reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"The American people to believe that? Do you think they're stupid? No." "What I am doing is protecting this country, providing historic reform, combating the weaponization of intelligence by the likes of you." "And we have countless proven you to be alive in Russia Gate in January 5." "You are the biggest put on a show so you can raise money for your charade." "You are a political buffoon at best." "But all you care about is a child sex predator that was prosecuted by a prior administration, and the Obama Justice department and the Biden justice department did squat." "And what did president Trump do? Bring new charges courageously." "33,000 pages of information to you." "I challenge you to say anything credibly to the truth." "Go ahead and run to the cameras where you wanna go now."

This isn't a place where you can just spin tales and deceive people. This is the news, and we tell the truth. It's alarming that a man who has struggled to denounce white supremacists is in this position. Remember when he said there were very fine people on both sides? Those words have power and meaning. When I speak, the world listens, including neo-Nazis and white supremacists. Why can't I denounce them or reject their support? I'm not talking about neo-Nazis and white nationalists; they should be condemned totally. What's your response to my saying Liz Cheney should be fired? I keep speaking in extreme terms about the potential dangers to the country if I don't win in November. I've even used words like "bloodbath".

Speaker 0 suggests there was potentially the biggest setup and one of the greatest crimes against the American people in the history of the country. Speaker 1 agrees it's important to get the truth and states they are working to uncover the cover-ups that happened after January 6th. Speaker 0 asks about Republicans involved in those cover-ups, acknowledging it's hard to address one's own party. Speaker 1 responds that they're going to go where the evidence leads, no matter what. Speaker 0 states they will hold Speaker 1 to that.

Congresswoman Pelosi asks, “Are you at all concerned that the new January 6 committee will find you liable for that day? Right here.” The other participant replies, “I can.” Pelosi then asks, “Are you at all concerned about the new January 6 committee finding you liable for that day? Why did you re refuse the National Guard on January 6?” The respondent retorts, “Shut up. I did not refuse the National Guard. The president didn't send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking points as if you're a serious journalist?” Pelosi concludes, “The American people wanna know. We still have questions. Thank you.”

Is this potentially the biggest setup in the history of the country? It could be. This may be one of the greatest crimes against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups that occurred after January 6th. We also need to address the involvement of Republicans in those cover-ups. I understand it’s challenging to confront these issues within your own party, but we must follow the evidence wherever it leads. I will hold you to that commitment.

You're being considered for FBI director, yet you didn't check if your associates, including the president, were involved in attacking police officers. Look at the Capitol Police behind you. Are you proud of raising money from those who assaulted them? You claim to support law enforcement, but your actions tell a different story. Did you ever publicly state that Donald Trump declassified all documents at Mar-a-Lago? You mentioned a declassification order, but did you confirm it included all those documents? Shouldn't we consider the potential risks to sources before declaring documents declassified? Did Trump consult agencies about the risks? You say you support transparency; will you back the release of your grand jury testimony and relevant sections of the special counsel's report? Your time is up.

It's our constitutional duty to do oversight. "Now in that video, that was your answer to a question to me two years ago. When I said how many agents or assets of the government were present on January 5 and January 6 and agitating in the crowd to go into the capital and how many went into the capital. Can you answer that now?" "I don't know the answer to that question." "Oh, last time, you don't know how many there were or there were none?" "I don't know the answer to either of those questions. If there were any, I don't know how many." "You've had don't know whether there are any." "I think you may have just perjured yourself that you don't know that there were any. You want to say that again? That you don't know that there were any?" "In discovery, in the cases that were filed with respect to January 6, The Justice Department prosecutors provided whatever information they had about the question that you're asking." "With respect to mister Epps, the FBI has said that he was not an employee or informant of of the FBI." "Mister Epps has been charged, and there's a proceeding, I believe, going on today on that subject." "The charge is a joke."

Remember when I promised to release the Epstein, JFK, and 9/11 files? It's been a while, and still nothing. I put Anna Paulina and Pam Bondi on it, even created a committee, which seemed unnecessary just to release files. They handed over binders to DC Draino and company, but the information was heavily redacted, supposedly to protect victims' names and due to the FBI's concerns, even though we oversee the FBI. Then national security became the excuse for more redactions, and the whole thing just stalled. Now, we're moving onto releasing the JFK files, while the Epstein files remain hidden. And now Pam Bondi is investigating antisemitism on college campuses. So, I just have one question: Where are those files?

Can we be honest with the American people about what's going on here? This is political theater. No. I don't think Thomas Massey understands government. I think he's a grandstander, frankly. The president's consultants have spent $1,800,000 against me. What he promised us was we would put America first. Most democrats are just fine with this kind of totalitarian state that the bureaucrats are pushing on us. But republicans at least pretend to be against these things. Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This is not going away. How many agents or assets of the federal government were present on January 6? We are going to the cathedral. The American public isn't buying it. We're knocking out bump stocks. What he's showing us here is not a bump stock. And I would hope that we've learned something from the COVID experience.

They deleted and destroyed a year and a half of testimony, which I believe is a major crime, with Cheney and Bennie Thompson involved. They should face consequences for their actions. When asked if Liz Cheney should go to jail, I think anyone who voted in favor of this should be held accountable. However, I won't direct the FBI or the Attorney General to take action; that's up to them to investigate. My focus remains on energy policies like "drill, baby, drill." Ultimately, they can decide their own course of action.

I am deeply troubled by your responses today. You need to acknowledge that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. You avoided answering that question when asked by Senator Durbin. Additionally, you should clearly state that those involved in the January 6th insurrection who committed violence should not be pardoned. I don’t have to say what you want me to say. I speak the truth and won’t say anything just to gain confirmation. I will answer questions to the best of my ability.

