reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There was no pandemic; data shows all-cause mortality did not rise before the WHO's declaration. The real public health emergency stemmed from government actions. Inappropriate PCR tests misled people into thinking they had a specific disease, while harmful medical procedures led to unnecessary deaths in hospitals and care homes. Many were denied life-saving antibiotics, resulting in bacterial pneumonia deaths. The claim of a pandemic justified rushed vaccine development, which is impossible within the stated timeframe. Manufacturing complex biological products typically takes years, and what was administered was likely a toxic substance. This narrative allowed for mass vaccinations, with millions reportedly dying as a result.

there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening. they called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic, because they were lying to you. there is nowhere in the world you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic. by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR. there's literally what we had is a pandemic of rollout of the test. it's not a mistake. they they knew it was rubbish. they designed it to produce positives where there was no illness. and then when people died, they said, oh, they had COVID. they called the pandemic, and then the data started arriving, which was fraudulent. if you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. for these pandemics, they just lied to you.

According to the speaker, the all-cause mortality data contradicts the idea of a viral respiratory pandemic. They argue that spikes in mortality during the COVID period were due to assaults on vulnerable people through medical treatment. Different jurisdictions had different methods of assault, such as overusing HCQ or using ventilators. They claim that more than half the countries in the world had no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, which resulted in a surge of deaths. Even in India, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were introduced, causing a significant increase in deaths.

Italy is described as being under total lockdown as coronavirus deaths continue to spike, with emergency rooms at or past breaking point. Authorities warn that Lombardy is running out of hospital beds and that morgue space has been exhausted, while army trucks transport bodies and new infections and deaths are reported daily. The president of the region asks for more military presence on the streets, with roadblocks and controls to limit movement without valid reasons. The transcript frames Italy as a new “ground zero,” noting almost twelve thousand five hundred cases at the time. A communications professor and former media and institutional figure, Alberto Contrini, is interviewed about why he believes Italy’s death toll rose. He says that fear propaganda included the use of large military trucks shown on TV carrying coffins, which he claims corresponded to one coffin per truck. He also claims that elderly people entering hospitals with other conditions were immediately declared COVID cases. Contrini attributes this to hospital reimbursement being reported as five times higher for COVID patients than for normal patients. He also alleges that incentives and payments led doctors to classify and treat patients in ways that increased COVID counts, including government payments per injection and “virologists” on television who he says were paid by pharmaceutical companies to promote a “massive propaganda.” He claims many doctors were suspended or marginalized for refusing these practices, and he describes legal actions by suspended doctors as ongoing. Contrini compares the Italian situation to the United States and says similar incentives and staging were used elsewhere, including treatment and reporting dynamics that he says manufactured death counts. He further suggests that, from his perspective as a media figure, the pattern of events implied opportunism evolving into something scripted before the outbreak reached Italy. He says other outbreaks were ignored by authorities despite doctors and scientists who believed they had effective approaches early. The transcript then shifts through multiple medical and investigative testimonies. Dr. Mariano Amici is described as having coordinated a study of over ten thousand patients who, he says, were all cured without a single death, treating COVID and other conditions successfully before protocols were imposed. He claims high death numbers were “made up,” images shown were not from COVID, and that the number of infected people was inflated by incorrect nose swab tests. He also claims incorrect treatments were used and that even patients who died from other causes were diagnosed as COVID to increase payment and change death rates. He says he found it “traumatizing” and that peers were pressured to comply with protocols and avoid losing their jobs. Rosanna Chiaverini Negri, described as a neurologist and holistic doctor, states she worked to write protocols to heal COVID patients and detoxify patients from “side effect” of what she calls an experimental genetic drug rather than a vaccine. She says she and others treated seventy thousand patients, with only ten hospitalized, and submitted medical records to Italian parliamentary bodies. She claims the media called the treatments witchcraft and that some doctors were suspended and had licenses removed. Raffaele Ragoli, an investigative journalist, says he went into a hospital on March 17 and saw conditions he describes as “hell.” He claims government policy required patients to stay home and take paracetamol, and that certain doctors used antibiotics against Ministry of Health guidance. He connects the narrative to mandatory vaccination policies and alleges that COVID was used to create fear and large-scale emergency measures that reduced rights. He also cites statements from WHO leadership about future pandemics and suggests biolabs and biological research are ongoing. He later asks whether the virus itself was actually responsible for the concentrated “explosion” seen in Bergamo and whether death patterns continued across Italy. Giovanni Trambusti, an electrical engineer focused on data processing and statistical analysis, describes downloading raw mortality data from ISTAT month by month to compare announced COVID numbers with real mortality. He claims mortality was highly concentrated in northern areas such as Bergamo and Brescia and “almost nothing” occurred elsewhere, and that the contagion did not move south even when people migrated south to avoid lockdown. He says he cannot explain the specific mechanism behind the northern concentration but insists that the numbers show an “explosion” in Bergamo. Dr. Pietro Gasparoni provides a hypothesis about the Bergamo surge. He describes alleged multiple meningitis cases in late 2019 and mass meningitis vaccination around January–February 2020, claiming that immune systems were low in the first two weeks after vaccination and made COVID infection spread more easily in that period. The transcript then emphasizes what it says are vaccine-related effects using mortality patterns. Trambusti is described as asserting that excess mortality in 2022 rose in regions where COVID deaths supposedly declined and suggests this indicates deaths were not from COVID. He claims a “fourteen-day trick” in death classification after vaccination, where deaths within fourteen days were categorized as if people were “unvaccinated,” producing a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative while the vaccinated were allegedly misclassified. He also claims spikes in mortality by age group aligned with vaccine rollout. A cardiologist, Dr. Giuseppe Barbrow, is quoted about myocarditis and pericarditis beginning in early 2021 and affecting males particularly in ages twelve to thirty-six. He claims myocarditis is not “mild” and that myocarditis can persist and generate potentially fatal arrhythmias. The transcript claims a view that the increase was driven more by vaccination than natural infection. Finally, multiple vaccine injury accounts are included, describing paralysis, loss of mobility, myocarditis within hours or after doses, thrombosis, pericarditis, neurological symptoms, and inability to walk. The narrative repeatedly frames these injuries as resulting from the COVID vaccines and contrasts them with being told to comply with protocols and vaccination. The closing portion returns to calls for scientific debate and study replication in Italy, including a request for replication of the “Henry Ford study,” a randomized pragmatic study, and removal of mandatory obligations “vis a vis such evidence.” The transcript ends with the host thanking a team and those who enabled the trip and work producing the film and study.

