reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

The speaker discusses the Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, which aims to continue the work of the Earth Summit and its agenda 21 for global environmental action. The act proposes a national strategy for sustainable development, led by a specific office and a high-level government official. It also encourages the United States to establish agreements for environmental protection and supports the creation of a United Nations Sustainable Development Commission. The president is urged to report on the progress made. The resolution has support from various organizations and members of the Foreign Affairs Committee. The speaker emphasizes the importance of taking action to sustain the planet for future generations.

The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns about energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is essential to improve living standards, but unrestrained growth threatens the environment. The Rio de Janeiro conference focused on sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation by national governments and international bodies is needed. The UN should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.

The resolution was adopted with 219 yays and 208 nays. The motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, also known as HCON Res 353, aims to build upon the Earth Summit's agenda 21 for global environmental action. It proposes a national strategy for sustainable development, led by a specific office and high-level government official. The resolution also encourages the United States to establish further agreements to protect the global environment and support the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission. The administration supports HCON Res 353, which has garnered 71 cosponsors, including members of the Foreign Affairs Committee and house delegates to the Earth Summit. This resolution emphasizes the need for the United States to take a leadership role in sustaining the planet and its resources for future generations.

The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, also known as HCON Res 353, aims to continue the work of the Earth Summit and its agenda 21 for global environmental action. It proposes a national strategy for sustainable development, led by a specific office and a high-level government official. The resolution also encourages the US to establish further agreements to protect the environment and supports the creation of a United Nations Sustainable Development Commission. The president is urged to report on the progress made. The resolution has received support from the administration, the State Department, the Foreign Affairs Committee, and various US non-governmental organizations. It emphasizes the need to sustain the planet and its resources for future generations.

The State Department's engagement with cities is a crucial part of their work. They collaborate with embassies on various issues such as connecting businesses, promoting energy security, combating human trafficking, and improving global health. The Innovation Plaza at the summit showcased solutions for government services, recycling, sustainability, and housing. To further this work, the Cities Forward initiative was launched, connecting 12 American cities with 12 Latin American and Caribbean cities. They will share experiences and lessons on reducing pollution and designing infrastructure to withstand natural disasters. Funding and technical assistance will be provided to develop sustainability action plans. The goal is to expand this initiative to cities throughout the hemisphere. Collaboration between cities, businesses, governments, and organizations is crucial for addressing challenges and creating a better future.

United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to inventory and control various aspects of the world, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. Contrary to popular belief, Sustainable Development is not just about recycling and creative reuse. It involves moving populations into concentrated city centers to regulate global activities. The ultimate goal is to establish a 1 World Government and achieve total control from a central unit. This is implemented through public-private partnerships and the use of chips. It is important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.

The resolution was adopted with 88 votes in favor and 4 votes against. The motion to reconsider was laid on the table without any objections.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

The Bezos Earth Fund is excited about the growing enthusiasm for philanthropy. Last year, when the 30 by 30 initiative faced uncertainty, 10 philanthropies, including the Bezos Earth Fund, pledged $5 billion in grant money to support it. They made it clear that if countries commit to 30 by 30 and show genuine dedication, these philanthropies will provide assistance.

Monica Medina, the Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, provided an update on US environmental priorities during the UN General Assembly. She highlighted the US Senate's ratification of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, which aims to phase down the production and consumption of super polluting chemicals. Medina emphasized the importance of global cooperation in addressing climate change, plastic pollution, and biodiversity loss. She discussed various events and initiatives focused on these issues, including the launch of a plastics disclosure and reporting initiative and the call for countries to conserve at least 30% of land and waters by 2030. Medina emphasized the need for action and multi-stakeholder engagement to protect the environment and combat the climate crisis.

Agenda 21 is a global agenda for sustainability, adopted by over 100 heads of state. It outlines the transformation needed in society. The United Nations presented a global biodiversity assessment, which explains how to implement the treaty on biodiversity. It includes a system of protected areas, with core wilderness areas surrounded by buffer zones. The Wildlands Project aims to convert 50% of North America into wilderness off-limits to humans, interconnected by wilderness corridors. The remaining 25% of land would be for sustainable communities. The White House created an ecosystem management policy enforced by 20 federal agencies. The United Nations wants to establish a regulatory structure affecting everyone, with control centralized in the United Nations. The Man and the Biosphere program has 47 sites in the US, covering 51 million acres. Many national parks are now UNESCO World Heritage Sites.

