reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Did you know about the 12 USC 531 exemption? It's in the US code on house.gov. Effective October 1st, 2023, Federal Reserve Banks, their capital stock, surplus, and income are exempt from federal, state, and local taxes.

The speaker initially believed that there was a law requiring people to file tax returns, but after researching for three and a half months, they couldn't find a clear statute that made a person liable. They realized that the government collects taxes to generate revenue, but they were unaware of the complexities involved. The speaker attended a meeting where someone argued that the IRS lacks authority, but they initially dismissed it as taking things out of context. However, after a conversation with the person, the speaker agreed to research the matter further. They delved into the Internal Revenue Code and found sections that seemed relevant but didn't provide a clear answer. The speaker's research led them to question their own authority to enforce tax laws, ultimately leading to their resignation. They discovered that the Internal Revenue Manual restricts enforcement due to constitutional issues. The speaker believes that if more people knew about the government's methods, they would stop filing tax returns.

The speaker interviews former IRS commissioner Sheldon Cohn about the tax code and voluntary compliance. They discuss the definition of income, Supreme Court decisions, and challenges the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages. Cohn asserts that the law requires filing tax returns, despite objections. The speaker questions the IRS's legal authority and highlights inconsistencies in tax enforcement. Ultimately, the speaker challenges the IRS to prove the legality of income tax laws. Translation: The speaker interviews former IRS commissioner Sheldon Cohn about the tax code and voluntary compliance. They discuss the definition of income, Supreme Court decisions, and challenges the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages. Cohn asserts that the law requires filing tax returns, despite objections. The speaker questions the IRS's legal authority and highlights inconsistencies in tax enforcement. Ultimately, the speaker challenges the IRS to prove the legality of income tax laws.

Federal Reserve notes are not taxable income because they are a debt. The 10.40 bonds were used to support the war effort, and although people invested in them, they were not guaranteed to get their money back. The IRS originated from the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms agency in Puerto Rico and is not part of the US government. By law, we are only supposed to pay taxes to support essential governmental services, but the current system forces us to pay for more than what we actually receive. This is like being forced to pay for 18,000 hamburgers when there are only 19 listed on the menu.

A former IRS commissioner is interviewed about the tax code and income tax laws. He argues that the IRS code is voluntary compliance, not mandatory, and defends the IRS's actions. The interviewer challenges the legality of income tax on labor, citing Supreme Court decisions. The former commissioner dismisses the arguments and asserts the IRS's authority. The interview ends with a confrontation, revealing a lack of transparency in tax laws and enforcement. The interviewer questions the legality of income tax on wages and calls for the IRS to show the law to the public.

The speakers in the video discuss their experiences and research regarding the requirement to file a tax return and pay income tax. Speaker 0 initially couldn't find a specific law mandating tax returns, leading to their resignation. Speaker 1 left the IRS after raising concerns about the agency's violation of the law and people's rights. Speaker 2 conducted research to win a $50,000 challenge, but couldn't find the law either. They believe that if the truth is revealed, it would expose a fraudulent system. Speaker 3 was surprised to hear IRS agents say there was no law requiring tax filing or payment. Both Speaker 0 and Speaker 2 admit to not filing tax returns, and they mention that millions of others also don't file.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

For 137 years, America had no federal income tax until the 16th amendment in 1913. Abraham Lincoln tried during the Civil War, but it was deemed unconstitutional. Despite this, America had roads and infrastructure before 1913, as shown by the Brooklyn Bridge, New York City subway, Broadway, Penn Station, Grand Central Station, 5th Avenue, Grand Army Plaza, and Wall Street. Public schools may not emphasize this history.

I couldn't find a law requiring me to file taxes, so I resigned. The IRS wouldn't address my concerns and asked me to resign. I searched for the law to win $50,000 but couldn't find it. Trained IRS agents said there's no law for Americans to file taxes. I haven't filed taxes since leaving, and many others don't file either.

A man was being tried for not filing his income tax. The defense questioned whether he could be innocent while still not filing. It was revealed that not filing taxes is not a felony at the federal level. The case was then moved to the state level. The defense questioned an IRS agent who claimed he didn't write anything down, but video evidence showed otherwise. The prosecutor attacked the defendant's character. The jury asked for a copy of the law but didn't receive it. They realized that if the defendant wasn't required to file federal taxes, then the Illinois law requiring tax filing would be nullified. The jury found the defendant not guilty, surprising the judge. Other individuals who claimed there was no law requiring income tax filing also won their cases.

The speaker argues against the idea of paying taxes, claiming that a progressive income tax is a tool for spreading Marxism and communism. They point out that America was founded as a tax-free nation, citing the Boston Tea Party in 1773. However, in 1913, the Federal Reserve and the IRS were created, leading to the introduction of taxes. The speaker believes that those who work harder and earn more money end up paying higher taxes, which they equate to communism. They assert that it is an American duty to refuse to pay taxes, referencing the Communist Manifesto as support for their stance.

Income taxes were nonexistent in America until 1913, yet the government functioned well. They are seen as a significant fraud against the public. Although the Constitution initially forbade income taxes, an amendment allowed them. This system shifts the burden of revenue collection onto citizens, who must complete extensive paperwork annually. Essentially, individuals do the work of providing documentation while the government simply collects the money. This situation is viewed as a clever deception on the unsuspecting public.

Tariffs could replace income taxes. This idea stems from historical context, as the U.S. was wealthiest in the late 1800s under President McKinley, known as the "tariff king." He eloquently advocated for tariffs, emphasizing the need to protect American jobs, factories, and families from foreign competition. The message was clear: foreign entities should pay a significant price to operate in the U.S. to safeguard domestic interests.

