reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims the current administration caused America's housing shortage by letting in over 10,000,000 people illegally, providing them with housing vouchers, food stamps, free plane tickets, and free cell phones. The speaker asserts that to address housing costs, the population should be limited by controlling immigration and open borders. The speaker also alleges that the administration's donors at BlackRock are buying up houses and that Airbnb is turning neighborhoods into transient areas with no social connection. The speaker believes it is inappropriate for the administration to lecture on the housing shortage that they allegedly caused.

Speaker laments replacing the America our fathers built with something alien. He describes a Walmart visit in a city 'drowning with illegal immigrants'—'not newcomers, not migrants, illegal'—where aisles feel like a 'third world country' and people treat him with a 'cold, hostile glare.' He argues that when you 'sneak into a country' you don't come humbled; you come 'with a list of demands' and refuse to 'learn our language' or 'respect our flag.' 'Breaking into someone's house doesn't make you family. It makes you an intruder.' He asserts 'we are a nation built on the word of God,' 'one nation under God, not one nation under Allah'—a 'Christian nation.' He says speaking truth leads to labels like 'Islamophobic, bigots, xenophobic.' Immigration should 'transform strangers into Americans'; skipping the process is 'invasion with missing paperwork.' Politicians 'cheer' this on, importing a voter base that won't assimilate. 'Diversity without loyalty is division.'

The exchange centers on accusations of hyperbolic statements and the accuracy of quoted posts. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's credibility, citing a series of posts and asking whether the statements were read correctly. - On 02/11/2026, Speaker 0 cites a Blueski post: “my words or your words, not mine. The democrats video telling service members to ignore illegal orders didn't go far enough. They should have also urged them to refuse unethical orders, whether illegal or not. There are many things deemed legal that are still obviously unethical, and everyone should hold themselves to this higher law,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 confirms reading it and asks if Speaker 0 disagrees with it, questioning whether people should do unethical things in their capacity of [unknown context]. - On 12/31/2025, Speaker 0 references a post reading, “in front of god and country. … They referring to Republicans think they control their way into us accepting ethnic cleansing,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 responds that it related to a DHS security post advocating a 100,000,000 deportations, stating that “A 100,000,000 deportations would be ethnic cleansing,” adding, “You would be True. One third of the country. So, yes, there are people within the Department of Homeland security.” Speaker 0 asks whether this is hyperbolic and requests more time. - On 02/05 (implied), Speaker 1 notes, “advocating a 100,000,000” but the sentence is cut off in the transcript. Speaker 0 comments, “reputations is … cleansing,” while continuing to engage in the discussion with the chair and audience; Speaker 0 asks for thirty more seconds. - On 03/02, Speaker 0 quotes Speaker 1: “if you rule against Trump's population purge agenda, no hyper permanently there, the nativists will name you, threaten you, and come after you. These judges are much braver than the ICE agents who hide behind masks while violating the constitution. They are much braver.” Speaker 1 clarifies, “They put their names on their rulings, and they stand behind their constitutional rulings. When I talk about population purge, I'm talking about the fact that they're trying to deport US born citizens, people born here. They are trying to deport them as well. So it's not a mass deportation agenda. It is also an agenda intended to reduce the population of The United States, including US born people.” - Speaker 0 responds, “Thank you.” Speaker 1 adds, “These are not hyperbolic statements. I appreciate you reading my account. Here's the good news.” The conversation escalates in tone as Speaker 0 interjects with disbelief, asking, “What planet … parachute him from?” Speaker 1 replies, “No. No.” Speaker 0 comments, “Hey, guys. You're you you You trigger my gag reflex,” and Speaker 1 closes with, “Mr. Bieber.”

