TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker noticed irregularities with the absentee ballots. The ballot numbers were in sequence, which is unusual for mailed-in ballots. The speaker also discovered that the envelopes lacked a date and the ballots were all from the same area. The signatures were similar, and there were no date stamps. Additionally, the ballots were not showing up in the system and had to be entered manually. When the speaker questioned these issues, they were met with resistance from the supervisor. Despite wanting to stay in the room, the speaker chose not to challenge further.

The speaker observed a broken chain of custody in the handling of mail-in ballots, drop box ballots, and Election Day USB card flash drives. They witnessed the voting machine warehouse supervisor uploading USB cards to the machines multiple times without being observed by the proper authorities. The speaker raised their concerns to the deputy sheriff and the Clerk of Elections, noting that the supervisor was carrying baggies and inserting USBs into the machines. This happened over 24 times.

The speaker explains that when a ballot jams in the tabulating machines, an error message appears with the options to discard or recount. However, instead of following the correct procedure of discarding the entire batch and rescanning the already tabulated ones, they were repeatedly rescanning the jammed ballots without discarding them. This led to the ballots being counted 8 to 10 times, indicating a lack of understanding and confusion among the individuals involved.

The speaker explains that a table was placed by a person at 8:22 am. Later, they witnessed four suitcases being taken out from under the table. The speaker questions why these separate ballots were only counted when the place was cleared out with no witnesses. They estimate that around 18,000 ballots could have been processed during the two hours when no one was present to supervise. The speaker mentions that the operation continued until around 12:55 am, and they have video evidence of people counting ballots after they were told to stop. The video concludes with the speaker asking if everyone has seen enough and fast-forwarding to 12:55 am.

Ballots were allegedly found under a table in a video presented. The person who placed the table there is said to be the same person who cleared the area and claimed to stop counting. Four suitcases were seen being taken out from under the table. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses present. The machines used can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were running for 2 hours. This raises concerns about the number of ballots processed without supervision. The video continues until around 1 a.m., showing the ongoing operation. The speaker asks if everyone has seen enough and proceeds to fast forward to 12:55 a.m.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 am. The same person who cleared the place later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table, and one was pulled out by a gentleman in red. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses and the place was cleared. Multiple machines were present for two hours, capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour. It is unclear how many ballots went through the machines during that time without supervision.

At 8 o'clock in the morning, a person placed a black table in the room. Later, when the place was cleared out, the same person pulled out four suitcases from under the table. These suitcases contained separate ballots that were counted without any witnesses present. With multiple machines processing around 3,000 ballots per hour for two hours, it is believed that the number of ballots processed during that time could have influenced the outcome of the race.

In Gwinnett County, approximately 270 people went to a ballot box, but 1,862 ballots were deposited according to the custody document. After reviewing 24 hours of video footage, it was confirmed that 271 people approached the ballot box, but only 1,962 ballots were seen. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. There were breakdowns in the process, and at the end of the day, two individuals were supposed to transfer the ballots into bags, but another person appeared and took the 1,962 ballots in two black duffle bags instead of the usual blue cooler. It is unclear who this person was. The supervision of this process falls under the responsibility of the secretary of state of Georgia. It was evident that nobody was intended to review these videos.

A table was placed by a woman with blonde braids at 8:22 AM, and the same person who cleared the area under the pretense of stopping the count also set it up. Four suitcases were seen being pulled from under the table. Questions arise about why these ballots were separated from others and only counted when the area was cleared of witnesses. The machines can process about 3,000 ballots per hour, and with multiple machines operating for two hours, it's crucial to consider how many ballots were processed without supervision, which raises concerns about adherence to statutes and rules.

The speaker observed that when people received Republican straight ticket ballots, they often ignored them or circled Donald Trump's name and put them back in the envelope. The speaker noticed USPS boxes filled with these ballots on the floor. They questioned the legitimacy of the process, as it seemed impossible to count all the votes accurately. The speaker mentioned that only a small number of ballots were counted at a time, with each pile containing no more than five ballots. They expressed concern about the removal of many Trump vote ballots.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 am. The same person who cleared the area later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table. A man in red pulled out one of the ballots. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses. The machines can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were there for 2 hours without supervision. The number of ballots processed during that time is unclear.

The speaker witnessed someone using correction tape inside a tabulator machine, which caused the ballots to get jammed. The tape was placed back in the machine after being peeled off. The speaker explained that if a ballot goes through the machine with the tape on it, the machine won't read anything, and the user can override it. The speaker also mentioned that the ballots had no numbers at the top, but they assumed the machine wouldn't read them and the user could manually input the ticket type. The person operating the machine repeatedly put the same set of 27 ballots in instead of separating them, resulting in an inaccurate count. The speaker explained that the machine doesn't have a way to detect if the same ballot has been inserted multiple times, as the sensor and reader are covered.

A scanner can only scan one dollar per second, but there are 4,000 ballots with the exact same time stamp of November 5th at 11:19:40. This suggests that these ballots may have been inserted and cannot be authenticated. The main question is whether this time stamp, which shows an unbelievable speed of scanning, is from the EMS system and not something we created.

