reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Achieving net zero emissions could have dire consequences, as at least 50% of the population relies on nitrogen-based fertilizer for survival. Banning this fertilizer, as some countries have done, would lead to widespread hunger and disease. The notion of saving the earth through such measures is seen as a disguised death wish, as the earth does not necessarily require saving.

Great Britain's energy policy is criticized for being based on flawed science. Mainstream media lacks serious debate on the issue, favoring celebrities over independent scientists. The push for net zero emissions is deemed absurd and unnecessary, with plans to triple wind turbines seen as futile. Solar panels in Yorkshire are questioned due to lack of sunlight. A website with expert input is recommended for those seeking unbiased information on the topic.

"The world is watching, and this is one of the babies. Who is it? Carrie. I got Carrie here. I mean, they have an obligation in a civil society." "Right? We don't suffer. It's in humane once again. Absolutely." "And the reason for her injury is because of the drones flying around and distressing the noise." "Injured before the drones. She was injured during those two helicopters, broke all the rules, flying over here in the dark with articulated searchlights. That's when they started running." "They went through the fences. Not the fence." "We don't even know if any of them got out that day." "What was her signs of dehydration? Very dehydrated. Skin tender. While she's drinking." "I've been appointed as the farm vet. And so are you guys. Sorry for that."

Speaker 0 asserts that Bill Gates is not a philanthropist because he “gives a little bit of money to take over entire sectors.” They say Gates works on seed, with the big seed banks described as the “CJR system.” The claim is that “he gives a million here, but he takes all the seeds of that system, the ICRISAT system.” They assert that all of the world’s seed banks are now controlled by Gates through this method. The summary continues: Gates “finances the Swalbat seed bank,” then “he creates patent systems.” He is said to develop and promote technologies for patenting, including gene editing technologies and digital sequence technologies, thereby controlling the seeds of the world. They claim Gates “destroys the international system that controls the country’s rights to their seed,” naming the Convention on Biological Diversity and the FAO treaty on seed. They say he “destroys and undercuts them so that all the seeds of the world are his seeds,” and that he can be the Newman Santo on a global scale. Later, it is asserted that Gates is “the biggest farmland owner of America.” The speaker contends Gates coined a term, “net zero,” and that Gates says climate problems can be solved by net zero. They insist it doesn’t mean emission reductions; rather, “we will con” [likely "we will con" is a fragment] and that we will absorb pollution via “offsets” on other people’s lands. The claim is that Gates “flies a private jet and has all the private jet services of the world.” They say he bought “all the land in America,” but he “wants our land for carbon offsets.” The overall assertion is that this is the climate strategy described as net zero, and that it constitutes a “land grabber” approach through carbon offsets.

When all else fails, they take you to war, and the climate hoax is an effective tool. In the name of saving the planet, they will take food, cars, gas boilers, and air travel. Land seized from farmers will be used for wind turbines and solar panels, which won't provide reliable energy, potentially leading to a new dark age. The production of turbines and panels uses oil, gas, and coal, requiring the mining of rare earth metals and minerals, destroying habitats and ecosystems. Mining for lithium, cobalt, cadmium, copper, and lead may increase by 2,000%. While coal mines are shut, other mines are opening to obtain materials for batteries. Child slaves give their lives for cobalt used in electric batteries. When turbines and solar panels reach the end of their lives, they can't be recycled and are buried in landfill sites, leaking lead, cadmium, and other toxins into the soil and water supply. This is driven by greed, benefiting the few and denying the many, after years of brainwashing people into thinking the Earth is about to catch fire.

