TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

When I started recording ballot numbers and names from mail-in ballots, I noticed they were in sequence, which is unusual. The envelopes had no date, just "November 0-2020." When I questioned this, I was told not to interfere. The ballots were all from the same street in Detroit, with similar signatures and no date stamp. They weren't in the system and were being entered manually. It seemed suspicious.

We have a problem with the election due to the influx of mail-in ballots. Trump was initially winning in Pima County, but more ballots were suddenly poured in. The issue lies in the fact that some mail-in ballots lack signatures, indicating a broken system. Regardless of who wins, we need to ensure a fair election. Election officials were rewriting rules instead of following the legislature's authority. We don't trust the media, as they have their own agenda. People witnessed irregularities during the election and want a fair vote. We can provide a forensic audit report for further information. The deletion of a million files before the audit was debunked.

The speaker observed a broken chain of custody in the handling of mail-in ballots, drop box ballots, and Election Day USB card flash drives. They witnessed the voting machine warehouse supervisor uploading USB cards to the machines multiple times without being observed by the proper authorities. The speaker raised their concerns to the deputy sheriff and the Clerk of Elections, noting that the supervisor was carrying baggies and inserting USBs into the machines. This happened over 24 times.

I witnessed numerous instances of misconduct during the election. GOP challengers and I were denied access to observe ballot procedures, and our concerns were dismissed. We saw ballots being backdated and data entered for mail-in ballots with incorrect birth dates. I have shared this information with Republican senators and representatives. There were reports of deceased individuals voting, with evidence showing over 17,000 registered voters above 80 years old who had voted and were found in obituaries. This election is crucial, and every legislator must uphold their oath to defend the US and Michigan constitutions. Despite media claims, there is substantial evidence of widespread voter fraud. Time is running out.

The speaker describes irregularities observed in absentee/mail-in ballots. They claim that the ballot numbers and the last names on the ballots were in sequence, which should not happen with mail-in ballots because those ballots are supposed to arrive at different times and cannot be sequential like 2-2-3-2 next to 2-2-3-3. This pattern triggered the speaker’s concern, leading them to think something was wrong. The speaker states they began noticing that the numbers were almost adjacent to each other, with one hovering around the middle. This prompted them to raise questions about the process. They then asked the supervisor for clarification, but the supervisor reacted angrily, saying, “you’re not letting us do our job. You’re disturbing us.” Feeling hesitant to push the issue further for fear of being kicked out and wanting to stay in the room due to a lack of other observers, the speaker chose not to challenge the process more than they already had. They allege that the sequence of ballot numbers came from the same area, specifically Goddard Street in Downtown Detroit, and that the signatures on those ballots were all alike. The speaker notes several additional anomalies: envelopes had no date stamp, only the word “November 2020” without a more specific date, and there was no second or third numbering visible. They observed that none of these ballots were coming up in the voting system; instead, they were being entered manually. The speaker claims that the poll book or the system would not reflect these details, implying that the ballots were processed outside the normal electronic recordkeeping. In summary, the speaker alleges a pattern of sequential ballot numbers and similar signatures associated with absentee ballots from a single street area, envelopes without proper dating, and manual entry into the system rather than through standard digital processing, with the supervisor resisting questions about these irregularities.

In the video, the speaker highlights several concerning issues related to the recent election. They mention the deletion of security logs, thousands of voters registering and voting after the deadline, individuals voting who were not on the voter rolls, and ballots being sent without evidence. The speaker also mentions a memo from Maricopa County instructing the use of Sharpies on election day, which raises concerns about ballot validity. They suggest that Republicans who waited to vote on election day may have been affected by this. Overall, the speaker raises questions about the integrity of the election process.

The speaker discusses a report and rates its significance on a scale of 1 to 10. They mention that the final report reveals that 23,344 mail-in ballots were sent to addresses where the individuals no longer lived, yet votes were still cast on them. These ballots were identified through a national change of address form, which people fill out when they move. The speaker finds this illogical and believes the attorney general should provide an explanation. They emphasize that the election was decided by a margin of 10,000 votes, while the issue of the 23,344 ballots is just one example of irregularities.

The speaker obtained a video showing a suspicious drop-off of ballots at a Detroit facility. Local media denied any fraud, but the video contradicts this. The escort car delivering the ballots had a Pennsylvania license plate, raising questions about its origin. A Michigan group counted only 1,400 drop box ballots, yet officials claimed to have received 16,000 ballots after hours. The discrepancy in numbers has sparked concerns about the legitimacy of the additional ballots brought in.

