reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The three largest asset managers in the world, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, control over $20 trillion of people's money without their knowledge. These firms are major shareholders in companies like Microsoft, Apple, Disney, Pepsi, and Coca Cola. This lack of competition is concerning because when both sides of the competition are controlled by the same actors, it undermines the idea of a free market economy. The reason behind this control is that institutions like CalPERS and New York State Pension Fund, which are government actors, demand that these asset managers adopt certain racial and gender ideologies and vote shares accordingly in order to manage their money. This requirement extends beyond just California's money.

Three major corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other and 89% of the S&P 500. They are now aiming to purchase every family home in America, with a projected ownership of 60% of single-family homes by 2030. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is part of the World Economic Forum and supports the idea of a "great reset" where people own nothing and are happy. These corporations often disrupt the housing market by making last-minute cash offers through ambiguous LLCs.

BlackRock is a publicly listed company on Nasdaq, managing over $14 trillion in assets. It holds significant shares in many major U.S. companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, airlines, and social networks. This ownership influences various agendas across these companies. For instance, when checking Amazon's stock on Yahoo Finance, it's evident that Jeff Bezos is not the largest shareholder; BlackRock and Vanguard often top the list of major holders. This highlights the extent of BlackRock's influence in the corporate landscape.

Nature underpins every aspect of the economy; air, water, soil, oceans, and minerals—the building blocks of economies. While these models of economic growth have driven global prosperity, their unintended consequences are not sustainable on a finite planet. Resource extraction and pollution—greenhouse gas emissions, sewage, plastics—are beyond the earth's carrying capacity, causing significant societal and financial costs. This shows up as financial risk for institutions. Lack of water is leading to disruption of operations of supply chains where water is needed as an essential input for manufacturing or power production. The degradation of soil is leading to reduced agricultural yields. The decline of pollinator species is also having an impact on agriculture. So that's leading to direct financial risks for organizations, for businesses, and ultimately for investors.

The Federal Register in 2023 reveals that the New York Stock Exchange is collaborating with the Securities and Exchange Commission to establish a new type of company called a natural asset company (NAC). NACs will hold rights to ecological performance in areas like national reserves and farmlands, taking over management responsibilities from public land agencies. These rights can be licensed from governments or private landowners, including publicly owned areas like national parks. The aim is to privatize these areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. Wall Street, particularly BlackRock, stands to benefit greatly from this, with the potential for trillions of dollars in economic value.

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are allegedly running everything, with these three being the largest shareholders in 88% of S&P 500 companies. They heavily influence defense contracts; BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are top shareholders in Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing. The US spends $744 billion on its military, with defense spending accounting for 13% of GDP, more than the next 10 countries combined. BlackRock has $10 trillion in assets under management, more than the GDP of every country except the US and China. BlackRock influenced 31 signers to participate with ESG, totaling $70 trillion of assets under management. BlackRock and Chase are helping rebuild Ukraine with a $400 billion contract. The speaker questions how to fight this power, suggesting that these companies have enough control to fire boards and replace CEOs. With 88% of S&P 500 companies controlled, it is argued that this constitutes a monopoly, exceeding the 50% threshold. The speaker suggests that defense contractors profit from wars and people dying. They propose breaking apart these companies to foster competition, as the speaker believes Larry Fink is the real commander in chief.

Three giant corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other and 89% of the S&P 500. They aim to buy every single family home in America, potentially owning 60% of them by 2030. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is on the board of the World Economic Forum. Their goal is for people to own nothing and be happy. Often, when someone is about to buy a home, an LLC with an ambiguous name, which is actually owned by BlackRock, swoops in with a cash offer, pushing the buyer out of the market.

The US government is using BlackRock to house illegal immigrants in New York, paying homeowners $125 per migrant per day. With BlackRock owning many properties, they stand to profit significantly. Incentives in New York make it attractive for migrants to go there. This arrangement is likely to continue until the census.

