TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I have been accused, and it's been a paid campaign, of being a federal agent because I was at January 6 and did not get charged. However, despite being at January 6 and not trespassing, which is the crime that everybody was charged with, despite not being charged, not having committed a crime, I only had my bank account frozen for six months, I only was placed on the federal no fly list for a year, and I was only subpoenaed by Congress. I testified under oath when I was deposed as part of the subpoena last year, or I think that was rather in 2022, that I did not ever have contact with federal law enforcement at any time during or after any of the election riots or protests. This was a narrative that was cooked up. Nobody was saying this in 2021 or 2022 because all of my legal problems were publicized. I was on the no fly list, I had my money taken, I was banned from everything. It was only after Joe Kent was defeated in 2022 in the midterms that Max Blumenthal, Joe Kent's best friend, wrote a three part hit piece about me with his wife, Anya Parampol, accusing me of being a fed. They paid people, someone paid people, on Influencible to spread this article and the narrative that I'm a Fed. The claim grew that I gave a speech outside the Capitol and I said, we're taking the Capitol back, keep moving. They say I incited people to go in the building. The report says that none of their confidential sources on the ground were encouraging people to go in the building. There were undercover operatives or informants tasked to do that, but there were no undercover agents and out of 26 informants none of them were doing that. If the claim was I was entrapping people, that wasn't happening. The report also says that all the confidential sources were known to law enforcement before and were interviewed afterward. If I were one of the confidential sources, why would they make the mistake of freezing my money and putting me on the no fly list? The New York Times said they did charge me. I testified under oath that I never talked to law enforcement under penalty of perjury. So if anything, they’ve been saying Trump is gonna get in and blow the whistle. I wish he would on January 6 because if anything comes out, they could arrest me for perjury. I spent hundreds of thousands of dollars defending myself from the feds; lawyers aren’t cheap. My lawyers, not cheap. I probably spent over 200,000, close to 250,000 in legal fees. All the money that I was given by the mysterious French donor, nearly all of it after it was unfrozen, I wound up spending on legal fees. I had to borrow money from people because my bank account was frozen for six months. I missed weddings of my best friends, funerals of my best friends because I was on the federal no fly list. I haven’t had banking services for four years. I haven’t been able to process a credit card for my business. I’ve been banned from everything—Facebook, Instagram; Twitter until May, not even a year ago. For years I spent defending myself from attacks as a racist and a Nazi and a Holocaust denier, then the tactic switched to accusing me of law enforcement, then gay, pedophile, the usual. The grand irony is that Tucker Carlson, a close friend of Max Blumenthal, collaborated on the piece; Tucker Carlson’s father is a federal agent, and during January 6 Tucker Carlson was not talking about election fraud and said he hated Trump. I’m pulling the veil back a little bit, because this is politics. The election was stolen, and there are these dynamics with Blumenthal, Kent, Tucker, and Max Blumenthal’s wife’s article in The Grey Zone.

A former senior FBI official, Steven D'Antwono, voluntarily testified before the judiciary committee, claiming that the Mar-a-Lago raid was illegitimate. He highlighted several deviations from protocol and accused the FBI of exacerbating political tensions. D'Antwono is known for overseeing the Whitmer kidnapping plot and the January 6th pipe bomb incident. Despite his resignation in disgrace, he felt compelled to expose the FBI's corruption. More revelations are expected from him. These charges emphasize that when the term "national security" is used, it often masks the actions of corrupt individuals in power.

I was part of the group arrested for the Whitmer kidnap plot, which was set up by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be targeting Whitmer's cottage. I got charged for material support terrorism and felony firearm possession. The government lied about the situation. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice in the face of government overreach.