Katie Hopkins enters a West Country field where a solar panel farm is being installed. She films as she argues that the countryside is being destroyed to place solar panels, claiming that “the valley is so pretty” and describing it as “heartbreaking.” She says she walked onto the site because the gate was open and insists she is showing what’s being done to farmland. She points to plastic packaging around the solar equipment, asserting that it “cannot be recycled, obviously,” and contends that the packaging is environmentally harmful. Hopkins highlights the solar panels themselves, noting their large size and the plastic wrap on them, and she states that “these solar panels can’t be recycled,” implying that much of it will become landfill in the future. Hopkins identifies herself and frames her critique as a stand against what she calls “the ridiculousness of net zero,” arguing against a perceived lie about net zero and its supposed benefits. She calls the situation “Batshit Bonkers Britain” and says she is trying to show people what’s been done to the countryside, vowing not to blame the workers but to condemn the vandalism of the countryside. She emphasizes that the valley belongs to the public and not to the company (“this is my countryside. It’s not yours, and it’s certainly not Canadian solar panels”). Hopkins describes herself as a countryside walker and rebukes those in the site, telling them she does not have access and that she shouldn’t be there, while noting that she did “let myself on” because the gate was open. She addresses the workers, arguing that they are angry with her and that she does not deserve to be there. Hopkins insists that the installation amounts to vandalism, even as she acknowledges the workers’ jobs. She asks what the workers are doing and expresses concern for safety, claiming she is “a dangerous person” and that her safety is at risk. She prays for reform to roll back net zero policies and for the end of what she calls “needless wanton vandalism of our countryside.” Throughout, she reiterates her stance against net zero and frames the solar project as environmentally and aesthetically harmful, arguing against the idea that the project is good for the environment and for rural areas. She also repeatedly asserts ownership of the countryside and questions the legitimacy of the installation by Canadian Solar. The scene ends with her leaving the site after maintaining that she filmed to inform her audience of what she perceives as damage to the countryside.

The video documents a drive through rural farmland in Indiana to a growing AI data center. The area is described as “super rural,” with miles of farmland and few signs of life until the data center lights appear, creating a noticeable intrusion in an otherwise empty landscape. The narrator notes the drive covers “30 plus miles, maybe more of nothing but just beautiful rural farmland,” and expresses strong emotion about returning to this area after a year away. As the video continues, the scenery remains rural and expansive, with mentions of semi trucks and cement trucks on the way to the site. The narrator highlights the emotional impact of the development, stating, “the first time I drove this, it genuinely made me so emotional because I haven't been this way. I haven't left town in, like a year.” The content hints at a pause in filming near a small parking lot or staging area before continuing along the corridor toward the project. A key claim is that the Meta AI data center is being built on this farmland, consuming “beautiful farmland that we will never be able to replace.” The narrator emphasizes the contrast between the large land use for the data center and the relatively small number of jobs it will create, stating that it will “only employ one to 500 people,” which the speaker finds startling. The final sentiment underscores the perceived imbalance between the considerable land impact and the limited employment opportunity, describing the situation as “pretty fucking insane.” The video ends after confirming the path to the data center and the ongoing construction.

The speaker reports they have been officially banned from entering the United Kingdom. They state the UK government, under Keirstarmer, deems their presence “not conducive to the public good,” and they express confusion over why being conducive to the public good is a requirement to enter a country. They compare this to thousands of illegal immigrants entering through the Channel daily, noting that “Nobody's asking them to be conducive to the public good,” yet they cannot go to the UK. The speaker mentions they did not apply for an EITA (likely a visa/permit) and had recently returned in September to join the Tommy Robinson rally where they spoke, intending to participate again in May, which now seems impossible. They describe the timing as suspicious, pointing out that three days earlier they posted about Kierst Armour calling out his hypocrisy for wanting to ban X because of women’s safety while allegedly allowing migrant gang rapes to happen. They imply this is connected to the ban as an act to ban free speech. They describe the situation as dystopian and emphasize the severe limitation of their freedom, noting that “as it says in email, I cannot appeal.” They stress they are not convicted of any crime, not under suspicion of any crime, and that the decision was made by Kirstarmer that someone like them is “not welcome in The UK.” The overall claim is that the ban is an abrupt, non-appealable restriction on their entry into the country, framed within accusations of political manipulation and hypocrisy by the UK government and Kier Starmer.

