reSee.it - Related Video Feed

At some point, there is a correlation between the purging of the database and the date of the audit. They both happen almost at the same time, the day before the audit. This connection requires an explanation.

Speaker 0: The election was stolen. A graph shows people who worked for ES&S, Hart, Dominion Voting Systems, ClearBallot, and Smartmatic, recycling through companies. People who worked at Dominion Voting Systems are entering the political sphere and taking over election offices; one county in Texas, after hiring someone who worked for Dominion, went blue for the first time. The speaker walks through information: Dominion using “Serbian technology with Chinese characteristics.” Huawei Bank is involved; there’s no public board saying Bank of China funds anything, but research on Roaming Networks—a relatively unknown Serbian company until 2013—shows it signed a value-added contract with Huawei Bank. Huawei is “the Bank of China.” Roaming Networks built ICT infrastructure and data centers in Serbia, with owner Nenad Kovac identified as the enterprise partner. Some Roaming Networks information may come off their site after this presentation. Dominion Voting Systems has a corporate office in Serbia; a screenshot of the office and a developer on their site is noted. A Serbian legislative leader said, “I know Dominion Voting Systems back in November. They have an office here.” Dominion started rapidly removing Serbian coders from their site/LinkedIn. Code is built in Serbia for a system used in the United States, using infrastructure funded by China, not just China but the Bank of China. A slide discusses Dominion’s enterprise partnership with Huawei, added to the restricted list on 05/16/2019. Roaming Networks references show Dominion Voting Systems using a pure flash storage solution in Dominion’s data center. A photo of Sacramento shows Dominion hardware coming from China, with a bill of lading from a Chinese supplier to Dominion’s McKinney, Texas office. Testing and approval of Dominion hardware show similarities with Smartmatic; the same hardware with different branding. They claim a “tail” behind the scenes—evidence of connections among ES&S, Hart, Dominion, ClearBallot, Smartmatic, with people cycling through these companies. People who once worked at Dominion are now entering election offices; in Texas, a county that hired a former Dominion employee “went blue” by accident with ES&S involved. The speaker calls out Gina Griswold for commenting on Tina Peters and Mesa, and Matt Crane’s role as Arapahoe County clerk and recorder, now head of the County Clerks Association; Crane’s wife previously worked for Dominion and Sequoia Voting Systems. The speaker asserts a public breach of trust requires an audit; if there’s nothing to hide, audits should restore trust. They argue, whether Dominion is the bad actor or not, removal of logs, altering code, and a “trusted build” are problematic, and emphasize the need for audits and investigations to restore trust in elections. Speaker 1: Indicators: a senior Dominion vice president’s name appears on patents; a software engineer involved in the Wayne County, Michigan tabulation center is connected to the software. Coincidences accumulate, suggesting there is a preponderance of evidence with affidavits across the country. The speaker asks which computer produced certain files analyzed yesterday; whether it came from the central count or precincts. Speaker 0: Answers with a non-answer, noting they imaged the main EMS and the tabulation system; servers in the county coordinate precinct information and house audit reports, cast vote reports, error reports, adjudication reports, and access logs. Thumb drives can contaminate the county and state systems if connected to a machine; it’s not unique to Dominion or voting systems but a general risk. They emphasize avoiding white noise and focusing on facts: Dominion is in Serbia; Huawei Bank funds the enterprise partnership and Serbia-based data centers; code is written in Serbia; imaging shows fingerprints of this. They call for audits, note deviations in Georgia (ballots appearing identical in different batches, a shredder truck before January 20 in Georgia, and a leaky arena water claim later proven to be a leaky toilet), and point to media silence. They argue against accepting the gold standard claim and highlight perceived connections to Soros-funded groups. They stress deviations in state and county behavior, urge audits, and compare the election system to a serial killer—unacceptable to let foreign systems run it. Speaker 2: Adds that with 100 indicators, a pattern emerges; reiterates the need to examine which files came from which computer, and questions the integrity of the central count. Speaker 3: Notes the risk of a non-internet-connected thumb drive introducing malware; emphasizes auditing all machines for that reason.