As a former 18-year veteran of the Department of Justice, I now lead a group called Justice Connection, aiding current DOJ employees facing demotions, firings, and threats from various sources, including January 6th rioters and those believing in the "deep state" narrative. These individuals are terrified for their careers and personal safety due to increased doxxing and harassment. The current environment within the FBI and DOJ is destabilized, impacting morale and daily functions, making it harder to focus on critical tasks like counterterrorism. While the administration defends personnel moves as aligning with its priorities, the safety and security of dedicated DOJ employees is at risk, especially with doxxing and harassment being criminal offenses.

I blew the whistle on the American Taliban case after discovering that torture had been used during the investigation. The Department of Justice failed to disclose this evidence during the prosecution. I went to the media about it, which led to a criminal investigation against me and being put on the no-fly list. This experience showed me the power and aggression of the government when you go against their narrative, even if it's based on falsehoods.

Why isn't FBI Director Chris Wray publicly defending his department's actions regarding the January 6th investigation? His resignation implies a lack of apolitical integrity within the FBI, suggesting that each presidential administration dictates priorities, rather than upholding a consistent, unbiased approach. This leaves the impression that wrongdoing occurred. The prioritization of the January 6th investigation over other crucial cases, like those involving child sex trafficking and serial killers, has negatively impacted agents' morale. However, some pushback exists; DC judges, including those appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents, have openly criticized the Department of Justice's actions, refusing to allow these cases to be dismissed. Their outspokenness provides a counterpoint to the perceived silence from other quarters.

An extraordinary scene unfolded outside the New York FBI office recently. I, Assistant Director in Charge James Dennehy, was forced to resign under pressure this week. As I departed the building, I was met with cheers from hundreds of my colleagues, accompanied by the sound of bagpipes. My departure was prompted by clashes with Donald Trump's Justice Department, particularly following the removal of senior FBI leaders and requests for the names of agents involved in the January 6 cases. To all those gathered, I want you to know that I will be your best cheerleader on the outside.

You've got to be heard. When I returned, my boss said I caused extra work and removed me from my squad, despite moving 2,000 miles for this job. I was assigned to a national security squad, given no work for six weeks, and sent into a potentially dangerous situation. This organization feels petty and tyrannical, not looking out for my interests or those of Americans. I was suspended without pay, complicating everything. I understand the investigation process, but it feels flawed. My experience has been filled with retaliation and unjust treatment. I want to express my side clearly during the interview, but I feel the system is broken. I don't trust the FBI anymore, and I doubt it can self-regulate. I appreciate your understanding, but I need to voice these concerns. Let’s meet soon to discuss everything in detail.

The FBI is accused of working against the American people and needing reform. Whistleblowers spoke out about the bureau's corruption and retaliation tactics during a congressional hearing. They detailed instances of being suspended, losing financial support, and facing humiliation and intimidation. Democrats attempted to discredit the whistleblowers, but they followed proper protocols and made protected disclosures. The FBI's role in the January 6th events was also questioned, with allegations of withholding video footage and the possibility of undercover agents being present. Protecting whistleblowers and holding those who retaliate against them accountable is crucial. Financial support is being provided to the whistleblowers through a crowdfunding campaign.

After being forced to retire by the Trump administration, I walked out of 26 Federal Plaza to a cheering crowd. My departure came after a battle with the Trump Justice Department, who wanted the names of FBI agents involved in the January 6 investigations. I spoke briefly to the current and former FBI, NYPD, and other law enforcement officials who came to see me off, telling them, "I will always be faithful to this country, to this organization, and most of all, I will always be faithful to you. And I appreciate you being faithful to me, to this office, and more importantly, our mission." I was given the choice to resign or be fired. It is unknown who the new Trump FBI director, Kash Patel, will choose to lead the FBI field office.

