicious activity; recall of “know your customer” and warnings that digital ID/digital currency/social credit are coming. Promo: free webinar Oct 9 privacyacademy.com/pulse.

I just did a Fox News appearance in Washington DC, where I talked about digital currency and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). I had a revelation about CBDCs during the truckers protest in Canada. The protesters were peacefully asking for their rights, but the government took pictures of their license plates, used news stories to identify them, and then shut down their bank accounts and credit cards. This left them unable to work, pay their bills, or support their families. This made me realize that freedom of currency is as important as freedom of speech. If the government can starve you financially for dissenting, we are living in a concerning situation.

The speaker says they “followed the money” to what they call the “protest industrial complex,” “Riot Inc.,” and identified a network of NGOs funding the ecosystem. They state the funding extends beyond the Soros/Open Society network to other funding networks, including the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, and “Foreign Cash,” along with “big, left wing” funders, including non-citizens. The speaker names Mr. Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland as an example of such funders. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, they describe Riot Inc. as having divisions similar to a corporation: not only an “Antifa boots on the ground” division, but also PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a “very well funded legal division” to “get these boots on the ground back on the streets as quickly as possible,” alongside the investors previously mentioned. Second, they claim they identified “dozens of radical organizations” that received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors, including “lawyer groups” that advocate for calling “good honest Americans fascists.” Third, they claim that more than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to “these very groups themselves.” They cite an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying more than 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism and that these groups received money from both “the billionaire class” and “taxpayer money” for that. The speaker also claims that this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms used by groups such as “Antifa,” the “John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (linked by the speaker to an attack on an ice facility), and the “Socialist Rifle Association.” They add that groups without LLCs or EIN numbers can still be paid through these crowdfunding platforms. The speaker closes by saying they will keep “following the money” and thanks the audience for leadership.

So you're confirming that accounts have been frozen both personal and corporate, but you're not releasing the information. And the actual follow-up is, I'm just wondering whether the bank accounts will be targeted of individuals who donated to the GiveSendGo and the GoFundMe campaigns? Are they considered designated people under the Emergencies Act, meaning that their credit cards could be cut and financial services are targeting them as well? Okay. So the names of both individuals and entities as well as crypto wallets have been shared by the RCMP with financial institutions, And accounts have been frozen, and more accounts will be frozen.

We followed the money to what is described as the protest industrial complex, referred to as Riot Inc., and to a network of NGOs funding it. The network includes not only the Soros/Open Society network but also the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash, and other large left-leaning funders, with some participants not citizens of the United States. Mr. Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland is cited as recognizing this international funding flow into the ecosystem. Three money facts are shared about Riot Inc. First, Riot Inc. operates like a corporation with multiple divisions beyond the visible “Antifa boots on the ground” unit, including PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a well-funded legal division designed to keep these boots on the ground on the streets as quickly as possible, in addition to the investors previously mentioned. Second, dozens of radical organizations have received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors. These include lawyer groups and other organizations that advocate for portraying good, honest Americans as fascists, among other activities. Third, more than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, with at least $4,000,000 directed to the groups themselves (not only Antifa-type groups). An example cited is an Atlanta event called Stop Cop City, where over 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism, and these groups reportedly received money from both billionaire donors and taxpayer funds. The speaker notes that this money also supports decentralized crowdfunding platforms, which facilitate funding for groups such as Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork (linked to the attack on the ice facility), and the Socialist Rifle Association. The absence of LLCs or EIN numbers for some of these groups does not prevent them from getting paid. Crowdfunding platforms are funded by the network identified as Riot Inc., enabling these groups to receive funds despite organizational formalities. The speaker concludes by thanking leadership and promising to continue following the money, emphasizing the cabinet’s leadership in this effort.

The SEC has sent Wells notices to PayPal and Coinbase, warning that the cryptocurrencies they deal with may have broken the law as unregistered securities. These companies have been asking the SEC for guidance on which coins are problematic, but the SEC has been unhelpful. There are concerns that the SEC and the Biden administration are trying to destroy crypto to make way for a CBDC surveillance coin. Recent attacks on crypto-engaged banks support this theory. The goal seems to be to eliminate alternatives and force the crypto industry to develop on a CBDC base. This is referred to as Operation Choke Point 2.0. Bitcoiners are enjoying the show as shit coins suffer, but the pattern suggests that Bitcoin and other blockchain-based entities may be targeted next. The aim is to cut off escape routes from fiat and strangle businesses building an economy based on Bitcoin.

OMG discovered potential money laundering at ActBlue's secret meeting in a Boston hotel. Donors found their names associated with large donations they didn't make. Security was tight, and police were called when journalists asked questions. ActBlue staff avoided answering about questionable donations. OMG urges people to check FEC donations for accuracy and invites insiders to share information. Join their citizen journalism efforts to uncover the truth about ActBlue.

