TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

An investigation revealed Israeli spies may have had advanced knowledge of 9/11 but did not share it. Over 60 Israelis were detained post-9/11, some with military backgrounds and intelligence expertise. Reports of an Israeli spying ring and wiretapping operations surfaced. Despite suspicions, evidence linking Israelis to 9/11 remains classified. The story was reported by Fox News but later removed. Israeli officials denied any wrongdoing. The issue was not pursued further by mainstream media. The FBI's investigation into Israeli spies knowing about 9/11 in advance was stifled. Israel remains a key ally of the US. Netanyahu once stated that 9/11 was beneficial for Israel.

Israel's delayed response to Hamas attacks on October 7th raises questions of a possible military stand down order. Despite being capable, it took hours for soldiers to arrive and engage militants. Former spy Jonathan Pollard hints at a stand down order. Reservists left on their own due to lack of mobilization. The timeline shows a slow reaction to the attack, leading to speculation about Israel's actions. The episode questions if Israel targeted only militants during the conflict. Stay tuned for more on Israel's war on Gaza.

There are concerns about Israeli intelligence following a recent breach at the Gaza border. Despite having advanced technology and training, there was no response to the breach. This raises questions about how Israel was unaware of the situation. The speaker, who served in the IDF, believes that Israel must have known about the attack. They suggest that this surprise attack may have been a planned operation, possibly orchestrated by the Deep State. The speaker sees this as a failure to protect the people of Israel, comparable to the Yom Kippur War. However, they acknowledge that it is still difficult to fully understand the situation.

Israel's entire military plan was leaked, including highly confidential information about how they're going to fight, where they're going to fight, and where they're going to go. The leak was possibly from the defense department or somebody. Authorities have no idea who did it. The speaker suggests that whoever leaked the information is the enemy, possibly the enemy from within.

On October 7th, a major attack occurred in Israel, where thousands of Gazans invaded and killed Israelis, taking hostages. There are suspicions that this was an inside job due to various reasons. The Israeli government confiscated weapons from security teams in Gaza Belt communities, ignored warnings of increased tensions on the border, and removed army protection. Additionally, there are allegations that international media outlets had advanced knowledge of the attack. The response from the military and government was slow, with helicopter and attack pilots waiting for orders for six hours. Many believe this was not just negligence, but sabotage from within. The government is now threatening to arrest those who criticize their actions.

On October 28th, the UK military issued a D Notice to media editors, instructing them not to publish information about UK Special Forces in Gaza. The D Notice system, operated by the UK Ministry of Defense, involves a committee that meets biannually with select journalists to determine what can be published. They send advisories to editors, urging them not to disclose certain information, claiming it’s voluntary, though there are enforcement mechanisms. The existence of the D Notice regarding Gaza became public only because the Socialist Worker Party newspaper exposed it, highlighting the lack of awareness about many such notices.

Open-source flight data reveals the extent of US and UK involvement in Israel's conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon. Over 6,000 military flights occurred in a year, including hundreds transporting arms to Israel. Israel conducted only 20% of the 1,600 reconnaissance flights. The UK accounted for almost half, utilizing its Shadow R1 surveillance aircraft to gather intel on Gaza ground movements, sending targeting data from 645 flights. Over 1,200 military cargo flights formed an airlift over a year. Several European bases in the UK, Germany, Italy, Cyprus, and Greece facilitated hundreds of flights each. This air bridge, alongside surveillance and air-to-air refueling, has sustained Israel's operations in Gaza and Southern Lebanon.

The BBC is facing internal conflict over its coverage of Israel and Palestine. Journalists are expressing frustration over what they see as systematic pro-Israel bias within the organization. This conclusion comes from a detailed investigation involving testimonies from 13 BBC journalists, extensive research, and the efforts of two data journalists. For a comprehensive understanding, readers are encouraged to visit dropsitenews.com to explore the full findings.

The speaker discusses trying to uncover what the Mossad is called when dealing with other intelligence agencies. After asking the prime minister's spokesman, it was revealed that they refer to themselves as the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service, or ISIS for short. This name is used when communicating with agencies like the CIA or British intelligence.