On February 11th, a script overwrote 462 log entries. On March 3rd, the same script overwrote 37,686 log entries. On March 12th, the day before the system was received, 330 log entries were overwritten by the script. The EMS admin account performed these actions. A log file from the Dominion software for results tallying and reporting shows that someone purged all the results for the election. The action completed successfully, deleting all the files on the NAS directory, including results and images from the election. According to the transcript, an individual ran a program to clear all records in the system used to generate the official results the day before an audit started.

The speaker discusses the issue of Windows security logs being purged right before two audits were set to begin. They highlight the difficulty in determining who had access to the RTR admin account, which is shared among all accounts. The speaker questions why someone would delete all the results and records from the Dominion software, which is used for tallying and reporting election results, just before an audit. They mention that the deletion was successful and affected files on the NAS directory where election images and details were stored. Overall, the speaker emphasizes the lack of accountability and the need to understand the motives behind this action.

On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by the same script. The day before we received the system, 330 log entries were overwritten by that script. The EMS admin account was responsible for this. The challenge is that this occurred before an audit, and it deleted all the records and files related to the election. Someone deliberately ran a program to clear all the records in the system used for generating the official results.

On various dates, an individual ran a script to find blank passwords for the accounts on the system. The script was executed multiple times, overwriting a significant number of log entries. The EMS admin account was responsible for this, but due to the lack of accountability in assigning the username, it is difficult to prove who exactly did it. Fortunately, historical data from MTech video feeds helped identify the individuals at the keyboards during those times. However, their names will not be released to protect them from scrutiny and potential impacts.

On February 11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script, and on March 3, 37,680 log entries were also overwritten. The day before we received the system, 330 log entries were overwritten. The EMS admin account was responsible for these actions. It raises concerns about the audit's integrity, as one would expect to have complete election context for auditing. The log file from the Dominion software indicates that someone executed a command to purge all election results, successfully deleting all records and images stored in the NAS directory. This action was taken just before the audit began, which is troubling.

The speaker reveals shocking information about the deletion of the entire database directory from the d drive of the machine called EMS primary. This deletion occurred approximately 10 days before the machines were handed over to the Senate. Deleting documents after being told to preserve them can have severe legal consequences. Additionally, the main database for the election management system software, which contains all election-related data from the November 2020 general election, is missing from the EMS primary machine. This suggests that it has been removed.

The speakers assert that there is evidence of direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). In the forensic images, they note that on November 5 an anonymous user logged onto the EMS remotely and performed actions with escalated privileges, making changes to the database during attempts to retabulate the election. They describe this as a major development, because it demonstrates that the machines were accessed remotely, and crucially, that the remote access was by an anonymous user who possessed elevated privileges within the system. They present this as a significant point for those who oppose forensic auditing or who are against non-forensic reviews. They also reference visible features on ballots, specifically the black boxes along the side of the ballot. The ballots reportedly contain 59 of these black boxes. In the forensic images, they indicate that certain blocks—numbers 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44—were intentionally modified. The described modifications concerned the height, width, and overall shape of these blocks, with the stated purpose of generating errors. Regarding the consequences of these modifications, the narrative claims that by altering these specific blocks, errors were created that led to rejections of Republican ballots. In other words, ballots cast for Donald Trump that were processed through the machine allegedly faced a higher likelihood of being rejected due to these block modifications. The asserted outcome is that such ballots were rejected at a rate of 20% more than ballots cast for Joe Biden.

Speaker 0 asserts that there was direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). They claim that on November 5, an anonymous user logged on to the EMS remotely with escalated privileges and made changes to the database while attempting to retabulate the election. This, they say, constitutes a significant development, proving that the machines were remotely accessed and that access was by an anonymous user with elevated system privileges. Speaker 0 also discusses ballots, referring to black boxes on the side of the ballot, noting that there are 59 such black boxes. They state that forensic images show that in Antrim County, blocks 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44 were intentionally modified. The modification involved altering the height, width, and shape of those blocks with the intention of generating errors. They describe the consequence of such modifications: by modding these specific blocks, they were able to cause rejections for Republican ballots. Specifically, they claim that if a ballot voted for Donald Trump and was fed into the machine, that ballot was rejected at a rate 20% higher than for Joe Biden ballots.

