TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

According to the latest report, US government data confirms a 143,233 percent increase in cancer cases due to COVID vaccination.

A recent paper suggests that COVID vaccines may meet the multi-hit hypothesis for cancer. According to the paper, the vaccines affect the p53 and BRCA tumor suppressor systems, impair DNA repair, and contain DNA fragments with cancer-promoting properties. The presence of SV40, a known cancer promoter, in the vaccines further supports this hypothesis. While it is important to note that this applies to some individuals, it suggests a potential link between the vaccines and cancer development.

Speaker 0 reports that the largest oncologic safety assessment of the COVID shots was just published in OncoTarget, a major cancer journal. They say the article was hit with cyberattacks just before publication, preventing online posting, and that the FBI was contacted. The piece then appeared in PubMed, but is described as having gone down again after another cyberattack on the journal. The core findings, as claimed, are that the researchers collected all of the cancer evidence associated with the COVID shots and found over three hundred confirmed vaccine-related cancer cases documented in peer-reviewed literature. This number is described as not representing the total seen in real-world data, but rather the count of cases identified by scientists within peer-reviewed sources, thereby supporting the claim that the phenomenon is real. The cancers span every type imaginable, with lymphoma accounting for about forty percent of the cases. Two large population-level studies are highlighted, totaling about ten million people. These studies reportedly show a major increased risk of multiple cancers in vaccinated populations compared to unvaccinated populations, with up to seven types of cancers increased. A military dataset consisting of around 1.2 million people is cited, in which lymphoma was reported to have increased drastically in 2021 among military members who were mandated to receive the shots. The summary characterizes the paper as so damning that it is presented as evidence that these shots are carcinogenic, and attributes the cyberattacks and other online disruptions to efforts to suppress these findings. The speaker emphasizes the sequence of cyber warfare activity around publication, the breadth of cancer types reported, and the notable increases in cancer incidence in large vaccinated populations, including a significant rise in lymphoma within the military cohort.

VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, collects data on vaccine-related adverse events. Analysis shows that in 2021, 98% of cancer-related reports were linked to COVID vaccines, significantly higher than other vaccines. A comparison with the flu vaccine revealed virtually no cancer cases associated with it, highlighting a stark contrast. Research indicates that PD L1, a receptor produced by cancer and immune cells, may contribute to this issue. Elevated PD L1 levels were observed two days after vaccination, suggesting an activated immune system may suppress responses to both COVID and cancer. This nonspecific immunosuppressive effect raises concerns about the potential for increased cancer risk following vaccination.

Kevin McKernan recently discovered that there is contamination in the mRNA shots with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called SV40. SV40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and impairs tumor suppressor systems. This means that the shots not only promote cancer through SV40 but also inhibit our ability to fight cancer. The increase in cancer rates is undeniable, but the question remains: how much of this is due to the vaccines?

Many people are questioning the potential links between COVID and the COVID vaccine to rising cancer rates. While some cancers, like colon cancer, are increasing, especially among younger individuals, the reasons remain unclear. There are theories suggesting that changes in the US diet may be a contributing factor, but further research is needed to understand these trends fully.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

An alarming increase in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbocancers," has been observed since the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. This rise is evident across all age groups, with significant increases in younger patients. Despite various theories, such as lifestyle changes and delayed diagnoses due to lockdowns, these do not explain the sudden surge post-2021. The correlation between the vaccine rollout and the rise in cancer cases fulfills several epidemiological criteria for causation. Potential mechanisms include immune suppression and disruptions to tumor suppressor functions. Many healthcare professionals have noted similar patterns and expressed concerns about vaccine safety. There is a growing consensus that the vaccines may be linked to these aggressive cancer trends, prompting calls for an immediate halt to their promotion and distribution.

