reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"The Canaanite Arabs have inhabited the land of Palestine since prehistoric eras, meaning the era before reading and writing." "Archaeological evidence, including farming tools dating back to a time when the Jews were not originally present, suggests that there were inhabitants who preceded all others in living on this land." "Life in Palestine reached the city state stage at the beginning of the Bronze Age, 3,200 BCE, 2,000 hounds BCE, marked by the presence of settled communities, houses, farms, and stability." "It was called the Gurab civilization, as archaeological excavations have confirmed." "During this time, trade and industry thrived, and bronze and metals were smelted." "According to the Torah narratives, the Israelis, led by Moses, came to Palestine from Egypt during the period approximately between fifteen hundred BCE to fourteen sixty BCE according to the most prevalent accounts." "Then Joshua, the son of Nun, led them to Jericho."

We discovered children's bodies in mass graves, raising questions about why they were there. This indicates a genocide by the Israeli occupation, with over 14,000 children killed, making up 40% of Gaza's total martyrs. Some bodies showed signs of torture, with hands tied using belts or fabric, suggesting civilians were mistreated by Israeli soldiers.

Ghislain Maxwell's father, a Mossad spy, named his company Pergamon Press. Pergamon, referenced in old religious scriptures, is known as Satan's throne, where human sacrifices to gods like Bal, Moloch, and Zeus occurred. He also acquired McGraw Hill textbooks in 1989, influencing education through a company named after Satan's throne. Growing up in this environment, it seemed normal, though I've blocked out many memories. There were rituals involving baby sacrifices. Some people would breed babies, concealing pregnancies by being overweight or going away and returning later. Other Jewish families are also involved in similar practices. Many people are now aware of these activities.

This site, known as Babadrah, is believed to be the ancient city of Sodom mentioned in the Bible. Excavations revealed a layer of ash and burned remains, including human bones and pottery, indicating a destructive fire. The presence of sulfur balls further supports the biblical account of the city's destruction. If these sulfur balls had landed on land, they would have caused widespread fires, but if they had fallen into the Dead Sea, they would have been extinguished and preserved. The speaker, who has spent years studying the biblical world, finds that the more they explore and excavate these sites, the more they see a clear connection between the biblical accounts and the archaeological evidence.

Some Popes rejected the legend of ritual murder, while others embraced it. Here in the Austrian Tyrol, a Catholic church displays the remains of Anderol of Rhin. He was a child canonized in 1755 by a papal bull. The claim is that Jews killed the child in a Passover ritual. There was a Jewish sect who drank children's blood. This is a fact.

The speaker revisits the notion of Jewish involvement in human sacrifice, challenging the common assumption that the Abraham-and-Isaac episode ended all such practices for Jews. The argument presented is that evidence suggests human sacrifice was sometimes practiced by Jews in ancient and medieval times, including children burned in pits called toffet, with drums used to muffle cries, particularly among Jews in Carthage around three hundred years before Christ who worshipped Baal. The speaker notes that similar reports persist in various periods and places, including assertions that during a battle in Syracuse nearly five hundred children were thrown into a burning toffet as an offering to Baal, and that children were placed in the arms of a bronze bull with a furnace below and then burned. The term holocaust is invoked as describing the act, with the speaker claiming that, in older dictionaries, holocaust referred to the burning of children as sacrifice to deities, though modern usage has shifted. Ancient historians such as Apion, Democritus, and Poseidonius are cited as describing Jewish ritual murder. Appian allegedly reported in 168 BCE that an intended victim, an adult, was found at a Jewish temple and that a ritual was enacted annually involving kidnapping a Greek foreigner, slaying him, consuming his flesh, and swearing hostility against the Greeks, with remains cast into a pit. Flavius Josephus is contrasted with Appian; Thackeray’s translation of Josephus recounts a Greek man abducted and brought to the temple, who explains a “one unutterable law of the Jews” involving kidnapping, ritual slaughter, and blood use. The account claims numerous later authorities described ritual murder of Christians during Purim, including Socrates Scholasticus and Baronius. It mentions a Gentile child crucified or slain by Jews in various chronicles (Imistar, Kiev, Treviso, Magdeburg, and England), with specific cases: a boy named William in England (documented by Thomas of Monmouth), whose blood supposedly produced miraculous effects; the boy’s murder was cited as a crusading cause against Jewish communities, culminating in William’s canonization as a saint. The speaker cites Thomas’s Latin account, later translated, of abduction, torture, and the bribes given to sheriffs, and claims William’s case helped alert English parents. The narrative continues with the notion that a converted Jew, Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that Jews took blood annually from Christians to obtain freedom and return to Palestine, with lots drawn to determine the blood source. Other cases cited include a December incident in Kissingen, Bavaria; Hugh in London; Isaac de Pouley in Oxford; Trent in 1475 (Simon), where children were punctured with marks, circumcision mentioned, and a saintly martyrdom recorded by Beatus Andreas. Luther’s remarks on “the Jews and their lies” are cited, noting accusations of poisoning wells and mutilation. Additional episodes include Christopher in 1492 Spain and Isabella I’s edict expelling Jews (with later reconsideration in 1967), Prague in 1502, Pona in Lithuania 1574, Lublin and Kutnia in 1598, and broader counts by Montague Summers and others of hundreds of alleged historic ritual murders and the use of blood for magical purposes. The speaker ties these anecdotes to a pattern of medieval and early modern allegations of ritual murder against Jews, asserted across multiple cities and centuries.