Larry Fink, Soros, State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock have significant influence in various industries, including defense contracts, Hollywood, and pharmaceuticals. These companies hold a monopoly-like control over 88% of the companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone has assets under management worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. They have the power to shape people's lives, replace CEOs, and buy politicians. The military-industrial complex is a major concern, as defense contractors profit from wars. ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives are seen as a means of control rather than just making money. The goal seems to be about acquiring power and control rather than accumulating more wealth.

State Street, BlackRock, and Vanguard are the largest shareholders in 88% of companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone is worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern repeats in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially have a monopoly. They have immense control, being able to fire boards and replace CEOs. This raises concerns about monopoly laws, as even a 50% market share is considered a monopoly.

In 2023, private equity firms, specifically BlackRock, accounted for 44% of single-family home purchases. This trend is impacting people's ability to buy homes, as BlackRock aims to create a world where ownership is impossible. They want to control what you can purchase by putting everything on debt. This means you may not own a home, a car, or even the clothes you wear. Their goal is to destroy permanence and the family structure, aiming to atomize and dehumanize individuals for easier control.

BlackRock, a major global asset manager, controls 40% of investable assets worldwide. They have investments in various industries like food, medicine, weapons, transportation, and media. This is public information. To sustain the economy, they create crises to boost demand. For instance, a war is necessary for a $90 billion weapon industry, a climate crisis drives demand for green energy, a pandemic is needed to sell vaccines, and drama fuels media traffic. This entire ecosystem is controlled by the upper class, and it's not a coincidence that we are always in a state of crisis.

The speaker questions whether it is strange that leading environmental organizations have met for fifty years with CEOs of heavily polluting corporations while the natural world keeps getting worse. They say that critics of the WAF are right when considering who the most important partners are that account for almost 71% of the WES budget. The partners include BlackRock, the Open Society Foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and many other large corporations, of whom Vanguard and BlackRock own the shares directly or indirectly.

BlackRock aims to unlock and take control of natural assets not in the financial system and turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street product. The plan is to build new asset classes on a universal ledger on blockchain with Aladdin-like risk management. The narrative ties this to a green model and decarbonization, saying the carbon market would unlock new assets and create debt. In the natural asset corporation model, one would identify a natural asset and issue shares at no cost to sell them. It's literally "it's literally just pointing out something outside and being like, this is mine. I'm going to fractionalize it and sell it to people and you're producing money in like, you know, out of thin air." The speaker claims this is financializing nature, framed as saving the planet but framing it as the only way to save the planet, the insane debt racket.

Speaker 0: I had a guy who worked, very, very, very high up at Citibank. And he told me around 2008, he said, Glenn, you know, don't worry about the financial system. And I'm like, uh-huh. And he said, you know, we're never gonna go broke. I mean, do you know how much just the national parks are worth? And I looked at him and said, are you seriously telling me that we should commoditize the national parks? And he said, it's gonna happen. And I wonder now if this is what he was talking about. If it was just a digital not actually selling them, it's just a digital commoditization of our parks. Speaker 1: Yeah. So apply this now to the the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era, you'll own nothing and be happy. Well Yes. There's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around, use it to speculate on. Mean, it's It's very insane. Yeah. And so, this is just one aspect of digital currency play. Obviously, there's a lot more than that just going on as well. I would argue that a lot of this push, particularly in The US for dollar stablecoins supposedly being better than a central bank digital currency, also falls into this paradigm we talked about earlier of, you know, moving from the public to the private of the public private partnership because a lot of these stablecoin issuers, you know, if the the big concerns about CBDCs was that they're seasable, they're surveillable and they're programmable, Well, all of those three things also can apply to stablecoins. The only difference is that you would have a private company issue it and control it. But we've seen time and again how a lot of these private entities are willing to do that. When contacted, just look at how Bank of America behaved with January 6, people accused of wrongdoing on that day, for You know, they have no qualms in doing that and engaging in those type of activities. And the biggest dollar stablecoin issuer, Tether, which just hired Bo Hynes from the White House, they have openly said that they are a close partner of the US government for dollar hegemony globally and have uploaded the FBI, the Secret Service and other aspects of the US government onto its platform directly and have seized tethers from people just because government told them to, and this was during the Biden administration. So they obviously are willing to do that under any administration, and it's essentially functioning as a de facto public private partnership, even though we're being told it's a it's much better than a CBDC, but in terms of its impacts on civil liberties, you know, that's not necessarily true. So, again, vigilance is is important here.

