TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I was contacted by a reporter from the LA Times, Lawrence Darmiento, who questioned me about accusations of deceptive editing in my videos. He included in his article that I had previously settled a lawsuit for $100,000. I find it ironic that the LA Times themselves had to settle a pay disparity lawsuit for $3,000,000, but in their reporting, they made sure to note they admitted no wrongdoing. I also admitted no wrongdoing in my settlement. Additionally, the reporter failed to mention the numerous legal victories I've had, including cases where judges ruled that my videos were not deceptively edited. Even the New York Times has stated that my videos, while edited, did not take words out of context. I am calling on the LA Times to update their article to include these facts.

My life has been like a movie. I have important info from Pfizer exec Nick Warren about lying to the FDA for childhood vaccine approval. Project Veritas has this info but hasn't released it. FBI raid happened after whistleblower Carrie Medei's appearance. Project Veritas also withheld Ashley Biden's diary. Project Veritas had the means to expose the truth about vaccines but chose not to. This should be held accountable.

No one openly discusses certain truths, but they are evident. Leads lead. Twitter permanently suspended an account after exposing CNN's hypocrisy. Project Veritas, known for controversial conservative views, has been accused of spreading misinformation. They recently won a defamation case against the New York Times. James O'Keefe is also suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. He argues that Twitter made false statements about him. Critics label O'Keefe as despicable, noting that some news articles inject personal opinions rather than sticking to facts. This situation reflects Project Veritas's ongoing strategy of promoting misinformation. Ultimately, the truth is not determined by opinions or biases.

The speaker reports a federal judge ruled in their favor, allowing them to continue deposing individuals and request comments on their reporting about Project Veritas. The speaker states this is a victory for the Amendment. The speaker says Project Veritas argued that the speaker was intimidating witnesses, but the judge noted the speaker wants them to talk. The speaker says this is an epic moment because people claim their journalism harms people. The speaker acknowledges claims of threats or anonymous comments against people, but asserts the public has a right to know information under the Amendment. The speaker says they will report more on this ruling after obtaining the court transcript.

In September, headlines falsely labeled me a sex criminal. This wasn't isolated; it was the culmination of a multi-year campaign to silence my dissenting views on geopolitical issues like the war in Ukraine. Governments and intelligence agencies, including those of the US and UK, were involved. My critiques, though not pro-Russia, challenged Western narratives and my ability to persuade a broad audience was perceived as a threat. Organizations like Coda Story, linked to the UK government and CIA, and others funded by Moderna, tracked and suppressed my content. This censorship extended to social media, orchestrated by my own government, without trial or named accusers. The attempt to discredit independent media is a broader effort to control information and suppress dissent, effectively creating a one-party system. This experience, though personally painful, especially during my son's heart surgery, has only solidified my commitment to truth-telling and challenging authoritarianism. The fight for free speech is ongoing and I believe a global awakening is on the horizon.

In September, media outlets falsely labeled me a sex criminal without naming accusers. This was the culmination of a years-long campaign to silence my dissenting views on major geopolitical issues like the war in Ukraine. My critiques, while not pro-Russia, questioned Western involvement. This led to accusations of being a Chinese propagandist by a US government-linked organization. Subsequently, the UK government, connected to the CIA, pressured social media to censor and demonetize me. This coordinated attack, involving organizations funded by Big Pharma and government, reveals the suppression of independent media and dissenting voices. The open contest of ideas is a sham, with governments actively working to silence opposition, even using taxpayer money against their own citizens. My experience exposes the fragility of free speech and the lengths to which powerful entities will go to maintain control. The fight continues, and the stakes are high.

I told someone that President Biden is more dangerous to the republic than Trump. Biden did something unprecedented, a court found he was censoring his opponents. No court has found Trump guilty of trying to steal the election or inciting insurrection, regardless of evidence. Biden censored me, and I won the suit, so this is a fact. Facebook admitted my posts were factually correct. They invented the term "malinformation" to describe my posts. This is factually correct information that is inconvenient for the government.

As I walk out of court, I’m forever grateful to Elon Musk for funding my legal fight; without his support, I’d probably be in jail. Today, free speech won in our fight back. The judge issued a damning verdict against them and their unlawful, targeted harassment. Personal thanks to Elon.

James O'Keefe shares a video of someone banging on his front door. He opens it to find a stack of documents, which turns out to be a federal lawsuit filed by Project Veritas against him. O'Keefe expresses surprise and questions what the lawsuit aims to achieve. He mentions that Project Veritas had a significant amount of money when he left but has apparently spent it all without raising much more. O'Keefe also reveals the names of the lawyers involved in the lawsuit, expressing his confusion and concern about their efforts to silence journalists.

We handled the controversial Hunter Biden laptop story differently than Twitter. The FBI warned us about potential misinformation, so we reduced the story's distribution while fact-checking. It was challenging, as some felt we censored too much or too little. In hindsight, the story turned out to be true, but we followed a reasonable process. Decisions on what to allow or restrict are difficult, especially with polarizing issues like elections or COVID. It's a complex balance between preventing misinformation and promoting free speech.

I angered big pharmaceutical companies with my claims on sunscreen dangers, leading to being deplatformed and accused of spreading misinformation. Scientific evidence shows 73% of sunscreen ingredients are linked to hormone disruption, pregnancy risks, and cancers. Despite providing evidence to the Wall Street Journal, they didn't share it, possibly to maintain their narrative. I believe in sharing truth and facts objectively without censorship.

