reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The committee's report on potential treasonous behavior is concerning, but no charges have been filed. The government takes foreign interference seriously, with new measures in place. The public's right to know about involved parliamentarians is debated, especially with an upcoming election. Foreign interference is a significant threat to democracy, with authoritarian regimes seeking to undermine it. Vigilance and defense of democracy are crucial in the face of global challenges. Law enforcement, not politics, should handle enforcement actions.

Canadians demand transparency in investigating potential traitors. The government is cooperating with the Hogg Commission and providing necessary documents. The National Security Committee of Parliamentarians will also be involved. The opposition should refrain from making baseless claims in parliament.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken urged Canada to push forward with the investigation into the killing of Hardeep Singh Najjar, expressing the need for India's cooperation. Canada has called on India and its allies, including the United States, to address this violation of international law and democracy. Canada emphasizes its commitment to the rule of law, as allowing bigger countries to violate international law without consequences would endanger the world. Regarding India's High Commissioner attending an event in Canada, Canada seeks constructive engagement with India despite their disappointment over India's revocation of diplomatic immunity for Canadian diplomats. Canada aims to work positively with India and uphold the rule of law.

The committee asked for information on how many of these so‑called police stations are operating currently in Canada, and whether any have been shut down. Response: There is deep concern about allegations and reports of foreign interference, including public reports of these so‑called police stations. The details of the investigation are the subject of ongoing initiatives by the RCMP, and questions about those details should be directed to the commissioner. The subsequent question specifically asked the commissioner to provide information to Canadians on how many of these alleged stations are operating in Canada, have operated previously, and if any have been shut down. Answer: Currently, we’re looking at three of the police stations in Toronto and one in Vancouver. We’re working with our police jurisdictions as well as with other Government of Canada national security agencies. An investigation has been initiated and is led by the Greater Toronto Integrated National Security Enforcement Team (INSET). So far, elements of the investigation have been very overt—there have been marked police cars and uniformed members to cause disruption to the allegations. We’ve released that visible presence, and that’s mostly so that people will see the actions, for two reasons: first, because we need more information, and second, so that when police are in the area dealing with the allegations, people will come forward. The investigation is ongoing, and while the details can’t be discussed publicly, a statement in October/November indicated that an investigation was underway into reports of possible activities at those locations. The committee member then asked for clarification: Can you confirm that you know the locations of these supposed police stations, and that RCMP in uniform have been at those locations causing disruption? Response: No. In the initial instances, instead of disruption by going in uniform with marked police cars, the approach was to speak with the people involved at those police stations or locations because those locations are a legitimate business in the front. The committee then asked for a timeline on when the investigation would conclude and whether the allegations are true. The conversation moved to indicate the inquiry would continue, but no specific conclusion timeline was provided in the exchanged statements.

India has announced the withdrawal of its officials. We are not looking for diplomatic conflict with India, but we will not remain silent while any country's agents are involved in threats, harassment, or violence against Canadians. Since September 2023, the Canadian government has not provided any information to us.

The speaker questions why the Indian government is not cooperating in the investigation if they have no involvement. They argue that India was convicted without the investigation being concluded, which they believe goes against the rule of law. They interpret the request for cooperation as a sign of guilt. However, they state that if any specific and relevant information is provided, India will investigate it.

I am currently seeking answers regarding classified briefings to ensure none of my MPs have ties to foreign powers. If any do, they should not run in the next election. Other party leaders should do the same. The federal government should be more engaged in defending Quebec regarding bill 96.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

Canada claims India possesses both the intent and capability to interfere in Canadian elections, particularly targeting Indo-Canadian communities. According to Canada, India ranks as the second most active country in electoral foreign interference, after China. India's interference impacts all levels of Canadian government, allegedly conducted by diplomatic officials and proxies. Canada believes India is acting due to New Delhi's perception that Canada is not adequately addressing the Sikh separatist movement and the security threats it poses to India.

The Prime Minister previously supported ENSCOCOP's role in examining foreign interference in Canada's democracy, but there seems to be a shift in stance. Questions arise about whether a recent ENSCOCOP report revealed involvement of Liberals seeking political and financial gain. Is the Prime Minister still committed to transparency and public trust in institutions, or has external influence changed this approach? In response, the Minister for Public Safety emphasizes the importance of oversight, noting that the government established a committee of parliamentarians to monitor security agencies for the first time. This committee includes members from all political parties, and their recommendations have been acted upon to enhance national security and combat foreign interference.

Our government is committed to ensuring the safety of our research institutions amidst growing threats. We are investigating issues at the Winnipeg Labs and taking necessary actions. Unfortunately, the Conservative party is using this serious matter for political gain, spreading conspiracy theories and hindering progress. Responsible debates are welcome, but weaponizing national security is not the way to go. It's disappointing to see certain members suddenly vocal on security issues while remaining silent on other important matters. This behavior is not fitting for an official opposition.

Canadian security agencies are investigating credible allegations linking Indian government agents to the murder of Canadian citizen Hardeep Singh Nejjar. Canada prioritizes the safety of its citizens and the defense of its sovereignty. Law enforcement and security agencies are focused on ensuring this safety and holding those responsible for the murder accountable. Canada has expressed its serious concerns to senior Indian intelligence and security officials. At the recent G20 summit, these concerns were directly communicated to Prime Minister Modi, emphasizing that any foreign government involvement in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil is an unacceptable violation of sovereignty.