Three major corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other and 89% of the S&P 500. They aim to purchase every family home in America, potentially owning 60% of single-family homes by 2030. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is on the board of the World Economic Forum, which promotes the idea of owning nothing and being happy. These corporations often outbid individuals looking to buy homes, using LLCs with vague names that can be traced back to BlackRock.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

Three major corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other, essentially forming one giant corporation. They also own 89% of the S&P 500 and have now set their sights on buying every single family home in America. If they continue on this path, they will own 60% of all single-family homes in the country by 2030. The CEO of BlackRock, Larry Fink, is on the board of the World Economic Forum, which promotes the idea of owning nothing and being happy. These corporations often outbid individuals looking to buy homes, using LLCs with ambiguous names that can be traced back to BlackRock.

In 1873, Congress established a secret trust for the American people that has grown to $150,000,000,000,000. This sum could pay off the national debt four times or make every American family a millionaire. The trust has remained sealed off from the public for over a century, but this is about to change due to President Trump. A 2024 Supreme Court ruling has paved the way for the president to release this wealth reserve, and he intends to do so. Taking the proper steps now could lead to a soaring net worth in the coming years.

Speaker 0: We tend to think about capital as only financial capital—cash and financial assets—but that is not the only value our economies depend on. Every aspect of the economy is fundamentally dependent on nature: the air we breathe, the water we drink, the soil, the oceans for the food we consume, and the minerals needed for technology and infrastructure. Without these forms of natural capital, economies wouldn’t exist; they are the fundamental building blocks. Yet the ways we have grown our economies and our models of economic development have been incredibly successful for global prosperity. But the unintended consequences of current growth models are not sustainable on a finite planet. The resources we draw from Earth and the pollution and waste we emit—greenhouse gas emissions, sewage, plastics into the ocean—are beyond the Earth’s carrying capacity. This is leading to significant direct impacts on society and substantial financial costs for the economy. Macro-level calculations show these costs, and they’re also showing up in practical ways as we breach environmental boundaries and undermine nature. These breaches translate into financial risks for institutions: lack of water disrupts operations and supply chains where water is an essential input for manufacturing or power production; soil degradation reduces agricultural yields; the decline of pollinator species affects agriculture. All of this leads to direct financial risks for organizations, for businesses, and ultimately for investors. The root cause is that decision-making within businesses and financial institutions currently relies on financial data and metrics that do not factor in nature. Nature is treated within the economy as though it is unlimited and predominantly free, and the risks and harms are not costed in financial terms. While macro-level costs can be calculated, they are not integrated into day-to-day decision making. The consequence is that our economies are placed at fundamental risk. We cannot do business on a dead planet. To protect natural systems, one solution is to bring nature onto the balance sheet—bring nature into the ways decisions are made within business, allocate a value to it, and integrate it into accounting and financial mechanisms.