In the United States, a vaccine equity program was implemented to vaccinate vulnerable individuals in various homes. This led to a significant increase in mortality among 25 to 64 year olds, with a fatality rate similar to that of India at 1%. The peak in deaths in Michigan coincided with the initial vaccine rollout.

In recent years, global mortality rates have been lower compared to the past 50 years, with a spike in 2018 due to new vaccines. Despite claims of a deadly pandemic, mortality rates have remained lower than in 1952. People were getting sick, but not dying at alarming rates. This raises questions about the severity of the pandemic.

Lockdowns will not be implemented again, as they have proven to be ineffective. Peru has had the most severe lockdown since March, enforced by the military, yet it has the highest per capita mortality rate from COVID-19. The global pandemic, originating from China, has led to the closure of economies worldwide. Currently, there are spikes in COVID-19 cases in Europe and various other regions.

On the 15th, data accumulated from 18 million vaccination events or people is being tracked. The presenters attempt to compare vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups, with the claim that unvaccinated individuals do not face particular problems when interacting with others, while the discussion centers on the vaccinated group and a phenomenon described as “the green side” that initially shows low numbers for one to two weeks. From around February, a large peak emerges, continuing through March and April, suggesting that the effects observed may be related to vaccines and their side effects. It is suggested that doctors who were vaccinated may have observed effects on the same day, the following day, or about a week later, which could reflect the influence of vaccination, and this information is being sent to PMDA. One more finding is reported: the more vaccination is administered, the more the peak tends to move forward and to the left, indicating a shifting pattern in the timing of peaks. As the number of vaccinations increases, the “mountain” of deaths is said to occur earlier, implying that with increased vaccination there may be a shift toward earlier occurrence of deaths in a shorter interval. The speakers emphasize a key point: if there is no toxicity associated with the vaccine or no effect that would attract lipids, a peak may not occur. This is presented as the first finding: increasing vaccination frequency appears to move the peak. The implication drawn is that the observed shift in peaks is linked to the increasing number of vaccinations, and that the timing of peaks changes as vaccination numbers rise. The dialogue frames these observations as findings rather than assertions about vaccine safety, noting the potential role of vaccine-induced toxicity or lipid-adjuvant effects in driving the observed peaks, while also acknowledging that the absence of such effects would mean peaks might not develop.