Forensic copy bit for bit of everything that was on the Mesa County computer. Just to clarify, there were two forensic images taken of the Mesa County Election server. One, before the software update. Another image taken after. Everything that had been on that drive before this update was gone. Looks like a cover up. Low risk of being caught. Low consequence if they are caught. The reason we know it was deliberate is because of Tina Peters. Are those files important to elections? Critical. The federal voting system standards are very clear that the election records that are required to audit a voting system include the digital records that are all the log files generated by that voting system, especially when it's a complex computer system.

County technical employees reported independently that the vote counts recorded by machines and stored on USB drives changed between the closing of polls and their reopening the next morning. Votes appeared and disappeared overnight. Attempts to verify the integrity of these voting machines were limited to a superficial visual inspection of the USB drives, and a forensic examination was denied.

The Windows security logs were purged right before two audits were scheduled to begin. This makes it difficult to determine who had access to the RTR admin account, which is shared among all accounts. It is unclear why someone would delete all the records and files from the Dominion software, which is used for tallying and reporting election results, the day before an audit started.

A 23-page forensic report released by Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) concluded that the Dominion voting system is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The report examined Dominion voting systems in Antrim County, Michigan, following a dispute over election equipment integrity. The report states that on election night, Antrim County switched 6,000 votes from President Trump to Joe Biden, allegedly due to an unexplained glitch. Poll workers reportedly tried to report problems with the Dominion machines, but local officials, including the Secretary of Michigan State, turned down requests, claiming the issues were the result of user human errors. After Antrim County resident William Bailey filed a lawsuit in early December, Judge Kevin Elzenheimer of the 13th Circuit Court ordered forensic imaging of the Dominion voting tabulators and related software, while also imposing a protective order restricting use and distribution of forensic findings. On December 14, the judge agreed to lift the protective order and allow release of the report. ASOG’s Dallas-based team conducted the investigation on Bailey’s behalf, taking forensic images and reviewing the county’s 22 Dominion tabulators, along with thumb drives and related software. ASOG reported that, out of 15,676 lines or events, there were 10,667 critical errors or warnings—an over 68% error rate. The report states that this high error rate shows the Dominion voting system is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws. It claims the Federal Election Commission allows a maximum error rate of 0.0008% for computerized voting systems, and that Dominion’s error rate of 68.05% is 85,000 times higher than the threshold. ASOG concluded that the system intentionally generates an “enormously high number of ballot errors,” leading to bulk adjudication of ballots “with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.” The report also states that Antrim County’s computer system maintained records of adjudication for previous elections, but records for the 2020 election were missing, which it says prevents audit accountability. The report further states: “We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.” Separately, one month before the election, it was exposed that Dominion’s parent company received $400 million from an investment bank in Switzerland with ties to China. Speaker 3 said ASOG’s evidence was “astonishing,” asserting the obvious conclusion that the Dominion voting system was designed to cheat, referencing error rates cited as 81.96% in Everett and Central Lake Township and claiming Dominion’s error rates were 85,000 to 224,000 times higher than the federal standard. Speaker 2 said there was “certainly foreign meddling” in the 2020 U.S. presidential election and warned that unresolved problems could lead to “unimaginable” future problems.

Is it standard practice to delete files off a server after an election? I hope not. It’s appropriate to maintain files, and while we deleted some files, they were archived. The auditors initially did not have access to those archived files because they were not subpoenaed. It’s laughable to suggest that deleting files in response to a subpoena is acceptable. The subpoena should have covered all election-related records. I cannot confirm if purging the database after elections is standard practice, but limited server space may require it. If that is the case, why was data from prior elections still present? We will provide answers to these questions. It's important to note that we had oversight during the 2020 election due to concerns about the previous administration's competence.

On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by the same script. On 12th, 330 log entries were overwritten. The EMS admin account is responsible for this. The challenge is that this occurred before an audit, which means the full context of the election is not available. The log file shows that someone purged all the results for the election, deleting all records and files. This happened right before the audit started.

