reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker asserts that there is a depopulation agenda between now and 2050. They argue that if a plan were to make a massive portion of the global population sick and lockdown people, the only things people can control entering their homes are water. They claim water treatment for drinking and showering uses proprietary blends, including a protein called e carol, described as a snake venom component that elicits blood clotting. The speaker urges viewers to look for venom and asserts that they are poisoning us, specifically pointing to the water. They state that there is no part of me that even questions whether or not they're poisoning us in water. To keep a family healthy, they conclude, you must ensure the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the food you eat are clean.

The chemical in 72% of American water systems is hexafluorosilicic acid. It is not pharmaceutical grade and is not manufactured for water treatment; it is captured from the smokestacks of phosphate fertilizer plants by pollution scrubbers. Regulators would classify it as toxic if it escaped into the atmosphere, and it would trigger an environmental emergency if it leaked into a river. Instead, it is shipped by tanker trucks to local utilities, diluted, and added to drinking water and used for cooking and bathing. The story is traced to decisions made decades earlier rather than through public approval. No national referendum approved fluoridation, no consent forms were signed by parents or grandparents, and in most communities no public hearing occurred. The policy is described as originating about 80 years ago with officials whose financial interests aligned with moving the substance from factories into water systems. The transcript links fluoridation to fluoride waste from aluminum refining in the early 20th century. A 1933 toxicology report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture singled out the aluminum industry as the biggest fluoride polluter. Lawsuits and environmental harms near Elco smelters are cited, including dying livestock and scorched vegetation. The 1930 Belgian Meuse Valley disaster is cited as having killed 60 people and identifying airborne fluorides as the primary cause. Disposal of fluoride is described as expensive, with Alcoa having large amounts. Andrew Mellon, founder and controlling shareholder of Alcoa and U.S. Treasury Secretary (1921–1932), is presented as an influential figure because the Public Health Service operated under Treasury jurisdiction. In 1931, the PHS is said to have sent a dentist, H. Trendley Dean, to study areas with naturally occurring fluoride. Towns with higher natural fluoride were reported to have fewer cavities, though they also had mottled, stained teeth. In 1931, Alcoa’s chief chemist is said to have identified fluoride as the cause of brown staining in Bauxite, Arkansas, an Alcoa company town. The transcript states that in 1939, Gerald Cox at the Mellon Institute (Alcoa’s research lab) fluoridated lab rats and declared the case for fluoride proved, then made the first public proposal to add fluoride to drinking water. It adds that U.S. public health regulations in 1939 stated that any water supply containing fluoride above 1 part per million should be rejected. Six years later, the same government is described as deliberately adding fluoride at 1 part per million, the stated threshold for rejection. A quoted comment attributed to a 2000 EPA scientist is used to describe the logic: fluoride is treated as a pollutant if released into air or water bodies, but not treated as a pollutant when added to drinking-water systems. On January 25, 1945, engineers at the Monroe Avenue Water Filtration Plant in Grand Rapids, Michigan, began adding sodium fluoride. Grand Rapids is described as the first city to fluoridate its drinking water, with Muskegon, Michigan, as the control. The comparative study is described as never finishing. The PHS is said to have endorsed fluoridation nationally by 1950, after which Muskegon demanded fluoridation, destroying the control group. The transcript also credits Oscar Ewing for accelerating the national campaign: in 1944 he joined Alcoa as lead counsel with a stated salary, then in 1947 was appointed to head the Federal Security Agency overseeing the Public Health Service, and the campaign used Edward Bernays as a public relations strategist. The transcript asserts that by the 1950s, supporters were uncomfortable with the speed and begins citing congressional concern, later European comparisons, and changing scientific consensus. It claims that fluoride’s mechanism is mainly topical and post-eruptive, and references a 2011 European Commission review stating no advantage of water fluoridation compared with topical fluoride application. It lists multiple European countries that did not fluoridate or stopped, while tooth-decay rates are described as declining at similar rates to the United States. A turning point is described as a September 24, 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen. The case is described as reviewing the National Toxicology Program’s system and analyzing 72 epidemiological studies, concluding that fluoridation at 0.7 milligrams per liter poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children. The transcript says the EPA appealed on procedural grounds and did not contest that risk. It then states that after the ruling, Utah banned community water fluoridation (House Bill 81, signed March 27, 2025) and Florida followed, with more than 60 communities serving over nine million people ending, suspending, or preventing fluoridation. Examples include districts disconnecting fluoride equipment and reported costs for removal. The transcript argues that government action is now shifting to prevent similar challenges by proposing changes to the Toxic Substances Control Act, described as aiming to stop courts from doing what the case did. It concludes by reiterating that the policy continued for decades without public voting, presenting the chemical’s industrial origin and the alleged financial ties behind its promotion as central to the narrative.