The speaker cites two population studies on COVID-19 vaccines and cancer risk, claiming they show massive increases in multiple cancers. The first study, from Italy, followed 300,000 Italians for about 30 months and reported about a 23 percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations, with increases of about 40 to 60 percent in breast cancer hospitalizations, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and leukemia/lymphoma. A new study from South Korea, involving over eight million Koreans, purportedly corroborates the Italian data and expands on it. It reports about a 26 percent increase in overall cancer risk and increases across six major types of cancer, including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, and breast cancer, as well as other cancers described as very rare. The speaker frames these findings as an absolute disaster and claims they confirm that the vaccines have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. They state that the datasets corroborate these results and that the observed effects can be explained by gene expression chaos documented in other studies, along with genomic integration observed in stage four cancer patients. The speaker characterizes the situation as a disaster that needs immediate acknowledgment.

An alarming rise in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbocancers," has been observed since the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Reports indicate a significant increase in cancer cases, particularly among younger populations, with unusual presentations and rapid progression. Theories attributing this surge to lifestyle factors, delayed diagnoses, or environmental changes do not adequately explain the post-2021 trends. A close temporal association with the vaccine rollout raises concerns, as various mechanisms suggest potential links between the vaccines and cancer development. Despite reporting these observations, feedback from health authorities has been minimal. Many healthcare professionals acknowledge the troubling patterns but fear repercussions for voicing their concerns. The data indicate that COVID-19 vaccines may not be safe or effective, prompting a call for their immediate cessation.

A study from Japan suggests a potential link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and increased cancer mortality. Researchers observed a statistically significant increase in age-adjusted mortality rates for all cancers and specific cancers, including ovarian, leukemia, prostate, lip oropharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers in 2022. This increase occurred after two-thirds of the Japanese population received a third or later dose of mRNA vaccines. The researchers state the increased mortality is not due to COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care during lockdowns, but potentially an effect of the vaccine. The study notes that several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination, discussing possible causal links between cancer and mRNA vaccines. The data reflects deaths from cancer, not necessarily new cases, potentially representing aggressive forms of cancer. Graphs were shown indicating excess mortality for breast, pancreatic, lip oropharyngeal, prostate, leukemia, ovarian, and all cancers.

The speaker discusses data from the VAERS database, highlighting a significant increase in cancer-related conditions following COVID vaccination compared to other vaccines. They mention the overexpression of PD L1, a molecule linked to cancer, post-vaccination. PD L1 can suppress immune response, potentially increasing cancer risk. The speaker emphasizes the concerning implications of this finding.

There has been a concerning rise in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbo cancers," particularly after the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. This increase is observed across all age groups, with a notable surge in younger patients. Traditional explanations, such as diet, obesity, and delayed diagnoses due to lockdowns, do not account for the sudden changes in cancer biology and incidence. The correlation between the vaccine rollout and rising cancer cases fulfills several epidemiological criteria for causation. Proposed mechanisms include immune system disruption and potential contamination in vaccines. Despite reporting these observations, feedback from health authorities has been minimal. Many medical professionals share similar concerns but hesitate to speak out due to fear of repercussions. The evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccines may not be safe or effective, leading to calls for their immediate cessation.

Two early population studies examining COVID-19 vaccines and cancer risk reported substantial increases in various cancers. The first study, conducted in Italy, followed about 300,000 individuals for roughly 30 months and found: - About a 23% increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. - Increases of about 40% to 60% in hospitalizations for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and for leukemia/lymphoma. A newer study from South Korea, encompassing over eight million people, examined cancer risks after vaccination and corroborated the Italian findings while expanding on them. It reported: - About a 26% increase in overall cancer risk. - Increases across six major cancer types, including gastric (stomach), thyroid, colorectal, and breast cancers, as well as other cancers described as very rare. The speakers characterize these results as an absolute disaster and claim that the data corroborate all experimental evidence. They state that these findings confirm that the vaccines have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. Further explanations offered include: - The datasets corroborate the observed cancer increases. - The authors suggest these increases can be explained by “gene expression chaos” documented in their other studies. - They also cite “genomic integration” seen in stage four cancer patients as part of the mechanism behind the observed cancer risks. The overall message presented is that there is a widespread, vaccine-associated rise in cancer incidence, supported by the Italian and Korean population data, and reinforced by their cited molecular and genomic observations. The speakers conclude that this situation is a disaster that must be acknowledged immediately.

