reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There were very fine people on both sides of a white supremacist rally. I’m not referring to the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely. However, there were many individuals in that group who were not neo-Nazis or white nationalists.

I don't understand why left-leaning media, which some say is predominantly Jewish, labels people as white supremacists. According to my Jewish friends, this perspective exists. But why is there a perceived animosity towards white individuals? It seems to stem from what some call "woke" culture and virtue signaling.

I don't support Black Lives Matter, but I believe in equality for all. I wear a shirt that says "White Lives Matter" because I love everyone and stand for America. I think it's hypocritical that people can wear BLM shirts but not WLM. I'm against the organization's methods, not the message of valuing black lives. I believe in equality for all races and groups, like Asians and LGBTQ+. I'm rebelling against BLM, not against the idea of valuing black lives.

Speaker 0 presents an ongoing mock quiz, starting with math questions that are intentionally disrupted. "One plus one. Yes. Two. Incorrect." The class then moves to "Multiculturalism. Well done, Simon." The next question is "What is three times three?" with responses "Yes?" and "Nine." but it is followed by "Wrong. Yes, Penelope. Gender equality. Very good, Penelope." Speaker 1 questions the situation: "Is this a joke? You think gender equality is a joke? No. But isn't this a math class? Don't be so racist." They insist, "I just asked a question. We don't ask questions. Questions are offensive." They comment on the handwritten display: "They've just written equality and drawn love hearts on a piece of paper. He expressed himself and it's beautiful. He didn't even spell equality correctly." Speaker 2 interjects, "We don't discriminate." Speaker 1 follows, arguing that the issue is not mathematics: "This has nothing to do with mathematics. You think you're so great with your maths and your science and your facts. What about feelings?" Speaker 2 responds, "Yeah. Feelings are more important than fact." Speaker 1 pushes back further, declaring, "This is wrong. You're all crazy. Crazy. Stop violating me with your different opinions. I have the right to speak my mind." Speaker 2 counters, "No. We have the right not to be offended." Speaker 1 concludes with, "And that's more important."

Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the anti defamation league was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges, right? Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this by the way last week and people came after us. Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.

The increase in hate groups can be attributed to shifting demographics in the US. In 1970, the country was about 83% white and 17% people of color. Today, the demographics have changed significantly, with 66% white and 34% people of color. This change has been challenging and will continue to be as we navigate it as a nation. Additionally, the fact that whites will no longer be the majority by 2040 has become part of the popular discourse, including among white supremacists. Some people mistakenly believe they can push back against this demographic shift, but it is not possible to change demographics by limiting immigration.

Speaker says a rising tide of racial hatred against white people and a shift from 'not seeing color' to 'you must see color.' They claim a 'perverse ideology' teaches that 'everything, every societal ill, is the fault of white people' and that 'we're being taught' a double standard where negative experiences are attributed to whiteness. They present TikTok clips against whites: 'You have a token white and you're hanging out with your friend group of color, you need to ask permission,' 'don't have babies,' and 'white privilege.' They contend that 'on one side of the political aisle, people of color actually have greater power than white people,' citing Minneapolis contract, New York COVID treatment policy, Cornell banning whites from rock climbing, and BIPOC events. They insist 'You are not an oppressor, period' and challenge the idea that 'racism is prejudice plus power.' They warn of demographic shift and urge 'Do better.'

Swiper did no swiping. Diddy didn't diddle. There are five lights. Ben Shapiro is five foot nine. Islam is a religion of peace. Trump's skin color is natural. Obama is 100% straight. Jews don't control the weather. The government is highly efficient. Cholesterol is bad for you. The dress is white and gold. We have always been at war with East Asia. Admiral Rachel Levine is definitely a woman.

Various professors from different universities have made controversial statements about white people, including advocating for their death or genocide. Some professors claim that white people are inherently racist or inhuman. Others argue that white privilege exists and that reverse racism is not real. These statements have sparked debates and discussions about race and discrimination. Additionally, there have been instances of professors promoting violence against white people or calling for them to give their money to black people. These controversial remarks have caused outrage and concern among the public.

I don't get why left-leaning media, which I hear is mostly Jewish, labels people as white supremacists. Did you really say that? Yeah, I mean, my Jewish friends say it is. But why do they seem to dislike white guys? It's just woke culture, man. It's all about virtue signaling and that kind of stuff. I just don't understand it.

If you support Palestinians having their own homeland, you're considered woke. But if you support white people having their own homeland, you're labeled as racist.