Dr. Christopher Wilde from IARC discussed pressure from the agrochemical industry to undermine glyphosate evaluation. The industry aims to protect its profits, registration, and defend against lawsuits. Glyphosate is widely used in the US, impacting many through agriculture and water sources. This issue highlights the importance of public health agencies labeling carcinogens, despite financial interests.

Glyphosate is described as the biggest enemy in food, with the speaker asserting it is “proven to cause and tons of evidence” and noting billions of dollars Bayer and Monsanto have paid in glyphosate damages because it is connected to a very specific form of cancer. The current battle is described as state by state, with Bayer trying to pass a bill that says if the EPA says glyphosate is safe, then damages do not have to be paid. The speaker compares this to seeking the same “nineteen eighty six vaccine immunity” but for glyphosate, arguing that glyphosate must be a top priority for the administration. Attention has been given to preservatives and food red dyes, but the speaker emphasizes that parents can choose not to feed their children certain foods, whereas glyphosate enters water systems and can drift from one field to another, affecting crops even if they are organic. It is claimed that glyphosate contaminates our food systems in ways that are very hard to prevent, even with active efforts to avoid exposure, and that it also impacts farmers. Red dye 40 and sodas are described as secondary priorities, though easier to address because the mechanisms are understood. The speaker mentions possible actions such as regulating the purchase of soda with SNAP as a straightforward policy: “regulating the use of SNAP for purchasing of soda” is presented as a reasonable and easy measure to enact. In contrast, glyphosate management is described as a much harder battle due to entrenched systems, and banning it is described as very challenging, with the EPA allegedly still protecting its use. Overall, the speaker stresses that glyphosate is a far more systemic and difficult-to-address problem than other additives, due to its environmental spread, its alleged health risks, and the political and regulatory protections surrounding its use.

It is important to filter water, especially in areas where water is fluoridated. To determine if your water is fluoridated, check the water report from your municipality or use the Environmental Working Group (EWG) water report database by entering your ZIP code. The effectiveness of plastic water filter systems varies. Some lower-end options do not remove fluoride and may not filter enough chemicals. Tap water can contain hormones, endocrine disruptors, pesticides, heavy metals, fluoride, and agricultural runoff, depending on location. Lead contamination can also occur due to lead piping. Therefore, caution should be taken with water used for drinking and cooking.

The state of Oregon has been shutting down small farms and market gardens, sending cease and desist letters to farmers in the name of water conservation. They have redefined CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations) to include any facility with a gravel or concrete floor, affecting not just dairy farmers but also chicken and goat farmers. Additionally, Oregon considers all water in the ground as a resource of the public, requiring permits for commercial use. This has resulted in market gardeners receiving cease and desist orders for watering their crops. The state's actions have been seen as an overreach, impacting small farmers and limiting access to fresh food. There are concerns that other states may follow suit.

Face labels warn to call poison control if swallowed. Toothpaste also advises contacting poison control if swallowed. However, drinking eight 8-ounce glasses of tap water daily results in four times the dosage of the substance found in those products. The speaker advises people to eliminate tap water from their lives immediately, along with GMO foods.

The fluoride added to water comes from phosphate fertilizer companies as a waste product called hydrofluorosilicic acid. These companies couldn't dispose of it because it was killing everything around their plants. So they decided to bottle it and market it as beneficial for teeth. However, this acidic and unpleasant form of fluoride is being sold back to the counties, meaning taxpayers are essentially paying to be poisoned.