The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns over energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, highlighting the difficulty of addressing divisive issues with moral dimensions. The United Nations should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth, essential for improving living standards, poses environmental threats without careful coordination. The Rio de Janeiro conference addressed sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but requires regulation by governments and international bodies. The United Nations should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.

The United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to control all means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, sustainable development is not just about recycling and creating resources for all. It involves relocating populations to concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. Agenda 21 is implemented through public-private partnerships, which is a form of fascism. It seeks to establish a one-world government and total control from a central unit. This corporatocracy is currently being developed globally, but there is still an opportunity to stand up and fight for freedom.

The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, also known as HCON RES 353, proposes a national strategy for sustainable development based on agenda 21. It calls for the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission and urges the United States to initiate agreements to protect the global environment. The resolution is supported by the administration, the State Department, and various environmental organizations. The speaker emphasizes the importance of taking action to sustain the planet for future generations and urges colleagues to support the resolution.

The Mental Leadership Act builds on the Earth Summit's Agenda 21 for global environmental action. It calls for sustainable development and the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission. The President is urged to report progress to Congress. The resolution is supported by the administration, the State Department, and major US environmental organizations. The Earth Summit provided an important opportunity to protect our planet for future generations. The United States must assert its leadership in achieving this goal. The speaker urges colleagues to support the resolution.

Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum are applauded for initiating the eco industry initiative and integrating it into the forums' work. This initiative will influence proposals presented to governments at the 1992 Earth Summit. It is hoped that this will provide a basis for a new role for business after 1992, positioning them as principal implementers of the movement toward a sustainable planet. The 1992 conference will emphasize the need for significant changes in motivating economic life at both the corporate and individual levels.

The Wildlands Project proposes converting at least 50% of North America into wilderness areas, interconnected by corridors and surrounded by buffer zones with limited resource use. This plan aligns with Agenda 21, adopted by over 100 heads of state, detailing societal transformations for sustainability. The UN's Commission on Global Governance aims to create a world standing army and consolidate global financial institutions. The biodiversity treaty emphasizes protected areas, including core wilderness and biosphere reserves, which are voluntary agreements with the UN. The goal is to significantly reduce the human population and regulate activities within these areas, impacting every individual globally. Many national parks are now designated as UNESCO World Heritage Sites, often without public awareness.

The vote result is as follows: 153 in favor, 10 against, 23 abstentions. Draft resolution A/E/L 27 has been adopted.

The Resolve Tibet Act passed the US Senate unanimously, reaffirming Tibetan people's right to self determination. Tibet supporters and activists lobbied for over a year for this bill. The next step is reconciliation with the House version before heading to the White House.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

The Mental Leadership Act, also known as HCONRes 353, proposes a national strategy for sustainable development in line with Agenda 21. It suggests the creation of a specific office and the appointment of a high-level government official to coordinate these efforts. The resolution also encourages the United States to establish agreements for global environmental protection and to form a United Nations sustainable development commission. The president is expected to report to Congress on the progress made. HCON Res 353 has received support from the administration, the State Department, the Foreign Affairs Committee, and various environmental organizations. It emphasizes the need to sustain our planet and its resources for future generations.

The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, also known as HCON Res 353, aims to build upon the Earth Summit's agenda 21 for global environmental action. It calls for sustainable development under the guidance of a specific office and a high-level government official. The resolution also urges the United States to establish further agreements to protect the global environment and support the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission. The president is requested to report to Congress on the progress made. The resolution has received support from the administration, the State Department, the Foreign Affairs Committee, and various US non-governmental organizations. It emphasizes the importance of taking action to sustain our planet and its resources for future generations.

Costa Rica was the first country to adopt sustainable development in its national policies. Now, many countries like Colombia, Iran, and Bangladesh are following suit. Around 25 countries are in talks about implementing this approach. In the US, major government agencies are considering integrating the IDG framework into recommendations for schools and agencies. This would mark the first time the inner dimension is included in climate change strategies. Regardless of the framework, scientists worldwide are embracing this shift in consciousness. Exciting news about these developments is expected in the next few weeks.