Archaeologist McAllister unearthed a Canaanite high place at Gezer, finding 12 standing stones, an altar, and disturbing evidence of child sacrifice. His excavation report detailed pits filled with human bones, including a young girl sawn in half, decapitated skulls, and infant skeletons in jars, many showing burn marks. McAllister interpreted these finds using the Bible, identifying the site as Amorite, referencing Exodus and Deuteronomy to support his conclusions about child sacrifice to Moloch. Kathleen Kenyon found similar evidence at Jericho, also suggesting infant sacrifice. McAllister viewed the child sacrifice as evidence of the Amorites' iniquity, aligning with biblical condemnations. Modern interpretations of the Gezer site downplay the sacrificial evidence, suggesting the stones were for alliances, omitting the burned remains. This shift reflects a secular view that contradicts the biblical narrative. The speakers equate this ancient child sacrifice with modern abortion, arguing that humanity's inherent sinfulness necessitates a divine solution, referencing Jesus' sacrifice. They cite Rahab as an example of an Amorite saved by faith.

The transcript presents a highly charged panorama of allegations about Jewish ritual murder, arguing that the accusation is not merely anti-Jewish propaganda but a recurring alleged reality with deep historical roots. It frames ritual murder as a long-standing practice attributed to some extremist Jews, despite frequent Jewish denial, and it asserts that “blood libel” has persisted through centuries as a response to perceived Jewish malfeasance. Key claims and sequence of events cited: - The video contends that Jewish ritual sacrifice is an ancient practice accused of by various observers, and that some researchers faced labels of anti-Semitism even when reporting what they found. It suggests that, for many, the blood libel persists because the crimes are said to involve extreme cruelty and covert concealment by Jews worldwide. - It notes that many historians acknowledge that human sacrifice occurred in various cultures, such as the Aztecs, India’s sati, and other groups, but argues that the focus here is on Jews and “Jewish ritual murder,” or blood libel, as a distinctive phenomenon with global reach. - The narrative recounts a series of historical incidents and alleged cases across Europe and elsewhere, presenting them as evidence of a pattern of ritual murder by Jews: - Carthaginian practices around 300 BCE involving tophet pits, child sacrifice to Baal, and the term holocaust historically used by Jews for such sacrifices. - Medieval and early modern episodes in various countries (e.g., England, Prague, Kiev, Magdeburg, Munich, Venice, Trent, Rin, Moristica, Oxford, and others) where children were allegedly ritually murdered, their blood consumed or used in occult rites, and where church or state authorities purportedly punished or condemned the perpetrators. - The Damascus Affair (mid-19th century) and subsequent allegations about the extraction and use of Christian blood in ritual contexts, including debates over the interpretation of Talmudic practices and the controversy surrounding blood in Passover rituals. - The Mary Fagan case in Atlanta, the Leo Frank case (early 20th century United States), and other European episodes (e.g., Andrei Yushinsky in Kiev, 1911) described as ritual murder or occult killings, with claims of biased or compromised investigations and trials. - The transcript also recounts later allegations connected to the 20th century, including supposed multi-generational testimonies (e.g., Oprah’s 1989 show featuring a Jewish survivor, Rachel, who claimed a family lineage of ritual murder) and other international rumors and supposed investigations. - It references a body of literature and figures to support the claim that ritual murder is real or historically documented, including works by Arnold Lees, Thackeray’s Josephus translations, Montague Summers, Vladimir Dahl, and various jurists, church figures, and historians who are said to have described or endorsed these acts. - The narrative asserts that some Jews allegedly used funds and legal maneuvers to suppress or dismiss accusations, including the existence of a “slush fund” to defend against blood libel charges, and claims that media control and political influence were used to stifle discussion or investigations. - It makes a provocative claim about the nomenclature and symbolism of ritual acts, including alleged associations with Sephirothic imagery, the Hebrew letter shin, and other Kabbalistic interpretations, tying these to alleged ritual wounds and occult meanings. - The transcript provocatively juxtaposes episodes tied to Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah with alleged killings, presenting these holidays as contexts for criminal acts and asserting that “the crimes” often occurred around Jewish holy days. - It concludes with warnings and statistics about missing children in the United States (quoting FBI figures) and urges vigilance regarding children during Jewish holidays, presenting a narrative of ongoing danger and conspiratorial guardianship by Jews over public discourse and law enforcement. - Throughout, it asserts that while some deny these claims or label them as antisemitic, there are numerous citations, historical episodes, and purported testimonies that supposedly corroborate ritual murder as a real, ongoing phenomenon, and it treats such accusations as frequently covered up or dismissed by Jewish interests. The overall thrust is to portray Jewish ritual murder as a historically documented, globally pervasive crime that has been concealed or minimized by Jewish communities and sympathetic institutions, while leveraging various historical episodes, scholarly names, and sensational anecdotes to argue for the continued relevance and reality of the claim. It closes with cautions to monitor children during Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah.