Speaker 0 summarized a study conducted in South Korea. The study involved "over 8,000,000 people who were vaccinated there" and a control group of "several 100,000 who were not vaccinated." A multivariate analysis was used to "eliminate" other variables associated with cancer. The researchers "eliminated any people who had had cancer or suspicion of cancer previously," so all participants were cancer-free at baseline. They followed the groups for "one full year from the time of their most recent injection or one full year from a picked reference date for the control group." The key finding reported was that, "at twelve months, there was a substantially higher number of cancers found in the vaccinated group," with six different cancers showing elevated risk. The cancers identified as elevated included "thyroid cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, [and] prostate cancer." Among these, "prostate and lung cancer were more than a fifty percent increase." The presenter noted that "this new technology is very risky" and acknowledged that "we can't say conclusively that it caused cancer," but emphasized that the finding is "very alarming" and "needs more research to back it up."

The Japanese study suggests an increase in cancer mortality, especially after the third mRNA vaccine dose. Specific cancers like ovarian, leukemia, prostate, liporal pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers showed higher mortality rates in 2022. Researchers suspect a link between mRNA vaccines and cancer development. The study focuses on cancer deaths, not new cases. The impact on future cancer rates remains unknown. Transparency and data disclosure from governments are crucial. The British prime minister asserts the safety of COVID vaccines.

Speaker 0: The very first two population studies that looked at COVID nineteen vaccines and cancer risk both found massive increases in multiple cancers. And these two studies, one of them is from Italy. One of them followed 300,000 Italians for about thirty months. That was the first one that found about twenty three percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. And they also found increases about forty to sixty percent increases in breast cancer hospitalizations, in colorectal cancer, as well as bladder cancer, and leukemia lymphoma. Now we have this new study that just came out that out of South Korea that looked at over eight million Koreans and looked at the cancer risks after vaccination there, and they corroborated the Italian data and even expanded on it. And they found about twenty six percent increase in overall cancer. But they also found increases across six major types of cancer including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, breast, all sorts of cancers were increased, very rare cancers. So this is an absolute disaster, and it corroborates all the experimental evidence. It's now confirmed that these shots have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. The datasets corroborate, and we can now explain it with the gene expression chaos we are seeing as documented in our other studies as well as the genomic integration we are seeing in stage four cancer patients. This is a disaster. This has to be acknowledged immediately.

A concerning trend has emerged where patients who were cancer-free for years are experiencing rapid relapses of aggressive cancers shortly after receiving COVID-19 vaccine booster doses. These cancers, including pancreatic, ovarian, lung, and colorectal cancers, are presenting at advanced stages and often affect multiple organs. Notably, some colorectal cancers are showing unprecedented explosive growth, and there are instances of different cancers arising in the same organ. Cases have also been reported of individuals with multiple cancers, such as a woman with three different breast cancers. Additionally, there is an increase in blood cancers like lymphomas and leukemias appearing soon after vaccination. Public health authorities have been hesitant to acknowledge this correlation, which is being observed globally where mRNA vaccines have been administered.

There are concerns that the COVID-19 vaccines may have a potential link to cancer. The spike protein in the vaccines could inhibit tumor suppressor systems in the body. Additionally, the vaccines may impair natural DNA repair mechanisms, increasing the risk of DNA damage. Contamination has also been found in Pfizer vials, which could lead to a direct DNA injection and activation of cancer-related genes. This multi-hit hypothesis suggests that repeated vaccination could promote cancer development. There have been clinical observations of rapid cancer progression and reactivation of cancers in remission after vaccination. However, no agency has confirmed a direct link between vaccines and cancer.