Speaker 0: The argument is that BlackRock, by unlocking and taking control of as many natural assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system, can deepen and expand its control over not just people in the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well and essentially turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street financial product. The goal, as described for Larry Fink in particular, is to develop new asset classes that can be used to fuel their existing business model and perpetuate it for millennia forward. One idea discussed for years is natural assets, what they call nature's economy—actual assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system—as a way to perpetuate what they do and broaden their control over the natural world, turning the natural world into tradable financial products. The supposed plan includes having all of this on a universal ledger on blockchain, presumably, and making it trackable and surveillable, so that it can be surveillable and automated. In this framework, Larry Fink would have his risk management AI—Aladdin—exercise control over these assets in unprecedented ways, to serve their benefit. Concurrently, there is movement toward a new financial governance system that pushes infrastructure toward a “green model” or decarbonization. The broader aim of the global carbon market, according to the narrative, is to unlock many new assets and far more collateral, enabling the creation of new debt and expanding the existing models to unprecedented levels, effectively perpetuating them indefinitely. A central feature of the natural asset concept, at least in the natural asset corporation model, is that you identify a natural asset such as a forest, river, or lake, and then, at no cost to you, you issue shares in that natural asset and sell those shares. The implication is that you can point to something in the natural world and declare it yours, fractionalize it, and generate money almost out of thin air by selling those shares. The natural world is vast, and the claim is that they’re financializing it all, framing it as the only way to save the planet. But really, it’s the only way for them to save their insane debt racket.

Larry Fink is now running, I believe, the World Economic Forum. He's acting chairman. Terrifying. He says that everything will be tokenized and that everything will soon be on the same universal digital ledger or database and that everything on that database will have a unique identifier number. So, for you as an individual, your identifier number will presumably be your digital ID or directly linked to that, but everything will have a digital ID. The tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize not just assets we traditionally think of, like real estate, for example, or gold or, you know, physical assets as well as digital assets like Bitcoin. There's a major effort connected with people like Fink and also people like Mark Carney, who's now Prime Minister of Canada, to tokenize the natural world and transform it into financial assets. There was an attempt to do this to an extent under the Biden administration, I believe through the Department of Interior with natural asset corporations, but that has not gone away. There are groups—for example, one of the creators of the ETF model originally, which BlackRock now owns, iShares, his name is Peter Kanez, I think is how you pronounce it—who's trying to turn the Amazon Rainforest into a digital commodity, sort of similar to Bitcoin in terms of the scarcity idea that each hectare of the Amazon Rainforest would represent a token and financialize it that way. And then each hectare would then have its unique identifier, right, on the blockchain and would be serviced by surveillance drones and all sorts of stuff. So even our most natural, the places we conceptualize as the most natural places on earth, these people want to come in and place surveillance technology and tokenize it and put it on a blockchain and use it to, know, I would argue in the case particularly of natural asset corporations and the group behind it, the intrinsic exchange group, they just want to open up a huge new asset class. They call it Nature's Opportunity so that they can continue engaging in the same type of bad behavior that, for example, brought us the two thousand eight financial crisis, by, you know, can kentoopling, basically, the amount of assets currently in play. It's You know, insane. I had a guy who worked, very, very, very high up at Citibank. And he told me around 02/2008, he said, Glenn, you know, don't worry about the financial system. And I'm like, uh-huh. And, he said, you know, we're never gonna go broke. I mean, do you know how much just the national parks are worth? And I looked at him and said, are you seriously telling me that we should commoditize the national parks? And he said, it's gonna happen. And I wonder now if this is what he was talking about. If it was just a digital not actually selling them, it's just a digital commoditization of our parks. Yeah. So apply this now to the the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era, you'll own nothing and be happy. Well Yes. There's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around, you know, use it to speculate on. Mean, it's It's very insane.

Publicly traded companies like Pepsi, Nike, and Starbucks are in billions of dollars of debt. To maximize profit, CEOs take on debt to open new markets, then make more stock available to the public. Investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street buy the stock, gaining enough ownership to influence corporate boards. Board members are aware that firms like BlackRock can replace them if they don't comply. BlackRock demands companies practice ESG, pushing climate change and social agendas. Failure to comply can result in the removal of board members and the CEO. Private companies like X and Bass Pro Shop are protected from this influence. Elon Musk made X a private company, preventing firms like BlackRock from leveraging it. Bass Pro Shop, controlled by its founder, doesn't promote social agendas. The speaker advocates supporting private companies and promotes his private homeschool community and books on topics like the Bill of Rights, free speech, and ESG.