reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker declares, "The best part of this whole goddamn thing is that he is not martyr material, so his death will mean nothing. It will activate no one. It will impact few. It's just great." The statement asserts that the subject is not martyr material and that his death will have little to no effect—meaning nothing, activating no one, and impacting few. The speaker ends with an emphatic appraisal, labeling this outcome as "great." The overall claim centers on the idea that the person in question does not qualify as a martyr and that any death-related consequences would be minimal or negligible, with the speaker expressing satisfaction at that prospect.

This week could be better. It would have to be. And we could move on to another story. That's how it usually works. But that doesn't feel right. And if we only wanted to give you cheap laughs, we'd just show you Brian Kilmeade's SAT scores. But unlike most stories that happen in life, the assassination of Charlie Kirk is immune to news cycles and short attention spans and unchanging media bias. That should have been true when Trump was shot, but because that story exposed the media's own complicity, it disappeared faster than Tim Waltz when a car backfires. But Charlie's murder exists now and forever, and his martyrdom resonates all over the world in marches and vigils.

So as we find this monster, I want him strung up. I want crows to eat his insides out. I want to be publicly televised after a guilty verdict due process and administered by the law. But I want the most monstrous, gruesome death that we just had to watch. I want that to be etched into the halls of eternity so that anyone who tries to do anything like this ever again sees what their own insides look like on national television. And their family will have to see it the way Charlie's has had to see his. I don't think I I think about whoever did this if they had to stand in a room with Charlie and how Charlie would tower over them, how they wouldn't stand a chance in a fist fight or a verbal fight or anything.

He wasn't scared. He said if anything happens, it's not suicide. He loved life, family, and brothers too much. Don't believe it.

Der Sprecher betont, dass es Gruppen gibt, die seinen Tod feiern, und dass dies mit nichts zu rechtfertigen ist, auch nicht mit seinen oftmals abscheulichen, rassistischen, sexistischen und menschenfeindlichen Aussagen. Er erklärt, dass Feiern seines Todes inakzeptabel sind. Zudem wird angedeutet, dass offensichtlich der radikal religiöse The speaker emphasizes that there are groups that celebrate his death, and that this is in no way justifiable, not even with his often despicable, racist, sexist, and dehumanizing statements. He notes that such celebrations of his death are completely unacceptable. It is also indicated that apparently the radical religious ...

If a democratically elected leader facing jail time cannot be stopped from competing in an election, then attempts to harm him will only increase his votes. Hitting him without stopping his candidacy is the greatest campaign ever. Some people know this, but others in endogamous groups think it's great and are making a huge mistake.

"Out the crime statistics? Not not exactly like I need you need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events so that they look to their leadership to turn down the temperature." "The issue is right now, they don't feel like there's any fear." "It's like memes. It's just memes to everybody, I guess." "I'm playing video games. Okay? I'm done today. I don't give a fuck." "God, I'm it's gonna be so fucking gay if I get killed in the next fucking two months of shit I'm doing." "Well, the cuck shit out here, please don't anybody make any actual fucking the most cucked weak ass fucking bullshit ass speeches on my side." "God, if it happens, holy shit. I'm gonna make a death note before I go out to go live and not god, it's so cucked. It's so optics cucked."

He did a lot to stifle my career, and suppressed me in many ways. And I antagonized him a lot and mocked him and ridiculed him and attacked his credibility. He was my opponent. But I would never wish death upon him. It is undeniable that he was a towering figure in American conservatism. He died at 31 years old and left a legacy that many people could not achieve in many lifetimes. And ultimately, that is why he was killed. Anyone, everyone, fighting and winning that spiritual battle for Christ and for his kingdom will be persecuted for his sake. And for that, I consider him a true martyr. Charlie Kirk was a good man. God bless him. And I pray for the repose of his soul, for his family, for him.

First speaker: Let me ask you. Regardless of what he thinks, what do you think, militarily speaking, looking at all just the fundamentals, if if The United States attacks Iran in any capacity and they respond back and they hit, we'll say, Al Udeid or any of these other bases that are in the area, the the the naval area at Bahrain, what would happen? What do you think would be the result on the ground? Second speaker: American casualties and then Israel will be destroyed. That's all nearly destroyed. That's pretty much what is gonna happen. And, the issue here is, how they can, basically preserve their US Navy's assets in the area. Obviously, United States has tomahawks, and many people do not understand. United States has about two and a half thousand tomahawks in general. It's the block four and block five, which is still I mean, it's it's a long range. It's about 2,000 kilometers. But the point is for the country like, Iran, 2,000 Tomahawks are nothing. You know? And so, they can still hit some political leadership. But, the moment they begin to fly, there will be a really, really serious repercussions for the liberal and fifth column in, Iran. And after that, we might have only the hardening of the regime if you wish. Because even if they kill Khamenei, okay. So what is gonna happen? Well, he becomes a martyr. And, Iranian people, they're they're they're courageous. I mean, they will fight back.

The speaker asserts that “the left wakes up tomorrow and realizes that somebody that agrees with them assassinated the equivalent of Martin Luther King junior” and that “they are celebrating right now.” He credits “Charlie Kirk started a movement, and he led that movement. And that movement changed the election. Without Charlie Kirk, president Trump does not win in 2024.” “The people whose minds he changed... they know it. And you just woke them up.” He calls it “the equivalent of assassinating Martin Luther King, and you'll never be able to live this down.” He warns of “the ones that are celebrating, the ones that are cheering, the ones that are excited and happy.” He asks, “who you are as a person that can allow you to watch somebody get assassinated... knowing his wife and his children were standing there watching, and you're cheering it.” “Because of words that he spoke, ideas that he had, which, by the way, are pretty standard ideas for all of millennia,” and that “you killed him.” “You just created a Martin Luther King, and you created 10,000,000 new Charlie Kirks at the same time.”

