TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

By 2030, there is to be a 50% reduction in farmed animals, and by 2050, a 100% reduction. Starman and Bill Gates have allegedly signed up to this plan. The speaker claims to have the document in writing and declares that "World War four" has commenced internally. The speaker urges listeners to "Keep Britain farming."

Using fertilizer, buying tractors, insecticides, and herbicides is what farmers are encouraged to do. However, after 17 years of practicing rotational grazing, the speaker firmly believes it is the superior approach. They emphasize that the money saved from not purchasing these inputs can be considered as profit.

"I'm absolutely fucked as farmers" and "Everything is so fucked," with the speaker saying they do not see anybody surviving this farm crisis. One of the best spawn crops they have ever raised is becoming worthless because, "because of the tariffs, China will not fucking buy it." They note that China is "the only country in the world that buys scorn" (sic) and conclude they are "literally just chopping it and blowing it on the fucking ground because it's fucking useless." They state they will need government assistance "to make it through this fucking crisis and kill these tariffs in." The speaker emphasizes, "Look at I've never raised a spawn crop like this," calling the situation "heartbreaking" and expressing doubt about how they will survive. They recall Trump's claim that "he fucking loved us farmers," and juxtapose it with their reality of "blowing my spawn crop all over the ground." They hope that Trump will "work a deal out where Antarctica and Mars will start buying this sporn and save the farmers." The segment closes with the blunt assertion, "sporn crop, but you're fucked."

"We're just absolutely fucked as farmers, guys. Everything is so fucked, and I do not see anybody surviving this farm crisis that we're in. Guys, look. One of the best spawn crops that I have ever raised in my life. And because of the tariffs, China will not fucking buy it. And they are the only country in the world other than well, they are the only country in the world that buys scorn. And so now I'm literally just chopping it and blowing it on the fucking ground because it's fucking useless. It's valueless. There's nothing I can fucking do to it. I am going to need government assistance to make it through this fucking crisis and kill these tariffs in. Look at I've never raised a spawn crop like this, guys. And this is just fucking heartbreaking to me. I don't know how I'm gonna survive. You know, Trump said he fucking loved us farmers, and here I am just blowing my spawn crop all over the ground. Hopefully, he works a deal out where Antarctica and Mars will start buying this sporn and save the farmers. I'm sorry, sporn crop, but you're fucked."

Farmers in the agriculture industry are being offered 1.5 times the value of their crops to destroy them. The federal government is also withholding subsidies for farming if crops are not destroyed. This creates a system where farmers cannot afford to provide food without government support. The government is trying to create a food shortage by paying farmers to destroy their crops. Farmers have received destruction notices and are given the option to manually destroy their crops for extra money. The government is providing instructions on how to properly dispose of the crops. This situation is concerning as it affects both food and energy control, limiting freedom.

The government is providing £2,500 for three years to participate in a scheme that requires no supplies. I plan to use this funding to cultivate land and receive £440 per acre. I can leave crops in the ground without harvesting, which means no straw for cattle or bread production. Additionally, I can plant bee and wild bird seed, for which I can also get paid. My accountant advises this approach since I won't need to buy expensive fertilizer, which has skyrocketed to £1,000 per ton due to the Ukraine war. This way, I can maintain a crop without the costs of spraying or tractor work while still earning £440 per acre.

I made money by getting into farming. Selling corn and chicken is great because they come out of the ground and you can kill the chicken for free meat or sell the eggs. Sheep's wool can be sold too, and it grows back. It's a brilliant way to make money without needing an alarm clock. While others struggle on the tube, I'm already at work, milking a lucky cow.

Farmers in Wilmot County, Canada, had 770 acres of farmland expropriated by the region of Waterloo for a battery plant. Expropriation means the government takes land with compensation, regardless of the owner's consent. Farmers planted crops, asserting their right to harvest them, but the government hired a company to destroy the crops weeks before harvest. The destroyed crops were valued at £2,800,000, or 2,500,000 boxes of cornflakes. The speaker claims this destruction of food is happening in a world where people are starving. They are concerned about the future and call for the public to share the video to stop this attack on farmland. The speaker concludes with "no farmers, no food, no future."

I received a list of crops that can be grown next year, and it turns out we can only grow Chinese cabbage. Everything else needs to be harvested by October 1st. It's ridiculous! We'll have to buy celery from Spain, even though it can't be grown there because it's too warm. Who came up with this list? We're not even talking about sustainability anymore. I've been trying to get in touch with the government about these issues, but they're not responding. The problems will be huge next year, and there won't be enough food. I've reached out to people in The Hague, but no one is listening.