The UK has announced it will arrest Netanyahu for war crimes if he visits, contingent on an ICC arrest warrant. The new Labour government has reversed the previous Conservative stance, affirming the importance of the rule of law. Despite this policy shift, UK support for Israel remains unchanged. The new foreign minister recently visited Israel, advocating for a ceasefire while confirming continued arms sales and military support. Since October 7, the UK has conducted over 200 intelligence flights off Gaza, sharing information with the Israeli military, and has authorized strikes on Yemen following attacks on Israel. Notably, the ICC has not yet issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, who may avoid countries likely to detain him.

In December, the government announced spy flights over Gaza to support Israel, but details about the flights were not disclosed, including their origin, duration, or how the intelligence was utilized. Independent findings revealed that these flights occurred up to twice daily, lasting six hours each time. During these flights, intelligence was collected continuously and shared with Israeli authorities, though the specifics of this sharing remain unclear.

We need to change how we discuss British involvement in the Gaza genocide. It's not just complicity; the UK has been a participant alongside the US and Israel from the beginning. After October 7th, I noticed daily military flights from the UK to Cyprus, specifically C-17 and A400 transport planes capable of carrying personnel and weapons. I began questioning the Ministry of Defense, and MPs joined in, but we received no clear answers about the purpose of these flights. The government claimed they were for medical supplies and ministerial travel, which seemed implausible given the number of flights. We still lack transparency about what was actually transported, and there’s insufficient press coverage demanding accountability from the government.

A Haaretz article reports that Israeli soldiers were ordered to deliberately shoot Palestinians near aid centers, even though those individuals did not pose a danger to anyone. This claim comes from interviews with multiple soldiers and commanders. Alongside this admission, the coverage notes that for nearly a month, since the conflict intensified on May 27, the Israeli military and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation have either denied or downplayed the casualties among Palestinians seeking aid. Gaza residents have described distribution centers as traps, with several aid organizations saying Palestinians are forced to choose between starving or risking death while seeking the limited food offered at these centers. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is described as a shadowy group whose backing, initial funding, and sponsors remain unclear; its existence and role have been controversial from the outset. Israelis and Americans have denied involvement or knowledge of the Foundation. The report asserts that 549 Palestinians have been killed in the last month while seeking aid, with the claim that these fatalities resulted from orders given to soldiers to shoot at Palestinians near aid distributions. The broader context suggests accusations that Israel intends to control all humanitarian distributions in order to gain greater military access inside Gaza.

Unit 8200 had detailed knowledge of Hamas' attack 3 weeks in advance but ignored it. The leaked document outlined Hamas' plan to breach the security wall and take hostages, matching the actual events on October 7. Blame has been shifted among officials, including Netanyahu, who blamed intelligence heads for failing to detect the attack. An investigation is ongoing, but parts related to Unit 8200 have been suspended. The battle to assign responsibility for the attack continues. Translation: Unit 8200 had prior knowledge of Hamas' attack but did not act. Blame is being shifted among officials, including Netanyahu. An investigation is ongoing, but parts related to Unit 8200 have been suspended. The battle to assign responsibility for the attack continues.