Speaker 0 asserts that kindergarten classes look “completely disgustingly changed” and that those children are not belonging there, calling them “anchor babies” and alleging they are “chemical weapons” and “biological chemical weapons” sent to destroy the fabric of the country. He adds that these people do not vote like white Christian men and vote against the interests of “small town, small America.” He then says, “White people in America, you will be replaced and your children will be black Muslims if you don't stand up now,” claims that “AIPAC is one of the main components to the people at the head of Hollywood that are brainwashing your children to vote Democrat, to take your guns, and to take your freedom,” and declares that it is time to fight back. Speaker 2 responds by stating that there is a war being fought against “our people,” and it is “in our school systems,” “in our cafeterias,” and “in our grocery stores,” and that replacement is happening “on our phones,” and “in our hospitals.” He calls for fighting back, organizing, and having more children, and urges turning minds and hearts toward Christ. Speaker 1 encouragements follow: “We need to stand up,” and “We need to stand tall.” Speaker 1 then proclaims, “I’m proud to be white, and I’m proud to be American,” and calls others to action: “America, fight back. Stand strong. Be brave.” The speakers exhort others to inspire those around them, and to affirm faith with “Amen.” Speaker 2 closes with “God bless America.”

We are being conquered by a complete resettlement of America with millions of people bringing different cultures and beliefs. This will permanently change the country unless there are massive deportations.

The FBI reportedly declared Minnesota's Fifth Congressional District the terrorist recruitment capital of the country. This district is represented by Omar. According to the speaker, this is connected to Obama's importation of 70,000 Somalian immigrants, who all stayed in that district. The speaker believes "we" are inviting immigrants in to destroy the country.

The speaker claims the current administration caused America's housing shortage by letting in over 10,000,000 people illegally and providing them with housing vouchers, food stamps, free plane tickets, and free cell phones. The speaker asserts that uncontrolled immigration and open borders expanded the population, leading to the housing crisis. The speaker also alleges that the administration's donors at BlackRock are buying up houses, and donors at Airbnb are turning neighborhoods into transient-filled areas with no social connection. The speaker finds it unacceptable for the administration to lecture on a housing shortage they allegedly caused.

As a legal immigrant, the speaker expresses frustration with Democrats for supposedly weaponizing diversity. The speaker asserts the U.S. does not need people who will support the ideologies that ruined their home countries. The speaker left their country because people kept voting for a party promising handouts. Legal immigrants supposedly want closed borders to prevent the same problems from arising in the U.S. Many immigrants run away from bad countries, then support the same ideologies in the U.S., expecting government assistance. The speaker claims legal immigrants oppose open borders and illegal immigration not out of selfishness, but because they know what happens when those types of people are the majority. It is frustrating to see America turning into what they ran away from after sacrificing to make America home.

The speaker believes Afrikaners are not being embraced because of racism. The speaker claims the Episcopal Church, which receives $50 million annually from the Biden administration to facilitate illegal immigration, is refusing to help genuine refugees from South Africa. The speaker accuses these Christians of lacking love for those who don't fit their paradigm. The speaker recalls the Episcopal Bishop of Washington, D.C., lecturing Donald Trump about migrants at his inauguration and patronizingly describing them as people who wash dishes and pick crops. The speaker alleges that the church wants subservient, good people who will vote for the Democrats and who are not white.

The so-called bishop promotes open borders and claims that most immigrants are not criminals, but this narrative ignores the legal definition of immigration. We must focus on the mercy owed to our homeless veterans and children affected by harmful ideologies. The push for open borders and transgender agendas is seen as a tactic to create a permanent underclass, undermining American values and traditions. The message is a corporate agenda that aims to control and manipulate society. True charity begins at home, and we must prioritize the needs of our citizens before those from other countries. The fight against these ideologies continues, and we must remain vigilant in defending our republic.