In Downtown Detroit at the TCF Center, a video discussion describes what a caller says happened during ballot processing. The account asserts that after precincts had counted ballots and were ready to close, three vehicles—a van, a Chrysler 300, and a Ferrari—arrived at about 4:00 a.m. with a claimed 130,000 ballots. The claim is that every one of these ballots were Biden ballots that had not been delivered to the precinct before its cutoff, constituting a “big irregularity” and suggesting voter fraud. The speakers say this is being contested by the president in a lawsuit for Michigan, with people who allegedly witnessed the event. Speaker 1 adds that back rooms at the facility enabled cars to drive in through a garage door, and that ballots appeared between 10:30 p.m. and 3:30 a.m. Approximately 38,000 ballots were said to have arrived in that window, with a reported count of 61 ballots described as being in USPS boxes. The boxes were not necessarily USPS-delivered; a white van with the city clerk’s emblem appeared to be delivering them, bearing the name Janice Winfrey and related tagline. The implication is that ballots arrived in an unverified, potentially improper manner. Speaker 2 notes possible additional vehicles present at the time and mentions that a mini panel truck with Detroit Elections Bureau regalia and a vehicle ID number was observed, with other people recording license plate information. The lack of verifiable chain of custody is emphasized: there was no confirmed Republican/Democrat presence during transfer, and seals on ballots were not verified. The speaker contrasts this with a suburbs experience where ballots were methodically processed, sealed, and tracked, implying Detroit’s process lacked similar controls. Speaker 3 explains that Gateway Pundit obtained video of the event after a delay, and that local media personnel claimed the event did not occur. The video shows an escort car and a lead car delivering items inside the facility, with the escort car reportedly from Pennsylvania and possibly a rental. The Michigan group, Patty’s group, counted drop-box ballots and reported about 1,340 to 1,400 ballots dropped in Detroit over the last two days. In contrast, after the shutdown, officials allegedly claimed 16,000 ballots were dropped in, with the question of where those additional ballots originated. Speaker 4 reinforces the Michigan group’s tally of roughly 1,340–1,400 ballots from drop boxes in Detroit in the adjacent period and points to the discrepancy between that count and the 16,000 ballots later cited, noting the eight-hour gap after the official closing time and the two separate deliveries to the TCF Center. The overarching claim is that these events indicate irregularities in ballot handling and raise questions about the source and legitimacy of the large ballot influx.

At around 8:22 AM, a person placed a black table in the room. Later, when the place was cleared out, four suitcases were taken out from under the table. The question is why these separate ballots were only counted when there were no witnesses present. The machines can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were there for two hours. If three scanners were working, that's 18,000 ballots. There were six people involved, and the operation continued until around 12:55 AM. The video shows the people who provided affidavits appearing at that time to check if counting was still happening. If you've seen enough, we can fast forward to 12:55 AM.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 AM. The same person who cleared the place later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table. There were separate ballots being counted without witnesses present. The machines can process 3,000 ballots an hour, and they were there for 2 hours. The question is how many ballots went through the machines during that time without supervision, in accordance with the rules.

A lady with blonde braids placed a table at 8:22 AM. The same person who cleared the place out under the pretense of stopping the count also put the table there. Four suitcases came out from underneath the table. A man in red pulled one of the suitcases out. The question is, why are these ballots separate from the others, and why are they only counting them when the place is cleared out with no witnesses? The machines can process about 3,000 ballots an hour, and there were multiple machines for two hours. The question is, how many ballots went through those machines in those two hours when no one was there to supervise, consistent with statutes and rules?

On October 11th, from 7:30 AM to October 12th, approximately 270 people accessed a ballot box in Gwinnett County, but 1,962 ballots were recorded as deposited. Reviewing 24 hours of video confirmed the 271 individuals, but the number of ballots did not match. There’s uncertainty about the discrepancy. On that day, two individuals were responsible for transferring the ballots, but an unidentified person appeared, took the ballots from two black duffel bags, and left without following the usual protocol of using a cooler. The oversight of this process is questionable, as it seems no one intended for the videos to be scrutinized.

The speaker noticed irregularities with the ballot numbers and names on absentee and mailing ballots. The numbers were almost consecutive, and some envelopes lacked a date. When the speaker questioned this, they were met with resistance. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures and no date stamp. None of these details were entered into the system, and they were being manually entered. The speaker suspected something was amiss but didn't challenge further to avoid being kicked out.

I noticed that the ballot numbers and last names on the absentee and mail-in ballots were in sequence, which is unusual because these ballots should come in different numbers. This raised my suspicion. I asked about the date on the envelopes, but there was only November 0, 2020, with no second number. When I questioned this, the supervisors became angry and accused me of disrupting their work. I didn't want to be kicked out, so I didn't challenge anything further. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures, and there was no date stamp after 0. None of these ballots were showing up in the system and were being manually entered, even though they knew these details wouldn't be in the poll book or system.