They claim that agriculture is causing global warming and threaten to cut off food supply, benefiting only billionaires. This would lead to poverty and starvation if they achieve net zero emissions. They argue that to reach net zero, all animals, including humans, would need to be killed since we emit CO2. Food and energy are crucial for survival, and they warn of the disastrous consequences if these actions are taken. They also criticize the notion that nitrogen fertilizer is a greenhouse gas and dismiss the campaign against CO2 as phony. Meanwhile, Russia, India, and China continue to build coal and nuclear plants.

See what happens when all the police drones are flying so low. Fuck off. Go away. The police drones are flying so low. They're putting our birds through fences. You wanna talk humane? Here's our here's our girl. She just went through a fence, got stuck. She's don't know if she can get up. They're causing these animals to kill themselves. They're going through fences. They're hitting fence posts because their drones are flying solo. Do you see this? This is life. This is this is humane. These are healthy animals that are suffering

The speaker, a long-time green energy supporter, was dismayed to learn about the environmental and human costs associated with green technologies. A single lithium mine allegedly creates millions of tons of waste annually, laced with sulfuric acid and radioactive uranium, polluting water for 300 years. Child labor is used to mine cobalt. Solar panels are allegedly made by laborers in razor wire enclosed camps exposed to quartz dust, causing silicosis. The Ethical Consumer Organization reports that forced labor in the solar panel supply chain is hard to avoid. Wind turbines consume vast resources, require diesel to start, gallons of oil to lubricate, and are hard to recycle. Solar panels are also extremely difficult to recycle, costing more than production. Lithium batteries pose steep challenges too. The speaker claims these "green" solutions are actually good marketing from the $1.5 trillion climate change industry. They urge people to prevent further escalation through unnecessary EVs and solar farms consuming farmland.

The focus on achieving net zero emissions is seen as a way to control people's lives and behaviors while increasing costs. Some believe it has little impact on the environment. Bikers should have the freedom to ride without interference.

- The speaker argues that data centers are expanding globally despite claims of an energy crisis, describing this growth as dangerous and indiscriminate. Project Matador in the Texas Panhandle is highlighted as potentially the largest data center, planned up to 18,000,000 square feet (about 6,000 acres) and reportedly using up to 96,000,000,000 kilowatts of electricity per year. Conservative figures are used for illustration. Texas residential electricity use is stated as approximately 172,000,000,000 kilowatts annually, meaning Matador could consume roughly 55–65% of all Texas residential electricity, with hundreds more centers either operating, under construction, or planned in the state (87 in operation, about 135 under construction, and a pipeline of over 600 planned). - The video cites reports of data centers destroying communities nationwide and worldwide. A segment about Meta’s new AI data center in Richland Parish, Louisiana, is presented: the center is 4,000,000 square feet and 2,250 acres (roughly 70 football fields). Residents describe rising rents due to out-of-state workers, disruption to local businesses, constant noise and bright lights, and a halo over homes. The speaker notes that the area has long faced job and poverty issues, and while some view the AI center as an economic opportunity, the disruption is described as significant and ongoing. - A conservative view is attributed to the Louisiana report, followed by the speaker’s own assertion that AI data centers will drain water and energy, potentially enabling a “smart city” agenda that renders rural areas unlivable and pushes populations to cities. The speaker suggests rural communities may be targeted as part of a broader strategy. - The discussion moves to Utah, where the Stratos project is described as rivaling Matador in scale. Jason Basleronex (the speaker’s reference) describes a proposed largest hyperscale data center in Box Elder County, Utah (approximately 40,000 acres, 62 square miles), backed by Canadian billionaire Kevin O’Leary and fast-tracked by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority with Governor Spencer Cox. The public would be locked out of decision-making. The project is linked to anticipated 50% increase in CO2 emissions, polluted water, and 24/7 noise and light pollution. The implication is that the initiative operates as a military operation, with national security justification cited. - A clip from Noah B Price is cited to illustrate living near a data center: water usage of 5,000,000 gallons per day in a drought state, with residents unable to collect rainwater in some areas, constant roar, and destroyed property values. The clip is used to argue about the “AI future” and potential government abuse of technology, including references to a broad list of dystopian outcomes (social credit systems, programmable digital currency, cars controlled by tech, rural self-sufficiency eliminated, and gene-edited humans integrated with AI). The speaker suggests these are directions supported by certain tech and government actions. - The video concludes with a call for local communities to band together, elect representatives who oppose the agenda, and protect their communities as a sanctuary against the “eye of Sauron” at Palantir HQ. It frames the data-center expansion as a threat to rural living and a push toward an AI-driven, controlled future. - The message ends with an advertising note for Genesis Gold Group and a free wealth protection guide via dailypulsesilver.com, promoting gold and silver investment as a hedge.