There was never a scientific consensus on many topics related to COVID-19. Before the pandemic, most scientists held views contrary to the prevailing narrative. A small group of influential scientific bureaucrats took control of the public discourse, dominating media and influencing politicians. This led to a catastrophic response to the pandemic, and the repercussions will be felt for a long time.

There was no pandemic, as all-cause mortality data did not increase, and the WHO fraudulently declared one. An inappropriate PCR test was used, giving the false impression of a novel disease. People were mistreated via mass ventilation, sedatives and respiratory depressants in care homes, and denial of antibiotics, leading to deaths from bacterial pneumonia. Since there was no pandemic, experimental medical interventions were unnecessary. It is impossible to rapidly invent, test, and manufacture a complex biomedical product; the fastest record was six years. What was done was the advancement of intentionally toxic materials, rushed and injected into people, resulting in millions of deaths. The lie of a pandemic was maintained to inject billions with an intentionally dangerous substance, resulting in 17 million deaths so far.

In this video, the speaker discusses the impact of reduced antibiotic prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic. They explain that poor states in the southern United States, where it is hot, experienced a higher death rate due to bacterial pneumonia. The speaker believes that bacterial pneumonia was a co-cause of death in many COVID-19 cases. They also mention that excess mortality rates varied across age groups before and after vaccination. Before vaccination, the rates ranged from 5% to 40% in the ten most populous states. However, during the vaccination period, the pattern changed, with 25 to 44-year-olds experiencing up to 60% excess mortality.

Dying of COVID-19 in the hospital is seen as a failure because hospitals are meant to save lives. Surprisingly, there were very few deaths at home from COVID-19, raising questions about what went wrong in hospitals that led to so many deaths there. There were no reports of people dying at home from COVID-19 in the United States, where most deaths occurred in hospitals.

Many people who died with a COVID diagnosis were already in a fragile state, where even a minor infection could be fatal. However, it is questionable whether these infections should be considered the cause of death. For example, if we started registering every urinary tract infection that pushed a frail person over the edge, we would have an epidemic of urinary tract infections. The same kind of illogical attribution happened with COVID, where 3,000 expected deaths in hospices were attributed to the virus. This raises the question of what a death certificate should actually indicate: the specific cause of death on a particular day, or the overall cause of death within a certain timeframe.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have killed 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each booster rollout, there is a peak in all cause mortality, which is consistently observed across different countries. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns, even in the Southern Hemisphere where it should be a low death period. They mention that this pattern is seen in all 17 countries they studied. Overall, they emphasize that these observations are unprecedented.

