reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The sale of securities circumvented the standard process, flooding the market with money that doesn't exist, causing an inflationary crisis. This is essentially like printing money. The speaker clarifies that "printing money" doesn't mean physically printing bills. The Bank of Canada made an initial statement about printing money.

Banks are broke due to fractional reserve banking, allowing them to lend money they don't have. Central banks engage in counterfeiting through quantitative easing, manipulating interest rates. Politicians and central banks are to blame, not retail banks. Taxpayers bear the cost when banks fail, which is considered theft. Without holding bankers accountable, this cycle will persist.

Banks compete to buy national debt, profiting from interest. These banks then sell some bonds to the Federal Reserve at a profit through open market operations. The Federal Reserve pays for these bonds by writing checks drawn on an account with a zero balance. According to the Boston Federal Reserve, unlike personal checks, the Federal Reserve's checks aren't drawn on existing deposits; instead, they create money. The Fed gives these checks to banks, creating currency.

All banks, including Bank Santander, Deutsche Bank, and Royal Bank of Scotland, are broke due to the system of fractional reserve banking. This allows banks to lend money they don't actually possess. The problem is worsened by moral hazard from the political sphere, including central banks. Quantitative easing is essentially counterfeiting, but governments and central banks get away with it. Central banks manipulate interest rates, not retail banks. When banks fail, taxpayers bear the cost through deposit guarantees, which is essentially theft. Unless bankers, including central bankers and politicians, are held accountable and sent to prison, this unjust system will persist.

Speaker 0 describes fractional reserve banking. When you deposit $100, the bank keeps just $10 in reserve and loans out the remaining 90 at interest. That $90 gets deposited into another bank, which keeps 9 and loans out 81 at interest. This cycle repeats and is called fractional reserve banking, a system that legally allows banks to lend or invest 90% of your deposits, effectively circulating new money into the economy. Wealthy investors and big corporations are the first to get access to big loans at low interest rates. With this loan, they buy real estate, stocks and businesses before the money circulates through the broader economy. By the time those funds trickle down to the working class, they have already triggered inflation. The result? The banks collect interest by loaning out money that didn't belong to them. The rich use borrowed capital from the bank to acquire assets that skyrocket in value, easily covering their low interest loans. And the working class are required to pay higher prices for rent and food, because the money supply has expanded, while the number of actual goods are the same. And that's how the rich keep getting rich and the poor become more poor.