The transcript features a large American farm run by a few people, renowned for profit and soil rebuilding. A neighbor's eroded soybean field contrasts with this farmer's perennial pasture and windbreak. The farmer cites six soil-health principles: 1) work with nature locally, 2) minimal mechanical/chemical disturbance, 3) keep soil covered (armor), 4) diversity rather than monoculture, 5) living roots year-round, 6) integration of animals and insects. A second speaker says he has not taken a government subsidy since 02/2019, no crop insurance, and eliminated seed treatments and pesticides; this saves about $2,000,000 annually. He speaks of family legacy avoiding chemicals and building a regenerative no-till system. A study of 100 corn/soy farmers found 88% reported higher earnings with soil health practices. The conclusion urges shifting to regenerative agriculture to heal soils, rivers, and communities, presenting humanity a choice between regeneration and degradation.

The speaker contrasts GMO sweet corn from the store with heirloom corn, noting the sunflowers turning away from the sun. They claim aluminum levels in the soil are now five to ten times higher than last year. Cucumber and hot pepper plants are not producing as much as in previous years. Normally, the speaker would have excess produce to give away, but this year the garden has suffered the worst. The speaker states they will still be able to maintain operational costs and can enough for their family. However, they claim they won't be able to provide for others as much as in the past.

Speaker 0: "The average conventional farm, at least in our country, they actually make more of their profit on crop insurance and other government subsidies than they actually do on selling the crop." "They feel like their hands are tied." "So there has to be a bridge." "Now, you know, I'm not risk averse, so I went out." "But, basically, I haven't received an agricultural government subsidy in my lifetime." "Our farm has never received them." "Economically, our farm, it makes five times as much as any of their farms, but that transition was not easy." "We had to eat pretty slim for a few years during the transition of the original farm." "You know, I think the the policy has gotten the farmers"

For 20 years, the political class has dictated farming methods, but as a farmer for nearly 500 years, I feel disconnected. We're paid to grow wildflowers instead of food, which is unsustainable. The political class is out of touch, as seen by the lack of MPs in the House of Commons. We're stopping wheat production for wildflowers, neglecting the need for homegrown food. This trend is also seen in Europe, where farmers are asked to grow wildflowers instead of food, leading to deforestation for food imports. This approach is not sensible.

Speaker 0 argues that farmers are fully justified in taking action. They point to beef as an example: a farmer earns about 3 euros per kilo when he has a chance, while in shops consumers pay about 15 euros per kilo or more for minced meat. They state that someone is getting rich from this, but it is not the farmers. They explain that farmers' costs have risen significantly in recent years, whereas food multinationals have driven up prices in stores, yet farmers receive only minimal compensation for their products. Some farmers even operate at a loss, while shareholders accumulate profits. They insist that this must change. There must be a return of respect for farmers, and a return of a fair price for farmers.

Speaker 0 outlines a sequence of political and corporate protections related to litigation and public health. He states that a Trump executive order will federally protect pesticide companies, such as Bayer, from lawsuits related to $7,200,000,000 in cancer. He contrasts this with Clinton’s protection of cell phone tower companies from lawsuits and Reagan’s protection of vaccine companies, implying a pattern across administrations. He then deepens the claim by alleging that all three presidents supported “the tiny hats, the Rothschilds,” and cites Murder by Injection to assert that Bayer was owned by the Rothschilds. Based on this, he advises against spraying pesticides on land and suggests boycotting as a strategy, noting that some farmers practice organic methods without pesticides. He names Amos Millers, Polyface, and White Oak Pastures as examples of farms that can operate without chemicals. The speaker contends that chemicals are used because if people aren’t poisoned, big pharma doesn’t make money, and the medical system is “ran by the Rawls Childs.” He mentions having delivered hundreds of talks on electroculture, which he says demonstrates that it’s possible to avoid using any pesticides, and asserts that those talks were deleted by YouTube for the topic. When asked what electroculture does, he promises it would bring “abundance”—“lots and lots and lots and abundance, all without chemicals.” Throughout, he repeatedly urges listeners to question everything and connects pesticide use to broader conspiratorial claims about corporate and financial control, as well as the influence of the Rothschilds on health and agriculture.

An individual claims to have been offered £2,500 to join a 3-year scheme where they don't supply food. They state they can plant Spring Barley and receive £440 per acre from the government, then leave the crop to rot, forgoing straw and produce. They claim they can plant mixes for birds and bees or wild birdseed, and get paid to spread wild birdseed. Their accountant advises doing it to avoid fertilizer costs, which have allegedly risen from £250 to £1,000 a ton since the Ukraine war. They state they can avoid spraying, tractor use, and fertilizing, collect £440 an acre, and repeat the process, while also receiving £2,500 from the government for 3 years.

