TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe both fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury syndromes. These side effects can be categorized into four major groups: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurological problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to typical treatments, and abnormalities in the immune system. These effects are not controversial or theoretical; they are real and have been documented extensively.

A recent study involving 99 million COVID vaccine recipients found increased risks of neurological and heart disorders, described as rare but significant. For example, the risk of brain swelling increased by 378%, myocarditis by 610%, and Guillain Barre syndrome by 286%. The cumulative risk of these adverse events raises questions about the overall safety of vaccines, especially considering the CDC's childhood vaccination schedule, which includes 72 doses without long-term safety trials. Each vaccine has a list of potential side effects, many serious, yet they are often labeled as rare. Historical data shows a rise in chronic illnesses among vaccinated children, suggesting a troubling trend. The notion that vaccine injuries are non-existent is misleading, as many children are experiencing adverse effects. It’s crucial to recognize and evaluate these risks comprehensively.

Speaker 0: What about vaccine injury? The ones that actually took the shots. What did you see there? Speaker 1: Massive. I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically and so quickly before they rolled out the mRNA injections. It was insane. Patient the worst of them were the ones called it sepsis, but it was, like, instant multi organ failure. Like, within hours, patients would die of liver, lung, kidney, all at once failure, respiratory failure. It was like their some of the records, the emergency crew that found them, it's like their body tried to reject everything. And and some of these cases, like, their family would be there thirty minutes before, and then within an hour, they're dead. And then there were patients coming in with seizures like I've never seen before. We couldn't control some of them. Days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it. And eventually, they kind of had to put down. They called it encephalitis or encephalopathy. And then later on, even the coding information organization, AHIMA, admitted COVID nineteen associated encephalitis. There were blood clots, strokes. The clots were insane. Never seen clots like that before. Even the interventional radiologist that were going in with, you know, they have angiopathies and, you know, different scopes where they can do, like, heart interventions and put stents in, like a carotid artery if you have a stroke going to your brain. They normally, it's rare to have more than one stent go in, and they were documenting, you know, multiple locations all at once. They had heart attack cases that were like that where they, you know, they needed massive amounts of stents that they never needed before. There were people in their twenties that had been hiking that were totally healthy, had been running marathons that suddenly needed an a leg amputated because they had massive blood clot going from their hip all the way down to their leg, and it couldn't be saved. So that happened. There were some cases of overnight spinal gangrene, which I've never seen before. And you can't amputate, you know, the spine when it goes gangrenous. Normally, cut out tissue that's dying like that, so it prevents further infection. And they didn't know what to do. The only thing they could do was, you know, do a basically replace the that part of your spine with an implant. That's the best they could do. Yeah. It was really intense. And I didn't question the vaccines as much as I should have. I started to about the flu shot way back in 2004. But with the pressure to get the COVID nineteen shot, I started looking into what it could do, and I I knew I didn't want anything to do with this experimental mRNA thing. And when I started looking into the experts that were saying, well, this is what this potential vaccine could do. This is what the research says. I was looking at the vaccine trials and what's happening to those patients and the Guill Barre that was happening and the strokes that were happening. And so I kind of knew to look for that when the vaccine came out. And the doctors were, you know, baffled. They weren't connecting the dots. But to me, knowing what the potential causes or potential symptoms of a vaccine injury could be, we a hundred percent had all the things that I just described. But doctors would never tell you that. They would just say it's a stroke. It's a heart attack. It's a blood clot, and they would never connect the two. Speaker 0: Is there anything that would make you take a vaccination of any kind ever again? Speaker 1: They would have to kill me. Nothing. Nothing would make me take it.

There are 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.

According to data from the DMED database in 2021 after the vaccine rollout, reports of myocarditis increased 200%. Cancers increased 300 to 900%. Infertility in both genders increased 500%. Miscarriages increased 300%. Neurological disorders increased 1000%. Demyelinating disorders increased 500%. MS increased 600%. Guillain Barre syndrome saw a 500% increase. HIV increased 500%. Pulmonary embolisms increased 400%.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

There have been unprecedented injuries, disabilities, and deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. By January 22, 2021, 182 deaths were reported to the US vaccine adverse event reporting system. The FDA and CDC, who co-administer the program, lack experience in vaccine campaigns. Pfizer knew about 1,223 deaths within 90 days of their vaccine but kept it confidential. Moderna has not released their data. There are over 34,100 peer-reviewed papers on vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths.