The transcript presents a sweeping critique of the modern monetary system, arguing that money is created not by governments but by private banks through debt, with consequences that affect the entire world. The speakers outline a long historical arc in which banking interests, central banks, and debt-based money have steadily gained power, eroded public sovereignty, and produced recurring crises, while the general population bears the costs. Key claims and points - The root problem: The money supply is created by the community of money users through borrowing from commercial banks. The bulk of money creation originates with banks, which decide when and how much money to produce, leading to an out-of-control system. Governments borrow money from banks, which effectively enslaves the broader economy. - Concept of the debt-money system: The money system is described as a global Ponzi scheme, in which new money comes into existence as debt with interest. Because interest must be paid, the system requires ever more debt to be sustained, and people and nations are drawn into a cycle that benefits banks at the expense of the public. - Historical pattern of private control: The narrative traces a long history in which private banking families (notably the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Morgans) and allied financiers manipulated governments to borrow and to reward speculative advantage. It alleges that private central banks and debt-based money systems sought to consolidate power in private hands, sometimes by fomenting or exploiting crises. - Tally sticks and early monetary control: In medieval England, tally sticks were used as money and as a way to keep money power out of bankers’ hands. Their suppression by bankers in 1834 is described as a revenge of a debt-free money system that had empowered the public for centuries. - Goldsmiths, fractional reserve lending, and counterfeiting: The text explains fractional reserve lending as a historic means by which goldsmiths expanded the money supply beyond real reserves, enabling them to profit from interest and to influence economies; this practice is labeled a form of counterfeiting and a source of systemic instability. - The rise of central banking and central control: The transformation from debt-free or government-issuing money to privately controlled central banks is traced from the Bank of England (1694) to the U.S. National Banking Act (1863) and the creation of the Federal Reserve System (1913). The Aldrich Plan, the Jekyll Island meeting (1910–1912), and the public relations campaign to popularize a central banking system are described as pivotal steps toward centralized control over the money supply. - Lincoln’s greenbacks and the political fight over money: The narrative emphasizes Abraham Lincoln’s issuance of greenbacks during the Civil War as debt-free money created by the government. It claims bankers reacted defensively (Hazard Circular) and moved to undermine greenbacks through bonds and later the National Banking Act, which made private banks central to the money supply. Lincoln’s assassination is linked to the broader battle over monetary policy. - Civil War, the rise of debt, and depressions: The text links episodes such as the Panic of 1837, the Coinage Act of 1873, and the Panic of 1893 to deliberate contractions or manipulations of money supply by banking interests. It argues these episodes were engineered to force or normalize debt-based monetary arrangements and central banking. - The 20th century and the Federal Reserve: The Great Depression is attributed to deliberate contraction of the money supply by the Federal Reserve. The text argues that the Fed, a privately owned central bank, has operated to protect the banking sector at the public’s expense, with the 2008 financial crisis cited as confirmation of this dynamic. - Political economy and influence: The narrative contends that politics and academia have been co-opted by moneyed interests. It asserts that large campaign contributions from banks shape policy, and that many economists are funded or controlled by the Reserve and major banks, limiting critical debate about monetary reform. It also claims media and public discourse are constrained by debt relationships and corporate power. - Proposed reforms and principles: Across speakers, a consensus emerges around three core reforms: - Forbid government borrowing as a mechanism for money creation; return to debt-free, government-created money that serves the public interest. - Put money creation under public control, not private banks, with national or local sovereign authority issuing debt-free currency. - End fractional reserve lending and ensure robust competition among banks so that money is created in the public interest and channeled into productive real-economy lending rather than financial speculation. - Practical implementation ideas offered by some speakers: - Government to issue debt-free sovereign currency directly; private banks would compete to lend government-approved money to the public. - Eliminate consolidated currencies (e.g., the euro) in favor of national sovereignty over money creation. - Use monetary policy to match money supply with real productive activity, controlling inflation by adjusting the money supply through public channels rather than debt-based credit expansion. - Repeal or reform existing central banking structures to reestablish a Bank of the United States owned by the people rather than by private banks. - Promote transparency, reduce the influence of special interests in academia and media, and educate the public about money creation. - Enduring critique and warning: If the status quo persists, the system is said to threaten Western civilization and global freedom, with potential for continued debt-serfdom and systemic collapse if debt-based money and private central banks remain in control. - Concluding perspective: The speakers urge decisive reform, emphasizing that the truth about money creation is accessible to the public and that collective political will can restore monetary systems to serve the people. They conclude with a call to remember Margaret Mead’s idea that a small group can change the world, and exhort listeners to pursue debt-free monetary reform as a path to greater production, independence, and freedom.

Banks don't lend money; they purchase securities. When someone seeks a loan and signs the contract, they issue a promissory note, which the bank purchases. The money isn't transferred; it's already within the bank. A deposit is the bank's record of its debt to the public. The money a person thinks they're getting as a loan is simply the bank's record of the money it owes them.

The Federal Reserve and the government incorrectly call paper currency "base money," but it is actually base currency because it is not money. Money must be a store of value and maintain its purchasing power. Historically, paper currency represented real money like gold and silver held at the treasury, redeemable at any bank. Now, base currency is a receipt or claim check on a bond IOU.

When you deposit $10,000 in a bank, they keep 10% and loan out the rest. If someone asks for a $9,000 car loan, the bank loans that amount from your deposit. The borrower pays the car seller, who then deposits the money in another bank. This becomes a new deposit and the process continues. The money is redeposited and reloaned until your initial $10,000 becomes $100,000. This is how the banking system creates $90,000 by loaning out your money. This practice started with goldsmiths in the 17th century, who stored gold in vaults and issued receipts as paper money. They would create more receipts than the actual gold they had and charge interest on the money they didn't possess.

