reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I was involved in vetting arms for Israel and learned about a 13-year-old boy being raped in an Israeli prison. We found the allegations credible and informed the government. The next day, IDF raided the charity's office and labeled them terrorists. It's crucial to prevent all atrocities, including sexual violence and other human rights abuses. People need to be valued and not dehumanized.

You're fixating on Morena's comments and the Department of Justice's indifference to certain issues. I'm confused about your priorities. I'm tired of this back-and-forth. You're trying to paint me as a misogynist, but I disagree.

Parents seek guidance from health leaders regarding vaccine decisions. I want to address a serious matter about character. You were accused of sexual harassment and assault by Eliza Cooney, who was initially hired as a babysitter. When confronted, you mentioned you weren't a "church boy" and acknowledged having "skeletons in your closet." You later texted Ms. Cooney an apology but claimed no memory of her account. Can you respond to these accusations in front of this committee? Did you make unwanted sexual advances toward Ms. Cooney? No, I did not, and that story has been debunked. Why did you apologize then? I apologized for something else. That’s not my understanding. You can read the text she published; it was not for that.

You are accused of calling Trump supporters extremists while repeating Hamas rhetoric. The questioner finds this hypocritical and disgusting. You deny the accusation and dismiss it as untruthful. The questioner questions if your congressional colleagues are lying. You invite them to ask a question. Thank you. Translation: You are accused of calling Trump supporters extremists while repeating Hamas rhetoric. The questioner finds this hypocritical and disgusting. You deny the accusation and dismiss it as untruthful. The questioner questions if your congressional colleagues are lying. You invite them to ask a question. Thank you.

I was saddened and outraged by the recent explosion at the Gaza hospital. It seems like it was caused by the other team, not you. However, there are doubts among people. We need to overcome these challenges and focus on saving innocent Palestinian lives.

I'm here to expose Ariel, who I believe is involved in serious wrongdoing, including child pornography. I see Dustin caught in the middle of this controversy, and while I don't defend him, I think he deserves a chance to speak without being interrupted. It's frustrating to see others, like Stew, dominate the conversation and dismiss Dustin. This behavior is counterproductive and undermines genuine discourse. I also question the integrity of those involved, especially regarding past movements that have been sabotaged. Instead of focusing on personal attacks, we should address the real issues at hand, including Ariel's alleged actions. I'm just sharing my perspective, and I know it may upset some, but it's important to speak out against these serious allegations.

Why are you doing this? You're kidnapped. What's happening in Palestine? How do you feel about the Palestinians? Innocent civilians are suffering. Why don't you care about them? The numbers are significant—how many people are affected? You can't ignore the plight of innocent civilians we've been advocating for. There’s misinformation being spread. Where’s the evidence of that? Are you serious? Do you want evidence of the atrocities happening, like women being raped?

The speaker is asked if they support Hamas killing 700 Israelis, including children, and kidnapping children. They respond by saying that the question is framed to make them look bad. They clarify that they do not support the United States, but they believe that the Israeli government is the real terrorist. The speaker is then asked a yes or no question about supporting the 700, but their response is not provided in the transcript.

I understand the concerns of feminist groups and radicals who criticize any association with Jeffrey Epstein. However, I question their silence on the mass rapes and abuse of young Jewish girls. The hypocrisy of the Me Too movement is evident when it comes to Jewish victims. I want to see a list of radical feminists who actively support revealing names and condemning Hamas for their crimes. I am glad that papers have been released, as they exonerate me. I only worry that some documents may have been withheld by judges. I believe every document, including those that challenge the credibility of accusers and accused, should be made public. We should not assume guilt based on accusations or associations.

The speaker questions whether Hamas is holding female hostages to prevent them from speaking about atrocities. During a negotiated pause, Hamas failed to release women as agreed, leading to suspicions. The speaker acknowledges this is not a proven fact but a belief held by many.

It's incredible how some people either don't think or just want to hate me. Usually, when a famous person faces these accusations, many victims appear. Name anyone, and you'll find hundreds of victims, new lawsuits, and countless stories. But here I am, three and a half years into this, with the most media spin ever, and not a single girl has come forward. Every girl they contact says I'm nice. They like me, even defend me. No one's against me.