Dangerous hate groups in America. Who will warn us about them? The media tell us. The Southern Poverty Law Center, based in Alabama, calls itself the premier group monitoring hate groups and other extremists. Looking at their map of hate groups, you'd think hate groups were everywhere. Apple gave them a million dollars. But donors don't know that today, the center smears good people. There is the presence of radical Islam. This Somalian woman speaks out against radical Islam. For that, the center put her on its list. Join the fight against hate and bigotry. Visit sblcenter.org. I do think that we have a problem with hate in this country. We put about 10 of these major hate groups out of business. When I first investigated the center, its leaders wouldn't talk to me. Liberal commentator Noemiki Kuntz defended them. They have a history, a long history, of fighting against extremists like the KKK. History? Yes. But they labeled skeptical Muslims like Ayaan Hirsi Ali as haters. If you have a horrible experience with religion, that's one thing. It's another thing to use those experiences as ammunition against others who are practicing their religion peacefully. But they're just speaking, criticizing it. Of course, she has the right to free speech as does the Southern Poverty Law Center has a right to push back. We can stand together against hate. The center also calls the Family Research Council a hate group. The definition of a marriage is what it's been for five thousand years. It's the union of a man and a woman. I often disagree with the council myself, but do they belong on this hate map? When they don't agree with you politically, they're gonna list you as a hater. You are haters. You hate gays. No. I don't hate gay people, and I know gay people, and I have worked with gay people. But once you become a hate group, you're a target. Developing now, word of a shooting at the Family Research Council there in Washington. One man was so enraged by what the Southern Poverty Law Center said about the Family Research Council that he went to their headquarters to kill people. A man shot the security guard in the arm. Fortunately, that guard stopped the man before he could shoot anyone else. He told the judge that he was there to kill as many of us as possible because we were a hate group. The center also smears the Ruth Institute, a Christian group that believes gays should not have an equal right to adopt children. They're not haters. I like gay people. I have no problem with gay people. The issue is what are we doing with kids and the definition of who counts as a parent. There could be cases where the best person for a particular child would be their uncle Harry and his boyfriend. You know, that could be. But we owe it to the children to give them the best we can, which generally is a married mother and father. So you're a hater. When the Southern Poverty Law Center put the Ruth Institute on its hate map, the institute's bank cut them off. We've determined that you're an organization that promotes hate, violence, harassment, and so therefore we're not doing business with you. The Ruth Institute and the Family Research Council are still on the hate list. There's no appeal, and I sure don't know how you get off. Morris Dees' salary is more than my entire annual budget. So yeah, whatever they're doing, it pays. Harper's Magazine reported that the center was the richest civil rights group in America, one that spends most of its time and money trying to make more money. They promised to stop fundraising once their endowment reached $55,000,000. But when they reached 55,000,000, they changed that to a 100,000,000, saying that would allow them to cease costly fundraising. But when they reached a 100,000,000, they didn't stop. They collected 200,000,000, then 400,000,000. Now they've got 730,000,000, yet they still smear people to raise more money. Much of which is in offshore accounts, Caymans and places like that. How do you know? Oh, we look at their September. And it says Cayman Islands? Now the Southern Poverty Law Center calls groups that simply oppose sexually explicit content in schools anti-government extremists. Moms for Liberty and Moms for America are on the hate map because they dare do things like seek school board seats to try to stop districts from disregarding opinions of parents. Give me a break. The center puts them on the hate map, but not Antifa, the hate group that beats up people on the right? The center's become a hate group itself. It's now a left-wing, money grabbing slander machine.

Professors across various universities make controversial statements about white people, advocating for their harm or criticizing white privilege. Some suggest mass suicide, genocide, or giving money to black people. Others equate white people with racism or criticize white masculinity. One professor was hospitalized for threatening to kill white people. Slides in classrooms depict white tears, colonization, and white privilege. These statements reflect a range of extreme views on race and society.

People have been finding ways to prove that the Earth is flat, which may not seem serious. However, believing in something that isn't true can lead to real problems and bring society to scary places. It's important to ensure people have access to freedom of speech, expression, and information.

There were very fine people on both sides of a white supremacist rally. I'm not referring to the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely. However, there were many individuals in that group who were not neo-Nazis or white nationalists.

Various professors from different universities have made controversial statements about white people, including advocating for their deaths, promoting white genocide, and calling them racist. Some professors have equated white privilege with math and blamed white supremacy for events like the Vegas shooting. There have been courses on white racism and slides in classrooms that perpetuate negative stereotypes about white people. These statements and actions all share the common theme of denying the existence of reverse racism. The video concludes by stating that white people are seen as dangerous and a plague to the planet.