Reports from the DMED database in 2021, after the vaccine rollout, show alarming increases in several conditions. Myocarditis reports increased 2800%. Cancers of various types increased 300 to 900%. Infertility in both genders increased 500%. Miscarriages increased 300%. Neurological disorders increased 1000%. Demyelinating disorders increased 500%. MS increased 600%. Guillain Barre syndrome saw a 500% increase. HIV increased 500%. Pulmonary embolism increased 400%. These are presented as some of the most alarming findings in the DMED database.

The discussion highlights the debate surrounding the effectiveness of polio vaccines, questioning why polio disappeared in Europe in the 1940s and 1950s without mass vaccination. There’s a suggestion that we might be addressing a problem that no longer exists. A question arises about the potential link between vaccines and conditions like multiple sclerosis (MS), referencing a new publication that connects early live virus vaccinations to later MS development. It’s advised that individuals with MS or similar neurological conditions review their vaccination histories. Additionally, a participant shares her experience as a Guillain-Barré syndrome victim following a swine flu vaccination and notes her research indicating that immunizations may often trigger autoimmune responses.

Vaccinated individuals are experiencing concerning symptoms like fatigue, mood swings, and weakened immune responses. A Yale study has revealed evidence of Vaccine Induced Autoimmune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS), showing a drop in immune cells and the presence of spike proteins long after vaccination. This has sparked internal conflict at Yale regarding the publication of these findings, which could expose vaccine risks. Additionally, there are rising cases of aggressive cancers and positive HIV tests among vaccinated individuals, attributed to vaccine-induced immunodeficiency. Despite this alarming data, mainstream media continues to downplay the issues, raising questions about accountability and transparency surrounding vaccine safety. The urgency to spread awareness about these findings is critical as the implications for public health are significant.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have been proven to cause real side effects in four major categories. Firstly, cardiovascular issues such as heart inflammation, myocarditis, and cardiac arrest. Secondly, neurologic problems including stroke, Gambray syndrome, and neuropathy. Thirdly, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments. Lastly, immune system abnormalities. These side effects are not controversial or theoretical, but rather a reality.

The program examines a heated controversy surrounding the hepatitis B vaccine, which is required for schoolchildren in many states and is administered routinely to millions of babies each year. Proponents describe vaccines as highly effective and safe, while opponents argue that the vaccine can trigger serious and mysterious illnesses or death in certain individuals. The report notes that hepatitis B is transmitted through infected blood or bodily fluids (similar to AIDS) and can be passed from infected mothers to their children. It is described as a life-threatening, potentially fatal disease of the liver, with four to five thousand Americans dying annually and worldwide about 200 million chronically infected. In the United States, more than 200,000 new cases occur yearly. Initially, the CDC adopted a broad vaccination policy, starting with health care workers at risk, but soon expanded to newborns nationwide despite the relatively small risk of infection in young children. The stated public health rationale was to prevent infection in the 20,000 children per year who might become infected in the first five years of life, in addition to the 6,000–7,000 infants infected at birth. However, from near the outset, some individuals reported serious adverse events after vaccination. Anecdotal reports include a Navy flight surgeon, Doctor Deborah Eggles, who describes abnormal brain scans, spinal fluid, and blood tests following vaccination, as well as a spectrum of severe symptoms reported by several other patients. Some families have filed lawsuits against vaccine makers and received settlements, though manufacturers argue there is no proven link between the vaccine and these illnesses. Federal package inserts acknowledge rare but serious adverse experiences after vaccination, including multiple sclerosis, arthritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and lupus. Medical experts featured present divergent views. Doctor Harold Margolis of the CDC explains the argument for vaccination, citing the risk of hepatitis B infection without vaccination and the need to prevent disease, even if adverse events occur in a small minority. Academic and industry voices, including Doctor Bonnie Dunbar and Doctor Robert Schirar of Merck, acknowledge that some individuals may have adverse reactions but maintain that vaccines are highly effective and safe, and that many people are better off vaccinated than exposed to the natural disease. The film highlights cases where the vaccine is suspected to have caused severe outcomes. Ronnie Allen, once a healthy preschooler, developed a life-threatening arthritis after the hepatitis B shot and underwent chemotherapy multiple times; his doctor suspects a vaccine trigger. Other cases cited include three-day-old Ben Converse with seizures, Nikki Sexton who died of heart failure three days after vaccination, and Lila Belkin who died shortly after receiving a first shot. Pathologists and families suggest vaccine links in these deaths, though statistical analyses indicate such newborn fatalities are extremely rare among millions vaccinated since 1991. The program also covers policy and civil liberty questions: should vaccination be mandatory for school attendance, or should parents have the right to exemptions? Some families, like the Saturns of Wyoming, faced expulsion from school after refusing the shot, illustrating the tension between public health policy and parental rights. Public opinion in the piece leans toward parental choice, with calls to place decision-making back in the hands of families rather than authorities. The narrative ends with ongoing uncertainty about long-term outcomes and the possible consequences of airing such controversy.