Speaker 0 argues that the Temple Of Baal in Syria is more than crumbled stone; it is a haunting reminder of a dark side of a previous civilization. He notes a castle on a cliff next to the site, claiming it has been melted into sand and suggesting both structures were built by the same group in the same period. He asserts that the Temple Of Baal was found in 32 AD, and that the site is inaccessible today due to war, which he views as a tactic to hide history. He contends the Temple and the castle were constructed around the same time, framing the location as an old world city or palace city, not thousands of years ago but closer to our timeline, largely destroyed to look older. Speaker 0 mentions Tadmer Castle, listed as a world heritage site in danger in 2013 because of the Syrian civil war. He states the castle was captured by ISIS in 2015 and recaptured in 2016. He describes ISIS retreating and blowing up parts of the castle, including the stairway, causing extensive damage. He claims the arch near the site was demolished in 2015 and asserts it was an attack on true history to obscure what happened there. He notes Palmyra and the Damascus Gate in the vicinity and argues the history presented by mainstream sources is a lie, pointing to an “advanced group” that left behind technology and construction that mainstream narratives hide. Speaker 0 rejects the idea that the Temple Of Baal and surrounding structures were built thousands of years ago. He speculates that a higher level of civilization was present in the last few hundred years and that their work remains visible today, with attempts to destroy or blur the past. He cites the Temple Of Baal as one of the most important temples in the ancient Near East and references Baal worship in modern Syria, clay tablets, and biblical mentions. He presents archaeological excavations at ancient Baal worship sites, including Palmyra, as evidence that sacrificial activity occurred, challenging the notion that such myths are purely mythical. He notes bones and texts confirming ritual activity and questions why such evidence would be hidden if myths were the whole story. Speaker 0 discusses a location about 200 miles from the Temple Of Baal where tablets and artifacts were unearthed in 1929, including the Ball Cycle, a collection of epic poems related to Baal worship. He emphasizes the discovery of 1,000 tablets and suggests there may be more, with many stories hidden beneath the surface. He claims the site has been affected by conflict, making the extent of damage to tablets unclear, and asserts that authorities downplay or conceal information to maintain the mainstream narrative. He contrasts the focus on pottery with reports of royal palaces, high priests’ libraries, and temples, arguing that more significant finds were suppressed or underreported. Speaker 0 invites viewers to consider what other stories might be found beneath the surface, pointing to the Ball Cycle and the alleged opposite practices under churches. He stresses that the past, including the old world, is not Mythical in his view, and he promises to continue the investigation in future episodes. He closes by urging viewers to remember the pottery as a possible distraction from more substantial discoveries, and he signs off with anticipation for further exploration.

The discussion centers on the idea that a set of nonhuman forces have long purportedly manipulated humanity. It references the Nag Hammadi library, noting that a fifth of its documents describe archons, Greek for rulers, as a nonhuman presence manipulating humans. The entities’ devil figure is identified as the Demiurge or Yaldabaoth. The conversation then brings in Krayta Mutwa, a Zulu shaman from South Africa, who allegedly describes legends and accounts of a nonhuman force taking a reptilian form and manipulating human society. The speakers assert that this same theme appears globally. The topic then moves to ancient history, where it is claimed that ancients performed sacrificial rituals to these gods, especially sacrificing children. The question raised is what the gods gain from these sacrifices. The implication advanced is that today’s wealthy elites participate in satanic rituals to these same gods, a pattern the speaker connects to documented cases such as footage from Bohemian Grove, associated with figures like George W. Bush, and claims that royal families, including the British and Dutch royal families, are major players in this “satanic ritual culture.” The conversation then ties these practices to the broader concept of feeding on human energy. The speaker references the first Matrix movie where Morpheus presents humans as batteries in a computer-generated dream world, using this as a metaphor to suggest that the gods feed off human energy. It is claimed that the gods or entities feed off a particular type of human energy generated by emotions and thoughts, with scientists purportedly having determined frequencies associated with different emotions. The speakers also discuss how people can sense energy in environments, such as feeling a “bad energy” in a room, or in a house with a history of dark events. They describe how individuals involved in negative actions emit a vibe, which can influence others unless the frequency is changed. The overarching claim is that these energies or frequencies are the driving force behind the interactions with these ancient and modern powers, tying together ancient sacrifices, modern satanic rituals, and the science of emotional frequencies.

The debate over Carthaginian child sacrifice to Moloch is fueled by archaeological and historical evidence. The deity is associated with child sacrifice, depicted as a bronze statue with a bull's head. Freemasonry's origins and Carthaginian rituals are linked to Moloch worship. French excavations at Carthage in 1923 found evidence supporting Greek and Roman accounts of infant sacrifices. The practice was carried out by the wealthy elite. Despite the horror of the cult of Moloch, it remains a mystery how Hillary Clinton is aware of it. Translation: The discussion about Carthaginian child sacrifices to Moloch is based on archaeological and historical evidence. Moloch is connected to child sacrifice and depicted as a bronze statue with a bull's head. Freemasonry's origins and Carthaginian rituals are associated with Moloch worship. French excavations in Carthage in 1923 found evidence supporting Greek and Roman accounts of infant sacrifices. The practice was carried out by the wealthy elite. Despite the horror of the cult of Moloch, it remains a mystery how Hillary Clinton is aware of it.

Do you remember when 360 children described ritual abuse through secret tunnels? And after everyone was acquitted, archaeologists found the tunnels? In 1983, children at McMartin preschool in Manhattan Beach made allegations. Not vague claims. 360 children, consistent descriptions taken through underground passages to hidden rooms photographed, rituals, multiple perpetrators, medical evidence documented abuse, seven year trial, longest in US history. All defendants acquitted. Media declared it satanic panic, proof children fabricate abuse through suggestion. Then archaeologist e Gary Stickle excavated the demolished site. He found hand dug tunnel systems beneath the preschool, entrance points where children described them, exit locations matching testimony. He published his findings, but McMartin remained the definitive false allegation case, raises which one question, if children fabricated the tunnels through suggestion, why did archaeologists find them exactly where children said they'd be?

