reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Justin Leslie identifies himself as a former Pfizer whistleblower and inside agent for Project Veritas and O'Keeffe Media Group, both founded by James O'Keeffe. He states that he had no idea what he was getting into when he started this journey. In a conversation, one person expresses concern about James O'Keeffe's attendance at a bohemian club, described as the most powerful secret society in the world, and inquires about his feelings and experiences. Leslie concludes by stating that what he discovered turned his world upside down and that he would like to share his story, titled "Project Whistleblower."

The speaker reports a federal judge ruled in their favor, allowing them to continue deposing individuals and request comments on their reporting about Project Veritas. The speaker states this is a victory for the Amendment. The speaker says Project Veritas argued that the speaker was intimidating witnesses, but the judge noted the speaker wants them to talk. The speaker says this is an epic moment because people claim their journalism harms people. The speaker acknowledges claims of threats or anonymous comments against people, but asserts the public has a right to know information under the Amendment. The speaker says they will report more on this ruling after obtaining the court transcript.

James O'Keefe is deposing remaining board members and executives under oath regarding his ouster from Project Veritas, after Project Veritas sued him in 2023 and he countersued in 2024. Barry Hinckley, who criticized O'Keefe's use of black car services, filed a protective order in Florida federal court to prevent his deposition from being video recorded, arguing O'Keefe will use footage to falsely portray him as lying or participating in a fraudulent ouster, harming his and his family's safety and reputation. O'Keefe argues this request violates First Amendment principles, as the truth is a defense and the public has a right to know what happened. He claims Project Veritas is judge shopping, as a New York federal judge already denied a similar request. O'Keefe states the lawsuit is not a private matter, given the public audit and leaks to media outlets. He asserts the public has a right to know about confidential FBI informants within Project Veritas and potential board conflicts of interest. FBI agent Kyle Sarifen's deposition is scheduled to be video recorded.

The video features James O'Keefe, an undercover journalist, confronting an individual who works in the White House Office of Cybersecurity. O'Keefe questions why someone in a cybersecurity role would meet with him, as it raises concerns about the government's ability to protect networks. The individual denies knowing O'Keefe and expresses personal opinions about Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. O'Keefe criticizes the individual for discussing sensitive topics in a public setting. The video ends with O'Keefe promoting a medical emergency kit and urging viewers to support his investigative work.

Can't come in. Here’s the ticket. Why not? That’s what I was told. This is day one of the Tribeca Film Festival. I’m passing out flyers about Acorn, stating the investigation is real. I exposed facts about Acorn breaking the law, and they’re making a movie about it. Some people think I’m despicable. Did you know the New York Times confirmed the transcripts match the audio? You’re hurting America. I’m James O’Keefe, and I’m in the Acorn movie. You’re a convicted felon. Actually, I’ve never been convicted of that felony. You’re a racist. No, I’m not. People are angry at the truth. We’ll be back tomorrow to expose it.

James O'Keefe claims that mass deportations will not occur until a certain problem is resolved. He mentions notification systems that alert people to avoid certain areas. O'Keefe believes that an individual in a video, along with their superiors and those who financially supported them, should be arrested, including Mackenzie Bezos. He intends to contact his network to initiate interviews. O'Keefe asserts that NGOs are thwarting the will of the American people and that this is antidemocratic and must be stopped.