The transcript claims the organizers “followed the money” to what they call “Riot Inc.” and its “protest industrial complex,” stating it involves a network of NGOs funded by multiple sources, including the Soros/Open Society network, the Arabella funding network, the Tides funding network, the network of Neville Roy Singham, “Foreign Cash,” and “big left wing funders.” It also says some funders “aren’t citizens of this country,” citing Mr. Hansjorg Veiss of Switzerland. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, like any corporation, Riot Inc. is described as having many divisions beyond an “anti… boots on the ground division,” including PR, marketing, and a “very well-funded legal division” intended to get “boots on the ground” back on the streets quickly. The transcript states that Riot Inc. has “investors that I mentioned.” Second, the speaker claims “dozens of radical organizations” have received “more than one hundred million dollars” from Riot Inc. investors. These organizations are described as including “lawyer groups” and groups that advocate labeling “good, honest Americans” as “fascists.” Third, the transcript claims “more than one hundred million dollars in US taxpayer funding” flowed into these funding networks, including “at least four million dollars” to “these very groups themselves.” It cites an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying “over sixty rioters were charged with domestic terrorism,” and claims these groups received money for that from both “the billionaire class as well as taxpayer money.” The transcript further claims the money helps fund “de-decentralized crowdfunding platforms,” naming groups and references such as “Antifa,” “the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (stated as having links to an attack on an ice facility), and “the Socialist Rifle Association.” It adds that some crowdfunding platforms are funded by the Riot Inc network, and asserts that lacking LLCs or EIN numbers “doesn’t mean they can’t get paid.” The speaker closes by stating they will “keep following the money” and thanking leadership.

Speaker 0: Once you've got everything under one roof and you've got all your ID together in one place, it means you can be switched off at the touch of a button. So they brought this system in in Thailand, and suddenly, like simultaneously, over 3,000,000 people had their bank accounts shut down. Thailand has become a case study for the use of biometric data in every facet of life. Every banking transaction is monitored and scrutinized. Any perceived discrepancies flagged as fraud and punished without due process. Regulations have overwhelmed the system resulting in a full fledged banking crisis. Over 3,000,000 Thai bank accounts were frozen instantaneously without warning as a result of government overreach. Transaction denied, you'd contact your bank to see why the payment failed only to learn that your account has been frozen, all of your accounts for that matter. The bank is investigating you for suspicious activity and potential money laundering or fraud. There was no warning, call, or letter, and there is no clarification as to what transaction was flagged. You're completely locked out of your accounts. You have lost the ability to purchase. You cannot fill your gas tank. You cannot purchase groceries. You've been completely removed from the financial system, and you do not know when or if you will regain access to your funds. This is the reality for millions of people banking in Thailand. That's crazy stuff, folks, and this freaked the entire country out. But the article goes on to say, thousands of accounts are frozen each week. Panic has ensued. Retailers are no longer accepting cards demanding payment in cash as they too are worried that they will be removed from the banking system. Confidence in the government and the entire banking system evaporated. People rationally fear that their account will be targeted next without warning. Government overreach has backfired, and the people are removing themselves from the banking system entirely. And that's a really good thing to see, folks. Yeah. So it backfired, and it caused the people in Thailand to see how much they need to keep cash alive and depend on cash. And it's saying it serves as a test case for what this digital ID is gonna do. Well, it also serves as a test case for why you shouldn't accept it. And so many of us have been warning about this for so long, folks, and it's imperative that people see this because this is what's been going on. All everyone's been arguing over whether Charlie Kirk died or whether he didn't, it doesn't matter. What matters is what they're gonna do with it.

Tether is known for facilitating illegal activities in the crypto market. Israeli law enforcement directed Tether to freeze addresses linked to Hamas and Russian entities. Tether fails to conduct proper screening despite being aware of its involvement in terrorism and illicit activities. A letter was sent to Attorney General Merrick Garland, urging the Department of Justice to conclude its investigation and consider criminal charges against Binance and Tether for their role in illicit finance. While the impact of crypto assets on funding Hamas has been exaggerated, any support for recent attacks is unacceptable. Binance and Tether, based in the Seychelles, Caymans, and British Virgin Islands, must face consequences for enabling terrorists to move funds.

In 2025, Canadians are allegedly still having bank accounts frozen, with People's Party of Canada candidate Megan Murphy as the most recent target. Murphy claims her bank account was frozen the same day her candidacy was confirmed, reportedly under government direction. The speaker recalls the freezing of bank accounts during the trucker convoy and criticizes the Conservative Party, particularly Pierre Poilievre, for not addressing this issue and other related incidents, such as political prisoners and election interference, with the same fervor that liberals use the "threat to democracy" label. The speaker suggests the Conservative Party's silence on these issues, including the cases of Chris Barber, Tamara Lynch, Randy Hillier, and Amy Hamm, normalizes what they see as far-left authoritarianism. They question what the Conservative Party is fighting for if it won't defend individuals with conservative ideas who are losing their jobs or getting their bank accounts frozen.

The Emergencies Act allows banks to freeze or suspend accounts without a court order starting today.