TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We will unite for freedom by repealing censorship law C-11, bringing back our news, and eliminating mandatory digital ID. We'll also ban my ministers from involvement in the World Economic Forum, assert parental rights in teaching sexuality and gender, and redirect funds from foreign dictatorships and multinational organizations to rebuild our military and support our troops. Above all, we'll provide opportunities and dignity to our brave veterans who fought for our freedom. Thank you.

The member from Spadina, Fort York, addressed the prime minister regarding national security and the upcoming Hogue Commission report on foreign interference. He questioned the prime minister's ability to work alongside ministers who may not be serving Canada's interests, implying that at least one minister could be compromised. In response, the prime minister criticized the member's comments as disgraceful and irreverent, emphasizing the seriousness of national security issues. He pointed out that the member's alignment with the Conservative Party is concerning, as their leader lacks the necessary clearance for briefings essential to keeping Canadians safe.

The committee's report on potential treasonous behavior is concerning, but no charges have been filed. The government takes foreign interference seriously, with new measures in place. The public's right to know about involved parliamentarians is debated, especially with an upcoming election. Foreign interference is a significant threat to democracy, with authoritarian regimes seeking to undermine it. Vigilance and defense of democracy are crucial in the face of global challenges. Law enforcement, not politics, should handle enforcement actions.

Canadians demand transparency in investigating potential traitors. The government is cooperating with the Hogg Commission and providing necessary documents. The National Security Committee of Parliamentarians will also be involved. The opposition should refrain from making baseless claims in parliament.

The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days. The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.

You claim to be running against the Ottawa establishment, yet you've been part of it for a decade. Why should anyone believe you're not part of the establishment? People can see the dynamics of the race. I resigned because I recognized the need to focus on the threat posed by Donald Trump. Wouldn't you have had a better chance to help Canada by staying in cabinet? No, Canada is strong and will impress the world with our resilience. I take pride in rallying Canadians and advocating for our country every day.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

The Prime Minister previously supported ENSCOCOP's role in examining foreign interference in Canada's democracy, but there seems to be a shift in stance. Questions arise about whether a recent ENSCOCOP report revealed involvement of Liberals seeking political and financial gain. Is the Prime Minister still committed to transparency and public trust in institutions, or has external influence changed this approach? In response, the Minister for Public Safety emphasizes the importance of oversight, noting that the government established a committee of parliamentarians to monitor security agencies for the first time. This committee includes members from all political parties, and their recommendations have been acted upon to enhance national security and combat foreign interference.

An open letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, signed by a retired detective and an active RCMP sergeant, accuses the Liberal government of ignoring national security risks, exposing Canadian intelligence agents, and targeting political opponents. The letter alleges CSIS mishandled the Meng Wanzhou/Two Michaels crisis and provided bad intel to the RCMP, leading to a flawed investigation that attempted to link Conservative party members to Chinese interference without proof. The unredacted documents exposed Canadians involved in covert operations in China. Nine Liberal MPs—Marco Mendicino, Dominic LeBlanc, Bill Blair, David McGinty, Anita Anand, Stephen McKinnon, Melanie Joly, Arif Varani, and Christina Freeland—are accused of inaction or obstruction regarding foreign interference and national security breaches. The RCMP officer who sent the letter had previously informed Trudeau about these issues, but the government allegedly did nothing. CSIS is accused of abusing its powers and smearing innocent Canadians. The speaker urges viewers to research and share this information, citing a lack of transparency and honesty in the Canadian government.

The NDP has called for a public inquiry into allegations of foreign interference, specifically from the Indian government. The Minister agrees that the inquiry should investigate interference from the Modi government. The safety of Canadians and the integrity of the rule of law are of utmost importance. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are actively investigating in collaboration with their US counterparts. The government expects full cooperation from India in this investigation. No further comments will be made due to the ongoing nature of the investigation. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.

I will propose a comprehensive investigation into the funding of political parties and politicians, as well as their connections with Russia. Additionally, I suggest excluding parties like Forum for Democracy and PVV from confidential briefings to the Second Chamber. We cannot tolerate any form of interference, both from external sources and within our own parliament. It is crucial to safeguard our democracy not only from Russian influence but also from internal threats.

The speaker discusses a document revealing foreign interference in the 2019 Canadian federal election involving Chinese individuals, community leaders, and politicians. They mention CSIS briefings on PRC interference in the elections, implicating candidates and staff. The panel received briefings on PRC's pragmatic interference tactics. The speaker confirms CSIS briefings to the panel but struggles to recall specific details. The language used in the briefings aligns with public summaries on PRC's activities.

I will be questioning the RCMP commissioner tomorrow about why they chose not to investigate Justin Trudeau's actions in the SNC Lavalin scandal. Trudeau pressured Jody Wilson Raybould to offer a deal to SNC Lavalin, but she stood firm. I will ask why Trudeau wasn't charged with obstruction of justice. Stay tuned for updates.

On his first day, President Trump signed an executive order recognizing only two genders: male and female. If elected as prime minister, would you align with this view? I'm aware of only two genders. If there are others, feel free to share. Personally, I believe the government should stay out of people's personal decisions. Regarding gender-neutral passports, my focus is on pressing issues like homelessness, poverty, and rising crime in Canada. With 25% of our population in poverty and housing costs skyrocketing, I find it odd to prioritize gender labels on passports. My goal is to restore the promise of hard work leading to decent pay and affordable living for Canadians. Let others discuss labels; I will focus on what truly matters for our country.

You've betrayed Canada for globalism. You're not serving our country but your globalist allies. I question how much you're being compensated for this betrayal. What should we do with traitors in Canada, Mr. Trudeau? Historically, they faced severe consequences for treason, and your actions feel similar to that betrayal.

A Globe and Mail reporter asked about a Liberal candidate's ties to China-friendly groups and the speaker's meeting with the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada, a "pro-Beijing group." The reporter questioned if the Liberal party is comfortable with Peter Yen's closeness to the Chinese consulate, given the foreign interference inquiry. The speaker denied ever hearing of the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada and refuted having a "setup meeting" with them. They stated that attending events and taking pictures with people does not constitute a meeting. Regarding Peter Yen, the speaker defended him as someone who has served his community for decades, including as deputy police commissioner. They asserted that Yen's meetings with community groups were part of his job and that they are proud to have him as a candidate.

I am running in the next election to fight for the middle class, reconciliation, climate change, and to build an inclusive economy. Pierre Polioff, on the other hand, wants to bring far-right populist politics to Canada. He insults people's homes, uses homeless individuals for political gain, bullies LGBTQ+ youth, and cuts important programs like dental care and childcare. Polioff lacks the ability to answer tough questions and his so-called "common sense" approach is nonsense.

In 2015, I emphasized rejecting divisive politics, hate, and fear. It's unacceptable. Recently, unacceptable views were discussed. A security breach at a sensitive lab led to a snap election before the news broke. China interfered to help win. Admiration for China's dictatorship was expressed. Trudeau was called a disgrace to democracy.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

The speaker claims that not only the current government, but all previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe it took so long for this information to come out because of partisan politics and the influence of Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised, posing a significant security risk for Canadians. They suggest the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws similar to Australia's 2017 law against foreign interference to protect the country's future.

The Prime Minister addressed concerns about foreign interference, emphasizing the measures taken to protect Canada. He highlighted the creation of oversight bodies and tools to safeguard democracy. He mentioned the ongoing foreign interference commission and the upcoming testimony before the commission. The Prime Minister reiterated the integrity of the 2019 and 2021 elections, confirmed by a nonpartisan panel. The focus remains on addressing challenges and ensuring the safety of Canada's democratic processes.

There are calls to reopen a report on Canadian veterans who fought with the Nazis. The government will focus on next steps in the house and be thoughtful about any further actions.

The speaker claims that both the current and previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe there are two reasons for this delay: partisan interests and infiltration by Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised by these agents. This poses a significant security risk for Canadians, as it raises questions about who is really in control of the country. The speaker suggests the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws, similar to those in Australia, to protect against foreign interference.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed allegations of Chinese interference in Canada's elections, stating he has not received any information from security agencies regarding federal candidates receiving money from China. Reports suggest that intelligence officials briefed Trudeau about China targeting Canada, including funding a network that supported 11 candidates in the 2019 election. A National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians highlighted significant foreign interference threats from countries like China and Russia, which aim to exploit Canada's openness and manipulate its political processes. Trudeau emphasized the importance of public concern for democracy and acknowledged attempts by China to interfere in Canadian elections in 2019 and 2021. In response, China's foreign ministry criticized Trudeau's remarks, urging Canada to refrain from statements that damage bilateral relations.