Is this potentially the biggest setup in the history of the country? It could be. This might be one of the greatest crimes against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups that occurred after January 6th. We also need to address the Republicans involved in those cover-ups. I understand it's challenging to confront these issues within your own party, but we must follow the evidence wherever it leads. I will hold you to that commitment.

If the January 6 committee is legitimate, then members of Congress can't hide behind the speech and debate clause if they committed felonies by destroying or suppressing evidence. When Donald Trump wins the presidency, there should be a full investigation into those in Congress who aided this activity. We need to find out who was responsible, whether there was ill intent to suppress evidence from federal investigators, and hold them accountable. If the January 6 committee is legit, then it is subjected to federal statutes. The deep state has gotten away with things for too long, so we must defeat it to have real accountability, whether it's Democrat or Republican. Electing Donald Trump is the first step.

My issue with my colleagues is that they have all supported Donald Trump for personal gain. Ron DeSantis begged for Trump's endorsement and attacked him in his book. Chris Christie lobbied for COVID money and prepared Trump for debates. The real enemy is the deep state that Trump tried to challenge. I'm the only one on this stage who can speak the truth. January 6th looks like an inside job, the government lied about Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9/11, the great replacement theory is part of the Democratic Party's platform, Big Tech stole the 2020 election, and the National Security Establishment stole the 2016 election from Trump with the false Trump Russia collusion hoax. We need someone who won't flip-flop and criticize Trump when it's convenient.

My issue with my colleagues is that they have all supported Donald Trump for personal gain. Ron DeSantis begged for Trump's endorsement and attacked him in his book. Chris Christie lobbied for COVID money and prepared Trump for debates. The real enemy is the deep state that Trump tried to challenge. I'm the only one who can speak the truth: January 6th was an inside job, the government lied about Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9/11, the great replacement theory is part of the Democratic Party's platform, Big Tech stole the 2020 election, and the National Security Establishment falsely claimed Trump colluded with Russia in 2016. We need someone who won't flip-flop and criticize Trump when it's convenient.

A congressman is asked if he filed impeachment articles against President Trump to get out of nearly $800,000 of campaign debt, given his history of scamming people. He is asked if he is scamming the American people. The congressman responds that there have been unconstitutional activities that need to be addressed. He is then questioned again about his history of scamming people and his campaign debt. Finally, he is told that if he hates President Trump so much, he should go back to India.

Can you clarify the presence of federal agents or assets on January 5th and 6th? Specifically, how many were there, did they encourage people to enter the Capitol, and did any actually go inside? I can't comment on an ongoing investigation. Two years ago, you were asked the same question. Can you provide an answer now? I don't know the answer. So you don’t know how many were present or if there were any at all? I have no knowledge of that. You’ve had two years to find out.

A House Republican report recommends a criminal investigation into Liz Cheney. If she broke the law, she shouldn't be exempt, just like anyone else. Questions arise about whether she manipulated evidence or coached witnesses. The investigation should reveal the truth; if she’s innocent, she has nothing to fear. There’s a concern about a double standard in justice, with calls for accountability regardless of political affiliation. The January 6th committee's investigation is criticized as a political witch hunt, with claims that it lacked impartiality and fairness. The conversation touches on the need for a consistent justice system and the belief that the investigation should focus on facts rather than politics.

A speaker questioned why a congressperson believes President Trump is above the law and why they haven't spoken out against the dismantling of the federal government by President Trump and Elon Musk. The speaker urged the congressperson to stand up for what's right and do their job. The congressperson responded that journalists constantly ask questions, but their answers are not published. To address this, the congressperson publishes statements and speeches on their website, "the scoop," because they cannot rely on news outlets to report what they say.

Is this potentially the biggest setup in U.S. history? It could be one of the greatest crimes against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups after January 6th. What about the Republicans involved in those cover-ups? Addressing that is challenging since it's within your own party. However, we will follow the evidence wherever it leads, regardless of the implications. I’ll hold you to that commitment.

I made a mistake in calling Mr. Parnas a Republican witness, he is actually your witness. I was a Republican for Trump. The committee is in recess due to votes, we will reconvene in 10 minutes.

We're diving into the January 6th select committee, which has not been truthful with the American people. The events of January 6th were indeed bad, with assaults on law enforcement being unacceptable. However, the narrative pushed by Democrats over the past four years is false and exaggerated. We aim to clarify what really happened and investigate why President Biden pardoned members of the committee. Since they are pardoned, they must testify, especially those no longer in office. Expect subpoenas to be issued soon.

Is this the biggest setup in U.S. history? It could be. This situation represents a significant crime against the American people. It's crucial to uncover the truth, especially regarding the cover-ups that followed January 6th. There are also Republicans involved in these cover-ups, which complicates the discussion. Despite party affiliations, we must pursue the evidence wherever it leads. I will hold you accountable for that commitment.

Jordan Conradson from the Gateway Pundit asks why the ethics committee didn't vote in secret to release the Matt Gaetz report. The speaker states they are bound by confidentiality and can't discuss anything that happened within the confines of ethics, neither confirming nor denying anything. Conradson asks about Susan Wilde leaking details and whether that is acceptable. The speaker reiterates they can't talk about anything. Conradson then asks for the speaker's opinion on the meaning of ethics and whether it is ethical to target political opponents.

The speaker discusses how a story about Donald Trump grabbing a Secret Service agent's neck was fabricated. The driver and others present that day denied it happened. The committee ignored evidence contradicting the narrative they wanted to push. Destroyed material likely went against their agenda. Liz Cheney is the prominent figure in this committee. Translation: The speaker talks about a false story involving Donald Trump and a Secret Service agent. Evidence disproving the story was ignored. Destroyed material likely contradicted their agenda. Liz Cheney is a key figure in this committee.