The transcript describes Italy under “total lockdown” during the coronavirus outbreak, with emergency rooms at or past breaking point and authorities warning of hospital bed shortages and morgue overflow, including reports of army trucks removing bodies and new infections and deaths reported daily. It asserts Italy had the highest death toll anywhere in the world at that time, attributing the situation to a significant elderly population and an overstressed health system. It then shifts to claims about how COVID deaths were reported. The transcript says ninety-nine percent of those who died from the virus had other illness, and that only twelve percent of death certificates showed direct causality from coronavirus while eighty-eight percent involved at least one pre-morbidity, often multiple. It also frames “excess death” as deaths above or below an average baseline. The transcript further claims Italy’s high death toll was influenced by age structure, the health system’s strain, and reporting practices. A series of interviews follows. The host interviews Alberto Contrini, described as a professor of communications and a former institutional media figure involved in discussions about propaganda during COVID. Contrini says Italy launched a “massive fear campaign,” referencing Bergamo and military trucks reportedly conveying coffins, but Contrini says each truck held one coffin. He also claims elderly patients entering hospitals with other pathologies were immediately declared COVID, attributing this to financial incentives: the transcript says hospitals received refunds five times higher for COVID patients than normal patients, encouraging diagnoses to be coded as COVID even when multiple conditions existed. Contrini also links the transcript’s claims to similar patterns described for the United States and says virologists on TV were paid by pharmaceutical companies to promote “massive propaganda.” He claims many doctors were financially incentivized (citing government payments per injection) and says dissenters were marginalized, including suspended doctors and ongoing legal actions. The transcript highlights a moment where Contrini describes asking Dr. Bassetti about contracts with pharmaceutical companies and says Bassetti removed his earphones and left. The transcript then interviews Dr. Mariano Amici, described as a COVID treating doctor. Amici claims that in a study of over ten thousand patients, his group “cured” over ten thousand people with “not even once” a single death, treating not only COVID patients but also patients of other concerns. He says the “explosion” of deaths was “made up,” describing alleged use of non-COVID images on national TV, claims about inaccurate nose swab tests, and assertions that people were misclassified as dying of COVID when they died from other causes such as car accidents. Amici claims he was “traumatized” by the situation and says protocols prevented doctors from treating patients, calling the protocol a “death protocol.” The transcript presents him as saying some doctors had successful early treatment approaches using steroids and antibiotics and later had those tools taken away. Next, the transcript interviews Rosanna Chiaverini Negri, a neurologist who describes herself as working to write protocols and detoxify side effects from a COVID “Name it vaccine” that she characterizes as an experimental genetic drug. She claims that early use of antibodies from healed people and heat is curative within “three days,” and says they treated “seventy thousand” patients with only “ten” hospitalized, bringing documentation to Italy’s Parliament and Senate. She says press coverage attacked the work and that some practitioners were suspended and had licenses removed. Raffaele Ragoli, described as an investigative journalist, says he went into a hospital on March 17 and saw what he characterizes as “hell,” including a policy to “stay home, wait, and just take paracetamol,” and guidance that he says discouraged standard treatments. The transcript says Ragoli attributes the perceived need for a declared pandemic to the WHO, including a claim that the WHO needed thousands of deaths to declare a pandemic and that there was a lack of cure. Ragoli says Italy was chosen as a front runner for a mandatory vaccination program, and he claims WHO strategy is influenced by organizations “on top” of governments and by entities including “Bill Gates” and major financial institutions. He also claims Tedros Ghebreyesus stated that the next pandemic would come, not if. Giovanni Trambusti, described as an electrical engineer specializing in data processing and statistical analysis, says he downloaded raw mortality data from ISTAT and compared it month by month to what was announced in media and government. He claims deaths were highly concentrated in northern areas (especially Bergamo and Brescia) and “almost nothing” in other parts of Italy. He attributes the lack of spread south to an alleged migration from north to south ahead of lockdowns, and says he sees “the numbers aren’t adding up.” The transcript then includes Dr. Pietro Gasparoni, described as treating vaccine injury. Gasparoni claims a mechanism involving immune suppression after “mass vaccination of meningitis combined with the flu vaccine” following meningitis cases in November 2019, leading to an immune-system low period and then a “COVID explosion” during January–February 2020. He references reported meningitis cases and quotes emergency responses described in the transcript around Sarnico and surrounding municipalities. The transcript also describes myocarditis and pericarditis claims through a cardiology interview with Dr. Giuseppe Barbuto, saying myocarditis first appeared in early 2021 and that 12–36-year-olds (especially males) were higher risk. The transcript states a claim that myocarditis was exclusively found in vaccinated people and cites other studies as supporting that vaccines, rather than natural infection, caused the increase. It says “mild myocarditis” is false and that myocarditis can last for years. Finally, it features multiple “vaccine injured” testimonials, including Amelia Padovano and others, describing severe post-vaccination symptoms and disability, including facial paralysis, paralysis and inability to walk, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis, neurological problems, and related losses. The transcript ends with additional claims about pressured suppression of debate and the desire for scientific replication and closed-door discussions, including calls to remove vaccine mandates and conduct a randomized pragmatist study.

Governments worldwide intentionally suppressed early treatment for COVID-19, causing fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. This controversial narrative aimed to harm citizens simultaneously. Disturbingly, doctors in the Netherlands admitted to euthanizing seniors with lethal doses of morphine instead of treating the virus. Similar occurrences were reported in Africa and South America. The bizarre behavior observed globally during the pandemic was not limited to the United States.