This account describes a deeply personal experience tied to the January 6 events and the author’s broader concerns about government overreach and the persecution of dissent. The speaker asserts that their journey is real and not abstract, detailing actions taken against them by federal authorities. Key points include: - The speaker was arrested by the FBI, placed in a cell, and branded a terrorist by their own government. - Their teenage son, who was sleeping in Los Angeles, was followed by TSA agents and placed on a watch list. - The speaker’s bank accounts were flagged, their reputation attacked, and they were effectively sentenced by a system that allegedly knew the accusations were false but did not correct them. - The speaker references recent media coverage to claim a shift in official acknowledgment: news reports allegedly confirm that there were hundreds of undercover FBI informants present on January 6, contradicting earlier statements that there were none, and even later statements suggesting only a few. - The speaker insists on recounting these events in their book, “Selective Persecution, the Legalization of American Fascism,” not as a pundit but as a witness, arguing that what happened to them could happen to anyone. The speaker emphasizes the breadth and seriousness of what they describe as state actions: targeting an individual with legal and reputational damage, coupled with surveillance and coercive measures affecting family members and financial standing. The narrative frames these experiences as part of a broader pattern of government behavior surrounding January 6, asserting that the claims are supported by new reporting about FBI informants on the scene. Overall, the account centers on personal testimony of alleged misconduct by federal authorities, the collateral impact on family members, and a broader claim about systemic abuse and misinformation surrounding January 6, framed within the author’s critique of American political dynamics as described in their book.

The FBI is being accused of corruption and targeting politicians, parents, and ordinary citizens. Whistleblowers have bravely come forward, facing retaliation and being blocked from working both inside and outside the FBI. This is a troubling time for the American people.

Derek Myers, a congressional candidate for Ohio's 2nd district, claims that undercover FBI agents and human assets were present at the January 6th Capitol protest. Myers states he was recruited by the FBI in 2017 as a field operative to infiltrate radicalized organizations, gather intelligence, help plan their activities, and "help radicalize them" to incite violence. Myers says he was deactivated in 2020 but was approached in December 2020 to be reactivated for an assignment in Washington D.C. in January, which he now believes was the January 6th Stop the Steal rally. Myers claims the FBI uses confidential human informants and plainclothes agents to infiltrate protests. He states he has evidence to support his claims, which he is prepared to share, despite the risks. He hopes his disclosure will shed light on the federal government's actions and force them to be honest about January 6th and the use of undercover agents.

FBI agents involved in the January 6th incident and the Mar-a-Lago raid are suing to keep their names private. Unlike them, my name was made public when they raided my house, which was widely reported. They surveilled me, invaded my privacy, and took my belongings. Now, they want to hide while I have no way to hold them accountable. It feels unjust that they can seek protection after their actions caused me so much distress.

I had a successful career in the FBI, overseeing operations in Southern California with a large team and budget. However, I believe that the organization has been infiltrated by the Illuminati Movement, along with other agencies like the NSA and CIA. I will provide more information on this later.

This internal government memo confirms I was retaliated against for speaking out against Homeland Security officials who I believed were breaking the law. No one at Homeland Security has been disciplined, demoted, or fired for failing to comply with the DNA law. To the contrary, some have been promoted. I've had my law enforcement credentials and firearm taken away, and my law enforcement retirement revoked. Publicly removing someone's firearm is the ultimate insult. I was iced, left to do menial tasks, and my future career potential vanished. I was demoted three levels, and like my colleague, my firearm and credentials were taken. Never in our combined seventy-five years of service have any of us even had a disciplinary action. One of the supervisors said the agency's goal is to bankrupt you, make you quit, die, kill yourselves, or preferably all of the above.

How many illegal FISA queries have occurred under your leadership? Reports indicate over a million errors among 3.4 million queries. Do you disagree with the inspector general's assessment? I don't have those numbers right now. The court noted over 200,000 violations during your tenure. Did you knowingly mislead Senator Lee about Pfizer's involvement in the January 6 investigation? I did not perjure myself; I believed Pfizer was not involved at the time. The court found FBI personnel conducted improper queries for personal reasons. What accountability measures have been taken? There have been disciplinary actions, but I can't discuss specifics. The FBI's trust is at an all-time low, and people feel you aren't providing honest answers. In Florida, applications to work for us have increased over 100%. We are proud of our agents and they deserve better.