Elon Musk accuses Media Matters of fabricating a story about corporate ads appearing next to Nazi content on Twitter. According to Musk, Media Matters created fake accounts that followed Nazis and took screenshots of ads next to the content. Musk plans to file a lawsuit against Media Matters, calling it a "fraudulent attack." If successful, this lawsuit could be a significant win for free speech and conservative media.

James O'Keefe is suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. He highlights a video showing CNN engaging in similar actions. The lawsuit claims that Twitter made false statements about O'Keefe and his organization, Project Veritas, which is known for its conservative activism.

James O'Keefe is suing Twitter for defamation after they made factual statements about him. This situation arose following a confrontation with a Facebook executive. Concerns about doxing led to the removal of a video, despite similar content being aired by CNN. The discussion also touches on Project Veritas, a conservative activist organization, and the implications of their actions, including accusations of fake donations. Ultimately, the truth and evidence surrounding these claims are called into question.

The New York Times published a false claim about me having an alcohol problem, which is completely untrue. I have never had any issues with alcohol. I shared my achievements to highlight that it would have been impossible to accomplish them if I had such a problem. The newspaper's report is a disgrace, especially coming from a reporter who used to cover me positively. It's disappointing to see her now being vicious and mean. If it weren't for press protections, she should be sued for libel and removed from the profession for being a liar. But that's okay.

No one openly discusses it, but it's clear that Project Veritas has faced backlash after exposing perceived hypocrisy at CNN. Their controversial approach has led to accusations of misinformation. Stanford researchers labeled their footage as part of a coordinated disinformation effort. Veritas is currently suing the New York Times for defamation and has reportedly achieved a significant victory in that case. James O'Keefe is also suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. Despite challenges, Veritas maintains that their factual statements about their work as a conservative activist organization are valid and that the truth is not determined by external opinions.

I had a disagreement with a colleague in front of others, and the next day he refused to resign, so I fired him. On February 2nd, after a video I made went viral, another person from Project Veritas told me they would have an emergency vote to restructure the company. I received an email with the agenda while I was on a plane, and realized I would be removed from my position by the time I landed.

Twitter censored the speaker's account in 2021 for sharing COVID vaccine-related information. Internal emails reveal that a Twitter employee named Michael Vincent Coe flagged a tweet for violating COVID misinformation policies. Coe, who has a business administration degree, dismissed the claims without providing evidence. Another Twitter employee, Joseph Guay, also flagged a tweet related to DARPA, questioning their involvement in funding vaccine research. Guay acknowledged that the article linked in the tweet discussed the topic accurately, but deemed the speaker's context as harmful and false. Both employees left Twitter around the same time. The speaker's lawyers are considering legal action.

In September, media outlets globally labeled me a sex criminal, omitting accusers' names. This was the culmination of a years-long campaign to silence my dissenting views on geopolitical issues, particularly regarding the war in Ukraine. My critiques, initially dismissed as Chinese propaganda, were the target of governments and intelligence agencies. Coda Story, linked to the UK government and CIA, played a key role. My reporting, which included concerns about Moderna's profits and the handling of the pandemic, led to de-platforming and demonetization. This censorship, orchestrated by my own government, revealed the sham of open discourse in the West. The attack on me demonstrates the vulnerability of even high-profile individuals to these powerful forces. The response confirms the threat I pose, a threat to those in power. The battle continues, and I choose to remain steadfast.

For over 2 years, the media and Democratic Party leaders controlled the narrative around the January 6th surveillance footage. However, we broke that monopoly by obtaining access to the footage. Other media outlets reacted strongly, accusing us of downplaying the violence. They argued that the footage should be shared with all news organizations simultaneously. Some even compared our actions to a Soviet or Nazi system. Despite the criticism, we believe in presenting the truth. The reactions we received were fueled by panic and fear.

They aim to harm us for disagreeing with them. Our justice system no longer prioritizes truth, but winning at all costs.

The speaker sued the Biden administration and won. According to the speaker, discovery revealed that 37 hours after Biden's inauguration, a White House group was appointed to censor the speaker and others. The speaker claims to have emails between this group and Mark Zuckerberg, as well as people at Twitter. The speaker credits Elon Musk with making these emails public and believes Musk is essential to free speech in the U.S. because he opened up Twitter. The speaker states that Musk released these documents to journalists against the advice of his attorneys.

I'm a free speech absolutist, yet my account was suspended and my verification removed. Subscribers can no longer support my work because Elon Musk disagrees with my statements. I didn't dox anyone; I shared publicly available FEC records. My intention was to warn the Trump administration about a significant issue that could lead to impeachment if the Democrats regain control and frame it as big tech buying influence. This is a serious concern that needs attention, especially since the MAGA base is reacting strongly to it.

Project Veritas sued me for a preliminary injunction, but the federal judge ruled in my favor. I refused a deal to limit my speech, testified for hours, and just won the case. Project Veritas is still trying to silence me, but I will not be silenced. I will never agree to any deal that restricts my first amendment rights. We are releasing a story about the DNC this afternoon. Translation: I was sued by Project Veritas, but the judge ruled in my favor. I rejected a speech-limiting deal, testified, and won the case. Despite Project Veritas's efforts to silence me, I will not be silenced. I will never agree to any deal that restricts my right to free speech. We will release a story about the DNC later today.