James O’Keefe confronts Garcia’s office over Epstein photos. O’Keefe says, “You guys said that you you had Epstein photos that you you broke, and we actually broke it already. You redacted some of the stuff on the chalkboard. We we broke the story in May.” Garcia staff counters, “We stand by our story. We put out information that is not included in your photo, so we did include photos that were not. But thank you so much for coming.” O’Keefe asks why the words on the chalkboard were redacted; staff replies they “go above and beyond to make sure that we protect any victims or potential victims.” O’Keefe notes they “broke the exact same photo.” The staff asserts they have many photos O’Keefe did not, and they “included photos that did not have” what O’Keefe released. O’Keefe presses for credit; staff says, “Absolutely not,” and claims, “we put out photos that were never before seen.” The source allegedly is the US Virgin Islands, “with response to a request from Congress.” O’Keefe says he has his own sources and asks for attribution. The staff accuses O’Keefe of “selectively editing videos” and of a broader reputation for filming people without their permission, stating, “That’s your reputation, and that’s why people don’t trust you.” O’Keefe challenges with, “Can you give me an example of how I’ve edited a video selectively?” The staff responds that Project Veritas’ reputation preceded him and declines to provide an example, saying they don’t want to speak to his audience and that he has a “reputation for filming people without consent selectively editing.” The exchange grows heated; O’Keefe asserts he is here as a member of Congress in Garcia’s office and asks for fair treatment. The staff reiterates, “Photos that you haven't put out. We said we were putting out photos that are never before seen. We did that. We did not lie at all.” O’Keefe highlights that he and Garcia’s office have “kicked out here” and describes the interaction as elitist and condescending. He references a quote idea about perception versus reality, then notes they “broke” an image where Democrats in House Oversight claim they broke it, and mentions that one word redacted was “dank or dark brain,” questioning which victim that protects. He promises to seek a retraction and signs off: “This is James O’Keeffe. You know me for exposing the truth and holding the corrupt elite responsible and accountable.” The interaction ends with the two sides firm in their positions, and O’Keefe walks away after being asked to leave, with Garcia’s staff maintaining their reporting and accuracy, while O’Keefe frames the encounter as a confrontation over credibility and transparency.

James O'Keefe is suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. He highlights a video showing CNN engaging in similar actions. The lawsuit claims that Twitter made false statements about O'Keefe and his organization, Project Veritas, which is known for its conservative activism.

The speaker, James O'Keefe, attended a school board meeting in New Jersey to discuss an equity audit. However, the board did not allow recording of the meeting, which O'Keefe violated. The board called the police on him while he was speaking. O'Keefe revealed a hidden camera device and stated that he intended to distribute similar devices to promote transparency. The board found this unusual. O'Keefe questioned the police officer about being called to the meeting, and the officer confirmed that his supervisor instructed him to come because O'Keefe was speaking as a journalist.

James O'Keefe is suing Twitter for defamation after they made factual statements about him. This situation arose following a confrontation with a Facebook executive. Concerns about doxing led to the removal of a video, despite similar content being aired by CNN. The discussion also touches on Project Veritas, a conservative activist organization, and the implications of their actions, including accusations of fake donations. Ultimately, the truth and evidence surrounding these claims are called into question.

James O'Keefe stated that a girl who works for him recorded someone. The person recorded was at Meta and was talking to someone else. After O'Keefe said "oh," the person hung up the phone.

No one openly discusses it, but it's clear that Project Veritas has faced backlash after exposing perceived hypocrisy at CNN. Their controversial approach has led to accusations of misinformation. Stanford researchers labeled their footage as part of a coordinated disinformation effort. Veritas is currently suing the New York Times for defamation and has reportedly achieved a significant victory in that case. James O'Keefe is also suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. Despite challenges, Veritas maintains that their factual statements about their work as a conservative activist organization are valid and that the truth is not determined by external opinions.

A journalist ("iTV") confronts another journalist about an upcoming court case. The journalist ("iTV") is being taken to court for allegedly harassing a couple of Germans after they endangered his family by photographing them. He questions why the reporter hasn't watched his documentary, which had 67 million views and details his seven months in solitary confinement. He accuses the reporter of being a "propaganda machine" who will publish a pre-written, biased article implying he caused fear of violence. He asks if he should be allowed to contact journalists and ask them questions on camera, and criticizes the Daily Mail for endangering his family. He believes he is facing ten years in jail for wanting to ask a question on camera. He claims he is being targeted with "lawfare" because he is an "uncontrollable journalist" who is ahead of the population on important issues.

James O'Keefe announces that Project Veritas has big things coming early next week. He is traveling to the airport but wanted to comment on Elon Musk's recent interview. O'Keefe highlights Musk's quote: "What I care about is the the reality of goodness, not the perception of it. And what I see all over the place is people who care about looking good while doing evil. Fuck them." O'Keefe claims that Musk's statement inspired whistleblowers and insiders who were previously hesitant to provide information to Project Veritas, and they are now willing to do so.