The session centers on evaluating past presidential performance and contemporary immigration politics. The speaker argues that the movement’s criticisms of immigrants and open borders would have appeared during Barack Obama’s presidency as well, pointing out that Obama is sometimes labeled “the deporter in chief.” When asked if Obama was a good president, the participants largely affirm that he did a good job: Governor Walts, Governor Pritzker, Governor Hochul, and Perryman all express the view that Obama’s presidency was good. The speaker then contends that Obama’s immigration policies were largely the same as the policies Republicans are currently opposing, noting that “Barack Obama had the very same policies for the most part on immigration that Republicans are parroting today.” The speaker contrasts this with charges that current protesters are labeling as Gestapo-like, arguing that those who advocate for open borders actually harm both Americans and those who are unauthorized immigrants, asserting that the policies do not arise from understanding or sympathy but have the opposite effect. A crucial part of the argument accuses those in power of exploiting racial identities for political ends. The speaker claims that “when you use brown people, just like they use black people with BLM and Marxists during BLM to usher that in,” money travels “back to the communist party,” and that elected officials’ platform is being used to usher in communism rather than defend American values. The speaker admonishes the audience not to roll their eyes, saying the topic is serious and that money is involved. The speaker emphasizes that the information being provided should inform decisions and asserts that if a person truly upholds American ideologies and constitutional perspectives, they should not be speaking at the rally. A formal action is announced: the speaker “authorized a letter to be sent to my office to the president of The United States to rescind millions of dollars in funding that we know are going to the no kings protest that were authorized and basically given under the last administration.” The claim is that Congress should act to protect the American people from foreign interests, foreign governments, and also the communist influence, rather than simply pointing fingers or blaming others. The statement ends with “Well, general lady yield,” signaling a procedural transition.

Let's talk about Ilhan Omar's people in Minnesota. They brought about seventy, eighty thousand of these Somali Muslims in. They grouped them in one spot, and then they used that to elect her to congress. That's how she got there. Now one thing you need to remember, according to the stats is over 90% of these people have availed themselves of some sort of social service welfare program. Now, the authorities in Minnesota have a huge investigation because these people have come up with all kind of different scams—feeding children, housing, fake marriages, fake divorces, you name it. They came here and they started scamming the system like nobody would believe. And these are her people all grouped together in Minnesota. We're gonna talk about Dearborn, Michigan soon too.

A new round of abuse-coverup allegations has resurfaced in federal court, this time targeting the daughter and son-in-law of church president Russell M. Nelson. The 79-page suit includes decades-old claims of sexual abuse against children as young as one year old, with the defendants identified as John and Jane Doe being Brenda Miles and her husband Richard, who are Russell M. Nelson’s daughter and son-in-law. The defense filed a 141-page motion to dismiss, denying all allegations. The plaintiffs allege that the abuse dates back to the 1980s and that after the victims came forward, church elder Neal A. Maxwell blessed them and told them to forgive and forget, and that if church leaders had taken further action with police, the abuse might not have happened. Although the LDS Church is not named as a defendant, the church issued a statement noting that allegations of interference or cover-up are baseless and offensive, adding that law enforcement investigated the matter in the 1980s and took no action against the church or its leaders. The plaintiffs’ attorney said the motive for filing now is that the alleged victims “now have a voice they want to be believed and they want justice for living with the shame and pain of what happened to them as children.” The defense argues that the statute of limitations has passed and that this is grounds for dismissal. A copy of the complaint was posted on kutv.com, fully redacted. In related discussion, a commentator described a conflict over how the church handles criticism, arguing that the only way to resolve it is through “brute force,” likening it to excommunication of critics, and asserting that the church avoids dispassionate dialogue to protect its brand. The commentator referenced Russell Nelson’s involvement in the Strengthening the Church Members Committee in the 1990s and claimed that Nelson was on that committee with James Faust. The segment also recaps a controversial personal history involving Bill Carstensen, a diagnosed child abuser who, after the church failed to discipline him, married Marilyn Brady, an employee in the church’s membership department. Brady reportedly trusted Nelson and ended up marrying Carstensen, who had abused multiple children, including a child later identified as Justin Hoyman. The report connects this to broader rumors about Nelson’s leadership and alleged shifts in church branding, noting rumors that Nelson emphasized not calling church members “Mormons” and suggesting derivations from Gordon Bowen’s influence, although no documents are provided to substantiate this claim. The segment closes by reiterating the existence of these allegations and the ongoing debate surrounding Nelson’s leadership and church branding.

The speaker claims that current policies have caused America's housing shortage by allowing over 10,000,000 people into the country illegally and providing them with housing vouchers, food stamps, free plane tickets, and free cell phones. The speaker asserts that uncontrolled immigration and open borders have expanded the population, contributing to the housing crisis. The speaker also alleges that the person being criticized is responsible for the housing shortage and that their donors at BlackRock are buying up houses, while their donors at Airbnb are turning neighborhoods into transient areas with no social connection. The speaker finds it unacceptable for this person to lecture on the housing shortage that they allegedly caused.

