reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers are at a protest and are trying to locate the police lines. They mention Antifa and express their intention to confront them. They mention someone named Rico and eventually find him. Tear gas is deployed, and they discuss which direction to go. They chant "USA" and help each other up. They express concern about being trapped by the police.

In a tense exchange, Speaker 0 insists that “Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Into the capital,” then adds “What? No. Peacefully,” followed by repeated “Fed” comments. They acknowledge that saying it aloud risks arrest, saying, “Tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested.” Despite warnings, they push forward with “We need we need to go I’ll say it. Alright. We need to go in.” A participant interrupts, “Shut the fuck up, boomer,” as the plan to go into the capital is reiterated, with “To the capital.” The dialogue includes, “Based fed posting? We need to go into the capital. I didn’t see that coming in. Okay. Alright.” Addressing another person, “No, Dave. But one more thing. Can we go up there? No?” They question, “When we go in Are we gonna get arrested?” and add, “We don’t need to get shot. Arrest us all? Let’s go.”

Tomorrow, the speaker expresses the need to go into the capital, but is cautious about saying it out loud due to potential arrest. They emphasize the importance of a peaceful approach. Another speaker wonders if they will get arrested or shot, to which the first speaker responds that they don't need to get shot and questions if everyone can be arrested.

The speaker briefly greets someone and mentions being behind the SFTP. They mention something about being on the main side of the cops and then abruptly tell someone to "fuck off" and to go up.

Two speakers discuss going into the capital tomorrow, insisting on a plan despite hesitation. They oscillate between urgency and caution: "Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital" and "I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested." They try to keep the rhetoric "Peaceful" and "Fed" in the mix, then confirm aloud: "We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright." A sharply cut interjection—"Shut the fuck up, Uber"—is followed by: "To the capital." They label it as "Based Fed posting? Yeah. Need to go into the capital." The exchange ends with a resigned acknowledgment: "I didn't see that coming in. Okay."

Speaker 0 urges someone to go home as there are many people and it could get dangerous. They mention seeing others getting hurt and not wanting the person they are speaking to get hurt. They promise to create a safe path.

I plan to go to the capital and trespass, even though I might get arrested. We should all go tomorrow, but we have to be careful not to say it out loud. We need to spread the word and go inside the capital building. We should avoid getting shot and instead get arrested together.

Speaker 0 is trying to confirm something with someone, but they are not responding. Speaker 0 wants the person to let someone know that they are trying to do something with their jeepers. Speaker 0 keeps asking for confirmation and tells the person that if they don't confirm, they will keep asking. Speaker 0 mentions that something needs to be cleaned up and asks the person to get up. Speaker 0 also mentions a bag of weed and asks if the person bought it. They also mention wanting drugs.

The conversation centers on a plan to perform a jump from a high spot, with the participants debating how to execute it safely and whether to proceed at all. Speaker 0 jokes about someone “playing baseball in his own house,” setting a loose, chaotic mood. Speaker 1 responds with hostility and questions, signaling tension and uncertainty about proceeding. The two then try to determine if everything is ready to go, asking Dan to confirm readiness: “Dan, is that ready to go? If I jump here. You want to throw it away?” Dan’s role is to validate whether they should proceed. The plan involves someone named Lucas who is expected to climb up to a platform to perform the jump. Speaker 0 says, “Lucas, you gotta climb up here and do it. I gotta jump off,” indicating that Lucas would be the climber, while Speaker 1 suggests there are alternative ways to approach the jump, including performing it from up there or moving to another spot. The dialogue reveals a few possible routes: jumping from a lower position to a target, or jumping from a higher point where there is a rope. The instruction from Speaker 1 is concrete: “You go here. All the way up to where there’s that rope.” The plan then becomes to “land on your feet,” with Speaker 1 reassuring that “it don’t hurt.” There is a sense of risk and improvisation throughout. Speaker 1 describes a preferred method: “you could do that too, actually,” but emphasizes using the rope as the primary point of contact for the jump. The sequence is described in steps: ascend to the rope, approach, then execute the jump, and land on one’s feet in the chosen landing zone. The dialogue emphasizes confidence in the landing technique, asserting that landing on the feet will avoid pain. Towards the end, the mood shifts to a darker, starker note as Speaker 0 asks, “What if we just, like, smashed you? Just line up.” This line introduces a hypothetical, more dangerous outcome, underscoring the tension and potential consequences of the stunt. The exchange ends with this ominous possibility, leaving the decision to proceed unresolved.