There is a dark matter still in the world today: human ritual sacrifice, an ancient practice, and it has been something for which Jewish extremists have often been accused throughout time. Understandably, many people are skeptical of this bizarre accusation that has the Jewish people for at least two thousand years. After all, why would fanatical Jews in the past and perhaps even to this very day commit human sacrifice? Many people do not like to even think about the topic, believing it to be pure anti-Jewish propaganda. Likewise, the Jews themselves are quick to say that such claims are lies handed down through the centuries. However, there are two sides to this issue. One side believes Jewish ritual murder is not merely anti-Jewish propaganda, but a fact that has had a terrible impact on society since it began. Perhaps some viewers may doubt what is uncovered in this video, but an honest glimpse into this matter may make you think. Likewise, an in-depth and fair examination will make most skeptics into true believers. It is true that many of the people who conducted research into these matters were branded by Jews with the epithet of anti-Semite. A term used by Jews to stifle discussion on any topic that criticizes them. Certainly, however, if someone who is branded an anti-Semite by Jews says the sky appears blue on a sunny day, is it any less blue just because the so-called anti-Semite said it was? This is usually the case with respect to these matters. While some people who investigated these matters were really anti-Semites, it was the fact that human sacrifice was practiced by Jews that caused many of these people to become anti-Semites. After uncovering the secret among the Jewish cult in times past, how could a Gentile feel otherwise? After all it is not the anti-Semite who commits the foul act of human sacrifice, now commonly referred to as Jewish ritual murder. Yet Jews sought to make the Gentiles who reported these crimes appear worse than the Jews who committed them. Most historians know and admit that human sacrifice has occurred in the past amongst various sects. The Aztecs’ blood-stained temples attest to this. Many innocents met their fate that way with their hearts plucked from their bodies. The practice called in India where women would sacrifice themselves in flames is still practiced today in obscure parts where some of India's 1,000,000,000 mostly Hindus live. In Mexico, even just a few years ago, a strange cult was uncovered that had sacrificed many people, including American college student Mark Kilroy. The same is true of Africa and various parts of South America today. If you merely comb the Internet, you’ll realize that, yes, there are some groups who still engage in barbaric practices such as human sacrifice. So what are the facts about the Jews? Have they also engaged in such terrible acts in the past? And could there be some proven sect amongst Jews, extremists no doubt, who to this very day still commit the wicked crime of ritual murder. Most Jews have asked about ritual murder will vehemently deny any knowledge of it, of course. And they’re probably telling you the truth. If there are Jewish hate mongers who engage in these acts and there is strong evidence to indicate such, it is probably only a small number of them. So if this is indeed the case, one question still remains. What makes these crimes stand apart from other cruel acts committed by man against man in the past? The answer to this question is not a pretty one. Based on numerous reports from the past to modern times, the main difference is the degree of cruelty. Reports say children sacrificed in Jewish occult rights were tortured to death in the most cruel and heartless ways imaginable. After the ceremony, Jews reportedly dried the child’s blood, often absorbing it into paper, for their various occult rights. Aside from claims of Jewish ritual murder being carried out in an extremely vicious manner, there’s one other difference that sets this crime apart from others. When such crimes are uncovered, not only the local Jewish groups, but Jews from all over the entire world seek to conceal it. In the past, Jews have even set aside a special fund to cover up such acts. However, by doing this they become as a police might say, an accessory after the fact. From time to time, there have been brave and honest Jews who would deviate from their kinsfolk and admit to the truth of these crimes. While such honesty was not common amongst Jews, it still occurred on occasions. For this reason alone, indictment against all Jews cannot be made. Indeed, some Jews, young and old, have admitted these crimes in front of court, written about them in books, discussed them in debates, and so forth. For the most part, however, Jews typically deny such accusations. They have even developed a phrase for this type of accusation, blood libel. This term is often used as a rallying cry amongst Jewish groups.

Children in various instances have described cannibalism as part of a ritual, where hearts and flesh were consumed. They also mentioned drinking urine, human blood, and feces as part of the ritual. One person shared their experience of having their arm cut open and their blood mixed with wine and urine for a ceremony to Satan. Cremation was witnessed by most children, possibly explaining the lack of bodies found. Police have not made connections between these testimonies and the disposal of bodies, as one youngster described how bodies were placed in trash bags and cremated in a hidden location.

A speaker expresses a desire to visit Israel and says it’s well worth going, but notes you should go with a mission. The mission described is to explore remarkable discoveries in biblical archaeology that connect biblical narratives to history, thousands of years after they appeared in the Bible. The speaker asks what best exemplifies archaeology bringing someone from scripture into history. The standout example is Pontius Pilate. For two thousand years he existed in the Bible with no extra-biblical verification. While digging in Caesarea Maritima, a stone tablet was uncovered mentioning Pontius Pilate, “prefect of Israel,” and also “prefect of Judah.” The speaker emphasizes that the tablet provides the exact title used for Pilate in the Bible and clearly identifies him as Rome’s man in Israel. This discovery, the speaker notes, makes Pontius Pilate an accepted historical figure.