I have personally witnessed numerous side effects in my patients, including brain thrombosis, large tumors under the arm, prolonged fever, sciatica, swelling, back pain, cold edema, throat redness, shortness of breath, pericarditis, shingles, aortic thrombosis, myocarditis, migraines, chronic colds, sinusitis, cancer recurrences, cancer pain, arm paralysis, facial hemiplegia, bruising on the arm, spontaneous foot hematoma, phlebitis, lung edema, and worsened respiratory diseases. There have also been cases of coma and amputation in young individuals, as well as multiple cardiac arrests. It is concerning that many of these individuals had received the vaccine.

The speaker witnessed severe vaccine injuries in patients who received mRNA injections, including rapid multi-organ failure, seizures, blood clots, strokes, and spinal gangrene. Despite doctors not connecting the symptoms to the vaccines, the speaker recognized the potential vaccine injuries. They vowed never to take any vaccination again, no matter the circumstances.

After the vaccine rollout in 2021, reports from the DMED showed significant increases in health issues: myocarditis by 200%, various cancers by 300-900%, infertility by 500% for both genders, miscarriages by 300%, neurological disorders by 1000%, demyelinating disorders by 500%, MS by 600%, Guillain Barre syndrome by 500%, HIV by 500%, and pulmonary embolisms by 400%. These are just a few of the concerning findings in the database.

Yesterday, my last patient of the day, a healthy woman, got the vaccine and the booster. Four days after the booster, she's paralyzed, wheelchair bound. "Really? And four days." "Alan, you and I have been doing clinical trials long enough to know that that's a serious adverse event, right?" "Sure." "Nobody reported it. So nobody's looking at it. It's like, oh, no problem. A good site will eventually report that." "I mean, will eventually have to come out of me because that, I mean, we would Might have reached out to her and tried to mitigate to not have her speak too much." But we're seeing it. "I'm seeing it every day. I mean, I have hundreds of people that have been vaccine injured. So"

There have been reports suggesting a significant increase in cancer rates since the vaccination rollout, with many anecdotal cases emerging globally. The immune system plays a crucial role in identifying and eliminating early cancer cells. However, the vaccination may have impacted immune function, potentially allowing cancers to grow unchecked. The extent of this issue remains unclear, but there are concerns that it could lead to a surge in cancer and other conditions linked to the vaccination program. Notably, some healthcare professionals, like Dr. Ryan Cole in Idaho, have reported increased cancer activity, raising alarms about the lack of thorough studies typically associated with vaccine development, which usually spans 5 to 10 years. This situation is unprecedented and warrants serious attention.

Many countries lack proper safety monitoring systems for vaccines, leading to miscommunication and confusion. Adjuvants are necessary for vaccine effectiveness, but can increase adverse reactions. Long-term effects and cross-reactivity between adjuvants are concerns. Health professionals are starting to question vaccine safety due to lack of confidence and education.