We discussed a sonar scan of land next to a church on an Indian reservation, where something “must be bones” was found and described as a mass murder with bodies dumped there, suggesting it spread across the country. Then we hear about the prime minister apologizing for the mass murder of a Canadian Indian people and ongoing coverage about churches being burned, including Catholic and other churches, with reporters repeatedly presenting new details. There’s talk of the residential schools and how terrible they were, and the narrative is said to go overboard with fabrications that have no evidence whatsoever, claiming not one bone has ever been found and labeling the whole story a hoax. It’s argued that this is acceptable because it criticizes “the evil white settlers” and similar notions, implying a political climate that allows certain criticisms at great length. The discussion moves to the idea that reports can be extended and sensationalized, highlighting the existence of double standards. For example, it’s claimed that the New York Times had a significant piece asserting that photography is racist, with examples like walking dogs being described as a white man’s activity. There’s also mention of Vancouver being characterized as the “anti Asian hate crime capital of the world,” based on statistics described as dubious. The speaker suggests that you can invent such things. In contrast, the speaker argues that when someone blows up an airplane and engages in separatist activity and threatens the leader of India—described as a rather important foreign partner—there is a reluctance to say anything. This is presented as evidence of hypocrisy and double standards that exist in discourse. The overall point is that there are selective criticisms and narratives shaped by political considerations, allowing some topics to be explored at length while others are suppressed or avoided. Key claims repeated include: the sonar finding of bones and a mass murder on land near an Indian reservation; widespread reporting of mass murder and church burnings tied to residential schools; the assertion that not one bone has been found and that the whole story is a hoax; accusations of fabrications with no evidence; the New York Times’ stance on photography as racist; the claim that walking dogs is a white man’s activity; Vancouver as the anti-Asian hate crime capital of the world based on dubious statistics; and the assertion of hypocrisy and double standards when comparing domestic issues to actions by actors related to India.

Speaker 0 states it is not okay to be white because white people have "done too much bad" and should "try not to be white." Speaker 1 questions if these statements constitute hate speech, imagining the reaction if someone expressed similar sentiments toward their skin color. Speaker 1 believes only white people are held accountable for their words and actions, and that some people are striving for supremacy rather than equality. Speaker 1 wonders if the person who made the initial statements is gainfully employed and if it would be wrong to find out where they work and inform their employer.

Professors from various universities make controversial statements about white people, including advocating for their mass suicide, calling for their deaths, and labeling them as racist. Some professors equate beliefs like hard work and math with white ideology and privilege. One professor even suggests that white people are a plague to the planet. These statements reflect a trend of anti-white sentiments and calls for violence in academic settings.

Joe Biden, the DOJ, and FBI are accused of being the biggest threat to America by creating hate crime hoaxes. They are believed to want to keep us divided and are seen as the real white supremacists. Their actions are said to aim at destroying us.

We see too much hate online with protesters using "honk honk," which stands for hail Hitler.

Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the anti defamation league was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. We have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Can we get that full list? Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. The philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors.

The civil rights movement is claimed to be part of a communist plot to enslave humanity. More evidence exists, but time limits discussion. Study further to understand the plan to subjugate the US. Avoid falling into the trap of division and work with others to save the country for future generations. Recommended reading includes "It's Very Simple, The True Story of Civil Rights" by Alan Stange and other materials available at American opinion libraries nationwide.

The speaker invokes Henry Ford’s 1921 book as a source and then launches into a sweeping conspiracy alleging that “tiny hats” (a pejorative term for Jews) have controlled civilization for centuries. The key points asserted are: - In 1492, Christopher Columbus was expelled from Spain and allegedly brought over 300,000 tiny hats; New York is described as the center of the tiny hats. - George Washington is claimed to have had 4,000 tiny hats; these individuals were “the traders” who controlled all trade. - Within fifty years, the tiny hat population supposedly grew to 3,300,000. - The tiny hats allegedly owned every major sector: grains, cotton, oil, steel, magazines, theaters, liquors, loan businesses, and every industry; their philosophy is said to be “not to make money, but to get money. Take your money.” - The schools are claimed to be owned by “the communist Bolsheviks,” and those who are not tiny hats are labeled as “gentiles.” - The reference to “the fifth protocol” is included in connection with their alleged plans. - Regarding Palestine, the claim is that the issue exists because “the Palestinians don’t have a tiny hat bank.” - Presidents allegedly kiss the wall, and Ford supposedly knew all of this by 1921. - The tiny hats are said to own the media and to create all social divisions. - Attacks on Christianity and removing religious elements from schools are attributed to them, as are various vices said to be introduced by them. - Questioning the narrative allegedly results in being labeled “anti tiny hat.” - The claim is pressed that “where do think all the slaves came from?”—attributed to the tiny hats; they supposedly changed their names so people wouldn’t know. - The ADL is described as protecting all of this, and anyone who goes against it is said to be arrested “just like that veteran.” - The speaker concludes with the assertion that “No one wants to fight for Israel.”

Speaker 0 claimed that white people make up 10% of the world's population, and that in California, the white population decreased by 71% in 73 years, which "kinda sounds like genocide." He questioned why violent crime and murder rates by race are not available from Sacramento. Speaker 1 interrupted, calling the statements racist and inappropriate for public discourse, and ended the call. Speaker 1 stated that racist tropes and stereotypes have no place in civic discourse.