Speaker 0 presents the view that great academies of the rabbis were established, thousands of new laws formulated, and that the Pharisees who killed Jesus Christ remained the rulers of Judaism. He asserts that in Babylon the Pharisees codified oral traditions into the Babylonian Talmud, which he claims reveals Israel’s apostasy and supports Christ’s descriptions of the Pharisees as hypocritical and malignant. He cites a Talmud passage in Treatise Sanhedrin claiming a Pharisee may kill indirectly, giving an example where binding a neighbor leads to starvation and liability is avoided. He contends the Pharisees manipulated Romans to kill Christ, arguing Romans were the direct cause of Christ’s death but the Pharisees claimed Romans as the guilty party. He states Christ called Pharisees adulterers and that the Talmud provides “loopholes” for adultery, providing examples such as exceptions for sex with a minor or a heathen’s wife, and endorses seduction of unwed adolescent girls described as designated bond maids. He emphasizes death penalties differ for natural versus perverse sexual acts, alleging that rape in a perverted form falls outside legal jurisdiction, and claims sexual perversion was a long-standing practice in Babylon. Speaker 1 continues by noting three major Talmudic treatises contain passages endorsing the seduction and marriage of three-year-old girls, with Simeon Ben Yohai among prominent rabbis upholding this privilege. He states that in Israel today, many venerate Simeon Ben Yohai. He quotes Simeon Ben Yohai and the great Raba approving intercourse with a little girl under three years and a day, comparing virginity to tears returning to a little girl, and asserts the same section covers sexual activity with small boys. He adds that the Good Samaritan story portrays Pharisees as racial bigots, unwilling to respond to a non-Jew’s suffering. He notes that God’s command to the Canaanites was harsh and that by New Testament times, separation and the sword had become obsolete, with God no longer making racial distinctions. Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss Gentile status in the Talmud and Jewish encyclopedias, claiming the Talmud’s critical attitudes toward Gentiles, including that Gentiles are not men but barbarians, lack legal rights, and that a Gentile’s suit in Jewish courts favors the defendant if the plaintiff is Jewish. They claim Christians are curses within the Talmudic framework, that Jesus is portrayed as a bastard, and that Gentiles face death for Sabbath observance or for providing testimony in a Jewish court. They assert that the Talmud equips Jews with an ethic fostering bigotry, isolation, and persecution, leading to the expulsion of Jews from Babylon to the West by the eleventh century. Speaker 2 reframes as a positive counterpoint: the tradition of Talmudic questioning, continuous inquiry, and a culture of learning that never ends, which exploded when the walls of the ghetto fell, and remains part of contemporary Jewish culture. Speaker 3 declares solidarity with Israel, insisting “Israel’s fight is our fight,” vowing unity and resistance to anti-Semitism, and asserting they will not be discouraged, defeated, or silent. Speaker 4 interjects with a hostile confrontation, expressing willingness to “kill Christ again,” accusing Jews of killing Jesus, and making violent threats toward a pastor and others; a rabbi’s circumcision practice is described graphically as supportive of Talmudic Judaism, followed by a denunciation aimed at Christian Zionists.

Speaker 0 argues that what is happening in Gaza is a ritual sacrifice. She notes that Israel is besieging and bombarding Gaza and acknowledges disturbing videos seen on social media, but contends that the truth is far more disturbing than the common description of events. She claims that throughout human history, civilizations have practiced ritual sacrifice before war, citing the Aztecs (temples with thousands of human skulls and mass murder of enemies in public) and the Phoenicians/Carthaginians (child sacrifice), with Romans also practicing human sacrifice by parading enemies through Rome and then strangling them at the Temple of Jupiter after a triumph. She states that this is sacrifice, though not always labeled as such. The central question she raises is why such sacrifices occurred in these civilizations and why, she says, Israel is doing something similar in Gaza today. She emphasizes that 47% of Gaza’s population is 18 years old, so the majority of those killed are children, calling this a striking and blatant aspect of the situation. She asserts that the world can clearly see what is happening in Gaza, and that the Israelis seemingly want the world to hate them. She notes widespread protests around the world against Israel’s actions in Palestine and argues that if Israel wanted to achieve its aims, there would be more effective, secret methods (for example, poisoning water or air to cause cancers), which could eliminate Gaza’s population over 20–30 years without public discussion. Instead, she claims, Israel chooses to do this openly to provoke global outrage. The speaker contends that this is intentional, designed to create the ultimate taboo—disgust and contention that unite the world against Israel. She connects this to a belief in extreme forms of Jewish eschatology, suggesting that some in the Israeli government want to accelerate an end-times scenario in which Israel fights the entire world with God’s help. She uses a Chinese military analogy: fighting with a river behind your back, where forcing an army to retreat to a dangerous river leads to a surge of energy to destroy the enemy. She equates the river to the taboo of killing children, arguing that there is no exit for Israel—either they go all the way or the world destroys them. She concludes by noting that online, this narrative is circulating globally and causing trouble everywhere.

Speaker 0 discusses Cypress’s Tombs of the Kings as part of a large necropolis on the island, describing it as a UNESCO site and a discovery first reported in 1783 with archaeology beginning in 1870. The speaker notes that this is not just “tombs of the kings” but a vast necropolis from the old world, with the implication that it reveals an advanced previous civilization still located beneath modern life. They claim that through extensive research and exposure, people can conclude that these sites are "right underneath our feet" and connected to many other necropolises across Cyprus. The narration emphasizes a pattern: excavations in the 19th century, with skepticism about earlier historical accounts, and asserts that many details about the tombs were lost over time. The speaker contends that the tombs were rich in expensive goods and old-world technology, and accuses mainstream narratives of grave robbers and cover-ups, claiming that bodies have been removed or lost due to looting or destructive restoration practices of the 19th century. They allege that remains have been taken for study or looting, leaving only a few intact burials today, and that the sites are often left inaccessible or destroyed to protect a narrative. The speaker highlights that adjacent to the Tombs of the Kings are catacombs and other necropolises, including a Western Necropolis, and argues they are interconnected. They point out that many catacombs repurposed as Christian places of worship undermine the notion that these were solely ancient burial sites. The claim is made that access is restricted next to the Salamis Necropolis and that information and mapping of the underground network are not provided to the public, suggesting that the network is much larger than publicly acknowledged. There is a repeated assertion that the “old world” civilization existed and that the pottery explanation for finds is a front to conceal what was discovered. The Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974 is cited as having led to greater looting of the Salamis Necropolis, with artifacts allegedly smuggled out during and after the conflict. The speaker connects Cyprus’s necropolises with other regional sites, including Palmyra in Syria, claiming proximity and interconnected significance and asserting that these sites reveal a true history that contradicts standard education. The episode repeatedly argues for full transparency and public access to excavations from start to finish, accusing authorities of protecting or preserving a narrative rather than the actual past. The speaker mentions that the necropolis excavations began in the 1950s for some sites and ties ongoing looting and restricted access to broader patterns observed in other “old world” sites. They conclude by noting that thousands of individuals were originally buried there and indicate anticipation for episode 111 next Saturday, promising further revelations about the ancient network and its looted heritage.

