TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Cancer is not a disease but a survival mechanism to house toxins. The tumor is created to protect the body by containing toxins. Biopsies are unnecessary as treatment remains the same whether the tumor is cancerous or not. People often die from cancer treatment rather than cancer itself. The healthcare system profits from sick individuals, leading to unnecessary procedures like biopsies that can worsen the situation.

There's no such thing as biopsy spreading cancer. They say that out loud, but they have not even one scientific study to show for that, whereas I have 50 to show that they do spread cancer. They just believe so strongly and so blindly what they were told, and they're afraid of the truth because it means that for years and years and years, doctors have been killing people through biopsies. Be very careful. Never do a prostate biopsy. Never do a breast biopsy. There are better ways. You don't need the mammogram with its own radiation. You don't need biopsy to tell you if it's cancer or not. You can be 99% sure just by doing an ultrasound with a technician who knows what she is doing.

Speaker 0 asks about a simple intervention for cancer risk, summarizing it as “sun, salmon and steps,” and requests details about that study and any other interventions with profound impact on reducing cancer incidence. Speaker 1 explains that Sun Steps is a good starting point. He is collaborating with Doctor Justice Hope (pen name). They are using AI to answer questions and to figure out the best prophylactic protocols to prevent cancer across low, moderate, and high risk. They are assembling a document so that, for example, for breast cancer a person can choose a protocol with a 40 percent reduction or one with a 90 percent reduction. The higher the risk reduction, the more nutraceuticals and drugs are required, which depends on risk. For very low risk, a person might take three or four protocols (root three, root four, root five). If someone has a BRCA gene, they would take the root nine, with more extensive medications and nutraceuticals. They are developing this for their website. They have used AI to help stratify which drugs are most effective and to calculate risk reduction for different cancers. Surprisingly, the most effective nutraceuticals start with green tea; EGCG is very effective in preventing cancer, due to its effect on cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Then curcumin is noted as acting on multiple biological pathways. Vitamin D is highlighted due to a very strong association between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. Omega-3 fatty acids are listed as the fourth. The basic protocol is called route four, consisting of these four items (green tea/EGCG, curcumin, vitamin D, omega-3s), which are described as reasonably cheap, safe, and with no side effects. Speaker 1 argues that people over 60, even if healthy, should consider taking these drugs because it will significantly reduce cancer risk. He acknowledges it will not completely eliminate risk, but emphasizes the cost effectiveness compared to the expenses of treating cancer with conventional chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors, which can run into millions of dollars, plus lost productivity. He suggests this should be a public health approach, given goals to prevent diabetes, obesity, and cancer, describing these as simple interventions that should be aggressively pursued.

A speaker asserts that colonoscopy has never been proven to reduce the mortality and morbidity of colorectal cancer in the population. They claim that society is spending many, many billions of dollars on a test that has never been proven to reduce the disease for which it is intended. They further state that, in reality, far greater numbers of people are suffering detrimental effects and adverse reactions to the colonoscopy procedure than the number of people who are actually diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The speaker emphasizes that, if about fifty five thousand are diagnosed every year as suffering from the condition, over seventy thousand are suffering from the horrific effects, adverse effects of the actual procedure called colonoscopy. In their view, society is paying a substantial amount for this situation. The speaker then presents a conclusion that there is an alternative to colonoscopy. They identify this alternative as being a test called M2PK. This assertion introduces an option they believe should be considered as an alternative to the conventional screening method discussed. The overall message conveyed is that the widely used screening method of colonoscopy has not demonstrated population-level mortality or morbidity benefits for colorectal cancer, accompanied by a large burden of adverse effects, and that the M2PK test represents another approach to address the issue.

"We get sick because of three things primarily. We get sick because of electromagnetic radiation, because of poisons that they put into the environment, and because of parasites." "I found about about five or six years ago, underground group of people that were using Fenbendazole in these things for cancer, and it was working." "He had throat cancer." "So his wife searched around the internet and found this story about the Fenbendazole and started treating him using the protocol." "Isn't it interesting that parasitic medication also treats cancer?" "I think it's not that it also treats cancer, it's that cancer is parasites."

"In all the autopsy I've done of cancer patients, not one of them died of cancer. They died of liver failure, they died of cardiac failure, renal failure, all due to chemotherapy." "We got a patient that had been through chemo they had cooked her liver and cooked her kidneys." "We looked at the blood work and realized she had no organ function to speak of left." "And I said we can make her more comfortable but the radiation treatment that they used on her has actually destroyed her organs." "She'd been given three weeks, we gave her six months and she got time to say goodbye to her family." "I'm doing the death certificate and I don't know what to write for cause of death." "You might try writing the truth for a change." "And she wrote radiation poisoning, cause of death."