Speaker 0 is questioning if the person in front of them is a police officer and threatens to call the police. They mention someone trying to help them and ask the person to stop.

Speaker 0 asks if they can go out and expresses concern about getting arrested or shot.

The speaker mentions witnessing the police arresting someone, and another person agrees with them. They mention someone named Megan and reassure someone that they are okay. The speaker then acknowledges that they are aware of something, but it is unclear what they are referring to.

Monument Hill. 'President is good speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. We spread the word.' The speaker notes the plan to move toward the capital to address issues and spread the message. 'Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go up there?' They then ask for permission to advance and discuss possible entry. 'No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested when go up there?' The exchange continues with concern about violence, as they respond, 'Yeah. You don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?' today.

The speaker expresses concern about the police lines and Antifa presence. They discuss breaking into a location and the potential consequences. They mention losing someone named Rico and speculate on his ability to walk. The speaker emphasizes respecting the police and mentions tear gas. They discuss which direction to go and express frustration. The conversation ends with a mention of letting everyone in and the possibility of being trapped.

Speaker 0 instructs others to 'stay stay back and back to the grass as much as possible.' He states, 'I the guy who was arrested, got a photo of him.' The exchange ends with 'Yeah.'

Tomorrow, we're planning to peacefully go into the capital to address our problems. We don't want to be arrested or harmed, so we should be cautious. However, one person asks if we'll all get arrested, to which another person replies affirmatively.

Tomorrow, we need to go to the capital, but we can't say it out loud because we might get arrested. We should go there to address our problems, but it's a risky move. We're unsure if we'll get arrested or shot. Can they arrest all of us?

Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol peacefully. No, no, no, no, no, peacefully. I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need to go in. Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Spread the word. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, shall we go out there? No? When we go in, are we gonna get arrested? We don't need to get shot, just arrested.

Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol peacefully. No, no, no, no, peacefully. I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need to go in. Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Yeah, we need to go into the capital. Spread the word. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, shall we go out there? No? When we go in, are we gonna get arrested? We don't need to get shot, just arrested.

Speaker 0 asks if they can go out, but Dave says no. They are concerned about getting arrested or shot if they go out.

The speaker asks an officer what is happening and what is going on. The speaker repeats, "What's that?" and "What?" The officer responds that they can't describe exactly what's going on, stating, "It's an ongoing investigation." The speaker repeats the word "crime" multiple times.

Tomorrow, we're planning to go to the capital, but we need to be careful not to say it out loud. We want to peacefully address our problems there. We didn't expect to actually enter the capital. We're concerned about getting arrested or shot. Can they arrest all of us?

Speaker 0 contemplates marching on the Capitol, acknowledging the risk of arrest. They say, 'I know. In fact, tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright.' They urge action with, 'We need to go in to the capital. Let's go.' They preface with, 'I'm gonna put it out there,' and confess, 'I'm probably gonna go to jail tomorrow.' The message centers on a planned entry into the Capitol and the likelihood of facing jail, repeating the call to action 'We need to go into the capital.'

An individual questions whether an action is due to security concerns or intimidation. The response indicates it is a security matter. Another person is told to stay away from someone. An individual asks why they aren't being arrested and demands to see video footage. Someone is told to calm down. An individual states "They will arrest me. I know nothing." Another person is asked if they would arrest someone else, claiming to have seen that person slap someone. It is asserted that no one said "stab him." Someone states they are on the side of another person.

Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. I don't even want to say it out loud because I could get arrested. But we need to go. Shut up, Uber. No, bad idea. Okay, fine. Let's go. But wait, will we get arrested? Will we get shot? Do we all need to be arrested?