reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The US military is now allegedly authorized to kill Americans on US soil, according to a headline from Zero Hedge and Armageddon Pros. This claim stems from a reissued Department of Defense (DOD) directive, specifically DOD directive 5240.01, reissued on September 27, 2024. The directive governs Department of Defense intelligence activities and now includes provisions authorizing lethal force in certain circumstances, supplanting the 2016 version, which did not mention that. Section 3.3 addresses assistance to law enforcement agencies and other civil authorities. It states that defense intelligence components may provide personnel to assist law enforcement when lives are in danger. Approval is granted for responding with assets with the potential for lethality or any situation where the use of force is likely to result in death or serious bodily injury.

Hamas's cameraman reveals their tactics in the war in Gaza. Despite having uniforms, they deliberately fight in civilian clothes to exploit the IDF's efforts to avoid civilian casualties. This allows Hamas to label their combatants as civilian deaths caused by Israel. It's a despicable tactic used by terrorists to protect themselves at the expense of innocent civilians.

There is a Zionist playbook published in 2009 to defend Israel's actions. It provides rules for effective communication and talking points about Palestine, Iran-backed Hamas, and Israel's right to self-defense. The playbook instructs people to show empathy and fake caring, while avoiding certain phrases. It is suggested that this playbook is widely used by reporters, anchors, and politicians. The playbook's influence is evident in the way questions are framed and repeated.

The BBC apologizes for incorrectly reporting that Israeli forces targeted medical teams and Arabic speakers in Gaza's main hospital. They acknowledge that this was a misquote from a Reuters report and should have stated that IDF forces included medical teams and Arabic speakers for the operation. The BBC admits that this error did not meet their usual editorial standards. The correct version of events was broadcast shortly after.

The IDF has collected footage from body cams taken by Hamas death squads during the October 7th massacre in southern Israel. There is concern about a growing denial of the atrocities committed by Hamas, so the government press office will screen previously unseen footage of the barbarities. Journalists who are interested can attend the screening tomorrow, Monday, October 23rd, north of Tel Aviv. For more information, contact the GPO or the prime minister's office.

A leak from the New York Times revealed that the UK deployed a spy team to assist Israel at the start of the Gaza conflict. An Israeli official confirmed that British intelligence provided valuable insights that Israel could not gather independently. Additionally, reports indicated that UK special forces, including the SAS and SBS, were involved in operations related to hostages in Gaza. Despite these revelations, there has been a lack of transparency regarding the activities of the SAS over the past year, with the British government only citing hostage rescue as the reason for their deployment. The absence of coverage in UK media about these developments is notable.

The BBC is facing internal conflict over its coverage of Israel and Palestine. Journalists are expressing frustration over what they see as systematic pro-Israel bias within the organization. This conclusion comes from a detailed investigation involving testimonies from 13 BBC journalists, extensive research, and the efforts of two data journalists. For a comprehensive understanding, readers are encouraged to visit dropsitenews.com to explore the full findings.

There has been a media blackout on the Pentagon files, which is being called the biggest US government leak since Snowden. Fox News even stated that they will not cover it. The leaked documents contain sensitive blueprints for Ukraine, and it seems to be a blueprint for setting up a war. John Kirby, Biden's spokesperson, who previously lied about the Nord Stream, told the media not to cover this leak and to stay on their side.

This is absolutely devastating. More than a 100 BBC employees have written a letter to the director general, Tim Davy, complaining that the corporation has become a mouthpiece for Israel. It was also signed by 300 other journalists, media professionals. One of them was yours truly. The BBC employees, as you would expect, all anonymous because otherwise, they would face grave consequences in terms of their careers. Now the letter says, we're writing to express our concerns over opaque editorial decisions and censorship at the BBC on the reporting of Israel Palestine. We believe the refusal to broadcast the documentary Gaza Medics Under Fire is just one in a long line of agenda driven decisions. It demonstrates once again that the BBC is not reporting about fear or favor when it comes to Israel.

Speaker 0: Agreed with an Israeli request to stop the distribution of a book that contains some pretty damning information about the Israeli secret service, the Mossad, if it is true. Speaker 1: The most sensational claim in the book involves this bloody day, the Beirut Marine Barracks bombing. The book says Israeli agents kept vital information from US Marines that might have saved the lives of 241 Americans killed here. Israeli government sources deny this account. But according to the book, an Israeli informant saw a Mercedes truck being fitted with secret panels for explosives. Israeli troops were told to be on the lookout for the truck. But the book says the Israelis intentionally gave the Americans only a vague warning, not mentioning the kind or size of vehicle. The book says Israeli intelligence was willing to let the terrorists succeed to protect their sources and out of contempt for US intelligence. It says agents withheld information on US hostages for similar reasons. In Toronto today, the author was under a court ordered gag not to discuss the book or the case. Speaker 2: You see, there's two restrictions. There's one restriction that I can't talk about what I learned or have done in the Mossad, and the other restriction is I cannot talk about anything that's in the book. Speaker 1: Israeli officials confirm that Viktor Ostrovsky worked for the Mossad in the nineteen eighties. Alarmed by the contents of the book, they got it temporarily blocked in Canada and The United States. Speaker 3: It's a position of the Israeli government that the information contained in the book could very well lead to the identification of employees of the Mossad and could jeopardize their lives. Speaker 1: But the book's introduction says it does not name active agents and gives only initials. It does say that more than two dozen senior Israeli agents routinely gather intelligence in The United States. Late today, the book was put out for sale in New York after the court lifted its restraining order. The publishers claimed victory, but the Israeli embassy said it will still pursue its action against the author. John Martin, ABC News, Washington.