Banks create money out of nothing and lend it at interest, a legal form of fraud. The banking lobby blames inflation on high wages and speculation, not on the money creation by banks. This practice leads to economic problems that cannot be solved.

Banks don't lend money; they purchase securities. When someone seeks a loan and signs the contract, they issue a promissory note, which the bank purchases. The money isn't transferred; it's already within the bank. A deposit is the bank's record of its debt to the public. The money the bank owes is what people perceive as the money they are getting.

You're about to learn the hidden secret of money and how the banking system truly works. Politicians create deficit spending, which leads to the Treasury issuing bonds, essentially IOUs that become our national debt. Banks buy these bonds, then the Federal Reserve buys them from the banks with counterfeit checks, creating currency out of thin air. Banks then use fractional reserve lending, loaning out most of your deposits while only holding a fraction in reserve, further expanding the currency supply. This system enriches the banks and indebts the public, leading to inflation because more currency causes prices to rise. Taxes are then used to pay interest on these bonds, perpetuating the cycle. The Federal Reserve, a private entity, benefits immensely from this fraud. This system requires ever-increasing debt and will eventually collapse under its own weight. Sharing this knowledge is crucial to building a better future.

A thousand years after the death of Christ, money changers, those who loan out and manipulate the quantity of money, were active in medieval England. They were not bankers per se; the money changers generally were the goldsmiths. They were the first bankers because they started keeping other people's gold for safekeeping in their vaults. The first paper money was merely a receipt for gold left at the goldsmith. Paper money caught on because it was more convenient than carrying around a lot of heavy gold and silver coins. Eventually, goldsmiths noticed that only a small fraction of the depositors ever came in and demanded their gold at any one time. Goldsmiths started cheating on the system. They discovered that they could print more money than they had gold, and usually, no one would be the wiser. Then they could loan out this extra money and collect interest on it. This was the birth of fractional reserve banking, that is, loaning out many times more money than you have assets on deposit. So, if a thousand dollars in gold were deposited with them, they could loan out about $10,000 in paper money and draw interest payments on it, and no one would ever discover the deception. By this means, goldsmiths gradually accumulated more and more wealth and used this wealth to accumulate more and more gold. Today, this practice of loaning out more money than there are reserves is known as fractional reserve banking. Every bank in The United States is allowed to loan out at least 10 times more money than they actually have. That's why they get rich on charging, let's say, 8% interest. It's not really 8% per year, which is their income. It's 80%. That's why bank buildings are always the largest in town. But does that mean that all interest or all banking should be illegal? Hardly. In the Middle Ages, canon law, the law of the Catholic Church, forbade charging interest on loans. This concept followed the teachings of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas. They taught that the purpose of money was to serve the members of society to facilitate the exchange of goods needed to lead a virtuous life. Interest, in their belief, hindered this purpose by putting an unnecessary burden on the use of money. In other words, interest was contrary to reason and justice. Reflecting Church law in the Middle Ages, Europe forbade charging interest on loans and made it a crime called usury. As commerce grew, and therefore opportunities for investment arose in the late Middle Ages, it came to be recognized that to loan money had a cost for the lender, both in risk and in lost opportunity. So some charges were allowed, but not interest per se. But all moralists, no matter what religion, condemn fraud, oppression of the poor, and injustice is clearly immoral. As we will see, fractional reserve lending is rooted in a fraud, results in widespread poverty, and reduces the value of everyone else's money. The ancient goldsmiths discovered that extra profits could be made by rowing the economy between easy money and tight money. When they made money easier to borrow, then the amount of money in circulation expanded. Money was plentiful. People took out more loans to expand their businesses. But then, the money changers would tighten the money supply. They would make loans more difficult to get. What would happen? Just what happens today. A certain percentage of people could not repay their previous loans and could not take out new loans to repay the old ones. Therefore, they went bankrupt and had to sell their assets to the goldsmiths for pennies on the dollar. The same thing is still going on today. Only today, we call this rowing of the economy up and down the business cycle. Like Julius Caesar, King Henry the first

The banking system in the United States relies solely on public confidence, which is based on the soundness of the product, not marketing. Confidence is crucial because the banking system does not actually have the money it appears to.