Vitamin D alone could prevent about 30,000 cancer deaths in a single country in a single year. The study looked in Germany and examined what would happen if they administered wide-scale vitamin D to the 50 and older population. Based on the most recent meta-analyses of vitamin D and cancer, there is about a 13% reduction in cancer mortality, and that is extrapolated to an entire country, resulting in saving about 30,000 lives per year. A recent paper on vitamin D and cancer and its biological effects is highlighted: there are over 900 peer-reviewed recent papers finding that vitamin D, when raised to adequate levels, exhibits anticancer activity against literally basically every single cancer known, through vitamin D receptor signaling as well as tumor microenvironment control and immune modulation. This is described as very, very important as winter months approach, so ensuring adequate vitamin D intake is advised. The speaker notes that some of the most powerful cancer prevention tools are neither profitable nor novel, and vitamin D is very inexpensive, biologically active, and, according to randomized clinical trial evidence, saves lives at scale. The main question posed is why public health agencies are ignoring this.

Every early cancer detection is customer creation and fraud, with no proof that it cures anyone. The cancer industry is a $300,000,000,000 industry driven by money, with each patient bringing in between $3,000,000 and $7,000,000. If a patient doesn't have cancer, they may be given it. Cancer is not an illness but an accumulation of symptoms. Cancer rates have increased from seven percent in 1900 to fifty-six percent today, and including "the thing we cannot talk about," it's ninety-two percent. The speaker claims to have cured 66,000 cancer patients.

The mitochondria, not the nucleus, is the center of cancer. Cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease. Realizing this will massively drop death rates in just a few years. We may never completely get rid of cancer, but we can learn to live with it and keep it at bay. If we restrict the fuels that cancer needs through diet and lifestyle, and keep our mitochondria healthy, we can manage it. If we don't focus on the mitochondria, then almost 50% of people will continue to get cancer.

- Chemotherapy prolongs life about two to three months. Two to three months. That's the sum benefit. - For some cancers such as gastric cancer, it actually reduces life expectancy. - Chemotherapy is a hoax. - It's a hoax perpetuated by big pharma to make money at the expense of, people who suffer. - There are a few cancers, maybe five to eight percent in which chemotherapy actually cures the cancer. - But the vast majority of cancers, know, the common cancers, breast cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer. - The performance of chemotherapy is appalling, but it generates billions of dollars.

The problem with a biopsy is this. Now it spreads all over the place. So you do spread it. But what they're not telling you is that the research is showing that if you take these drugs, you're almost guaranteeing metastasis. If you did a biopsy and or a surgery, you're gonna get metastasis. Now if you add high dose chemo, you're get metastasis. If you do radiation, you're gonna get metastasis. What they're looking at is giving you a short term reduction of the primary, and then you think, oh, I'm in remission. Nine months later, it would came back. The federal, the FDA will have approved it. Your insurance will pay for it. It's the right thing to do. And you're gonna do that. It's also part of the sales team. It's part of the sales technique.

Using the tools Sam and Masa are providing, the team is pursuing a cancer vaccine. All cancers, cancer tumors, and fragments float in your blood, enabling early cancer detection via a blood test. AI analysis of the blood test can identify cancers that are seriously threatening. After sequencing or gene sequencing the cancer tumor, you could vaccinate the person with a personalized vaccine, designed for each individual to target that cancer, and produce it robotically as an mRNA vaccine in about forty eight hours. This could enable early cancer detection and a vaccine for your specific cancer within forty eight hours. This is the promise of AI and the future.

Cancer is a symptom and a tumor for example is nothing else in the approach of the body to keep us alive. We have so many toxins in our system that would kill us so the body builds a bubble, a bucket, a tumor, and collects all these poisons and basically keeps the poisons on one spot where they don't do harm. That's a tumor. So the cancer is basically your friend. The tumor is working on keeping you alive. This view warns that a needle biopsy can pinch into this tumor and release the toxins into the system and suddenly you have a very fast growing, very aggressive cancer that you didn't have before the needle biopsy. The same problem occurs with mammography. They put 50 pounds of pressure on the breast. If the lymph node is ready to burst, that cannot be a good thing. Usually it bursts and that's what causes cancer. Not just two percent; "mammography's can cause cancer just by the pressure that's applied."