Speaker 0: The Hypogeum in Paola, Malta, is described as an enormous subterranean structure excavated 4,524 years ago, with huge limestone blocks removed. It was discovered in 1902 during house construction, which blocked the public for nearly a decade. It reportedly contained about 7,000 elongated skulls, many destroyed and the rest hidden from the public. The speaker notes that some underground chambers appear to imitate above-ground megalithic temple architecture, with false bays and underground windows. A ceiling features one ring of carved stone overhanging the one below, allegedly to imitate a roof. The speaker questions whether the structure was originally underground or came from above ground and was buried during an event, possibly killing thousands inside. He asserts the mainstream view is that it was a burial site, while the speaker posits that people were killed on the spot or trapped underground, with bodies piled rather than buried separately, suggesting a catastrophic event that melted structures globally and reshaped civilizations. Speaker 0 then states they revisited the Hypogeum of the Valle dei Famili (Valumnus) in Italy, noting about 200 tombs and a 1840 discovery. The excavation uncovered a site used into the first century BC, with 10 rooms and two winged demons guarding the entrance. He points out urns with painted scenes, including griffins, and argues that the griffin imagery links to Tartaria and Greek mythology, asserting that much of this history has been removed or hidden. A photo shows items behind a wall prior to modern changes; he claims that items were removed from the site between 1839 and today, suggesting ongoing suppression of evidence. Speaker 0 highlights an underground complex near Palmyra, Syria, the Temple of Baal, and a castle on a cliff—arguing that the area contains massive stone structures, hundreds of columns, and a temple the size of the Great Pyramid, with a perimeter roughly half a mile. He notes a mosque or palace-like complex nearby, and references the destruction and removal of the arch and other structures by modern groups, claiming that these actions suppress true history. He mentions the Baal Temple was allegedly found in 32 AD, though war zones have prevented access and exploration. He cites the Temple of Baal as being built on a tell, layering past civilizations, with the nth-century destruction of the post-classical elements—they allege the site had advanced construction and technology. Speaker 0 asserts that Palmyra’s temple complex was judged by mainstream narratives as centuries old, while the speaker believes it is much younger and part of an extensive old-world city evidence. He points to the Temple of Baal, the Temple of Baal Shemin, and the Taimer (Tadmur) Castle on UNESCO’s danger list in 2013 due to the Syrian civil war; ISIS captured it in 2015, recaptured in 2016, and the stairway was blown up in 2015, with plans to rebuild the arch denied by the speaker. He repeats the view that the old world had advanced technology and that the public has been misled, with the pottery focus being a deliberate decoy. He also references the Baal Cycle tablets—the ball cycle—found in 1929, claiming thousands of tablets reveal more than pottery, including royal palaces, high priests’ libraries, and texts about Baal’s rituals and offerings. Speaker 0 closes by suggesting that the true history lies beneath our feet, with a hidden past shaped by an advanced civilization violently erased or relocated, and that the current timeline is a fabrication designed to obscure what truly happened in the last few hundred years. Speaker 1 comments on the beauty of the cities and the impossibility of rebuilding them as they were, reinforcing the notion of lost grandeur.