Speaker 0: We are proud to have penetrated the cabinet. Speaker 1: A constituent asked about outside interference in our democracy. Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, boasted about infiltrating governments worldwide, including over half of Canada's cabinet. Can the member disclose which cabinet ministers support the WEF agenda for transparency? Speaker 2: Sorry for the poor audio and video quality. I'm unsure if the member...

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

The speaker, Ryan Davidson, is being questioned by an Integrated National Security Enforcement Team about his online posts regarding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Davidson claims he is seeking a lawful remedy for what he perceives as a criminal conspiracy with the Communist Party of China. He expresses concerns about the well-being of citizens and offers to contribute to investigations. Davidson criticizes Trudeau's government and accuses him of being propped up by a terrorist. He calls for an independent civilian to oversee the RCMP investigation. The security team warns Davidson about making inflammatory statements and confirms that they have no interest in stifling his speech. Davidson insists on continuing to voice his opinions until the issues are resolved.

Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc testified at the foreign interference inquiry, stating Canadians can vote with confidence. He expressed a preference for being promptly informed by senior staff about urgent matters, even if it meant being contacted at inconvenient times. PMO officials explained that some information, like notes about foreign interference, didn't reach the Prime Minister due to world events in early March 2020 that interrupted the process. They added that briefings are sometimes delivered in paper form for security reasons. According to PMO staff, CSIS never names individuals in briefings and is restricted in what information it can share outside the government, sometimes resulting in MPs not fully understanding the warnings they receive. Security expert Wesley Wark believes Bill C-70 will improve this by allowing CSIS to share some information with politicians and diaspora communities. Wark anticipates that India and China's alleged interference will be prominent in the inquiry's final report, and that all future governments will need to pay close attention to intelligence. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is scheduled to testify on Wednesday.

The speaker claims that not only the current government, but all previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe it took so long for this information to come out because of partisan politics and the influence of Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised, posing a significant security risk for Canadians. They suggest the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws similar to Australia's 2017 law against foreign interference to protect the country's future.

The Prime Minister addressed concerns about foreign interference, emphasizing the measures taken to protect Canada. He highlighted the creation of oversight bodies and tools to safeguard democracy. He mentioned the ongoing foreign interference commission and the upcoming testimony before the commission. The Prime Minister reiterated the integrity of the 2019 and 2021 elections, confirmed by a nonpartisan panel. The focus remains on addressing challenges and ensuring the safety of Canada's democratic processes.

Canada has reached out to India and its allies, including the United States, to address the credible allegations of Indian government involvement in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil. Canada takes this matter seriously and emphasizes the importance of upholding international law and democracy. However, Canada was disappointed when India violated the Vienna Convention by revoking the diplomatic immunity of over 40 Canadian diplomats. Canada believes that if countries can arbitrarily revoke diplomatic immunity, it poses a danger to international relations. Despite this, Canada remains committed to working constructively with India and will continue to stand up for the rule of law.

There are calls to reopen a report on Canadian veterans who fought with the Nazis. The government will focus on next steps in the house and be thoughtful about any further actions.

The speaker claims that both the current and previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe there are two reasons for this delay: partisan interests and infiltration by Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised by these agents. This poses a significant security risk for Canadians, as it raises questions about who is really in control of the country. The speaker suggests the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws, similar to those in Australia, to protect against foreign interference.

Canada has reached out to India and other allies to investigate the killing of a Canadian citizen allegedly involving Indian government agents on Canadian soil. They emphasize the importance of upholding the rule of law and working constructively with India. However, Canada expresses disappointment when India violated the Vienna Convention by revoking the diplomatic immunity of over 40 Canadian diplomats. This action raises concerns about international relations and the safety of diplomats. Canada wants to resolve the issue cooperatively and urges India to work together on the investigation. Canada considers both India and the United States as close friends and hopes for a peaceful resolution.

New information reveals that ArriveCAN contractors submitted receipts for a non-existent company. The investigation already involves allegations of identity theft, forged resumes, contractual theft, fraudulent billing, price fixing, and collusion in the creation of the $54 million ArriveCAN app. The speaker questions how much worse this situation can get and asks which Liberal insiders got rich. In response, the honorable minister states that public servants are expected to follow appropriate contracting practices. The Border Services Agency uncovered information during an internal audit and referred it to the police. The minister emphasizes the importance of letting the RCMP handle the investigation.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed allegations of Chinese interference in Canada's elections, stating he has not received any information from security agencies regarding federal candidates receiving money from China. Reports suggest that intelligence officials briefed Trudeau about China targeting Canada, including funding a network that supported 11 candidates in the 2019 election. A National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians highlighted significant foreign interference threats from countries like China and Russia, which aim to exploit Canada's openness and manipulate its political processes. Trudeau emphasized the importance of public concern for democracy and acknowledged attempts by China to interfere in Canadian elections in 2019 and 2021. In response, China's foreign ministry criticized Trudeau's remarks, urging Canada to refrain from statements that damage bilateral relations.

Canada is deeply concerned about credible allegations that agents of the Indian government were involved in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil. They reached out to India and other allies to address this violation of international law and sovereignty. Canada emphasizes the importance of the rule of law and working constructively with India. However, they were disappointed when India violated the Vienna Convention by revoking the diplomatic immunity of over 40 Canadian diplomats. Canada believes that if countries can arbitrarily revoke diplomatic immunity, it poses a danger to international relations. Despite the challenges, Canada remains committed to working with India and upholding the rule of law.