Banks create money out of nothing and lend it at interest, which is legal but akin to counterfeiting or cooking the books. The banking lobby avoids changing the system by blaming inflation on high wages or housing speculation, not acknowledging the root cause of money creation by banks.

The speaker questions the practice of banks taking actual cash value from borrowers, using it to fund bank loans, and then returning it as a loan with interest. The judge acknowledges that this is a common practice and that Congress allows it. The speaker highlights that borrowers essentially give their own money to the bank for free, which the bank then loans back to them. The judge confirms that this is the bank's policy. The speaker emphasizes that borrowers are unaware of this process and urges people to educate themselves about the financial system.

Speaker 0: So who are the people that actually get to be inflation? Well, they're the ones that are climbing up the network. They're the compromised ones. Why? What do they get? They get 0% money. The most corrupt money in the world is quantitative easing. Right? You essentially get the banks to buy the government's debt, and then central banks, put it on their balance sheet. So this is just pure corruption. This is below interest money. What about the banks? They get to create it for free. You know, they actually get to create it. They get a thousand decks on you you're paying 10%. They get they get to lever that up a 100 times. They get a thousand percent. And remember, this is all a debt based Ponzi scheme. The money to pay the interest doesn't exist, so you gotta find another person to take on the debt. You're either if you have a positive money in your in your bank balance, it's because somebody else is in debt. The money doesn't exist unless somebody else is in debt, and the money to pay the interest doesn't exist. So we create this economic environment where your money is continually being debased, and then you need to speculate in order to beat inflation. Now if you do a bit of speculation and you just invest some of your money in stocks, what happens? You're suddenly like, I don't know what stock to buy. I'm I'm not a professional trader. So there's a company out there, BlackRock, that will just buy all the stocks for me, and I just can give them a £100 a month or something. And, now I don't need to figure out what stock to buy. Okay. So now BlackRock is taking everyone's investment money that can't be bothered to figure out what stock through ETFs and index ones. Then they're taking everyone's pension. Then they're taking everyone's insurance contributions because you're trying to hedge some of the risk. And then when you get your house, you have to have insurance. And so where did BlackRock and all the asset managers in this financial industrial complex get all the money? It's your money. You paid for it. So then what do they do? Well, the banks create all of these. They they create new money every time they issue a mortgage. And then they say, do you know what? I don't even wanna take the risk of these mortgages anymore. What if can I just package it up and give it to someone else? So Larry Fink says, yeah. I've got all this money. All these people are putting these pension money in. Why don't we create something called a mortgage backed security? Let's package up all of these mortgages. Just put them into one product. And then what I can do is we can slap a credit rating on it. And if everyone complies, then they get this credit rating. Credit rating is not it's about compliance with the network. So now you've got all the banks are creating the money, and then they create these mortgage backed securities that allows them to control effectively all the real estate and transfer it. But who do they sell it to? They sell it to you. And so they created the money. They created the mortgage backed security, and then they sold it to your pension. So you paid for the very system for them to get the 0% money in the first place, and they're charging a fee for it. And what else do they get? They get a board seat on every company.

The Treasury issues IOUs in the form of bonds. Banks buy these bonds with currency. The Federal Reserve then writes its own IOUs, or checks, and gives them to banks in exchange for the Treasury bonds. This process creates currency. Essentially, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury swap IOUs, using banks as intermediaries to create currency. This process enriches the banks and increases public debt by raising the national debt. The end result is an accumulation of bonds at the Federal Reserve.

Banks are broke due to fractional reserve banking allowing lending of money they don't have. Central banks engage in counterfeiting through quantitative easing. Governments and central banks manipulate interest rates, not retail banks. Taxpayers bear the cost of bank failures. Without consequences for bankers and politicians, this cycle will persist.