The IDF admitted to running a propaganda channel on Telegram, showcasing brutal acts against Palestinians. The channel, 72 Virgins Uncensored, featured gore, dehumanization, and glorification of destruction in Gaza. Despite initially denying involvement, the IDF confirmed their propaganda unit was behind it, claiming freelancing. The content included genocidal language, war crimes, and atrocities celebrated by IDF soldiers. This propaganda aims to cover up the failure of military objectives, strengthen domestic support, and justify brutal actions. The IDF's involvement in promoting these atrocities raises questions about official government policy and accountability.

We need to change how we discuss British involvement in the Gaza genocide. It's not just complicity; the UK has been a participant alongside the US and Israel from the beginning. After October 7th, I noticed daily military flights from the UK to Cyprus, specifically C-17 and A400 transport planes capable of carrying personnel and weapons. I began questioning the Ministry of Defense, and MPs joined in, but we received no clear answers about the purpose of these flights. The government claimed they were for medical supplies and ministerial travel, which seemed implausible given the number of flights. We still lack transparency about what was actually transported, and there’s insufficient press coverage demanding accountability from the government.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate, linked to pro-Zionist groups, targeted Palestine Declassified for censorship. Trevor Shinn, a key figure in UK Zionism, has ties to the CCDH. The CCDH has US ties, including a former CIA employee. The report on Palestine Declassified was co-published by the Anti-Defamation League, known for spying on activists. The CCDH is part of a campaign against independent media like 0 Hedge and The Canary. This report aims to silence critical voices, particularly on Palestine. Translation: The Center for Countering Digital Hate, associated with pro-Zionist groups, tried to censor Palestine Declassified. Trevor Shinn, a prominent figure in UK Zionism, has connections to the CCDH. The CCDH has links to the US, including a former CIA employee. The report on Palestine Declassified was co-published by the Anti-Defamation League, known for spying on activists. The CCDH is part of a campaign against independent media like 0 Hedge and The Canary. This report aims to silence critical voices, especially on Palestine.

A Haaretz article reports that Israeli soldiers were ordered to deliberately shoot Palestinians near aid centers, even though those individuals did not pose a danger to anyone. This claim comes from interviews with multiple soldiers and commanders. Alongside this admission, the coverage notes that for nearly a month, since the conflict intensified on May 27, the Israeli military and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation have either denied or downplayed the casualties among Palestinians seeking aid. Gaza residents have described distribution centers as traps, with several aid organizations saying Palestinians are forced to choose between starving or risking death while seeking the limited food offered at these centers. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is described as a shadowy group whose backing, initial funding, and sponsors remain unclear; its existence and role have been controversial from the outset. Israelis and Americans have denied involvement or knowledge of the Foundation. The report asserts that 549 Palestinians have been killed in the last month while seeking aid, with the claim that these fatalities resulted from orders given to soldiers to shoot at Palestinians near aid distributions. The broader context suggests accusations that Israel intends to control all humanitarian distributions in order to gain greater military access inside Gaza.

Australia has been providing military equipment to Israel, but the government is keeping the details hidden. In the past 5 years, Australia has given Israel over 350 military export permits, but the public doesn't know what's in them or who they are being given to. The government refuses to disclose the contents, cost, or recipients of these permits. This means that we have no idea about the extent of Australia's involvement in Israel's military actions. The Albanese government is trying to keep this information secret, but the public is determined to uncover the truth. Stay tuned for more on military exports in the coming weeks.

A leaked document revealed that the government had vital information that they claimed was so important, yet they were unaware it was missing until it was published by The Guardian. The interesting part is that three high-level US officials initially suggested that the leak had the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. The documents also revealed that NATO and US military were assisting Ukraine, with the UK having the largest contingent. This information is likely to be used by Moscow to argue that they are not only confronting Ukraine but also NATO.

On the third day of the conflict, the Israeli Defense Council made a decision. They announced a complete siege on Gaza, cutting off electricity, food, water, and gas. Everything is closed. The two million Palestinians living in Gaza, a territory under Israeli blockade since 2007, are now deprived of everything.

CNN and The Associated Press were aware of the upcoming massacre on October 7th but chose not to inform anyone so they could be the exclusive reporters. They traded Israeli lives for close-up footage. Hamas trusted them so much that their leaders even kissed them. CNN and AP knew that Hamas would massacre people, rape women, and murder civilians, but they didn't disclose this information. They also covered for Hamas by publishing an article that portrayed the attack as a chaotic rampage instead of acknowledging Hamas' intent. These reporters should be prosecuted, or Israel should take appropriate action against them.