The speaker references a collection of legal and policy claims surrounding the Homeland Security Act era, asserting that: - They possess Supreme Court case law defending the First Amendment and US Code provisions on conspiracy against rights, deprivation of rights under color of law, and federally protected activities, to be shared with the group. - The DHS/ICE complex was formed as part of a catalyst event that directly caused the Patriot Act, which the speaker claims “virtually shredded the constitution.” - Nine/eleven is described as the catalyst for the Patriot Act; the speaker alleges overwhelming and undeniable evidence that Israel, Jews, and Israel loyalists are responsible for 9/11. - Michael Chertoff is described as an “Israeli Talmudic Jew” who drafted the Patriot Act, which was prepared less than six weeks after 9/11/2001. DHS was established in 2003 and consolidated 22 federal agencies, birthing ICE. - Michael Chertoff is noted as the second secretary of DHS, who later founded the Chertoff Group LLC and profited from TSA airport surveillance and body scan machines. - The speaker claims every DHS secretary has been Jewish or a “Jew loyalist/Zionist.” - DHS allegedly worked directly with Jewish refugee NGOs (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, International Rescue Committee, Refugee International, etc.), and DHS paid Jewish NGOs with US tax dollars to import foreigners. - Under former secretary Mayorkas, described as a dual citizen with Israel and Jewish, DHS purportedly imported over 80,000 refugees after the Afghan withdrawal, in addition to millions of other migrants; impeachment of Mayorkas is claimed to have been dropped due to “anti Semitic conspiracy theories” linked to a claimed Klerge plan and a UN document titled Replacement Migration. - The speaker asserts immigration is a tool of a “Zionist occupied government” intended to justify a permanent authoritarian surveillance police state, asserting use of the Patriot Act and Palantir as weapons against Americans. - ICE is claimed to receive training, policies, and protocols from the IDF, with hundreds or thousands of IDF foreign military members operating within ICE, implying a foreign paramilitary domestic organization operating under a federal agency on U.S. streets. - The broader claim: the United States is not only occupied, but in the early stages of a Bolshevik Revolution 2.0. - A reference to the constitutional right “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state…” and an oath to support and defend the Constitution is included, followed by a detour mentioning the Dow, fertilizer, and the Tree of Liberty, with an intention to drop off a document, implying risk to the speaker. The transcript ends with the speaker noting a potential assassination risk and instructing to leave the document with a clerk.

The speaker argues that the LDS Church is the second largest private landowner in the US, with “2,300,000 acres. Tax free,” and holds “$300,000,000,000 in market assets,” predicting it will “hit a trillion in market assets in the next decade” “under the guise of a religious institution.” He says the church “registers their investment fund as an auxiliary,” and that “not a single dollar of that fund has ever gone to humanitarian purposes or even the church.” He cites loopholes: “the private jet can be registered as a house of worship in Texas, so you don't pay tax on the jets.” He describes farms and a “storehouse” and asserts “if you've given your full tithe, you're gonna get to enjoy the benefits of our storehouse” and “if you don't give your full tithe, you don't get to benefit,” including temple recommends. He references “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and give to God the things that are God's” and adds “Churches don't pay taxes.” He notes 1913 exemptions for “12,000 organizations,” the Salvation Army's 14 points, and “400,000 churches in The US” with “1,900,000 nonprofits” today.

Speaker 1: Mentions there are many things she wishes people knew, but mostly with the administration she wishes people knew that “we're letting in criminals daily.” Speaker 2: States the big issue for the region is migration, noting “we poured a lot of money into Central America,” amounting to “4,000,000,000 over four years,” but migrants are now coming from elsewhere, including Venezuela. Speaker 3: Asks, “So what is the end goal?” Speaker 1: Asks why aren’t they allowing children, noting “a lot of children travel to The United States, David.” Speaker 2: Explains aid goes to female presence in Mexico, training women, and mentions working with gender issues in Pakistan, aiming to recruit, retain, and advance more women in law enforcement. Asks whether US taxpayers’ money should be spent in “our country on this issue,” implying women may not care about certain aspects. Speaker 2: Asks how close Secretary Lincoln is to him, “five degrees separation,” and notes migration is a niche industry that flies under the radar; the average American doesn’t know what they do. Speaker 1: Thanks the chairman, ranking member, and members for the opportunity to testify. Speaker 2: Mentions upcoming briefings in two weeks on the FY 2025 budget request on the Hill. Speaker 0: States migration is the big issue for the Hill and asks, “Stop migration. What are we doing to stop migration?” Speaker 1: Responds that he’s not accountable for that and says, “We do stuff,” referencing the root causes strategy, which is about giving money to support and help people at the origins of migrants so they feel they can stay there instead of migrating. It’s “Central America, basically.” He says they poured a lot of money into Central America, and again mentions “4,000,000,000 over four years.” Speaker 2: Asks if it’s doing anything; response: yes, for them, but migrants are now coming from elsewhere like Venezuela, and acknowledges that outcome looks bad for the administration and for politics in general. Speaker 3: Seeks the end goal and asks again why there’s a limit on who’s allowed in. Speaker 1: Cites changes in demographics in the United States; notes that Nebraskans are traditional Americans not leftists, while Latin Americans are described as leftists, framing it as a system to try to change demographics.

The speaker asserts that political influence in the United States comes from foreign and special interests, claiming “They’ve bought our politicians. They’ve thrown their Jewish money at our politicians.” This funding, the speaker says, has sustained “forever wars,” and is tied to a broader pattern of influence that the speaker attributes to a deliberate agenda. In response, the speaker declares an uncompromising stance: “as American Christians, it’s America first. It’s America only.” The speaker emphasizes a resolve to resist what is described as entrenched interference, asserting, “we will have no choice but to declare our country a white Christian country.” A central aim named by the speaker is pushing back against an “immigrant takeover,” which is said to have been brought about by those who have “paid off our politicians.” The speaker expands this claim to a global scope, stating that these forces have “flooded Europe” and “flooded America with all different types of brown people and Middle Eastern Muslims.” This phrasing is used to identify the purported agents of influence as “the head of the snake behind the brownification of America,” and the speaker further alleges that these groups or interests have “bought out hundreds of millions of dollars in politicians in our country.” In naming specific individuals, the speaker cites Joe Biden, Beijing, CCP Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Mary Aladdin, presenting them as part of the described network of influence. The overall message links political funding, immigration, and demographic change to a conspiracy aimed at reorganizing American political and social structure away from the speaker’s asserted vision of America. The speaker’s framing ties national allegiance to a combination of religious identity (white Christian) and ethnic framing, while portraying immigration and non-white population growth as a deliberate strategy by unseen actors. The overall claim centers on the belief that political power in the United States has been captured by financial interests tied to immigration and international actors, necessitating a national repositioning to prioritize “America first” and “America only.”

Speaker 0 asserts that names must be kept so these people are not replaced by others, noting that there are generations now. The speaker identifies George Romney as part of a victimization, claiming Romney is actively involved in merging Catholic information with CIA information on mind control to create a more powerful form of mind control. This merged mind control, according to the speaker, is intended to be enhanced by technology available today and is described as the most powerful form of mind control being brought into the Mormon church. The speaker states that the Mormon church is something the speaker was exposed to later on and describes it as a very powerful form of mind control. The speaker then shifts to a directive that “that one” needs to clean up their mess next. Following that, the speaker urges listeners to pay attention to so-called politicians who are paraded in front of the public as something new and different, insisting that, in fact, these figures are not genuinely new or different. The overall implication presented by the speaker is that there is an ongoing manipulation involving prominent individuals and institutions, with specific emphasis on George Romney’s alleged involvement in combining Catholic and CIA mind-control information to be amplified through technology, and with the Mormon church identified as a powerful vehicle for that form of control. The speaker also signals a warning to focus on political figures presented as novel, suggesting that their claims of novelty or difference are misleading. The passage ends with an incomplete thought, implying that the audience should remain vigilant about those who are currently presented as fresh or different in the political arena, as there is more to the situation than meets the eye.