Rishi Sunak, a politician, has decided to backtrack on some net zero timelines in order to grab headlines from Liz Truss. He claims that since the UK only emits 1% of total carbon emissions, there is no need to do more and bankrupt the British people. However, the important point to note is that he mentions the risk of losing the consent of the British people. This tactic of presenting a bad idea and then pulling back is commonly used by both sides of the political spectrum. The speaker emphasizes that the British people were never asked for consent regarding net zero measures. They argue that net zero is questionable and that COVID has transitioned into climate lockdowns.

A privileged status exists for farms, and I believe we should take action against them, similar to what Margaret Thatcher did to the miners. You mean close them down? Yes, there’s an industry we could do without. If people are upset enough to protest and spray slurry, then we don’t need small farmers. So, you would use heavy-handed tactics to push them out of business? If the public is that angry, it indicates a need for change in the farming industry. Just to clarify, you were a former labor special adviser, right?

Germany made everyone go solar, and now they are taxing the sun. You are not only paying rain tax in Germany. Now you have to pay sun tax too. A few years ago, the German government was all like, go solar, save the planet. Solar panels popped up on every roof. It was a solar wave. But today, the same people who installed solar systems are told, 'Now you have a solar system, and you are using the sun, so you need to pay sun taxes now.' If you already have a solar system on your roof in Germany, you are paying what they literally call a sun tax. They found a way to tax sunlight. They are still taxing the rain, but now it's the sunlight too. I would not install a new solar system in Germany anymore. Do you think that's right? I'm speechless today.

The speaker questions why Greta Thunberg never criticizes Saudi Arabia or Russia, only Western energy. They ask if she will condemn OPEC energy and every delegate who arrived on a private jet. They challenge her to condemn private jets and ask if she has ever been on one. The speaker claims to own 100 private jets and asks if Greta has ever been on one, to which she responds affirmatively.

Katie Hopkins filmed a solar panel farm construction site, expressing outrage at the destruction of the countryside. She criticized the plastic packaging of the solar panels, claiming it's non-recyclable and that the panels themselves will become landfill. Hopkins stated that the solar panels are being installed while there are plans to dim the sun. She accused the workers of vandalizing the countryside and claimed local farmers are negatively impacted. Hopkins admitted to entering the site through an open gate and argued it's "her countryside." She prayed for the end of "net zero bollocks" and the cessation of countryside vandalism. A worker asked her to leave, citing safety concerns and lack of authority to be on the site. Hopkins asserted her right to be there and accused the workers of vandalizing the countryside.

I support green energy and the environment, but I was shocked to learn about the negative impacts of lithium mining and the use of child labor in cobalt mining. The production of solar panels and wind turbines also has significant environmental and resource costs, and they are difficult to recycle. The ethical concerns and human suffering associated with the production of electronic devices are minimal compared to the requirements for electric vehicles and solar farms. The climate change industry, worth $1.5 trillion annually, heavily markets these solutions. We cannot undo what has been done, but we should prevent further damage by avoiding unnecessary electric vehicles and solar farms on valuable farmland.