It is necessary for me to sacrifice myself for the good of my people. Know that even though I may die, my spirit will live on. My spirit will rise from the grave, and the whole world will come to realize that I was right all along.

They should all know this. If you thought that my husband's mission was powerful before, you have no idea. You have no idea what you just have unleashed across this entire country and this world. You have no idea. You have no idea the fire that you have ignited within this wife. The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry.

I was relieved when I heard Trump was shot, but then disappointed to learn it was just in the ear. I don't feel bad about it. He disgusts me.

He wasn't scared. If anything happens, it's not suicide. He loved life, family, and brothers too much. Don't believe it.

You missed a shot at Donald Trump, which could make him a martyr and hand him the presidency of the United States.

I'm all alone, you said. Why celebrate the execution of another human? Aren't you supposed to value life? I believe in the sanctity of life, but many Americans felt a sense of justice because of the harm caused by this individual. Joy in a man's execution? Not joy, but certainly not empathy. This man was responsible for the deaths of many innocent Americans due to healthcare policies. Should all health care executives be killed? No, that wouldn’t solve anything. You seem to find this hilarious. I find your question absurd. I don't find it funny that thousands die from lack of care. This incident has drawn attention to the healthcare crisis. You view the execution as joyful? Joyful is the wrong word; it feels like justice when someone responsible for so many deaths faces consequences. It's shocking that anyone could feel joy over a murder, regardless of the person's role.

To those trying to incite violence against us, you have nothing. You are nothing. You are wickedness, jealousy, envy, hatred. You can build nothing, produce nothing, create nothing. We are the ones who build, create, lift up humanity. You thought you could kill Charlie Kirk? You have made him immortal. Millions will carry on his legacy, and we will devote rest of our lives to finishing the causes for which Charlie gave his last measure of devotion. You cannot defeat us. We will carry Charlie and Erica in our heart every day and fight harder because of what you did to us. The dragon you have awakened, you have no idea how determined we will be to save this civilization, to save West, to save this republic. We will defend goodness, light, virtue. We are on the side of God. God bless Turning Point, Erica, Kirk family, and United States.

"You gotta just give up. It's it's gonna come out. Whatever it is, it's gonna come out. There you would have to and I wouldn't put it past you. You'd have to get rid of all of us." "You got, like, 7,000,000,000 people you've got to ethnically cleanse right now if you wanted to just forget about the Charlie Kirk story." "In 1963, when JFK was shot, people didn't watch it on TikTok." "You traumatized all of us." "We're grieving because you assassinated Charlie Kirk in front of the entire world." "If you had pretended he slipped and fell on some ice in the winter, maybe you wouldn't have this response."

Speaker 0: Isn't it just so refreshing to finally see an assassination pulled off successfully for once? I mean, talk about professionalism at the right time.

I'm not saying I would try to assassinate a presidential candidate, but if I did, I wouldn't miss. The person who tried to shoot Trump was killed on the spot. I think this moment will be remembered as when we were doomed. Despite the attempt, I respect the effort to make a change. But how did it go wrong?

There's a lot of content online that glorifies the murder of the UnitedHealth CEO, and that's dangerous. People might see him as a folk hero and then consider targeting other CEOs, like Elon Musk. Most CEOs have their addresses publicly available as a business expense, which makes them vulnerable. Someone unstable could confront them or worse, especially with how easy it is to acquire a weapon in some places. We need to be careful about what we post. Glorifying violence can inspire someone to act, turning them into a "folk hero" who sparks a revolution against the "ruling class". We can't allow that to happen.

You know what's interesting about assassination? Well, not only does it change those popularity polls in a big fucking hurry, but it's also interesting to notice who it is we assassinate. Do ever notice who it is? Stop to think of who it is we kill. It's always people who've told us to live together in harmony and try to love one another. Jesus, Gandhi, Lincoln, John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Medgar Evers, Malcolm x, John Lennon. They all said, try to live together peacefully. Bam. Right in the fucking head. Apparently, we're not ready for that. Yeah. That's difficult behavior for us.

I hope when this is all over, you remember who fired first. You've tried to kill the president twice, and now you've assassinated man for talking. You don't really wanna do this. K? 400,000,000 plus firearms in this country, and they don't belong to the left, bro. Yeah. If you think it's okay to murder someone because of their opinion, you get what's coming to you. You and yours.

"I'm not saying she deserved it, but I'm saying God's timing is always right." "These people are absolutely despicable." "They're cheering the fact that a man was out speaking to a crowd in public, got shot in the neck, and blood was spurting out of his neck like it was a water hose." "It hasn't even been two hours." "But these people saying these things? Disgusting." "It's interesting how all this dramatic high level violence is happening against people on the right and not the left." "I'll be sending an article out later today or early tomorrow explaining this whole situation in detail." "The link to this is on my profile. Just go there, click the link, drop your email, and hit subscribe." "Anyway, that's all I got for now. We'll see you in the next one."

Oh, man. That activist in America, Charlie Kirk, he got shot. Did you see that? That activist in America, Charlie Kirk, he got shot. Did you see that? That guy loves gun violence, and he got shot. Did you see all that blood that came out of his body? The blood was like, what? To every Zionist, every Christian Zionist, may you be just like that shop, the Target. All his followers, just like the shop, the Target. I'm not saying that violence isn't the way, so don't misconstrue my words. Okay? Did you see all that blood? That dude's dead. There is a fucking god.