Is this seat taken? Actually, that person works for me. Live from the Bronx, I'm James O'Keefe with OMG. You work for BlackRock, right? Yes, but I don’t consent to being recorded. You don’t have to; it’s a one-party consent state. I’m not interested in talking if you’re recording. You mentioned that BlackRock buys politicians. I didn’t say that. I’m just a low-level employee. But you did say it on video. No, I didn’t. You said it’s not about who the president is, but who controls the wallet. I’m nobody. I was just trying to impress someone. We’ll expose more people at BlackRock. I’m going to the police station to ask them to stop you from following me. James O'Keefe here, outside the police station, where the BlackRock executive is discussing my presence and denying his previous statements about Ukraine and buying politicians.

Hidden camera footage shows the FBI raiding the home of a Project Veritas journalist last November. This invasion of First Amendment rights is alarming for journalists nationwide. The government targeted Project Veritas, following our lawful acquisition of materials related to Ashley Biden's diary in 2020, which we chose not to publish and returned to local law enforcement. This raid is part of a broader effort to intimidate and silence journalists, but Project Veritas remains committed to defending our rights and those of all journalists. More revelations about the SDNY's attacks on journalism are forthcoming, and we will continue to fight for our First Amendment protections.

James O'Keefe reported on developments in the Project Veritas situation, including efforts to regain control and a film exposing board member business entanglements, such as Petrogen potentially being sold to Pfizer. He noted that more board members are to be deposed, but Project Veritas requested a stay on discovery, alleging O'Keefe was publishing deposition excerpts, leading to death threats. A federal judge acknowledged the public nature of the proceedings. Project Veritas's lawyer claimed O'Keefe was intimidating witnesses, citing a police report about O'Keefe visiting a witness's home and requesting depositions proceed remotely. O'Keefe highlighted a cordial interaction with George Scakel, despite Scakel's company potentially being sold to Pfizer. The judge denied the request to prohibit O'Keefe from attending depositions and sharing materials publicly, stating a proper showing of intimidation was needed. Discussions included violent threats against O'Keefe, including a former Project Veritas attorney's email containing threats of physical violence. The judge acknowledged limitations in preventing public commentary and reporting on the case. O'Keefe agreed to seek comment through means other than unannounced visits. Project Veritas's lawyer stated they intend to depose O'Keefe. The judge scheduled a future update.

The speaker announces the launch of "FBI Leaks," a project to release audio and video of FBI officials speaking off the record. The first video features Deputy National Intelligence Officer Rami Hassan discussing the Epstein case, calling it a "shit show" and suggesting law enforcement "turned a blind eye." The speaker calls on insiders to reveal the truth, referencing past encounters with individuals from the Pentagon and Department of Defense. They highlight Jamie Menina, a former FBI special agent and "spy hunter" caught on hidden camera. The speaker recounts being attacked and discredited, including being sued and allegedly blackmailed by a lawyer representing intelligence agents who threatened to expose undercover sources if they didn't cooperate and provide funding. Despite these challenges, the speaker vows to continue their work.

In this video, the speaker, Alex Jones, discusses the challenges his company, InfoWars, is facing. He recounts conversations with a security guard and a court-appointed CRO named Pat McGill, who have filed false claims against him. Jones expresses frustration and determination to fight back against these actions, believing there is a plan to shut down his company. He plans to take legal action and calls for support from his audience. The video also includes a heated conversation between two individuals discussing the legal situation and potential conflicts within the company. Jones concludes by asserting his commitment to telling the truth and defying the "new world order." He encourages viewers to visit drjonesnaturals.com to support his company and keep their broadcast on air.

Project Veritas sued me for a preliminary injunction, but the federal judge ruled in my favor. I refused a deal to limit my speech, testified for hours, and just won the case. Project Veritas is still trying to silence me, but I will not be silenced. I will never agree to any deal that restricts my first amendment rights. We are releasing a story about the DNC this afternoon. Translation: I was sued by Project Veritas, but the judge ruled in my favor. I rejected a speech-limiting deal, testified, and won the case. Despite Project Veritas's efforts to silence me, I will not be silenced. I will never agree to any deal that restricts my right to free speech. We will release a story about the DNC later today.