We have concerns about mail-in ballots in Clark County, with reports of ballots found in trash cans and multiple ballots sent to one address. Signatures were supposed to prevent fraud, but we haven't been able to verify them. We suspect there are ineligible voters, including deceased individuals and those who have moved. A voter was turned away due to someone else casting their ballot. We're taking legal action to stop the counting of improper votes. Thank you.

The speaker highlights the insecurity of the system, mentioning that over 600,000 mail-in ballots have been counted, including some sent to dead people and those who moved out of the state. They claim that 200,000 votes were verified by a machine with a reduced signature verification standard. The speaker also mentions that the machine requires a 200 DPI setting to match signatures, but the photos in the Nevada system fall below this standard. They express concern that 400,000+ votes have not been looked at and emphasize the lack of scrutiny in the mail-in system. Specific allegations include dead voters and over 3,000 people who moved out of Las Vegas but still voted. The speaker acknowledges the difficulty in verifying these claims.

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

I witnessed numerous instances of misconduct during the election. GOP challengers and I were denied access to observe ballot procedures, and our concerns were dismissed. We saw ballots being backdated and data entered for mail-in ballots with incorrect birth dates. I have shared this information with Republican senators and representatives. There have been reports of dead people voting, with evidence showing over 17,000 registered voters above 80 years old who voted and were found in obituaries. This election is crucial, and every legislator must uphold their oath to defend the US and Michigan constitutions. Despite media claims, there is substantial evidence of widespread voter fraud. Time is running out.

My mail-in ballot never arrived; it got stuck at the post office. Interestingly, my dad, an 82-year-old registered Republican, also didn’t receive his ballot for the first time. He mentioned that everyone in his office, likely voting Democrat, got theirs weeks ago. When I went to vote, I had to scroll down to the second page for my choice. I've noticed reports of glitches in the voting process, and it’s curious that these glitches seem to favor one candidate. I haven't seen any glitches that benefit Trump. Also, in California, when I asked if I needed to show my ID, they seemed offended.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

In the video, the speaker discusses discrepancies in the ballot recount process. They mention that while 782 ballots were initially counted, only 1,401 were recounted using machines. The speaker questions the disappearance of over 300 ballots between the counts. They also mention that military ballots are separated and not required to be mailed in, with 93% of them being submitted electronically. The speaker expresses concerns about verifying signatures on electronic and email ballots, as well as the lack of evidence linking military ballots to the individuals who cast them. They find it troubling that a majority of these military ballots went to Biden.

- Speaker 0 asserts that mail-in ballots are corrupt and that a Republican-led effort will end mail-in ballots, including drafting an executive order by “the best lawyers in the country.” They claim the U.S. is nearly the only country using mail-in ballots and cite “massive fraud all over the place,” arguing that secure, paper-ballot elections with watermarking would produce faster results (claims that paper ballots provide results the same night, whereas machines allegedly take two weeks). - The conversation references a specific election night anomaly: a block of 138,000 votes (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 confirm “138,000” votes) all reportedly voting for Biden with no Trump votes in that segment, described as inexplicable and not consistent with expected linear reporting. They note the timing as around 04:30–06:30 in the morning and suggest the results should not be linear given numerous counters reporting across states. They also complain that Nevada stopped counting mid-day, calling it inexplicable and illogical. - Speaker 4 claims a counting software glitch caused a 6,000-vote swing in a county, where ballots counted for Democrats were miscalculated for Republicans; she states that 47 counties use the same software. - Speaker 5 demonstrates concerns about voting-machine security: he shows how a bad actor could gain full admin access in under two minutes by opening a device, removing the card reader, and bypassing error messages, implying easy manipulation of tabulation in 18 states using the machine. - Speaker 6 describes observed ballot processing irregularities: a ballot-stuffing environment where ballots are stamped and filled in rapidly at the top of tickets, with security oversight present but gaps noted in workflow. - Speaker 7 discusses absentee/mail-in ballots with suspicions about sequence numbers: numbers appeared almost sequential, suggesting they could not be from mailed-in ballots, as mailed ballots typically arrive at different numbers; they note there was no date on envelopes and that some details would not be in poll books or the system, alleging irregularities in how ballots were handled. - Speaker 8 reports ongoing theft of duplicate ballots: a table for duplicates existed, but ballots were copied and redistributed at various tables, with duplicates not fully processed and ballots stashed under boxes; the speaker claims this occurred throughout the night. - Speaker 9 recounts a local media denial of fraud at the TCF center, contrasted with video obtained later showing a van delivering ballots after hours; she describes escort cars, a back-and-forth of ballots, and suggests the presence of unobserved ballots and a lack of witnesses during tabulation. She notes that the video was shared publicly and led to the suspension of a social-media account. - Speaker 10 provides a timeline from October 21, detailing a driver delivering mail-in ballots from New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and then to Lancaster, with the driver faced hours of waiting, lack of slips, and unclear purpose for moving the load; the driver states that this was the only time he transported mail-in ballots and expresses a belief in the importance of honest elections for Americans.