Bill Gates has reportedly partnered with Nestle and BlackRock to buy farmland with aquifers, with the alleged intention of selling the water. The Nestle CEO has stated that water is not a basic human right. Additionally, a product called Appeal has been approved for use on organic produce. Appeal is claimed to be non-water soluble, meaning it cannot be washed off. The speaker suggests that because the human body is 70% water, consuming Appeal could be harmful. The speaker promotes a Kangen water machine, claiming its 11.5 pH water can remove the Appeal residue from produce.

The EPA is limiting forever chemicals in drinking water for the first time, focusing on PFAs linked to health risks. Water utilities must reduce 6 types of PFAs to near zero levels within 5 years. The bipartisan infrastructure law allocates $9 billion to aid in addressing contamination.

Popular wine and beer brands in the US have tested positive for containing glyphosate, a carcinogen. The wines include Sooner Home Merlot, Behringer, and Barefoot Cabernet Sauvignon, while the beers include Coors Light, Budweiser, and Stella Artois. The levels of glyphosate found were said to be below the safe limit set by the EPA, but this contradicts the EPA's claim that glyphosate is not harmful. In the past, the EPA had acknowledged that glyphosate causes cancer, but changed its stance after Monsanto funded studies. This raises concerns about the regulation of glyphosate.

In November, the EPA will vote on a bill to add costly water treatment programs to butcher shops, impacting local producers. This move limits consumer choice and favors big packers. The cost is high for small businesses, potentially restricting access to locally sourced meat. The shift may push consumers towards larger corporations controlling most of the industry. Share your thoughts and remember to support American and local businesses.

atrazine. What is atrazine? It's in the water. It's a pesticide. They took atrazine, and they put it in a tank with 40 frogs. They put below the exposure levels that EPA considers acceptable to humans. They're all male frogs, and 30 of those frogs were chemically castrated. Four of them turned into females and produced fertile eggs. Here it is. Report toxic herbicide found in many Texans drinking water. That's from February. And we're subjecting our children to exposure to that every day. What does this do to sexual development in children? We know what it does to frogs. It's terrifying.

Farmers in Northern Lucknow use cola companies as cost-effective pesticides, as spraying their fields with colas is cheaper than traditional pesticides. However, a study by the center for science and environment found that 57 samples of Cola drinks had pesticide residue levels 24 times higher than agreed limits. Both Pepsi and Coke deny any wrongdoing, but this is the second condemnation in three years, leading many to doubt their claims and product quality.

Face labels warn to call poison control if swallowed. Toothpaste labels also advise contacting poison control if swallowed. However, drinking eight 8-ounce glasses of tap water daily results in four times that dosage. The speaker advises people to eliminate tap water from their lives immediately, along with GMO foods.

Nestle, one of the world's largest food and beverage companies, is accused of a series of scandals and hidden practices behind its success. The transcript asserts that Nestle supports child slavery, steals water, and makes false marketing claims that have resulted in the deaths of millions of babies. Ivory Coast produces 45% of the total cocoa in the world. In 2021, eight former child slaves sued Nestle and several other companies for aiding and abetting the illegal forced labor of thousands of children on cocoa farms in their supply chains. Nestle has been accused of trying to cover this up by actively misleading the public and promising to phase out child labor, even though it hasn't to this day. Water is portrayed as a profit for Nestle, while being presented as a basic human right. In the United States, including Florida, Michigan, and California, concerns about Nestlé water extraction are described as “Nestless water pill fearing activities.” An example given is Strawberry Creek in California, where the company collects water as the region faces increasing droughts, water shortages, and devastating wildfires. The transcript also claims Nestle is exploiting groundwater in Pakistan, which recently went from water stress to water scarce. It notes that water levels in areas where Nestle began to produce its Pure Life water have sunk hundreds of meters, and Nestlé allegedly obtains it all for free. The company’s history with baby formula is characterized as a long-standing false claim that its baby formula is better than breast milk, which the transcript claims led to boycotts of Nestle in the United States and parts of Europe in the 1970s and 1980s, and similar accusations in Pakistan in the 1990s and then in China in the 2010s. The transcript claims Nestlé focused marketing on developing countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia during the 1970s, sending saleswomen dressed as nurses to convince mothers and paying doctors and hospitals to support these false claims, while neglecting to educate women about how to prepare the milk formula. It claims millions of babies died while the company made billions in revenue from its baby formula and continues to do so. In addition to being described as the largest global food and beverage company, Nestlé is alleged to be consistently named as one of the worst plastic polluters. Despite evidence pointing to the contrary, Nestlé’s website is said to boast a long-standing commitment to sustainability. The transcript also alleges that Coca-Cola, Donone, and Nestlé have been accused of falsely claiming that their plastic bottles are 100% recycled. It adds that two children died and dozens became seriously ill last year after eating contaminated pizza from a French brand owned by Nestlé; the company allegedly closed the factory and Nestlé was forced to pay compensation to dozens of victims of the Boynton pizza scandal. The transcript describes Nestlé’s corporate ties, including a 53.8% stake in Austin Investments, an Israeli food producer, and mentions Nestlé’s other investments and collaborations with Israel. It cites a 20% stake in L’Oréal. The familiar slogan Good food, good life is noted as part of Nestlé’s branding. But after all these examples, the transcript ends by asking: is that really so?