A man questions a judge about how banks supposedly operate with borrowed funds. He presents a scenario: “I gave you the equivalent of $200,000. You returned the funds back to me, and I have to repay you $200,000 plus interest. Do you think I’m stupid?” He asserts that banks and Congress allow practices where banks breach written agreements, use false or misleading advertising, act without written permission or the borrower’s knowledge, and transfer actual cash value from the borrower to the bank, then return it as a loan. The man asks if, in this system, the borrower’s actual cash value funds the bank loan check and how the bank then uses those funds. The other participant, identified as a borrower in the discussion, responds that the borrower “got a check in the house.” The man pushes: is it true the actual cash value funding the loan check came directly from the borrower and that the bank received the funds from the borrower “for free”? He states, “No equal consideration. They got it from you for free,” and presses that the bank’s policy is to transfer the borrower’s cash value from the check to themselves and keep the money as the bank’s property, which they then loan out back to the borrower as if they own it and loan their own money. The other participant answers affirmatively, though notes not being present at the time to know the borrower’s intent. The man asks further: if a lender loans a borrower $10,000 and the borrower refuses to repay, is the lender damaged? The reply: yes, the lender is damaged if the loan isn’t repaid. He asks whether the bank’s practice is to take the borrower’s actual cash value, use it to fund the bank loan check, and never return it to the borrower. The response: the bank returns the funds, but as a loan to the borrower. The man clarifies: was the cash value returned as the bank loan to the borrower or as return of the money the bank took? Answer: as a loan. The man concludes, “So how did the bank get the borrower’s money for free? … It doesn’t make any sense.” A narrator then frames the scene: a man discussing banking with a judge, summarizing the exchange about funding checks with the borrower’s name, and the judge’s reaction that “all the banks are doing this” and that Congress allows it. The narrator describes the process in which you apply for a loan, a check with your name is issued, the bank takes it, and then “gives it back to you as a loan plus interest,” sourced from your own funds. He asserts there is no equal consideration and suggests people don’t understand truth in lending. The speaker claims that if the public understood the financial system, there would be a revolution, but people prefer to “dance.”

The biggest hidden secret of money is that the modern banking system allows a few to plunder many through a scam. Currency is created faster than trees can grow, but most people don't understand how. Modern societies create currency similarly, and the US dollar is the majority of the world's currency, so the United States will be used as an example. It begins when a politician says, "Vote for me."

The treasury creates currency and deposits it into government branches, which politicians then use for deficit spending on public works, social programs, and war. Government employees, contractors, and soldiers deposit their pay in banks. When you deposit currency in a bank, you are loaning it to them, and they can use it as they please, including investing in the stock market and lending it out at a profit. This is where fractional reserve lending comes into play, allowing banks to reserve only a fraction of deposits.

The modern banking system creates currency faster than nature. Politicians create deficit spending, which is paid for by Treasury bonds (IOUs). Banks buy these bonds and sell them to the Federal Reserve at a profit. The Federal Reserve creates currency by writing checks on accounts with zero balance, giving the currency to banks, who then buy more bonds. The Treasury deposits this currency, and the government spends it. When currency is deposited in banks, it is loaned out through fractional reserve lending, expanding the currency supply. 92-96% of all currency is created by the banking system, leading to inflation. Taxes are used to pay interest on bonds the Federal Reserve bought with essentially nothing. The system requires ever-increasing debt and will eventually collapse. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation owned by banks, who profit through interest and dividends. The system funnels wealth to the government and banking sector, causing economic booms and busts and wealth disparity. The solution is to understand the system, share the knowledge, and join the conversation to design a new monetary system.

The biggest hidden secret of money is that so few plunder so many through the biggest scam in history. The modern banking system creates currency faster than trees can grow. Most people don't understand how currency is created because economists and bankers make it seem too complex. Every modern society creates currency similarly, but the US will be used as an example since the US dollar is the majority of the world's currency. It starts when a politician says vote for me.

All banks, including Bank Santander, Deutsche Bank, and Royal Bank of Scotland, are broke due to the system of fractional reserve banking. This allows banks to lend money they don't actually have, which is a criminal scandal. The political sphere and central banks contribute to the problem with moral hazard and counterfeiting, also known as quantitative easing. Governments and central banks artificially print money, while ordinary people would go to prison for the same act. Central banks manipulate interest rates, not retail banks. Additionally, deposit guarantees are discussed casually, but they ultimately result in taxpayers bearing the burden when banks fail. To stop this ongoing outrage, bankers, including central bankers and politicians, should be sent to prison.