The speaker claims they were prevented from adequately observing ballot procedures, and that supervisors dismissed their concerns. They allege ballots were backdated from November 4th to November 2nd, and that data was entered into computers for these mail-in ballots. According to the speaker, poll workers entered ballot information from new mail-in ballots, including dates of birth of 01/01/1900, into electronic poll books and processed those ballots for tabulation, even though the information was not previously in the electronic or paper supplement book. The speaker also claims to have emailed Republican senators and House representatives information about dead people voting, referencing a website listing 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters over 80 who voted in the 2020 election and are listed in online obituaries. The speaker believes this is the most important election and urges legislators to fulfill their oath to defend the US and state constitutions, asserting there is massive evidence of voter fraud.

The speaker noticed irregularities with the ballot numbers and names on absentee and mailing ballots. The numbers were almost consecutive, and some envelopes lacked a date. When the speaker questioned this, they were met with resistance. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures and no date stamp. None of these details were entered into the system, and they were being manually entered. The speaker suspected something was amiss but didn't challenge further to avoid being kicked out.

During the election, there were damaged mail-in ballots that couldn't be read by scanners. The board decided to duplicate these ballots using pink highlighters. However, the highlighter couldn't be read by the scanners either, so all the duplicated ballots had to be fixed. The solution was to give workers stacks of blank mail-in ballots to individually fill in the correct ovals with a dark pen. This process went on for hours without observation until the observers confronted the deputy commissioner. Eventually, thousands of mail-in ballots were counted this way. This raises concerns about the integrity of the process.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

This graph shows Wisconsin vote totals, particularly a spike at 3:30 AM that raises questions. The issue stems from how absentee ballots are counted. I support allowing counties to count these ballots the day before, with equal observers from both parties, to avoid such sudden increases. This spike likely comes from Milwaukee Central Count, which faced significant operational issues, including a failure to seal a power outlet box, requiring the reprocessing of 30,000 ballots. Despite the chaos, election observers believed the results would be legitimate, though heavily favoring Democrats. A major concern in Wisconsin is the lack of maintenance on voter rolls, with 7.5 million registered voters compared to only 3.6 million eligible voters.

The speaker discusses the final report released to the public, which reveals that 23,344 mail-in ballots were sent to individuals who no longer lived at the address. Despite this, votes were still cast using those ballots. The speaker emphasizes that this is just one example of irregularities in the election, which was decided by a margin of 10,000 votes. They express their confusion and call for the attorney general to address this issue.

The speaker expressed concerns about mail-in ballot irregularities in Clark County, including ballots found in trash cans and multiple ballots sent to homes. They mentioned the inability to observe or challenge signatures on ballots, leading to suspicions of improper voters. Reports of dead voters and individuals who moved away during the pandemic having their votes counted were mentioned. They cited an incident where a voter was denied the opportunity to vote due to someone else casting their ballot. Legal action is being taken to stop the counting of improper votes.

I personally witnessed numerous instances of misconduct during the election. GOP challengers and I were not allowed to perform our duties properly, as Michigan laws dictate. We were consistently prevented from observing the ballot process, and when we raised concerns, they were dismissed. We saw ballots being backdated and incorrect data being entered into the computer system. Poll workers were inputting information from new mail-in ballots, including birthdates of 1/1/1900, which were not previously recorded. There have been numerous reports of irregularities during the vote count. I have shared this information with Republican senators and representatives. Dead people were found to have voted, as evidenced by a list of over 17,000 Michigan voters above the age of 80 who had cast their ballots and were also listed in obituaries. This election is crucial, and it is time for legislators to fulfill their oath to defend the constitution. Despite media claims, there is substantial evidence of widespread voter fraud unlike anything we have seen before.

Excuse me, how many ballots are you turning in? You're only supposed to submit one ballot per person. Do you have an affidavit for all those? It's with the post office. That seems suspicious. There's someone in Northampton County dropping off an excessive number of ballots right at the deadline after the office has closed.