The discussion centers on whether Netanyahu's government is in serious trouble and what recent developments suggest about Israeli politics and the Gaza situation. - Protests and public sentiment in Israel: Proponents point to large weekly protests in Tel Aviv against Netanyahu, noting claims of “massive protests” that have drawn thousands, with some saying a quarter of a million previously. The speakers emphasize that demonstrations before October 7 indicated substantial opposition to Netanyahu, including calls for a commission of inquiry into corruption and judicial overreach. They also acknowledge a shift after October 7, with Netanyahu attempting to build a coalition and currently holding about 65 of 120 seats, suggesting he remains in power. One speaker asserts that protests are used politically, while acknowledging their scale in the center of Israel. - Netanyahu’s political standing and coalition: The speakers describe Netanyahu as facing multiple felony charges related to corruption and note his history of coalition-building with smaller parties. They argue that war and conflict are used domestically to unite the population and distract from corruption allegations. They suggest Netanyahu’s government is the most extreme right-wing in Israel’s history, with two cabinet ministers having felony convictions for anti-Arab hate crimes and holding key security and finance roles. The prognosis offered is that Netanyahu is not likely to be removed from power soon, potentially leading through 2030. - Funds to Hamas via Qatar before October 7: A new report from the Tel Aviv newspaper Idiot “Iranath” states that Israel asked Qatar to increase funds transferred to Hamas in Gaza less than a month before October 7. The claim is that Netanyahu-era officials knew the money would enable Hamas to divert funds to arms and military preparedness, and that Hamas was exploiting Qatar’s civilian aid to strengthen its military capabilities. The discussion emphasizes that Israel funds Hamas indirectly through Qatar, and that nothing entering Gaza happens without Israeli knowledge or approval. - Stand-down orders and the October 7 attack: The conversation discusses Israeli stand-down orders and the protests among IDF soldiers about the events of October 7. There is an assertion that some young women in IDF outposts were put at risk, with questions about what the government knew and whether it allowed certain actions. The speakers describe a view that the Israeli military and political leadership may have been complicit or negligent regarding operations on October 7, including claims about attempted obfuscation of investigations and the Hannibal directive. - CIA, John Kiriakou, and past U.S. behavior: The dialogue references CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou, noting his exposure of the Bush torture program and contrasting U.S. actions with Israeli policies. John Kiriakou comments on his experiences in the Middle East, including an anecdote about discussions in Riyadh in 1991 regarding Gaza’s infrastructure, and he asserts that Netanyahu’s government is deeply integrated with actions surrounding Hamas. - Prospects for accountability and investigations: The speakers express strong doubt about a credible investigation into October 7, arguing that Israel is in “survival mode” and that Netanyahu will not be imprisoned. They describe proposed commission arrangements as potentially whitewashing, with Netanyahu seeking to appoint some members himself, and they predict that the investigation is unlikely to be thorough or independent. - Summary stance: The discussion presents Netanyahu as politically resilient despite corruption charges, with a broad right-wing coalition and ongoing protests. It underscores the interconnections between Israeli funding structures for Hamas through Qatar, the alleged stand-downs surrounding October 7, and perceived obstacles to a transparent, independent accountability process.

Australia has been providing military equipment to Israel, but the government is keeping the details hidden. In the past 5 years, Australia has given Israel over 350 military export permits, but the public doesn't know what's in them or who they are being given to. The government refuses to disclose the contents, cost, or recipients of these permits. This means that we have no idea about the extent of Australia's involvement in Israel's military actions. The Albanese government is trying to keep this information secret, but the public is determined to uncover the truth. Stay tuned for more on military exports in the coming weeks.

A leaked document revealed that the government had vital information that they claimed was so important, yet they were unaware it was missing until it was published by The Guardian. The interesting part is that three high-level US officials initially suggested that the leak had the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. The documents also revealed that NATO and US military were assisting Ukraine, with the UK having the largest contingent. This information is likely to be used by Moscow to argue that they are not only confronting Ukraine but also NATO.

Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a full-throated warning to the United States and Israel against attacking Iran, saying any attack would be a grave mistake with devastating consequences. Russia also cautioned that threats of new military strikes on Iran are categorically unacceptable and criticized Washington for external interference in Tehran’s internal politics. Amid these tensions, Putin’s anger over Israel’s handling of Syria was referenced, with reports that Russia sent multiple large freight flights into Tehran in recent days. There was discussion about whether this could be connected to comments from President Trump that killings in the region might be winding down, with a reporter noting that the killing has “now stopped” and a follow-up remark that it is “winding down” despite uncertainty. The program suggested that pro‑Zionist accounts and MAGA influencers are circulating propaganda—fake death numbers from Iran and videos of protests—while questioning the reliability of such footage and calling out what was described as propaganda used to push for war in Iran. Claims were made that “the number of people killed is far higher than the 12,000” from Mark Levin’s reporting, and that Iranian body bags and mass casualties were being publicized by certain viewers, though not all claims could be independently verified due to a media blackout. Laura Loomer was cited showing footage of body bags claiming nearly 20,000 Iranians had been murdered for protesting for their freedom, while noting Mossad’s heavy involvement in Iran’s protests, including arming protesters with live firearms per Israel’s Channel 14. The discussion raised the possibility that Reuters and other sources were reporting imminent U.S. bombing of Iran within 24 hours, while also noting Trump’s pattern of weekend bombings when markets are closed. Anya Parampil of the Grey Zone, who had recently been in Iran, joined to discuss on-the-ground realities. She explained that the initial demonstrations in Iran began around rising inflation and economic hardship, worsened by sanctions that the United States has openly admitted using as a weapon. She noted that early protests were largely by pro-government or conservative segments, with the government making concessions and the president, Hassan Rouhani’s successor, acknowledging responsibility for policy decisions. Violent elements subsequently appeared, and a blackout on information has followed, with Internet cuts, complicating independent reporting. Parampil suggested outside support and covert interventions could be destabilizing the country and providing a pretext for international intervention, comparing the current situation to Syria in 2011. Parampil described the escalation from peaceful economic demonstrations to violent street actions involving armed extras, questions about who is killing whom, and the risk of a Syria-style CIA or covert foreign-backed civil conflict in Iran. She emphasized sovereignty and the Iranian people’s own trajectory, arguing that sanctions and external pressure complicate genuine domestic grievances and can undermine authentic movements. The discussion also touched on the nature of domestic sentiment: some protests were pro-government, driven by sovereignty and economic concerns, while others involved calls for reform. The participants urged skepticism about casualty figures, questioning sources funded by Western organizations and the reliability of reported death tolls amid the information blackout. They warned against rushed military action and suggested that the window of opportunity for U.S.-Israeli action might be closing, given the political clock in the United States and Israel. The program closed with notes that the Israeli media reported Mossad’s involvement and arming on the Iranian side, while U.S. reporting remained less transparent, and that the situation remained highly uncertain with conflicting narratives about who is directing violence and protests on the ground.

CNN and The Associated Press were aware of the upcoming massacre on October 7th but chose not to inform anyone so they could be the exclusive reporters. They traded Israeli lives for close-up footage. Hamas trusted them so much that their leaders even kissed them. CNN and AP knew that Hamas would massacre people, rape women, and murder civilians, but they didn't disclose this information. They also covered for Hamas by publishing an article that portrayed the attack as a chaotic rampage instead of acknowledging Hamas' intent. These reporters should be prosecuted, or Israel should take appropriate action against them.

Turns out that shortly before this attack, the government had ordered the removal of all military presence from that area. Hamas was literally given a free pass to enter and start their operation. Israeli defense forces that were supposed to be around Gaza were placed around the West Bank because of security concerns so that the the Gaza envelope was left unoccupied with military. They say around 60 to 80% of that area was left without the IDF forces that were supposed to be there. A year ago, there was a military operation in Gaza to prepare for such events, and ongoingly there are trainings for these kind of scenarios. What happened? Two years ago, there was a successful deployment of underground barriers with sensors to alert exactly on these kind of terrorist breaches. There's no way in my view that Israel did not know of what's coming.

The BBC is in civil war over its coverage of Israel and Palestine with journalists there at breaking point because of their outrage at what they regard as systematic pro Israel propaganda at the corporation. That's a finding of my new detailed investigation into the BBC for the brilliant drop site news. It's based on the testimony of 13 BBC journalists on a huge amount of research and the crucial work of two data journalists who I worked with. Do go read the piece at dropsitenews.com. It's a long piece because there's a lot to expose.

