TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. The UN has significant potential but has not been effectively managed, failing to resolve many ongoing conflicts. The primary purpose of the UN should be to assist in settling these disputes, and there is a need for improvement in its operations to fulfill this potential.

The World Health Organization has become a corrupt entity, heavily influenced by China. When the pandemic began, it covered for the Chinese Communist Party, leading to the termination of the U.S. relationship with the organization. The U.S. was paying nearly $500 million annually, while China contributed only $40 million. Joe Biden foolishly rejoined without negotiations and is now pushing a pandemic treaty that would undermine U.S. sovereignty. This treaty would require the U.S. to supply medical resources to other countries and promote censorship on public health matters. Under a future Trump administration, this treaty would be terminated, and the U.S. would withdraw from the WHO, which failed during COVID. A new coalition of nations focused on health and sovereignty would be established. Biden missed the chance to renegotiate a lower fee for WHO membership, opting instead for the higher cost.

The speaker raises concerns about a new convention on pandemic prevention and preparedness that would give the World Health Organization (WHO) more power. They argue that this would require a significant financial commitment from the US without proportional voting power. The convention would also require the US to give 20% of vaccines and pandemic-related products to the WHO, transfer intellectual property rights, and give the WHO a leading role in fighting misinformation. The speaker criticizes the WHO for its failure to detect the COVID-19 pandemic and accuses the Biden administration of considering joining the convention without Senate approval. They call for the amendment to be submitted to the Senate for review.

The speaker expresses concerns about the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty. They question the WHO's ability to learn from past mistakes and argue that giving the organization more power could lead to catastrophic errors. The speaker discusses the WHO's structure, funding, and influence, highlighting the role of external sources such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They criticize the WHO's reliance on private-public partnerships and claim that member states have limited input in decision-making. The speaker also raises concerns about the WHO's ability to define information and determine what is considered settled science. They emphasize the importance of considering the potential costs to democracy and individual freedoms.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight how the US paid a significant amount to the WHO while China paid much less. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and criticizes President Biden for rejoining without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies to other countries and censor free speech. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO, abolish and replace it, and form a new coalition of nations committed to health protection, sovereignty, and freedom. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the WHO deal for a lower cost.

The select subcommittee is examining the future of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States' relationship with it. The WHO, known for its role in eradicating smallpox and reducing polio cases, failed to serve all members equally during the COVID-19 pandemic. It prioritized politics over global public health, ignoring facts and echoing Chinese government statements. The WHO's lack of independent investigation allowed the pandemic to worsen. Reforms are needed to ensure transparency, verifiability, and accountability. The WHO should not be influenced by politics and must hold its members accountable. The United States should set the standard for best practices and ensure American interests are protected in any new international health regulations. The goal is to strengthen the WHO for the future.

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. While the UN has great potential, it is currently not meeting expectations and is poorly managed. Many conflicts remain unresolved, and the UN should be more effective in helping to settle these issues. The organization needs to improve its operations to fulfill its primary purpose.

Speaker 0 argues against the WHO International Health Regulations (IHR), calling it "a legally binding treaty that would basically put the entire world or any country that signs onto it under the emergency preparations that we saw the WHO direct the really disastrous pandemic emergency response." The rhetoric suggests emergencies would be run "just disastrously as the WHO ran it" with "them calling the shots, not individual sovereignty of our nation and our states." The speaker says, "Kennedy just said, we're done. We're not signing on to this. US rejects amendments to WHO international health regulations. So we're out of there." They add that "just last week, Kennedy stepped away from GAVI. That's Bill and Melinda Gates funded vaccine repository." The message: the US is pulling out of a lot of things, including the WHO "as soon as president Trump took office," though the segment ends with "But I want."

The speaker raises concerns about the World Health Organization's power to declare and maintain a public health emergency, issue legally binding recommendations, control information, and lack accountability. They argue that without open debate and differing opinions, there can be no science, democracy, legal proceedings, or justice. They emphasize that if one authority has predetermined results, there can be no proper scientific or decision-making process, nor any democracy. The speaker asserts that these issues violate international law and basic principles.

The World Health Organization has become a corrupt entity, influenced by China, especially during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. The United States was paying nearly $500 million annually, significantly more than China's contribution. I ended this relationship, but Biden rejoined without negotiations, pushing for a pandemic treaty that could compromise U.S. sovereignty and promote censorship on public health issues. Under my next administration, that treaty will be terminated, and the U.S. will withdraw from the WHO, which failed during the pandemic. I aim to create a new coalition focused on health while preserving national sovereignty. I had the opportunity to renegotiate a lower fee to rejoin the WHO, but Biden chose the higher amount. This is just one example of the many issues facing our country. Thank you.

It doesn't matter who comes before us as long as they support this administration and ignore your beliefs. If your views are fundamental, how do you reconcile that? President Trump tasked me with ending the chronic disease epidemic and making America healthy again. This is my primary focus at HHS. If we don't tackle this issue, all other discussions about healthcare funding are irrelevant. The U.S. has the highest chronic disease burden globally, and during COVID, we accounted for 16% of deaths despite having only 4.2% of the world’s population. The average American who died from COVID had multiple chronic diseases. This situation poses an existential threat to our economy, military, and overall well-being, making it a top priority for President Trump. If confirmed, I will address this challenge directly.

Hello, I'm Dr. Tess Lawrie. The World Health Organization's pandemic agreement is set to be finalized by November 11 and adopted in December. However, the WHO has failed its mission to ensure health for all, and its authority is questionable due to its COVID policies. Consider the WHO as a gang imposing rules on us, demanding compliance and silencing dissent. We have options: comply, plead for change, escape, or confront them. Negotiating with such entities is unlikely to succeed. It's time to inform the WHO that their agreements are irrelevant to us, the people. Thank you.