At a solar panel farm in the West Country, a speaker films to highlight what she calls the destruction of the countryside, saying, “This valley is so pretty. It's heartbreaking.” She claims the field is “ripping up” the countryside and that the workers are “vandals.” She points to “the plastic packaging that goes around all of this stuff, none of this can be recycled, obviously, but it's so green” and adds that “these solar panels can't be recycled” leading to “future landfill.” She condemns “the lie about net zero” and “net zero bollocks,” calling it “Batshit Bonkers Britain,” and states, “I'm trying to stand up for the countryside.” She notes the gate was open and she “wandered in,” addressing an audience of “1,200,000 people that follow me.” She mentions reform to roll back plans to “dim the sun” and references “Canadian solar.”

In London, a 15-year-old girl was fatally stabbed. The speaker criticizes the police for focusing on social media instead of solving crimes. They also claim that the surveillance cameras outside of London are a scam, with no scientific evidence to support them. The speaker accuses Sadiq Khan of rewriting evidence to serve his own agenda and warns of the beginning of a surveillance state. The transcript ends with the speaker mentioning spending their day in the Clink.

The speaker discusses the idea of eating synthetic meat and bugs to combat climate change. They suspect ulterior motives behind this suggestion but acknowledge the role of profit. They claim that the person in question has caused the deaths of thousands of children in India and Africa through medical experiments, including the HPV vaccine. They mention that this individual has been banned from India. The conversation ends abruptly due to time constraints.

The speaker, a long-time green energy supporter, was dismayed to learn about the environmental and human costs associated with green technologies. A single lithium mine allegedly creates millions of tons of waste annually, laced with sulfuric acid and radioactive uranium, polluting water for 300 years. Child labor is used to mine cobalt. Solar panels are allegedly made by laborers in razor wire enclosed camps exposed to quartz dust, causing silicosis. The Ethical Consumer Organization reports that forced labor in the solar panel supply chain is hard to avoid. Wind turbines consume vast resources, require diesel to start, gallons of oil to lubricate, and are hard to recycle. Solar panels are also difficult to recycle, and lithium batteries pose challenges. The speaker claims these so-called green solutions are actually good marketing from the $1.5 trillion climate change industry. The speaker urges people to prevent the exponential escalation of these issues with unnecessary EVs and solar farms.

Speaker 0: Growth without restraint is driving corporate takeovers of physical space, water, power, land, and communities, with costs pushed directly onto people through their electric bills, water supply, property values, and quality of life. This is framed as enabling big tech to build the backbone of the AI economy, an economy described as planning to eliminate most jobs and most futures. Speaker 0 says the AI story is widely discussed online, including on X and Instagram. Speaker 0 rejects the idea that it is “the Chinese” pushing this, saying it is Americans asking what is happening in their communities—why electric bills are changing and why people are being forced off property—because some American oligarch wants to build a massive data center using more energy than the rest of the state. Speaker 1: Speaker 1 responds to Kevin O’Leary by saying Americans have concerns about noise pollution, light pollution, the use of local water, takeover of farmland, and destruction of local ecosystems, and that it is not foreign agents but American people who have the right to protect communities and resources. Speaker 1 argues that data centers threaten and displace local people and that they provide no benefit to the communities affected. The outcome is described as job replacement rather than job creation, with claims that people would face 24/7 noise from gas turbines and a gigawatt of power without receiving an “utopia” of abundance. Speaker 1 says the result includes noise, pollution, taking water, destroying real estate value, and taking jobs. Speaker 1 identifies himself as an accomplished AI developer who supports AI technology when used “for humanity,” but calls the data center effort “a threat to humanity.”