I understand the concern about the silence of certain feminist groups regarding the Hamas' crimes against Jewish girls. The speaker questions the hypocrisy of the Me Too movement and calls for a list of feminists who have condemned Hamas. They express satisfaction that the papers have been released and emphasize the importance of transparency, hoping that all documents, including those that challenge the credibility of accusers and accused, will be made public for people to form their own judgments.

The US government has seen Hamas commit atrocities and hold female hostages. There is no evidence for why they have not released the remaining hostages. It is hoped that they will change their mind and release the women. There is a desire for the hostages to speak about their treatment.

A Muslim American leader accused a congresswoman of lying about Hamas committing rapes against civilians. Israeli authorities have started investigating these allegations, but evidence has been difficult to obtain. Witnesses have described the brutal killings and sexual violence inflicted by Hamas during the attacks. Israeli police have found trauma consistent with rape and assault on the bodies of the victims. Women were humiliated, paraded through the streets, and subjected to gender-based violence. Shockingly, there has been little international outrage or acknowledgment of these crimes. The silence from the international community, including the United Nations, is seen as a failure to recognize the suffering of Israeli women and a failure of humanity.

It's important to address the claims about sexual violence in the context of the conflict. The UN special representative on sexual violence reported that Israeli hostages in Gaza experienced sexual violence, including rape and torture. This report indicates that such abuse is ongoing and that there were incidents of conflict-related sexual violence during the October 7 attacks, including multiple cases of rape. When denying these occurrences, it raises questions about the credibility of the UN's findings. Why would the United Nations fabricate such serious allegations?

"We're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan?" "That's not right. Wrong headed." "I So got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand." "I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer." "He says, I think he would have told me." "He didn't say he had any of those connections." "I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true." "It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein." "But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you antisemitic."

The Prime Minister's comments this morning highlight that advocating for victims of mass rape is not a far-right stance. It's crucial to address the concerns raised by those victims. The act of smearing individuals who bring up these issues contributes to the initial cover-up. People deserve to hear the truth about these matters.

- On October 7, approximately 1,200 people were killed, with about 400 combatants and 800 civilians, according to the speaker who bases this on authoritative human rights reports (UN HRC Commission of Inquiry, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch). He notes that these organizations do not have perfect records but argues there is no compelling evidence that contradicts Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza being responsible for the majority of deaths, while there is no evidence that Israeli actions within Israel constituted a significant share of the total deaths. - The speaker contends there is no credible evidence of weaponized rape by Hamas on October 7. He discusses the UN Commission of Inquiry’s distinction between rape and sexual violence, and Pamela Patton’s report, which he says concluded there was no direct digital or photographic evidence of sexual violence on October 7, despite reviewing thousands of photographs and hundreds of hours of digital evidence. He argues the rape claim relies on assertions by observers and advocates rather than verifiable forensic or photographic proof. - Eyewitness testimony is challenged as being part of a pattern that could promote a narrative of Israeli moral exceptionalism; the speaker asserts that some eyewitness accounts “tell you Israel is the most moral army in the world” and notes that many such testimonies come from sources described as biased, with Israeli soldiers often embedded in a siege mentality. He suggests that Israeli society, with a citizen army and strong military culture, may have incentives to shape or repeat certain stories. - The speaker discusses Hamas’s planning and motives in the years leading to October 7, describing Gaza as an “inferno under the Israeli occupation.” He cites early 2000s characterizations of Gaza as a concentration camp by Israeli officials and UN/Human Rights reports, and notes the blockade and economic collapse. He explains that in 2023, Gaza was described by The Economist as a “rubber sheep” and by others as a toxic dump, with extremely high unemployment (60% of youth) and a deteriorating social fabric. The anticipated end of Gaza’s struggle was seen when Saudi Arabia joined the Abraham Accords, leading the speaker to say Gaza’s fate was sealed. - The discussion on Hamas’s shift to violence notes Hamas had previously tried diplomacy, international law (including cooperation with human rights organizations after Operation Cast Lead and Operation Protective Edge), and even nonviolent strategies like the Great March of Return (endorsed by Hamas). The UN report on the March of Return found demonstrators overwhelmingly nonviolent, while Israel was accused of targeting civilians. The speaker argues Hamas pursued multiple avenues but faced a harsh blockade and a failing prospect of improvement. - Regarding the broader regional context, the speaker asserts that the West Bank and Gaza have different trajectories; Egypt and Jordan are seen as neutralizing or stabilizing forces, while the West Bank’s situation is contrasted with Gaza’s harsher conditions. He argues that the goal in places like Egypt is to neutralize, whereas Israel’s policy toward Gaza is described as cleansing or subjugation, a distinction he says differentiates regional dynamics. - The speaker critiques the UN Security Council’s handling of Gaza, describing a 2023 resolution (UNSC Resolution 2803) that endorses the Trump peace plan and creates a “board of peace” with sovereign powers in Gaza, headed by Donald Trump, and notes that no external body supervises this board beyond a quarterly report to the Security Council. He claims this arrangement renders Gaza effectively under a transitional administration, with reconstruction timelines alarmingly long (fifty to eighty years to rebuild) and a minimal chance of Israel withdrawing from the green zone. - He argues that after October 7, the board’s governance path, the Trump plan, and Arab states’ support for the resolution collectively resulted in Gaza’s “death warrant,” with reconstruction hampered by deliberate destruction and political arrangements that preclude meaningful self-determination or statehood for Gaza. - On international reactions, the speaker notes varying support for Gaza among Arab nations and emphasizes that some regional actors (including Turkey, Egypt, Qatar, and others) endorsed handing Gaza to Trump; he accuses these states of compromising Gaza’s future for broader geopolitical aims and accuses several of “slavery and subservience” to such outcomes. - The concluding portion covers Gaza’s future: the speaker reiterates that Gaza has effectively been made unlivable, with rubble and toxic contamination delaying any reconstruction for decades, and he maintains that the path to a two-state solution remains contested, with the Trump-led framework limiting Palestinian rights and self-determination. He indicates he has just completed a book on UN corruption and the Security Council’s role in Gaza, titled Gaza’s Gravediggers, and suggests that the UN declaration of war on Gaza nullifies international law regarding self-determination.