The speaker discusses the World Health Organization (WHO) and its current state. They believe that the WHO has lost its way and is attempting to gain power by declaring pandemics and imposing healthcare policies on member nations. The speaker plans to negotiate with the WHO and defund it if necessary. They criticize the WHO for being influenced by China, Davos, the pharmaceutical industry, and the big ag industry. The speaker believes that the WHO should focus on supporting local health clinics, agriculture, economic development, and clean water. They also express concerns about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, citing a study that shows girls who take the DTP vaccine are more likely to die from other causes. The speaker emphasizes the need for thorough testing and understanding of pharmaceutical products before mandating their use.

Two weeks ago, I signed an executive order announcing the United States' withdrawal from the W.H.O. This decision is due to the W.H.O.'s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global health crises. We declared a public health emergency of international concern. From the moment we detected viral pneumonia in Wuhan, we requested more information, activated emergency systems, alerted the world, convened global experts, and published comprehensive guidance for countries on protecting their populations and health systems. This all happened before the first death was reported in China on January 11, 2020. Many nations face economic difficulties, and the US announcement has intensified this situation.

The HHS Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is addressing controversial WHO amendments to international health regulations (IHR) that establish a framework for managing global public health events. The US is rejecting these amendments due to concerns about national sovereignty, as the regulations could grant an unelected international organization power over health emergencies, potentially leading to lockdowns and travel restrictions. The agreement bypasses the US Senate and employs broad language, enabling the WHO to implement unified public messaging, raising fears of censorship. Provisions regarding health IDs, vaccine passports, and a centralized medical database could lead to global medical surveillance. The WHO's failures during COVID, including its handling of China's actions, further fuel concerns. Rejecting the amendments aims to strengthen national autonomy and prevent a technocratic control system that uses health risks to curtail freedoms. While the regulations may have been written with good intentions, they represent a step in the wrong direction. This rejection is not a rejection of international cooperation, but a commitment to protecting civil liberties, the Constitution, and American sovereignty.

The WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty gives the WHO excessive power, potentially undermining America's interests. We must prevent President Biden from signing it to protect our constitution and sovereignty. Research this issue and stand against international bureaucrats and their Davos allies. We, the people, still hold the power to resist.

The WHO's new treaty and amendments are causing concern as they could potentially seize governing powers during a pandemic. This unelected body, funded by billionaires, could dictate when people can leave their homes, wear masks, and receive mRNA shots. It is seen as undemocratic and not in the best interest of the people. The United States government proposed changes to the treaty, but most were withdrawn due to public outrage. However, the WHO continues to pursue their agenda, finding alternative methods to achieve their goals.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. The WHO's reform process, initiated after the COVID-19 crisis, aims to bring significant changes that will affect all 194 member states. They are proposing a pandemic treaty that would give them authority over health decisions and the power to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. Critics argue that the WHO has failed in the past and should not be granted more power. The treaty is set to be voted on in May 2024, and citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to oppose it.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight how the US paid a significant amount to the WHO while China paid much less. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and criticizes Joe Biden for reentering without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies and promote censorship. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO and replace it with a new coalition of nations committed to health and sovereignty. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the WHO deal for a lower cost.

An unelected body like WHO, controlled by multibillionaires, should never act in place of a democratically elected government. Any government that supports WHO's power grab is anti-democratic and shows contempt for the people. The speaker vows to expose and name anyone who disrespects democracy, including government officials and parliament members. Elections are coming up, and the people deserve to know who is responsible for abolishing democracy. The speaker, along with seven brave citizens and millions around the world, will fight against WHO every step of the way. They are the majority, and WHO is the minority. They will bring WHO down and won't stop until they succeed. The fight is on.

The World Health Organization is allegedly attempting a global power grab to become a global ministry of health with divisions like the FDA and CDC. The WHO's definition of health encompasses every area of life, including climate, animals, and the environment via "One Health." According to the speaker, the head of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, considers climate change, racism, and gun violence to be public health emergencies. If these are public health emergencies, every area of life would fall under the WHO's control. The WHO adopted amendments to the international health regulations and intends to push through an international pandemic treaty by the end of the year or May 2025. They will allegedly continue until humanity says no.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight that the US paid almost $500 million to the WHO while China paid only $40 million. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and accuses Joe Biden of reentering without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies to other countries and censor free speech. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO, abolish and replace it, and form a new coalition of nations committed to health and sovereignty. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the deal with the WHO for a lower cost.

As president, it is your duty to protect the health, freedom, and sovereignty of the people. If you want more information on why many people, including myself, have been against the power grabs by the WHO, feel free to reach out to us. Look into the World Council for Health's policy rejecting a monopoly over global public health and the work done by Children's Health Defense. It is important to exercise the right to referendum, otherwise politicians may become irrelevant, not just through the WHO, but also the United Nations. These organizations are seeking authority over global emergency shocks. Politicians need to prioritize the interests and self-determination of the people to maintain their relevance in a democratic country.

This morning, the United Nations approved a political declaration on pandemic prevention. In May 2024, the WHO will have a final vote on international agreements behind closed doors. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

I expressed skepticism towards the World Health Organization's ability to handle a global pandemic due to past errors and conflicts of interest. While we can assist other countries, we must not give up our sovereignty or agree to a lockdown charter. In emergencies, governments may feel pressured to make harmful decisions. Therefore, I believe that no pandemic treaty is preferable to a flawed one.