Speaker 0 claims to have video footage from January 6th of two federal agents attacking the Capitol. Speaker 0 states they have been trying to get the FBI to investigate for over a year, providing them with twenty-nine minutes of high-definition footage. Speaker 0 says the FBI has not arrested the agents, nor have their images appeared online. Speaker 0 claims the FBI refuses to accept a statement or view video from January 5th, 6th, and 7th. Speaker 1 says the FBI raided them twice, came to their home, and took their phones. Speaker 1 advises Speaker 0 to avoid the FBI if possible.

An extraordinary scene unfolded outside the New York FBI office recently. I, Assistant Director James Dennehy, was forced to resign this week amidst clashes with Donald Trump's Justice Department, particularly after the removal of senior FBI leaders and requests for the names of agents involved in the January 6 cases. As I departed the building, I was met with cheers from hundreds of my colleagues and the sound of bagpipes. To everyone gathered, I promised to be your best cheerleader on the outside.

I'm Norm Eisen, publisher of The Contrarian, and I'm joined by Jen Rubin, editor in chief. We have Andrew Weissman with us, who discussed the troubling termination of FBI agents involved in the January 6 investigations. Emil Bove, the acting deputy attorney general, has ordered the disclosure of names of all FBI personnel associated with these cases, potentially affecting thousands. This raises concerns about public safety for those involved in prosecutions. The FBI leadership is reportedly resisting this order, with some special agents standing up for their colleagues. The situation echoes past injustices, and it's crucial for the Department of Justice to uphold the law rather than compromise it. FBI agents are trained in the law and are committed to their mission, demonstrating loyalty to justice over political pressures.

An extraordinary scene unfolded outside the New York FBI office. I, Assistant Director James Dennehy, was forced to resign this week under pressure. As I exited the building, I was met with cheers from hundreds of my colleagues and the sound of bagpipes. My departure comes after clashing with Donald Trump's justice department, particularly after the removal of senior FBI leaders and requests for the names of agents involved in the January 6 cases. To all of you, I promise to be your best cheerleader from the outside.

There's a clear distinction between legitimate evidence for an investigation and fabricated evidence, as seen in the Russia collusion scandal where the FISA courts were misled. The Biden administration and the DOJ have also engaged in politically motivated actions, such as the indictments and the raid on Mar-a-Lago, which many view as unjust. This politicization of justice is concerning. It's important to acknowledge that many rank-and-file FBI agents are frustrated with the current situation and desire reform. I've been critical of figures like Merrick Garland and Jack Smith throughout this process.

FBI agents and analysts, who handle investigations and surveillance, are not influenced by political changes and are dedicated to their work. Most intend to stay for their entire careers, often facing potential termination or retribution for doing their jobs on significant national security cases. This situation has created a sense of fear and uncertainty among them, as losing their jobs would jeopardize their reputations, financial stability, pensions, and health insurance. The current environment within the FBI is chaotic, with employees worried about their futures due to political maneuvering. It is unjust and unacceptable for them to endure such treatment.

The speaker testifies about the weaponization of the FBI and DOJ against its own employees and the American people. He served in the Army in Iraq and Afghanistan, then as a police officer, and later as an FBI special agent. Despite receiving high performance reviews and being selected for specialized units, he has been smeared as a subpar employee after witnessing weaponization within the FBI. He states that too many in the FBI prioritize avoiding difficulty over upholding the Constitution, leading to an Orwellian atmosphere that silences dissent. He is speaking out despite the potential personal cost, including the loss of his job and family's home. He claims the FBI allowed him to accept orders to a new position, sell his family's home, and report to the new unit before suspending him on his first day, rendering his family homeless. He concludes that bad actors have begun running parts of the government, but he will never stop trying to serve the nation and protect the innocent.