A recent analysis of CDC data shows a concerning trend in cancer deaths among individuals aged 0 to 54. Before 2020, cancer rates were stable, but after the rollout of COVID vaccines in 2021, there has been a statistically significant rise in cancer cases each year. This trend persists despite a decrease in booster vaccinations, suggesting potential long-term effects from the initial vaccines. Observations indicate that some individuals develop aggressive stage 4 cancers months after vaccination, with poor responses to treatment. Research indicates a shift in antibody production, which may lead to the immune system tolerating both the spike protein and cancer cells. This raises concerns about permanent damage from the vaccines that could manifest years later.

There have been reports suggesting a significant increase in cancer rates since the vaccination rollout, with many anecdotal cases emerging globally. The immune system plays a crucial role in identifying and eliminating early cancer cells. However, the vaccination may have impacted immune function, potentially allowing cancers to grow unchecked. The extent of this issue remains unclear, but there are concerns that it could lead to a surge in cancer and other conditions linked to the vaccination program. Notably, some healthcare professionals, like Dr. Ryan Cole in Idaho, have reported increased cancer activity, raising alarms about the lack of thorough studies typically associated with vaccine development, which usually spans 5 to 10 years. This situation is unprecedented and warrants serious attention.

Decades of research indicate risks associated with foreign synthetic DNA integrating into human cells, potentially leading to cancers and immune disorders. Contamination of synthetic DNA in Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines raises concerns about genomic instability. These vaccines function more like gene therapy, as lipid nanoparticles deliver synthetic DNA into the body, risking integration into our genetic material. Since February 2022, there has been a troubling trend of cancer relapses in patients who had been stable for years, particularly aggressive forms of cancer following booster doses. Colorectal cancer is notably increasing in prevalence, along with blood cancers like leukemias and lymphomas. Research indicates that boosters suppress T-cell responses, allowing uncontrolled growth of cancer and other foreign invaders. Concerns about the timing of these cancers following vaccination are widespread among colleagues and patients.

This study looked at the population of South Korea and there were over 8,000,000 people who were vaccinated there and they drew from that population as well as several 100,000 who were not vaccinated for the comparison control group. They did a multivariate analysis where they found other variables associated with cancer and canceled those out. They eliminated any people who had had cancer or suspicion of cancer previously, so all these folks had never had cancer and they followed them for one full year from the time of their most recent injection or one full year from a picked reference date for the control group. What they found was quite astonishing because overall at twelve months, there was a substantially higher number of cancers found in the vaccinated group, and this comprised six different cancers that had a higher risk. You can see this on the forest plot that I’ll have up on screen, that this included thyroid cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer. All of those were elevated in the vaccinated group and the prostate and lung cancer were more than a fifty percent increase. This new technology is very risky and we can't say conclusively that it caused cancer, but certainly this is a very alarming finding and needs more research to back it up.