Chemo drugs are the only ones doctors profit directly from. They buy it for $5,000, sell it to patients for $12,000, and insurance pays $9,000. Doctors keep $4,000. Chemotherapy is used because it makes money, not because it works (97% failure rate). The pharmaceutical industry controls us. Money raised for breast cancer doesn't go to alternative treatments or research, only drugs and surgery that don't work.

They canceled this cartoon because it exposed the truth: There's more money in treating disease than curing it. Why cure cancer in a day when they can bill you for a lifetime? I, Dana White, won't go to doctors for my general health. They just want to give you pills. The best doctors couldn't stop my snoring or control my blood pressure and cholesterol. Now everything is good. Medicines stack up, and you end up on fourteen pills with side effects. I jump out of bed ready to kick ass every day now. I went from constant sickness to this by making one change using natural remedies. A doctor revealed that chronic sinus problems are often due to mold fungus, and oil of oregano is the best remedy. The trillion-dollar healthcare industry limits access to this information. There's a lot of money to be made from keeping you sick. My family uses oil of oregano instead of antibiotics. Make sure to choose one with high carvacrol. I use this one from Balanced.

A tumor is a bubble the body builds to collect toxins and keep them in one spot, preventing harm. Cancer is a symptom, not an illness, and is essentially your friend. A needle biopsy can release toxins into the system, causing a fast-growing, aggressive cancer that wasn't present before. Similarly, mammography, which applies 50 pounds of pressure to the breast, can cause a lymph node full of toxins to burst, leading to cancer. Each mammography raises cancer risk by two percent and can directly cause cancer due to the applied pressure.

Speaker 0: Let's start with I had predicted, unfortunately, and I hate that I am right. I predicted before the vaccines were ever launched to the public that they would have a profound impact on the immune system. And as a result of that alone, would likely cause increased cancer rates just because of their immunological impact. So let's start, if you would, just by talking a little bit about what you are seeing in the data, in the numbers with regard to cancers, what kinds of cancers, those sorts of things. And then maybe we'll get into the weeds, you and I, about perhaps some of the pathology of that, why that might be, some theories for why we're seeing these numbers. Speaker 1: You know, Doctor. Kelly, I've been tracking these turbo cancers as they're being called, these very aggressive cancers that are showing up in young COVID vaccinated people. The youngest case I've reported is a 12 year old boy who had a Moderna vaccine and came down with, end stage brain cancer that killed him in less than a year. I'm seeing it in teenagers in university and college students who are mandated to take COVID vaccines. People in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties are coming down with stage four cancers. These cancers are presenting at a late stage, stage three, but usually stage four. These are lymphomas, leukemias, these are breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers, hepatobiliary cancers, testicular cancers in young men, ovarian cancers in women, kidney cancers, renal cell cancers, melanomas, skin cancers, and sarcomas as well. So these are the types of cancers that are showing up in a younger cohort than oncologists expect. They're showing up at a late stage. The tumors can grow very large. So some of these tumors are described as football sized, even watermelon sized, you know, these are ten, fifteen centimeter tumors, and they're very aggressive and and they really they spread very rapidly. Even when the surgeons are trying to get at them, trying to surgically excise them so that they could control the tumor, what they usually find after surgery is that the tumor has already spread. It's already spread to the lymph nodes, it's already spread to the lungs or the bones, very aggressive cancers, and really related to the COVID-nineteen vaccine specifically, and mRNA vaccines, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Speaker 0: One of the things, me just step back for a second, because one of the things that might not be known to our audience is that all cancers are not created equal with regard to the population that they hit. You know, for example, we not uncommonly and tragically see certain blood cancers in children leukemias, for example. It wouldn't be uncommon, to to see a brain tumor, brain cancers sometimes in young children. It would be extraordinarily uncommon to see a colon cancer in somebody before the fourth or fifth decade. Very uncommon to see a lung cancer before the fourth or fifth decade. Those sorts of things, extremely uncommon to see. So some of these cancers that we are seeing, and I think you're getting at that, things like these colon cancers, we are now seeing colon cancers in people in their late teens, twenties, and thirties. And again, as you said, very aggressive colon cancers. So it's not just that cancers per se, but it's seeing cancers in in groups of people in whom they'd never seen before. So let's in terms of just to put some magnitude on it. In terms of give us some sense of the magnitude versus what we would have considered to be the baseline numbers. Speaker 1: You know, it's very hard to get a sense of this because it's almost impossible to get good cancer data from from the governments. Know, Ed Dowd has talked about this, the difficulty of getting good data. You know, I've tried to get cancer data here in Canada from Statistics Canada, from the Canadian Cancer Society, and they are not reporting any data from 2021 or 2022. It seems they're holding this data back. And so I'm left with anecdotal evidence. When Ed Dowd, you know, he'll report from US insurance data that disability rates, in the working population, let's say, eighteen to sixty four, who abided by the COVID vaccine mandates, disability rates are 500% higher compared to the working population who dropped out of the workforce and didn't want to get the vaccines. Well, a big portion of those disabilities are these cancers, are these cancer diagnoses. And so, you know, I'm seeing an explosion of these cancers. I'm seeing it in doctors. I'm seeing it in nurses. I'm seeing it in other vaccine mandated professions. So all types of healthcare workers, I'm seeing it in teachers, I'm seeing it in police officers, firefighters, the military. You know, you see it in flight attendants, for example, you know, you had these airlines that wanted to have 100% vaccinated workforce. So really anywhere where there were very strict COVID vaccine mandates, that's where I'm seeing these explosions of these very aggressive cancers. And I can tell you, this year, '23, seems to be much worse. There's many more cases of these turbo cancers than in 2022 or 2021. The trend is upwards. The numbers are on the rise. You can see this on websites like GoFundMe. If you go on GoFundMe and you put stage four cancer and you can pick whatever cancer you want, you could put, you know, breast cancer, you could put lung cancer, colon cancer. Not only are you seeing the shocking ages, young ages of these individuals who are reporting their cancers and their fundraising because, you know, they lose their jobs when they're undergoing chemotherapy, for example, by you see just how many people are suffering are coming down from these cancers, especially in 2023. It's just unbelievable. It's a tsunami of cancer diagnosis.