- Shortly before the attack, the government allegedly ordered the removal of all military presence from the area, giving Hamas a “free pass” to enter and begin their operation. In the following videos, former Israeli Defense Force (IDF) members warn that something very concerning is happening in Israel. - Afat Fenningzon reports, dated 10/07/2023, that Israeli defense forces around Gaza were instead positioned around the West Bank due to security concerns, leaving the Gaza envelope unoccupied. He says about 60 to 80% of that area was left without IDF forces. He notes that a year earlier there was a Gaza operation to prepare for such events, and ongoing trainings for these scenarios exist. This raises questions about Israeli intelligence: two years ago there were successful deployments of underground barriers with sensors to alert on terrorist breaches, yet there was zero response to the border and fence breaching. He emphasizes that Israel has a highly advanced military and questions how there could be no indication of what was coming, given that a cat moving near a fence would trigger forces. He asks, “What happened to the strongest army in the world? How come border crossings were wide open?” He describes the chain of events as very unusual and not typical for the Israeli defense system. He calls the current government highly corrupt and asserts the previous one was no better, stating his goal is to expose evil forces. He characterizes the surprise attack as seemingly a planned operation on all fronts and, if he were a conspiracy theorist, would say it feels like the work of the deep state. He suggests the people of Israel and the people of Palestine have been sold to “higher powers,” acknowledging how difficult the reality is to fathom. - Speaker 2 questions how the strongest army and the most sophisticated intelligence in the world could allow a few hundred Hamas fighters to enter Israel and cause the attack, while Hamas fighters did not meet any Israeli resistance in the area. He asserts it is not logical and implies there is more behind it, suggesting Israel sacrificed its own people and civilians on the Gaza border, removed protection and the army, and allowed Hamas to carry out their actions. He reiterates that Israel has the most sophisticated intelligence and a strong army, yet such an incursion occurred, implying hidden mechanisms or plans at work.

Le Hamas a suivi un plan détaillé pour attaquer le mur de Gaza, incluant des attaques de roquettes, drones pour neutraliser la surveillance, et franchissement du mur en parapente, moto et à pied. Des fuites suggèrent une connaissance préalable des actions israéliennes. En 2023, un analyste a averti des attaques imminentes, mais a été ignoré. Le rapport a circulé dans l'armée israélienne et les services de renseignement, probablement connu par les gouvernants depuis des années. En 2016, une note signée par Avigore-Liberman a averti du Hamas déplaçant le conflit en Israël. Le plan du Hamas a été prévu depuis longtemps, mais les responsables politiques n'ont pas agi en conséquence. Translation: The Hamas meticulously followed a plan to attack the Gaza wall, including rocket barrages, drone attacks to disable surveillance, and breaching the wall using paragliding, motorcycles, and on foot. Leaks suggest prior knowledge of Israeli actions. In 2023, an analyst warned of imminent attacks but was ignored. The report circulated within the Israeli army and intelligence services, likely known by the government for years. In 2016, a note signed by Avigore-Liberman warned of Hamas shifting the conflict to Israel. The Hamas plan had been foreseen for a long time, but political officials did not act accordingly.

Several Gaza-based freelancers from major news organizations, including CNN, The New York Times, Reuters, and the Associated Press, were found to be embedded with Hamas during the Hamas infiltration and killing of 1,400 Jews. A Reuters journalist captured a disturbing image of an Israeli soldier being brutalized by a lynch mob. CNN severed ties with one of the freelancers mentioned in the report. The Associated Press claims they had no prior knowledge of the attacks. The situation is compared to the Taliban tipping off a news network before 9/11 or a school shooting, with the media showing up to document it instead of preventing it. The media's biased coverage of Israel is also criticized. The story is still developing.

In 2008, an AP staffer says he was the first to erase information from a story due to threats from Hamas. The detail removed stated that Hamas fighters dressed as civilians were being counted as civilians in the death toll. The staffer says he suggested an editor's note about complying with Hamas censorship but was overruled. Since then, the AP and other organizations allegedly collaborate with Hamas censorship in Gaza, focusing on civilian casualties while obscuring militant deaths and Hamas's military strategy. Casualty numbers are reportedly provided by the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry, shaping the narrative. The speaker claims the press has become an amplifier for Hamas's ideology. All reporters in Gaza are Palestinian, and they allegedly either identify with, are intimidated by, or belong to Hamas. The speaker suggests this dynamic results in biased reporting that portrays Israel negatively.