The speaker asserts that in their affidavit they list 19 points and describe spending 27 hours at the TCF Center. They state they are a mother with two children and two degrees, and claim they would never write an affidavit under oath just to write it, noting that you can go to prison for this. They explain that they was initially supposed to work at the Detroit Department of Elections building, an order by their manager, Nick Economagunas, whom they identify as part owner of Dominion. They claim they have emails confirming the arrangement and that they were trained on the adjudication and tabulation process. An email allegedly instructs them to park in a lot and be shuttled to what they call the “Chicago Warehouse.” The speaker asserts that there was illegal activity at that location, stating that there are pictures of people carrying ballots out of the place and vans full of ballots leaving. Around 4:30 AM, they say there was an announcement that a new shipment of ballots was arriving, and that these boxes of ballots were brought in by “mister Baxter” from the rear of the room. They personally witnessed Mr. Baxter carrying boxes from the rear basement of the TCF Center to the tables. They describe each box as containing approximately 600 ballots, and note that the tables were 10-foot tables and about seven tables in total, all full of boxes of ballots. They estimate that about 50,000 ballots were brought in, clarifying that not all ballots were necessarily from the rear entrance, but that there were far more ballots than the ones brought in from the rear entrance. They recount the timeline as starting at 6 AM, with shipments arriving around 4:30–5 AM, and three rounds of activity earlier in the night—from around 10 PM to 1 AM and 1 AM to 4 AM—followed by the arrival of the 4:30 AM boxes. With the shift change, most volunteers, who had expected to be there from 10 PM to 5 AM, left at 5 AM, leaving the speaker to stay. The shift change occurred, and at 6 AM, Baxter and his management team resumed on the microphone. They allegedly stated, “this is what democracy is is supposed to look like,” and the whole room cheered in response to the new shift.

Jackie Pick, speaking as a volunteer and attorney not acting as counsel in this case, presented what she said is evidence from State Farm Arena in Fulton County concerning fraud or misrepresentation. She described the scene as a single large room where absentee and military ballots are tabulated on election day, with videotape from morning through close of polls. She stated that two Republican field organizers were sent as observers but were not allowed to observe meaningfully. They were “roped off with the press” in a roped-off area. She explained the timeline: the observers were to arrive around 08:00 to watch the tabulation of absentee and military ballots; about 10:00, a person working the polls allegedly told everyone in the room to leave because they were going to stop counting and would return at 08:30 in the morning. At approximately 10:00, workers remained, and the press and Republican observers left, but four people stayed behind and continued counting and tabulating well into the night, until about 10:25–10:30. The observers allegedly learned from a news crew that counting had continued after they had been told to leave. The observers returned to State Farm Arena around 01:00 in the morning and confirmed that people had left in contravention of the supervisors’ instructions. The video frames show the room becoming a ghost town between 10:25 and 10:37 as those who stayed behind were described as continuing work after the observers and press had left. The four people who remained behind were described as the lady in purple, two women in yellow (near the scanners), and the woman with blonde braids who had earlier instructed everyone to leave and stop counting. Pick asserted these four stayed behind to operate scanners once the area was clear of witnesses. She directed attention to the act of pulling ballots out from underneath a table, with the same blonde-braided woman having placed a table at 08:22 a.m. The video allegedly shows four suitcases of ballots being moved from under the table, prompting questions about the origin and chain of custody of those ballots, and why counting occurred only when the room was unsupervised. Her team calculated the possible volume: with three scanners processing about 3,000 ballots per hour over two hours, roughly 18,000 ballots could have been scanned during that unsupervised period. They noted six people involved in moving ballots in and out (the four workers plus two others), suggesting a prolonged period of unsupervised tabulation until about 12:55 a.m., after which the witnesses left again. The witnesses say counting resumed around five minutes before their return around 01:40–01:45. During the hearing, respondents questioned whether a water leak or water main break occurred and whether it affected operations; officials described conflicting accounts, with some asserting the leak did not disrupt work and others noting a toilet leak in some testimony. There were claims that a monitor was on-site throughout the process, which Fulton County officials reportedly disputed, stating the video had not been viewed by all parties. Additional questions from senators covered: who operates the cameras (the State Farm Arena) and whether the footage is secured and accessible; whether the scanners maintain real-time logs; and whether the video presents new information not previously reviewed by election authorities. The presenter emphasized the need for further hours of review to fully assess the frames and warrants.

The speaker noticed a batch of absentee ballots that stood out because they were in pristine condition, unlike the others which were worn. These ballots had no folds and felt different. One ballot had a white eclipse in the bubble where it should have been filled. As they sorted the ballots, they realized that a significant number of them were exactly the same, with no folds. One ballot in the stack was also misaligned. Additionally, instead of the usual 100, this batch had 110 ballots, which was unusual.

A person placed a table at 8:22 AM, under which 4 suitcases of ballots were found. The ballots were counted without witnesses present, raising concerns about the process. With machines capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour, multiple machines ran for 2 hours without supervision, violating rules and statutes.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.