The transcript compiles a series of alleged ritual murder cases and accompanying commentary stretching from the 17th to the early 20th centuries, presenting a continuous thread of accusations against Jews in various European locales and times. - 1663, Kakao, Poland: Rabbi Matatia Kallahora was believed to have murdered a gentile child for his Jewish occult rights; he was tried, convicted, and executed. - 1669, near Metz, France: writes doctor Dahl, the Jew Levi kidnapped a baby, later found dead in the forest; the guilty man was put to death. The case details are described in a small French book, A Summary of the Trial Against the Jews in Metz in 1670. - 1619, Belarus: Jews reportedly murdered a young child named Gavril in a ritualistic fashion; in 1997, Belarusian television produced a documentary about the murder. - 1753, Markova, Vonitsa (in the area of present-day Greece/Ukraine borderlands): Gittomura promulgated on Friday, April 20, 1753; in the village of Markova, Vonitsa, Jews allegedly called three-year-old Stefan Struditsky and carried him away. - On Sunday, the Jews gathered in a house, blindfolded the child, closed his mouth with pincers, and then, while holding the child in a tub, pricked him from all sides with sharp nails, moving him to extract as much blood as possible. After the child’s death, the corpse was carried to a forest and found the next day. By obvious evidence, the Jewesses Brine and Frutza, without torment, confessed to involvement; their husbands were exposed by them. Other men were implicated and subjected to torture; these others confessed and detailed the crime, and the Jews involved were executed. A picture of the corpse was drawn, showing the pricked body, kept safe with the archbishop of Lvov. - 1791, Tasnad, Hungary: Jews were accused of ritually murdering a gentile boy; one of the Jews’ children admitted having seen the event. - 1797, Gelats, Romania: a child was allegedly ritually murdered by Jews. - 19th century: explorer and linguist Sir Richard Francis Burton wrote a manuscript called Human Sacrifice Amongst the Sephardim or Eastern Jews. Some of his manuscript was obtained by Jews and published as The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam. In this book, Burton notes that in 1825, the Jews of Beirut made a way with Fatala Sayyid, an Alpine Mohammedan. - 1829, Hama: the Jews of Hama murdered a Mohammedan girl and were expelled from the city. - 1839, Beirut: a Jewish-owned flask of blood passed through the customs house of Beirut. - 1840, Damascus: one of the most notorious modern ritual murders occurred when a Catholic priest named Father Thomas was ritually murdered. Burton’s original manuscript described the investigation; notes used in The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam did not include full details. - The New York Herald (04/06/1850) reported the case under the title Mysteries of the Talmud, Terrible Murder in the East, describing the murder of Father Thomas and the trial of those involved, including claims that blood was used to moisten holy unleavened bread. Manuscripts of the original trial are said to be sealed by French and Austrian councils; Mustafa Talas, with a doctorate in history, translated transcripts from France into English in a book called Mazo of Sion, which is being made into a movie. Talas describes the investigation, including confrontations about blood and the Talmud. - Jonathan Frankel wrote The Damascus Affair to counter Talas’s book; Frankel’s work is suggested to reveal less than Talas’s, potentially to conceal the truth of the event. - Early 20th century aftermath: two people independently guided investigators to the remains of Father Thomas discovered in a sewer behind a rabbi’s home. - 1850s–1900s: references to subsequent stories of Jewish ritual murder in various contexts continue, including the implication of a universal sensationalism and the alleged practice used to undermine Christianity or to achieve occult aims. - 1911, Kiev, Russia: a highly publicized case of Andrej Yushinsky, an innocent young child killed for occult rights; Menachem Mendel Baylis was accused; extensive international involvement and allegations of jury manipulation, witnesses killed, and evidence destroyed; Baylis was freed by a simple majority verdict (six of twelve jurors), with later claims of corruption and a “kangaroo court” linked to the Bolshevik era. - John Grant, US consul in Odessa, reported the jury verdict; Baylis allegedly killed by fanatical Jews; evidence pointed to the crime occurring inside a synagogue at the Jewish-owned Seitzew factory. A 13-wound pattern on the head was cited as symbolic of ritual acts, with a referenced line of analysis connecting Sephirothic symbolism to the wounds. - Vasily Rosenov (Rosanoff) and others connected to Kabbalistic interpretation, including the concept of Echad, and the Shin letter as a symbol within the wounds, was discussed in supporting material. - Postscript: Zamoslovsky, the prosecuting attorney, wrote The Murder of Andrei Yushinsky; the Bolshevik revolution followed; Zamoslavsky was murdered for exposing the facts, and his book was classified until 1997 to suppress the truth of the matter.

The video launches with a provocative premise: the history we’ve been taught may hide the truth about who we are and what was here before us, using Sardinia, Italy, and the Giants of Monte Prama as a case study. After four excavations from 1975 to 1979, roughly 5,000 underground items were found at the site, including 15 heads and 22 torsos, among others. The claim is that many pieces were moved and stored for thirty years in the National Archaeological Museum of Cagliari, with the number of items and their condition allegedly undisclosed or unverifiable, and that only a subset has been exhibited while the rest remain hidden from the public view along with the statues. The speaker argues that archaeologists’ work would be illegal to perform today, yet the authorities publish numbers that are easily questioned. The video asserts that what is taught in schools is based on select pieces shown to the public, while the majority of finds were kept in basements or backrooms for decades. It is claimed that the restoration and subsequent display have been selective, with many pieces not accessible to the public and a broader narrative being pushed about the site’s significance, timeline, and origins. A central accusation is that Monte Prama’s timelines are manipulated. There’s criticism of dating, such as a late fourth-century BC abandonment versus other proposed centuries, asserting that the dates are “made up,” and that local or regional authorities have altered timelines to fit a narrative. The video references the use of local leaf tests to assert ages between the eleventh and eighth centuries BC, and claims these are debatable and not definitive proof of the site’s history. It contends that limestone preservation would require destructive testing or ancient processes, and argues that the heads have been damaged or removed, obscuring what the past looked like and what people held or wore. The narrator speculates about six fingers, watches, and other artifacts possibly hidden in the stonework, joking about Apple Watches, then insists that hands, feet, and other parts have been removed to conceal information. The Giants are described as over eight feet tall, with elongated heads and horns, and the video maintains that the depictions reveal a different history than the conventional narrative. It claims more than 25 statues existed, with the total later estimated to be 44, and asserts that more are stored in back rooms. The restoration project, the video asserts, should be transparent and livestreamed so the public can see the process. It accuses the group behind the official exhibition of manipulating information, destroying or hiding evidence, and restricting access to the site for decades. Beyond Sardinia, the discussion expands to the broader region, linking Sardinia to Syria (episode references Palmyra and the Temple of Baal) and touching on Georgia (the Lord’s Fortress), Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Tartaria. The narrator asserts that these regions contain melted rock-town structures and extensive tunnel networks, sometimes described as multi-level, ancient urban settlements connected by underground passages. Carbon dating is criticized as being unreliable for proving human presence at these sites, and there is a persistent assertion that mainstream archaeology fabricates or withholds the truth. In Georgia and adjacent regions, tunnels, staircases, and hidden halls are described as evidence of advanced subterranean civilizations, with claims that earthquakes or other disasters are misrepresented by mainstream accounts. The speaker references political figures and questionable provenance for dates, and ends by urging continued exploration and public scrutiny, implying a global pattern of hidden or manipulated premodern advanced knowledge. The closing note teases more content next Saturday, inviting viewers to weigh in on what is truly below the sand and what ancient civilizations might have built beneath the surface of the world.