The panel discusses replication (replicon) vaccines and their potential dangers, focusing on how they differ from conventional messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and what new risks might emerge as this technology develops. Key points and concerns raised - Replicon vaccines concept and fundamental differences - Replicon vaccines use replication-capable genetic material, so the embedded genetic information not only makes antigen proteins but also multiplies inside the cell. They are described as having both constitutive function (the ability to make proteins) and, crucially, the capacity to replicate, which distinguishes them from traditional, non-replicating mRNA vaccines. - It is explained that replication introduces additional mutation and recombination opportunities, because the RNA genome is copied more than once, and the process can produce variants that differ from the original design. - Central dogma exceptions and viral biology - The speakers explain that while the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) generally governs biology, some viruses violate this, with RNA viruses that replicate via RNA-dependent replication and even some reverse-transcribing retroviruses that convert RNA to DNA and integrate into genomes. This context is used to frame why replicon vaccines could behave unpredictably. - Potential risks of replication and spread - A core concern is that the replicon approach might allow the vaccine genome to spread beyond the initial target cells, potentially reaching other cells and tissues, or even spreading to other people via exosomes or other means. Exosomes can transport DNA, RNA, and proteins between cells; thus, the replicon genome could in theory be disseminated. - The possibility of homologous or heterologous recombination between replicon genomes and wild-type viruses could yield new variants. The panel emphasizes the difficulty of controlling such recombination in a living system. - Specific material and design considerations - The use of viral components like spike protein genes in replicon vaccines raises concerns about how these proteins might mutate or recombine during replication, potentially altering antigen presentation or safety. - A concern is raised about the lack of repair mechanisms in RNA replication (as opposed to DNA replication), which could make error rates higher and lead to unpredictable changes. - The panel notes that current replicon vaccine designs (including those using alphavirus backbones) inherently carry high mutation and recombination risk, and that the replicating systems may encounter unpredictable evolutionary dynamics inside the human body. - Safety signals and clinical anecdotes - The speakers cite cases of adverse events temporally associated with vaccines, including vascular inflammation and thrombosis, stroke-like events, and myocarditis, to illustrate that immune responses to vaccines can be complex and occasionally severe. They emphasize that such observations do not establish causality, but argue they warrant careful scrutiny. - There are references to cases of acute vascular and neural complications following repeated vaccination, and to broader immune dysregulation phenomena, including IGG4-related disease and immune dysregulation syndromes that can involve multiple organs. - One example concerns a patient who developed sudden limb problems after the third dose, requiring surgery; another describes myocardial involvement after multiple doses and subsequent inflammatory sequelae. - DNA contamination and analytical findings - Kevin McKernan’s analysis of certain Japanese CoronaVac vaccines is cited: both DNA contamination and the presence of SV40 promoter elements were detected in some vaccine lots, with DNA amounts exceeding some regulatory benchmarks in at least one case. The concern is that DNA contamination, or the presence of promoter sequences, could influence integration or expression in unintended ways. - It is noted that vaccines using lipid nanoparticles can potentially deliver nucleic acids into cells; in the presence of exons or promoter sequences, there could be unintended cellular uptake and expression. - Implications for public health and policy - The panel underscores the need for caution, thorough investigation, and long-term observation of any replication-based vaccine platform before broad deployment. There is a call to evaluate risks, monitor long-term outcomes, and consider the possibility that replication-competent constructs could drive unforeseen evolutionary dynamics within hosts or communities. - There is contention about how information is communicated to the public, with particular emphasis on avoiding misinformation while ensuring that scientific uncertainties are transparently discussed. - Broader scientific context and forward-looking stance - The speakers discuss how the field’s approach to gene-based vaccines is evolving rapidly, and they stress that the compatibility of replicon systems with human biology is not yet fully understood. - They frame their discussion as not merely about current vaccines but about the trajectory of vaccine platforms: if replication-based or self-dispersing systems prove too risky or unpredictable, the prudent path might be to favor conventional, non-replicating strategies until safety, efficacy, and containment of unintended spread are more firmly established. Closing and takeaways - The session closes with emphasis on careful evaluation of replicon vaccines, awareness that viral genetics can behave differently in humans than in theory, and a call for continued discussion, independent verification, and transparent communication as the technology develops. - Throughout, speakers acknowledge the complexity of immune responses to vaccines, the potential for unexpected adverse events, and the importance of safeguarding public health while advancing vaccine science.

Alarming data from the DMED database post-vaccine rollout in 2021 shows significant increases in various health issues. Myocarditis cases rose by 200%, while cancers increased by 300% to 900%. Infertility rates for both genders surged by 500%, and miscarriages rose by 300%. Neurological disorders saw a 1000% increase, with demyelinating disorders up by 500%, multiple sclerosis by 600%, and Guillain-Barré syndrome by 500%. Additionally, HIV cases increased by 500%, and pulmonary embolisms rose by 400%. These findings highlight serious health concerns linked to the vaccine.

They classified post-vaccine issues into three categories: immediate effects like pain, swelling, and redness, but vomiting, diarrhea, fainting, etc. are not considered immediate side effects. They also mentioned Covid-like illnesses that resemble Covid-19, with data from Israel showing that 11% of people had Covid within two weeks of the anti-Covid injection. They warned about post-Covid injection syndrome (P0IS or P0V), which includes various inflammatory, multisystemic problems like cardiac, neurological, hematological, vascular, immune system, reproductive health, cancer, and congenital complications. This classification highlights the wide range of adverse effects and raises concerns about the vaccine's safety.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and abnormalities in the immune system.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.