I find it ironic that those defending Hamas online are the ones most likely to be targeted by them. They claim to be freedom fighters, fighting for their land, while I fight for my right to express myself. It's like being in a toxic relationship. I understand you may have a different perspective, but I can't empathize with someone who kidnaps, murders, and commits horrific acts. Just because someone had a difficult childhood doesn't mean I sympathize with them. If you want a free Palestine, free it from... [transcript ends]

I can't understand why you wouldn't want to read about this case, especially as a paid commentator. I have read newspaper reports, but not the full transcripts because it's difficult to imagine what those girls went through. It's not about feeling sick, it's about doing something. You said last week you hadn't read the transcripts, and you still haven't. Knowing the details should make you feel more strongly that something needs to happen. It makes me sick that people haven't grasped the disgusting nature of what happened, and I'd bet it's still happening today. It's unacceptable for the media to turn a blind eye. I am not turning a blind eye. You haven't read the details. I feel like you have. People in the media refuse to understand. People turn a blind eye because of class. They look down on these girls because they are working class.

I understand the concern about ties to Jeffrey Epstein, but where are radical feminists when it comes to Hamas' crimes against Jewish girls? The hypocrisy of the Me Too movement is evident in their silence on this issue. I want a list of feminists who condemned Hamas for their rapes and murders, and how many stayed silent or even supported them. Let's consider this context.

I understand the concerns about the hypocrisy of certain feminist groups who remain silent on the issue of Hamas' abuse of young Jewish girls. I believe it is important to reveal the names of these feminists and assess their stance on Hamas' actions. I am glad that the papers have been released, as I have always maintained my innocence. However, I worry that some documents may have been withheld, and I urge for the release of all documents to ensure a fair judgment by the public.

I believe it's unfair that the gag order is still in place. I have shown 32 legal experts who agree there's no case against me. I should be allowed to speak freely, but my rights have been taken away. I want to tell the truth, unlike others who can say whatever they want about me. The judge needs to lift this gag order.

Some may find it offensive that you seem indifferent to the deaths of Palestinian families, while knowing the names of Israeli soldiers but not the victims in Gaza. It appears you value Israeli blood more than Lebanese or Palestinian blood, as evident to discerning viewers.

I understand the concern about the hypocrisy of feminist groups and their silence on Hamas atrocities compared to their strong stance against Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker questions how many feminists have condemned Hamas for the rapes and murders committed. They express satisfaction that the released papers have vindicated them and express a desire for all documents, including those that challenge the credibility of accusers and accused, to be made public. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not assuming guilt based on accusations alone, but rather on evidence.