In the US, a vaccine equity program was implemented to vaccinate vulnerable individuals in various homes. A significant peak in mortality for 25-64 year olds was observed, coinciding with the program. States with this program had a 1% vaccine dose fatality rate, similar to India. A peak in Michigan occurred during the initial dose rollout.

Hospital deaths from COVID-19 are seen as a failure, as hospitals are meant to save lives. Surprisingly, there were very few deaths at home from COVID-19, raising questions about what went wrong in hospitals that led to so many deaths there.

Data on all-cause mortality collected over the past 100 years shows a clear seasonal pattern, with more deaths occurring in the winter than in the summer. This pattern is observed in northern latitude countries, while the opposite is true in the Southern Hemisphere. COVID-19, however, did not follow this pattern. The timing and synchronicity of the increase in mortality after the declaration of the pandemic, limited to specific hotspots, suggests that it was not solely due to the spread of a viral respiratory disease. Instead, the excess mortality can be attributed to factors such as lack of treatment, aggressive medical protocols, government measures, and the stress and isolation imposed on people. The rollout of vaccines and boosters has been associated with further increases in all-cause mortality, particularly among older age groups. The mortality risk per injection is approximately 0.1%, increasing exponentially with age.

There was no pandemic. The all-cause mortality data did not increase before the WHO's fraudulent declaration. The PCR test was inappropriately used, creating a false impression of a specific disease. People were mistreated via mass ventilation, sedatives and respiratory depressants in care homes, and denial of antibiotics. Based on this lie, we were told vaccines would save us, but there was no pandemic, so no rushed intervention was needed. It's impossible to invent, test, and manufacture a complex biomedical product so quickly. What was done was the advancement of intentionally toxic materials, sketchily advanced and injected into people, with millions dead as a result. The lie of a pandemic was maintained to inject five and a half billion people with a dangerous substance, resulting in seventeen million deaths so far.

Data on all-cause mortality collected over the past 100 years shows a clear seasonal pattern, with more deaths occurring in the winter than in the summer. This pattern is observed in northern latitude countries, while the opposite occurs in the Southern Hemisphere. COVID-19 pandemic announcements led to immediate surges in mortality in certain hotspots, but this synchronicity is inconsistent with the spread of a viral respiratory disease. Excess mortality before the vaccine rollout is attributed to lack of treatment, aggressive medical protocols, and government measures that isolated and stressed people. The rollout of vaccines and boosters is associated with increased all-cause mortality, with the risk of death per injection being higher for older individuals. The mortality risk per injection is approximately 0.1%, or 1 person per 800 injections.

According to Dennis Rancourt's data, there was no increase in all-cause mortality leading up to the WHO's declaration of a pandemic. The use of fraudulent PCR tests created a false impression of a specific disease. Inappropriately treating people in hospitals, such as mass ventilation, resulted in numerous deaths. Additionally, the denial of life-saving antibiotics and treatment for bacterial pneumonia in the community worsened the situation. This is the only pandemic that exists.

In China, a strange case of atypical pneumonia is reported by an eye doctor. Within 11 days, the first PCR kits to test for the virus are shipped. The World Health Organization accepts a PCR protocol as the gold standard for testing. A study on clinical symptoms related to COVID is published, followed by a study on asymptomatic transmission. All of these developments occur within a compressed timeframe of just 26 days. The speaker argues that each step was premeditated and false.

Governments implemented measures during the pandemic that can be seen as assaults, resulting in excess mortality in various jurisdictions. The impact varied, with some places experiencing significant deaths while others had fewer. Additionally, the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself led to excess mortality. This was evident in the peaks of deaths directly linked to different vaccine rollouts for various age groups and in different regions. The connection between the vaccines and deaths is undeniable, as there is clear evidence of the vaccines causing a significant number of fatalities.

The speakers discuss the correlation between COVID-19 vaccination campaigns and spikes in mortality. They observe that after vaccine rollouts, there is a noticeable increase in deaths, even during the summer months when mortality rates should be low. This pattern is consistent across multiple countries and age groups. The speakers mention the presence of winter peaks and booster peaks in mortality data, which contradicts the expected trends. This correlation is observed globally, including in the Southern Hemisphere where a decrease in deaths is expected during the summer.