Yesterday, Donald Trump banned the Associated Press from the White House because it declines to call the Gulf Of Mexico the Gulf Of America. This is press censorship based on viewpoint discrimination. During Trump's presidency, the DOD kicked out news groups from the Pentagon that asked skeptical questions, including the New York Times, NBC News, and the Washington Post. These organizations were replaced by outlets willing to advance the party line of the states, like Breitbart and One American News Network.

The BBC is in civil war over its coverage of Israel and Palestine with journalists there at breaking point because of their outrage at what they regard as systematic pro Israel propaganda at the corporation. That's a finding of my new detailed investigation into the BBC for the brilliant drop site news. It's based on the testimony of 13 BBC journalists on a huge amount of research and the crucial work of two data journalists who I worked with. Do go read the piece at dropsitenews.com. It's a long piece because there's a lot to expose.

There has been a media blackout on Pentagon files leaked recently, considered the biggest since Snowden. Fox News refused to cover it, citing sensitive Ukraine blueprints. John Kirby, Biden's spokesperson, urged media not to report on the leak, calling it a blueprint for war.

- Speaker 0 asserts that drones are in the air all day and mentions Palantir as “keeping tabs of on everything that was happening,” suggesting Palantir’s involvement in Gaza. Speaker 1 confirms Palantir’s involvement in Gaza, noting a long-standing relationship with Israel that began in 2014 and significantly scaled up during the Gaza events starting in 2020. They describe the source as biased and imply the article’s phrasing is questionable, but acknowledge the basic fact of Palantir’s use in Israel, including a mention that it’s “even on palantir.com.” - The discussion shifts to perceptions of bias in reporting. Speaker 2 notes that when Jamie mentions an article, Joe Rogan quickly labels it “a very biased article and that no one should trust it,” arguing that Palantir’s technology being used in Israel is a well-known fact. This is presented as something Joe Rogan “plays super dumb to,” influenced by fear of Peter Thiel, according to Speaker 2. - There is a critique of Joe Rogan’s appearance or demeanor, with Speaker 0 making a flippant remark and Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 continuing the thread about Joe’s attitude toward the information and his handlers. - The conversation revisits Joe Rogan’s relationship with his “handlers,” with Speaker 2 suggesting Joe’s handlers have been upset with him, possibly due to a recent Dave Smith podcast in which Rogan appeared anti-MAGA, calling MAGA supporters “a bunch of dorks,” and criticizing the Trump administration’s immigration policy while praising Obama-era deportations. Speaker 2 recounts that JD Vance said he would text Rogan to tell him he was wrong, indicating tension or pressure from political allies. - Speaker 1 quotes/digests a broader concept: “America is great. Make America greater, I’m down. But make America great again and then it becomes a movement of a bunch of fucking dorks,” noting that many participants are “dorks” and “real genuine patriots,” and that the idea of making America great is good, but the inclusivity of the team leads to problems. - Speaker 3 challenges a claim: Rogan roasted the Trump administration and suggested that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are better at deporting people than Rogan, claiming this is almost an exact quote, and questions whether MAGA is “full of dorks.” The group contemplates whether the audience includes many dorks, but asserts a distinction between dorks and genuine patriots. - The dialogue concludes with Speaker 2 asserting that there are people in the government with direct contact to Joe Rogan who push their agenda, implying Rogan might be under pressure to align with certain positions. This is presented alongside the idea that Joe is “skating on extremely thin ice” with these figures, and that Theo’s critique of the administration contributed to tensions. Joe’s response is characterized as telling Theo to “chill out and stop talk.”

In 2008, an AP staffer says he was the first to erase information from a story due to threats from Hamas. The detail removed stated that Hamas fighters dressed as civilians were being counted as civilians in the death toll. The staffer says he suggested an editor's note about complying with Hamas censorship but was overruled. Since then, the AP and other organizations allegedly collaborate with Hamas censorship in Gaza, focusing on civilian casualties while obscuring militant deaths and Hamas's military strategy. Casualty numbers are reportedly provided by the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry, shaping the narrative. The speaker claims the press has become an amplifier for Hamas's ideology. All reporters in Gaza are Palestinian, and they allegedly either identify with, are intimidated by, or belong to Hamas. The speaker suggests this dynamic results in biased reporting that portrays Israel negatively.

Israel has decided no journalists from outside can go in for three reasons. The first is the safety of the journalists. The second is the ability of IDF soldiers to conduct the war against Hamas. The third reason is that journalists in Lebanon had to be very careful about what they reported because of what Hezbollah would do to their colleagues in Beirut. Hamas members wearing press vests are not journalists. The Israeli government doesn't want international journalists crawling all over Gaza because they do not want them reporting what they will find. Some believe the real issue is that terrorist organizations control journalists' reportage.