In Ohio, a coffin was discovered containing a skeleton holding a small cemented box. Inside the box was a little black stone with writing on it. Scholars initially couldn't decipher the writing, but after 20 years, local rabbis identified it as an ancient form of Hebrew. The writing turned out to be a version of the Ten Commandments. These findings are known as the Holy Stones of Ohio and provide the oldest known record of the commandments in America, dating back to the time of Solomon. This discovery reveals the truth about the Hebrew script and its connection to the commandments.

Speaker 0 describes the Temple Of Baal in Syria as more than crumbled stone, a haunting reminder of a dark side of a previous civilization. He notes a castle on a nearby cliff that has been melted down to sand and believes both structures were built by the same group during the same period. He states the Temple Of Baal was found in 32 AD, not 31 or 33, and adds it is inaccessible today due to being in a war zone. He argues that war zones are used to block public access to lost history, suggesting that destroying the main entrance is a method to erase true history and credit war instead. He asserts the Temple Of Baal was built two thousand years ago and that the castle was built 1,200 years later, next to hundreds of columns and a temple the size of the Pyramid Of Giza. He claims the Tadmer Castle was placed on the World Heritage in Danger list in 2013 because of the Syrian civil war, was captured by ISIS in 2015, and recaptured in 2016. He mentions ISIS retreating fighters blew up parts of the castle, including the stairway to the entrance, causing extensive damage. He states the site has not been highlighted in mainstream history, with captures occurring yearly in 2016 and 2017. He questions the claim that the castle was built by the Mamluks, arguing that Mamluks translates to “one who is owned,” and contends the idea that enslaved workers built a palace using no training is ridiculous. He notes the proximity of the castle to a temple and a pyramid-sized structure and calls it more than a coincidence. He suggests that the area’s destruction is a targeted effort to erase true history, referencing the 2015 demolition of the arch and the destruction of the Tower Of Elable, and questions plans to rebuild, calling rebuilding impossible and inappropriate. Speaker 0 argues that the timeline is fabricated and questions why the site wasn’t destroyed in 1650 or 1420, implying that dates are not real. He asserts an advanced civilization built the sites within the last few hundred years, and that myths about the past are false, citing Baal’s dwelling as described in myth as a magnificent palace, with silver and gold, and defended like a fortress, which he claims is no longer mythical. He points to archaeological excavations at Palmyra showing sacrificial activity linked to Baal worship, including bones found at the site and texts confirming worship practices. He mentions the Ball Cycle, a collection of texts that provide evidence of ritual offerings to Baal, performed by priests, and notes a catacomb under churches with ritualistic practices. He discusses a location about 200 miles from the Temple Of Baal where tablets and artifacts were found in 1929, including the Ball Cycle and texts about Baal, Danil, and Baal’s death. He claims 1,000 tablets were found and suggests numerous other stories were uncovered beyond pottery, including royal palaces and high priests’ libraries with Grand Palaces, libraries in the Acropolis, and texts about Baal worship. He contends that the public was misled about the discoveries and that access to artifacts has been restricted to preserve them, while pottery is used to distract from the broader finds. He ends by inviting viewers to continue the exploration, emphasizing that the past is not as Mythical as claimed and promising more discoveries in future episodes.

This video explores the historical origins of child sacrifice and its connection to modern-day practices. Biblical archaeologist Henry B. Smith Jr. emphasizes that archaeology confirms the reality of these ancient events and warns against dismissing them as mere myths. The mention of child sacrifice in the Old Testament serves as evidence that these gods were not fictional but actually existed. The video draws a parallel between ancient child sacrifice and the practice of abortion, highlighting the disturbing discovery of aborted babies in a Los Angeles shipyard and the possession of medically preserved fetal remains by a doctor in Indiana. It suggests that this evil has transformed into a profitable industry, where the value of fetal body parts translates into millions of dollars. The video concludes by questioning why such practices would not continue to persist today.

The speaker asserts that the Wailing Wall is not the sacred remnant of the Second Temple but is actually a surviving wall of the Roman Fort Antonia, with the actual temple once standing to the south near the Gihon Spring, a location needed for temple purification rituals that the Roman fortress did not meet. The protruding rock beneath the Dome of the Rock, commonly mistaken for the temple’s foundation stone, is described as the central part of Fort Antonia instead. Therefore, according to the speaker, Jews today are praying at the wall of a Roman fortress, not at the remains of God’s temple. Beyond this architectural and historical claim, the speaker moves to a doctrinal critique, arguing that the rituals at the Wailing Wall are not rooted in biblical faith but in the thirteenth-century occult system of the Kabbalah, as elaborated in the Zohar and further mystified by the Hasidic movement. The supposed divine presence sought at the wall is described as the Shechinah, a feminine emanation in Jewish mysticism, often portrayed as a divine consort with whom spiritual union is sought through prayer, a practice called kavana. The speaker contends that the physical movements at the wall, such as back-and-forth motions, mirror an esoteric sexual ritual intended to unite the Shechinah with the Einsof, the infinite masculine force of their god concept. The conclusion drawn is that this is not worship but a metaphysical sex act disguised as devotion, an inversion of divine truth rooted in mysticism that scripture calls an abomination. The discussion then connects these beliefs to politics, claiming that nearly every major political figure must perform a rite of passage at the Wailing Wall, pressing hands against the stone and bowing heads in reverence. The speaker asserts they are not merely engaging in traditional gestures for voters or diplomacy but knowingly or unknowingly participating in an occult ritual, submitting at the seat of a synagogue of Satan. The speaker invokes scripture to support a reinterpretation, citing Acts 17:24, which states that God does not dwell in temples made with hands, and contends that God would not dwell in a Roman fortress surrounded by rituals that glorify a false god and mystical union. The result, according to the speaker, is that leaders are not just shaking hands with global powers but shaking hands with the devil through these acts.