Nicholas Holcher, an epidemiologist and foundation administrator at the McCullough Foundation, appears on the WiderWake Media Podcast to discuss what he calls harms from the mRNA COVID vaccines and to critique mainstream approaches to the pandemic and public health policy. - Vaccine definitions and mRNA technology - Pre-2000 definition: a vaccine is an injectable or oral product that introduces a killed part of a virus or an inactivated form to the body so that encountering a wild-type version would not infect or would cause a less severe illness. - He asserts that mRNA injections are not vaccines: they are a gene transfer platform using modified messenger RNA with long persistence in the body (via N1-methylpseudouridine), delivered in lipid nanoparticles. He claims these bubbles distribute systemically, including to the brain, heart, bone marrow, and reproductive system, and that they instruct cells to produce a spike protein, effectively turning organs into “toxic spike protein production factories.” He says this leads to autoimmune attack on those tissues and contributes to adverse events, including myocarditis, strokes, immune destruction, and “turbo cancers.” - History and purpose of mRNA in vaccines - According to Holcher, work on this technology existed for decades but animals testing showed high mortality or sterilization in ferrets and mice, preventing approval except under a declared global emergency. He contends the COVID-19 crisis enabled emergency use authorization across Western countries, with ulterior aims to inject the globe with mRNA technology. - Global impact and uptake - He estimates about 70% of the global population received at least one COVID-19 injection (mRNA or viral vector). He notes Eastern countries used non-mRNA platforms (e.g., AstraZeneca/J&J in some places; Sinovac elsewhere) but that uptake in the West was high. - Harms and evidence - Excess deaths: cites a study by Dennis Brancourt et al. estimating around 17 million deaths worldwide as a result of COVID injections (as of September 2023); he claims US deaths could be in the hundreds of thousands to millions. - Turbo cancers: cites multiple studies in 2023 showing increased risk of seven cancer types (colorectal, bladder, breast, thyroid, prostate, etc.) in vaccinated groups; cites a major cancer journal, OncoTarget, reporting hundreds of turbo cancer cases across 27 countries, with Pfizer contributing most cases. Holcher also mentions his own group’s work with Neo7 Bioscience documenting genomic integration of vaccine-derived mRNA in a stage IV bladder cancer patient (31-year-old woman) with a segment of mRNA found in circulating tumor DNA on chromosome 19; another study reported thousands of dysregulated genes in post-vaccine cancers, including p53, KRAS, and BRCA. - Definition of turbo cancer: per Merrick et al., rapid, aggressive tumor progression with sudden onset and early metastasis, often in younger individuals, and resistant to treatment. - Fertility, pregnancy, and autism - Fertility: cites studies suggesting fertility impacts, including Karaman et al. finding depletion of primordial follicles in rats after mRNA vaccination; Manichi et al. reporting 33% lower conception rates in vaccinated women in Denmark; a study indicating a ~20% drop in sperm concentration and motility with no recovery over five months. - Autism: asserts a large body of evidence linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders, citing a 136-study review with 107 studies finding positive associations between vaccines and neurodevelopmental issues, including autism, attributed to toxicity and immune system disruption, particularly in children with high vaccine exposure and reduced detox capacity (CYP450 impairment). - Other topics tied to vaccines and public response - The COVID-19 period and vaccine skepticism: claims the pandemic catalyzed a large anti-vaccine movement because people were compelled to take an experimental gene therapy product. - Sam Altman and gene editing: discusses Altman’s Preventive venture with the aim to reduce heritable diseases via in utero gene editing but warns of the path to designer babies and the potential for harm in early-iteration edits, citing prior CRISPR experiments on human embryos that produced deformed offspring or nonviable results. - AI, workers, and future society: predicts two-tier society with implanted or enhanced individuals and a replacement of human labor by robots and AI systems; discusses military and surveillance ambitions in gene editing and AI augmentation. - Mental health and digital life: references a randomized trial showing that turning off mobile Internet improved depression scores and well-being to an extent comparable to or greater than antidepressants. - World Health Organization (WHO): notes the US has pulled out of the WHO, arguing this is good for the US but potentially harmful for others still in the organization; expresses concerns about the pandemic treaty and ongoing global health governance, including vaccine passport-style surveillance. - FDA and public health policy: acknowledges some shifts (e.g., cutting doses from the childhood schedule) but argues the FDA remains compromised and too aligned with vaccine industry interests; criticizes the removal of a potential black box warning for vaccines and calls for more accountability. - Resources and contact - Holcher invites listeners to follow him on X (Twitter) at @nichulsher and to read their work on focalpoints.com and through McCullough’s network. Note: The transcript presents Holcher’s claims and interpretations about vaccines, turbo cancers, autism, fertility, and policy changes. The summary reproduces these points without endorsement or evaluation.

Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.