"Comes to picking up things that affect their quality of life or affect even them being alive." "It's too late. Boom." "Yes." "Because there's a lot just as dudes too as well. There's a lot of stuff that we take control of." "The car we drive, the job we have, you know, if we we see a beautiful girl, you wanna talk to her, whatever the thing may be." "But then when it comes to health stuff and this idea of sometimes looking into the hood can make you feel vulnerable, maybe a little bit weak, you don't wanna do that." "We shy away from that. We put our head in the sand, as you say." "And that's the thing that I thought, oh, well, what an opportunity this is with function health to give dudes and guys like, hey, permission. Yeah. Like, go after it."

Biopsies spread cancer, and there are 50 scientific studies to prove it. Doctors have been killing people for years through biopsies, but they blame the cancer instead of the metastasis caused by the biopsy. Therefore, one should never do a prostate or breast biopsy. There are better ways to determine if it's cancer. Mammograms are unnecessary because of their radiation. An ultrasound with a skilled technician can provide 99% certainty.

I urge everyone, especially black men, to get checked for their health, even if you're 45 or 455 like me. It's crucial to stay alive and vote in 2024. Let's take care of ourselves and each other.

Speaker 0 argues that medical procedures can cause death or spread disease: - A colonoscopy in elderly people (60–70, completely healthy and fit) can lead to death three days later because “they poke a hole in the colon, the bacteria goes in and they are dead.” - In mammography, when something is found, the medical profession proceeds with a needle biopsy, and “pokes into something that's there to save your life.” A tumor is described as there to save your life, yet the procedure is claimed to spread illness. - The body builds a bag to store toxins in its lymph nodes; “so now they come and poke into the lymph node and what will happen is they now spread the poison that the body is collecting for ten-twenty years in the entire body and twelve days later these women are dead.” - Mammography is described as applying “50 pounds of pressure on a woman's breast.” The analogy is made: if you have a lymph node or a pimple ready to burst, applying that pressure would “burst it to give the patient the cancer.”

But actually, I have to tell you, I have now seen where the end of cancer is coming from. I've had well over a dozen patients, and there are hundreds of people like this that are starting to form, that can go from stage four cancer, that's game over cancer, to stage zero. Not for everybody yet, but we're beginning to see where the light at the end of the tunnel is, and it involves your immune system. And some of the remarkable scientific breakthroughs are teaching us that our body heals itself against diseases as serious as cancer in ways that the pharmaceutical industry can't by itself do, but it really relies on the body. So, when you talk about food as medicine or medicine as medicine, none of them are as powerful as what the body is hardwired to do by itself.