On the left is the image before the Dominion employee arrived at the election management server, and on the right is the image after the employee left. The logs folder on the left is missing on the right, indicating that it disappeared after the employee left. Additionally, in the Inetpub log folder, there are multiple log files that contain evidence of connections to the web server. The number of log files is not mentioned.

Mr. Bennett questions if it's standard practice to delete files off a server after an election. Mr. Gates says they maintained files but deleted the ones that were archived. It is revealed that Maricopa County deleted files off the server after the election, which the auditors didn't have access to initially. The auditors didn't subpoena those files, and Maricopa County claims they responded to the subpoena. Mr. Bennett finds it laughable that the county would delete files in response to a subpoena, as the subpoena requested all records related to the election. The county interpreted the subpoena differently.

On various dates, an individual ran a script to search for blank passwords on the system. This script overwrote a significant number of log entries. The EMS admin account was responsible, but it's difficult to prove who specifically executed the script due to the lack of accountability in assigning usernames. Fortunately, historical data from MTech video feeds allowed us to identify individuals at the keyboards during those times. However, we won't disclose their names due to the potential scrutiny and impact on them.

There is a discussion about log files on two screens. One screen shows hundreds of log files from 2019 until May 22, 2021. The other screen only has three years of log files, which have mysteriously disappeared. It is mentioned that when a Dominion employee came in, the log files vanished. These files record all access to a specific machine. It is also mentioned that Dominion sent people around the country for software updates during that time. Some participants confirm this information.

According to the report, Dominion Voting Systems is alleged to have intentional errors that can lead to fraud and influence election results. The system allows election workers to decide votes without oversight or transparency. Experts found an error rate of 68.05%, much higher than the recommended rate. Suspiciously, all vote adjudication logs for the 2020 election and security logs before November 4th are missing. The Dominion Image cast prison cards were also reprogrammed, violating election laws. Despite calls for transparency through forensic audits, skeptics have attacked attempts to review logs. In Maricopa County, Arizona, election officials have ignored subpoenas for election data and machine audits until after the inauguration.

The hard drive was cloned for forensic analysis, revealing deleted or altered election records. 29,000 records were affected, impacting election totals. Two forensic images were compared, showing data loss after a software update. The actions suggest a cover-up with low risk and consequences. Tina Peters' involvement indicates deliberate tampering. The missing files are crucial for elections. Translation: The hard drive was copied for investigation, uncovering changes to election records. A comparison of two images showed data loss post-update. The situation implies a cover-up with minimal risk and consequences. Tina Peters' role suggests intentional interference. The missing files are vital for elections.

On February 11th, a script overwrote 462 log entries. On March 3rd, the same script overwrote 37,686 log entries. On March 12th, the day before the system was received, 330 log entries were overwritten by the script. The EMS admin account performed these actions. A log file from the Dominion software for results tallying and reporting shows that someone purged all the results for the election. The action was completed successfully, deleting all the files on the NAS directory, which contained all the results and images from the election. An individual ran a program to clear all records in the system used to generate the official results the day before an audit started.

The Secretary of State and Dominion emphasize backing up election records, but this doesn't align with legal requirements. Election machines are supposed to be disconnected from the internet, yet evidence shows they can connect. There's a lack of training on how to ensure this disconnection. Additionally, crucial access and audit log files were deleted, preventing accountability for who accessed the system. In court, it was revealed that preserved evidence from these logs is being used against them, as the prosecution did not allow them to present their side. The indictment was structured to exclude any mention of election machines, indicating a deliberate omission in the case.

The speaker asserts that there was direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). According to the forensic images, on November 5 an anonymous user logged on to the EMS remotely with escalated privileges and made changes to the database while attempting to retabulate the election. This is presented as a major development indicating remote access to the machines, and specifically remote access by an anonymous user with elevated privileges. Additionally, the speaker describes intentional modifications to ballot components. Ballots have black boxes along the side, with boxes 59 in total. The forensic images allegedly show that blocks 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44 were intentionally modified, altering their height and width to generate errors. The claimed consequence of these modifications is that errors were produced which led to ballot rejections. Specifically, ballots in which a voter chose Donald Trump and then fed the ballot into the machine were rejected at a rate 20% higher than ballots for Joe Biden.