Pharmaceuticals like Ibuprofen, Caffeine, and Monocin are present in our drinking water, along with many others. A study by the Associated Press found drugs in the water of 24 major cities, affecting around 41 million Americans. The range of pharmaceuticals is vast, including epilepsy medication, mental health medicines, mood stabilizers, antibiotics, angina and heart drugs, cholesterol drugs, and even sex hormones. The issue lies in the fact that the federal government doesn't specifically test for pharmaceuticals in the water, and there is currently no method to remove them from treatment plants.

Pharmaceuticals like Ibuprofen, Caffeine, and Monocin are present in our drinking water, along with many others. A study conducted by the Associated Press found drugs in the water of 24 major cities out of 50 that were investigated. This means that approximately 41 million Americans are consuming these drugs through their water. The range of pharmaceuticals found is extensive, including epilepsy medication, mental health medicines, mood stabilizers, antibiotics, angina and heart drugs, cholesterol drugs, and even sex hormones. The issue lies in the fact that the federal government does not specifically test for pharmaceuticals in water, and there is currently no effective method to remove them from treatment plants.

Billions of people have received contaminated products, which should not have happened. If meat at the grocery store is found to have toxins, it is immediately recalled. However, vaccines with known contamination are being administered to billions of people worldwide. This was revealed through our reporting. It is concerning that these contaminated products are still available in the consumer marketplace. When a crib causes the death of two children or a tire leads to multiple accidents, they are taken off the market. Yet, intentionally adulterated vaccines with undisclosed gene sequences are still being sold.

Drinking water is contaminated with various substances, including painkillers, blood thinners, and chemotherapy drugs. This poses a public health crisis, with chemicals like PFAs found in 610 locations across the country, affecting around 19 million people. These chemicals can lead to over 100,000 cancer cases over a lifetime. The indestructible nature of these toxins makes tap water highly toxic. PFAs, also known as forever chemicals, stay in the body and are linked to cancer and birth defects. It is crucial to be aware of the dangers and consider alternatives to tap water.

Pharmaceuticals like Ibuprofen, Caffeine, and Monocin are present in our drinking water, along with many others. A study conducted by the Associated Press found drugs in the water of 24 major cities across the US, affecting around 41 million Americans. The range of pharmaceuticals discovered includes epilepsy medication, mental health medicines, mood stabilizers, antibiotics, heart and cholesterol drugs, and even sex hormones. The issue lies in the fact that the federal government does not specifically test for pharmaceuticals in water, and there is currently no effective method to remove them from treatment plants.

You should filter your water, especially if you live in an area where water is fluoridated. Check your municipality's water report or the Environmental Working Group (EWG) database by entering your ZIP code to see what contaminants are found and which exceed safe limits. The effectiveness of plastic water filter systems depends on the filter type. Some lower-end options don't remove fluoride or enough chemicals. Tap water can contain hormones, endocrine disruptors, pesticides, heavy metals, fluoride, and agricultural runoff, varying by location. There have been instances of high lead levels due to lead piping. It's important to be careful with water used for drinking and cooking.