The transcript presents a claim that seed companies pressure farmers to buy their seeds, contributing to higher food costs. It asserts that farmers can be sued if they plant their own seeds, and that farmers do not own the genetics of their crops unless they use heirloom seeds. To plant these seeds, farmers must pay a fee, and seed companies can come onto a farmer’s property to inspect plants; if any part contains the company’s genetics, the farmer can be sued. The speaker emphasizes that farmers do not own the hard work of growing the plant because of these seed-ownership practices. Seed companies are described as reminding farmers of their purchasing history by saying, “we know you bought our seed last year,” and that if farmers do not buy seeds again, the companies will audit them. The speaker then shares a personal example: an order of three totes, sufficient to plant 300 acres of soybeans and to have the right to plant them, cost over $30,000.

Our government is providing £2,500 for the next 3 years to plant crops without harvesting them, receiving £440 per acre. Fertilizer prices have increased due to the Ukraine war, now costing £1,000 per ton. There are options to plant crops for birds and bees, as well as wild bird seed, with additional payments available. Despite not needing to spray or fertilize the crops, the government will still give £2,500 for the next 3 years.

Do you realize that if you go out outside, there's about 30,000 tons of free available nitrogen above every acre of ground? 30,000 tons. And how much does a farmer need to raise corn? About a 125 or a 130 pounds. So we need to educate the farmer on how to implement the practices that retrieve and pull that nitrogen into the system to where you no longer need inputs. And that's what we're doing. We're doing you know, these guys have have cattle grazing. We've got our livestock are the microbes under the ground. Those guys are working all the time. And and you need to have that right now at home. For example, we are raising organic corn with zero inputs. No nitrogen, no p, no k, no chemistry, nothing. But you can't do that. Right? You can't do that. But you can. So we have to understand, though, the next phase to push this thing is education. We have to understand how to educate the educators to then teach the farmers.

We were offered £2,500 to join a scheme for 3 years without supplying anything. By planting specific crops for birds and bees, we can avoid buying expensive fertilizers. The government pays us £440 per acre, allowing us to leave the crops to rot in the ground. This saves us from spraying, fertilizing, or harvesting. It's a great deal that many are taking advantage of.

By 2030, there is to be a 50% reduction in farmed animals, and by 2050, a 100% reduction. Starman and Bill Gates have allegedly signed up to this plan. The speaker claims to have the document in writing. The speaker suggests this signals a "world takeover" and declares "World War four commence," urging listeners to "Keep Britain farming."

The speaker, a farmer, emphasizes the importance of animals in the soil cycle for sustainable agriculture. They argue that without animals, the production of vegan alternatives like soybeans and impossible foods would rely heavily on mining minerals, which is unsustainable. The speaker also criticizes the negative environmental impact of monoculture and mass agriculture, which has led to a significant decline in insect populations. They suggest that the solution lies in consuming less meat, specifically grass-fed meat, as it helps fertilize the soil. The speaker warns that neglecting the natural cycle of soil and food production will ultimately lead to desertification.

"In this episode, I sit down with farmer Joel Salatin. He and his family owned Polyphase Farms, and he's the author of 17 books including Everything I Want to Do is Illegal, War Stories from the Local Food Front." "You notice there's no flies, there's no smell. These are unvaccinated, unmedicated, no pharmaceuticals, none of that." "You can't have a porta potty, so now you're at $50,000 to put in a certified septic system in order to have a kitchen that passes compliance." "Salatin believes that what America desperately needs is a food emancipation proclamation." "Which basically says, you and I can engage in a food transaction without the government's permission." "In my lifetime, I have watched this erosion of farmer access to retail dollars." "The question is, is it all gonna go to Vanguard, BlackRock, Bill Gates, the Chinese?"

Story: they say 'organic food was just food,' 'grass fed beef was just beef,' and 'raw milk was just milk.' Farmers seeking real healthy food were 'forced to use government issued pesticides and chemicals.' They describe schemes where farmers were 'paid to not grow food,' told to plant wildflowers and scatter bird seed, raising prices as fertilizer costs rose. '£500,000,000' was taken away from farmers and handed to farmers abroad. They blame a 'climate crisis' and say 'cow's farts' are the problem. They claim 'world's largest landowners' push for us to eat bugs and lab grown foods, 'to wipe out the farming industry piece by piece.' 'No farmers means no real food.' Support local farmers: buy from farm shops, grass-fed meats, unhomogenized milk, and real free range eggs.

We usually avoid political topics, but recent issues significantly impact British agriculture. As farmers, we see ourselves as caretakers of the land, which we intend to keep within our families. For instance, Clarkson's farm, spanning 1,000 acres, could face an inheritance tax bill of up to £2.5 million, forcing the next generation to sell land to manage the debt. In 2023, land purchases by UK farmers fell by 8%, while institutional investors increased their acquisitions by 13%. This raises concerns about land ownership in the UK—should it remain with local farmers or go to corporations? This shift could harm food security and the UK economy. Despite our differences, we all agree that Labour's budget undermines British agriculture. We encourage everyone to unite and show support on November 19th.