The speaker asserts that the world’s white population has declined from 30% in 1900 to 7% now, framing this as part of the “Islamification of Europe” and the “Islamification of America” aimed at destroying white people. They claim that white Christian, European, Western civilization built the arts, the Colosseum, and powered the industrial age, and that Muslims aims to drag them back, oppress women and homosexuals, and destroy what makes America great. They urge President Trump to “send ICE” into Dearborn, alleging that Muslims have overstayed their visas and are part of “H-1B chain migration invaders” come to destroy the country’s way of life. The speaker claims Muslims “lie to our faces, pretending to be Americans, wearing your suits,” and says this behavior is unique to the United States, asserting there are 53 Muslim-majority countries where tyranny and “shithole living” prevail. They declare a desire to avoid Muslims in the country, stating, “We don’t want you in our country,” and even say, “We will come and eat your shawarma in Somalia.” The speaker emphasizes a perceived right to self-determination, claiming fathers fought and died for white Americans and that they are being driven out. The claim is made that Muslims marry multiple wives and outbreed non-Muslims, change laws, and make the country resemble places they fled from, asserting, “We don’t need it here in Michigan. We don’t need it in any part of America.” They call for removal with the line, “Respectfully, get the fuck out of my country.” The rhetoric gains urgency with a reference to World War II veterans, suggesting they fought for a constitutional republic and are now seeing Europe and America become “taken over.” The speaker accuses Muslims of outbreeding “without a single shot fired,” calling them “insidious parasites on the American way of life,” and declares that Muslims will never look like or eat like them or build like them, asserting “You are nothing. You can build nothing.” Culminating in a repetition of “America first. America only,” the speaker aligns with the sentiment of President Trump’s “great American friends” and ends with “God bless America.”

Speaker 0 asserts that under former secretary Mayorkas, described as a dual citizen with Israel and a Jew, the DHS imported over 80,000 refugees after the Afghan withdrawal, and claims this number does not include “millions of migrants from elsewhere.” The speaker states that Mayorkas’ impeachment was dropped due to anti Semitic conspiracy theories known as the “Klerge plan,” and contrasts this with reference to a “literally a 177 page UN document titled Replacement Migration.” The speaker contends that “Immigration is the tool of the Zionist occupied government in order to justify the full establishment and implementation of a permanent authoritarian surveillance police state,” and claims they are utilizing the Patriot Act and Palantir “as a weapon against the American people.” The speaker alleges that ICE “receives their training, policies, procedures, protocols directly from the IDF,” and that “ICE has hundreds, if not thousands, of IDF foreign military members operating within the agency.” They further claim that “these United States Of America are not only occupied,” and describe “a foreign paramilitary domestic terrorist organization operating under the guise of a federal agency on our streets, by definition.” The speaker proclaims that the country is in the “beginning phases of Bolshevik Revolution two point o,” and invokes the phrase “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” They reference their own oath: “I swore a note to support and defend the constitution of The United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” The passage ends with the speaker asking, “Did you?”

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

Six people are suing Brenda Miles and Richard Miles—the daughter and son-in-law of church president Russell M. Nelson—over decades-old abuse allegations. The 79-page suit includes claims of sexual abuse dating back to the 1980s, with a John and Jane Doe accusing an LDS church leader of holding touching parties and sexually abusing children as young as one. The suit alleges that after victims came forward, church elder Neal A. Maxwell blessed them and told them to forgive and forget, and that if church leaders had taken further action with police, the abuse might not have happened. In a motion to dismiss filed Wednesday in federal court, the defendants—Miles and others—deny all allegations. The motion, a 141-page document, asserts the victims only came forward after meeting with a psychologist alleged to be at the center of a satanic ritual scare in the 1980s. The LDS Church was not named as a defendant in the suit. Because it involves Nelson’s daughter and son-in-law, the church issued a statement saying, in part, that “these allegations of interference or cover up are baseless and offensive.” Law enforcement investigated the matter in the 1980s and took no action against the church or its leaders. The plaintiffs’ attorney explained the filing by saying the alleged victims “now have a voice” and want to be believed and seek justice for living with the shame and pain of what happened to them as children. The defendants contend that the statute of limitations has passed, which they argue is a basis to throw out the suit. A copy of the complaint has been posted on kutv.com, fully redacted. A commentator comments on the situation, noting the difficulty of resolving the issue and suggesting that excommunication has been used to suppress discussion. The speaker asserts that Russell Nelson, who was on the committee requesting the report, had a daughter named in one of the abuse cases and references Nelson’s past involvement with the Strengthening the Church Members Committee in the 1990s. The discussion then shifts to a separate allegation about Bill Carstensen, a diagnosed pedophile who did not face church discipline and later married Marilyn Brady, who worked in the church’s membership department. Brady was warned by Carstensen’s ex-wife about his predatory history, but Brady married him, trusting church leaders, and he allegedly abused several children, including one associated with Justin Hoyman. The speaker claims Justin Hoyman is actually Justin William Hoyman, also known as William Carstensen, who disappeared from Salt Lake City in November 2017, and states that the public record links Hoyman’s family to Carstensen. The claim is made that this disappearance would not have happened if Marilyn Brady had not trusted Nelson and the church’s handling of discipline. The speaker notes Nelson became president in 2018 and asserts he began making radical changes to the church, including rumors that the name change to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was influenced by Gordon Bowen to improve the brand, despite the church’s historic identification as Mormons.

The discussion opens by acknowledging the courage involved in leaving home for two years to serve a mission. Speaker 1 asks whether a bias toward Mormons would prevent full investigation, to which Speaker 0 responds strongly, expressing anti-Mormon sentiment toward specific individuals (Terry Reed, Romney, Jeff Flake, Rhonda Romney McDaniel) and accusing them of being the worst. Speaker 2 notes that percent of TP USA is Mormon and questions why the conversation has focused on Israel involvement, while Speaker 0 shifts back to the topic, proposing to analyze means, motive, and opportunity. He states that Mormons do not have the means to perpetrate and cover up the crime as it has been, arguing that the politics do, and that the government and various media and federal agencies would be involved. He interjects with a provocative comparison, suggesting the line of inquiry resembles antisemitic accusations about controlling information, asserting that “you’re literally doing what you accuse Jews of doing right now.” The debate then centers on a local crime scene in Utah and the extent to which federal authorities could influence the investigation. Speaker 1 counters that no one claims Mormons as a group killed Charlie Kirk; there is a group of Mormons surrounding him who seemed to be involved, but others around him were not Mormon. They discuss whether Andrew Colvet and Eric Kirk are Mormon, and reference Mike McCoy as part of the conversation about the common denominator. Timmy comments on objectivity, noting that none of the people described as around Charlie Kirk are Jewish, and suggests using an objective approach. Sam is described as feeling marginalized, and Speaker 0 indicates he could explain the difference in perspective. They discuss supremacy and cultural differences: Speaker 1 concedes Mormons are not supremacists, but suggests there is an unspoken higher regard toward them, citing a tendency toward higher-performing culture, lower criminal behavior, and better outcomes in areas like schooling; Speaker 1 mentions that many country leaders, CEOs, technology leaders, and BYU alumni have connections to Mormon institutions. Overall, the exchange covers tensions around bias toward Mormons, the feasibility of Mormons having means or motive in a hypothetical crime against Charlie Kirk, and contrasts between local Utah dynamics and broader federal or media involvement, alongside commentary on perceived cultural traits and leadership pipelines linked to BYU.

I'm here in Chicago at Lincoln United Methodist Church, which I believe is a communist organization aiding illegal immigration at the expense of American citizens. This church is the origin of the sanctuary movement and is run by Emma Lozano who is directly involved with what I consider the invasion of America. This isn't an exception; it's happening in major cities across America. It's liberation theology and communism, not God. These places, along with the UN, are aiding the invasion of our country by spreading social justice, transgender ideology and communism. It's not about preaching the word of God. They pretend to be Christian. How many illegals are you harboring? These aren't churches, they are synagogues of Satan.