**Speaker 0:** 212 Democrats voted against no tax on tips, Social Security, and overtime. If the government makes money and spends it responsibly, taxes aren't necessary. The new administration is holding the government accountable, and people are mad about it. **Speaker 1:** There's no tax on tips, overtime, or Social Security in the budget resolution. Taxes are normal. This utopia where nobody pays taxes isn't going to work. Read the budget before lecturing people about it.

After the Federal Government lost its ability to issue its own money, the national debt soared because the government had to pay the Federal Reserve interest on all currency printed. This interest on the national debt could never be repaid, as the Federal Reserve required all debts to be repaid with gold, which the government did not have. The interest portion of the national debt was not issued into the money supply, so more debt would have to be issued to service the growing interest payments on all loans. To cover this interest payment, Congress passed the income tax legislation, which became law in 1913 with the ratification of the sixteenth amendment. Initially, they levied a 1% voluntary tax on all incomes over 3,000 and a progressive surtax on all incomes over 20,000.

Democrats plan to expand the IRS with 87,000 new agents, according to the administration's treasury department. One speaker claims to have not paid federal income taxes for 30 years, blaming international bankers and the Federal Reserve. Another speaker criticizes Congress for implementing income tax in 1909 and questions why technological advances haven't made everyone prosperous. They propose a plan to drain the Washington DC swamp. The same speaker claims to be the number one NMD IRS and pays taxes, but also mentions voting for Barack and Hillary as an American thing to do.

We often hear the slogan "make America great again," but what does it really mean? It's important to consider when America was considered great. Looking back to the turn of the century, around 125 years ago, the economy was thriving. At that time, there was no income tax, and the government relied solely on tariffs.

There is a law requiring tax returns, but many struggle to find it. After extensive research, some individuals, including former IRS agents, concluded there is no clear statute making citizens liable to file or pay income tax. They resigned from the IRS after presenting evidence of legal violations and received no satisfactory responses. A challenge was issued for anyone to prove the law exists, but no one has succeeded. Despite widespread belief in the legality of income tax, many question its legitimacy. A class action lawsuit was initiated against the IRS, highlighting the agency's refusal to clarify the legal basis for income tax enforcement. Some citizens maintain that paying taxes is a civic duty to support government services, while others argue for transparency regarding tax laws.

A man was on trial for not filing his income tax. The defense questioned whether he could be innocent while still not filing. It was revealed that not filing taxes is not a felony in the federal government. To get a conviction, they had to involve the state. The defense questioned an IRS agent who claimed he didn't write anything down, but video evidence showed otherwise. The prosecutor attacked the defendant's character. The jury asked for the law requiring tax returns, but the judge denied their request. They discovered that the Illinois state law requiring tax returns is dependent on the federal law. The jury realized that if there is no federal law, the defendant isn't breaking any laws. They found the defendant not guilty, shocking the judge. Other cases also challenged the requirement to file income tax returns, resulting in acquittals.

There is no law requiring payment of taxes in the US. The IRS manual states they have no jurisdiction over US workers, only those abroad. Share this info and challenge the IRS to prove tax obligations.

We went from fighting a 2% tax on tea during the revolution to being taxed on money in various ways today. Taxes are imposed on income, spending, saving, investing, and even driving. The government takes more as you earn more. The federal tax code is 26,100 pages, with over 9,000 additional IRS regulations. Despite this, infrastructure funded by taxpayers is deteriorating. Our founding fathers would be displeased with the current tax system.

You become a federal taxpayer when you file your first IRS 1040 form. However, signing this form is not legally required, and employers cannot force you to sign it. By signing the form, you declare yourself a federal taxpayer under penalty of perjury. The good news is that you can revoke this contract at any time, as long as you pay any taxes owed up to that point. Revoking your election to be a federal taxpayer cancels your status as one. If you did not voluntarily elect to be a federal taxpayer and do not meet certain criteria, it is unlikely that you owe any income tax. The seizure of your earnings without your permission is a violation of the constitution.

In 1894, the Supreme Court ruled in Pollock v. Farmers that federal income tax was unconstitutional. However, in 1913, two significant events occurred: the establishment of the Federal Reserve and the introduction of income taxes. The onset of World War I followed in 1914. By the 1930s, the government began taking income directly from paychecks through payroll taxes, a practice that was accepted by the American people. This marked a pivotal moment where citizens consented to the government withholding taxes before they received their earnings, fundamentally changing the relationship between individuals and taxation.

No taxation without representation is a fundamental principle in Canada, outlined in Section 53 of the Constitution Act 1867. Only elected representatives in the House of Commons can vote on tax increases, not unelected officials from the CRA. Currently, the CRA is attempting to enforce a capital gains tax hike that has not been legislated. The Canadian Tax Credits Federation is preparing a constitutional challenge against this action. This tax increase could lead to the loss of over 400,000 jobs and remove $1 billion from the Canadian economy. The Federation is committed to opposing this undemocratic tax hike.

The speaker interviews Sheldon Cohn, a former IRS commissioner, about the belief that there is no law requiring Americans to pay income tax. Cohn argues that voluntary compliance is used as a term for traffic laws, but it does not apply to income tax. The speaker questions the definition of income and cites Supreme Court rulings that state income is not wages. They also discuss the lack of a law making individuals liable to file a tax return. Cohn dismisses the Supreme Court's relevance to the IRS and the speaker concludes that the IRS operates through intimidation and fear. They challenge the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages.