reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Israel is America's only true friend in the Middle East and should be supported. The speaker believes that God has a special covenant with Israel and that America should defend it against Iran. They emphasize that God has chosen Jerusalem as his dwelling place and that when the messiah comes, he will establish peace in the city. The speaker warns that if America stops supporting Israel, God will stop blessing the United States.

The speakers welcomed various leaders, including the Senate Democratic Leader, Senate Republican Leader, Speaker of the House, Secretary of State, Vice President, and President of the United States. The Prime Minister of Israel was also welcomed back to the APEC stage. The speaker emphasized the unique alliance between Israel and the United States, stating that US support for Israel is and should remain bipartisan. They described Israel as a strategic ally and emphasized the unbreakable friendship between the two nations. It was asserted that America is safer when it stands with Israel, and that caring about American security necessitates caring about Israel's security. The speaker concluded by saying that America and Israel need support more than ever, and offered blessings for both nations.

The speaker argues that Israel is not permanently isolated and can break out of a siege despite claims to the contrary. They note that some actors have halted shipments of weapon components, yet assert that Israel is capable of producing weapons and that intelligence and weapon systems are shared with the United States. The speaker expresses gratitude for bipartisan support in military matters for Israel, both in historical times and today, and emphasizes that this support persists across political boundaries. They highlight the ubiquity of Israeli-made goods, pointing out that many everyday items—cell phones, medicines, foods, including cherry tomatoes—are produced in Israel, illustrating a tangible contribution to global products. The speaker acknowledges that Israel can make things and cherishes the continuity of American support, vowing to work to ensure that support continues on both sides of the aisle. Further, the speaker asserts that Israel will eventually achieve the independence it needs so that Western European nations, which they say might deny Israel, will not succeed. They claim the capability to break the siege and to become independent of external restrictions or pressure. The passage ends with an incomplete thought: “And the last thing,” suggesting there was more to be said.

The speaker declares that these are historic days that will be recorded in Israel’s history. Under Operation Roaring Lion, the war is ongoing and intensifying, with Israel pummeling the Islamic regime in Tehran and its emissaries, including Hezbollah in Lebanon. The speaker emphasizes unprecedented coordination between Israel and the United States, asserting that this collaboration has produced substantial achievements that are altering the situation in the West Bank, the broader Middle East, and beyond. According to the speaker, these developments are elevating Israel’s status to that of a regional superpower—and in many respects a global superpower—thereby strengthening its ability to confront and deter enemies and secure its survival. The claim is made that threats may rise and fall, but once Israel attains superpower status, it gains the power to push away threats and safeguard its future. The speaker references a personal historical perspective: in 1993, they published an article in a newspaper asserting that the greatest threat to the State of Israel is not solely from Arab states but from Iran. They assert that, for more than thirty years, the ayatollah regime has acted to attack the United States and the West and, foremost, has worked to implement a plan to destroy the state of Israel. In summary, the message is that Operation Roaring Lion represents an escalating conflict aimed at Iran and its allied networks, backed by strong Israel–U.S. cooperation, which the speaker contends is reshaping regional dynamics, enhancing Israel’s power status, and aligning with long-standing concerns about Iran as a central threat to Israel.

Israel is a critical ally and vital for their existence. Supporting them is important, especially with replenishing their defense systems like the Iron Dome. Our assistance helped them defend against recent attacks. This support is crucial, and most Americans understand its significance. Translation: Supporting Israel is crucial for their survival, especially with replenishing their defense systems like the Iron Dome. Our assistance helped them defend against recent attacks, and most Americans recognize the importance of this support.

Speaker 0 argues that on a public policy level, reparative policies are not as effective as people want. He cites Holocaust reparations from Germany as an example, noting there was a huge debate in Israel over whether survivors should accept reparations, with the view that accepting payments could be seen as expiating past sins or buying off history. He asserts that reparations are not the reason Israel has become economically successful; rather, success comes from a determined effort to meet the meritocratic standards of success. He then discusses US foreign assistance to Israel, calling it a bargain for the United States because Israel “doesn’t need the money,” and contrasts this with other fiscal considerations. He mentions a claim that the black community would gladly take foreign assistance, though he notes he cannot speak for them. He provides a related financial context: “it’s like $3,000,000,000 a year” in some form of aid, and adds comparative U.S. military expenditure on bases abroad—“we spend $6,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Japan, $5,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Germany.” He emphasizes that a substantial amount of U.S. money helps other countries and underlines that Israel does not simply receive money but receives military product produced in the United States. The speaker explains that the relationship includes intelligence sharing and Israel’s development of its own technology, which the U.S. benefits from through disseminating tech they develop. He gives a concrete example: helmets used by F-35 pilots, noting these are Israeli-developed helmets, illustrating technology add-ons that the U.S. can leverage. He insists that the notion of a zero-sum dynamic—money sent out with nothing in return—is inaccurate, because the arrangement yields reciprocal benefits through defense collaboration and technology development.

- Speaker 0: Since Israel began strikes on Gaza after Hamas’ surprise attack on October 7, it has targeted residential buildings. The UN says nearly 200,000 structures have been destroyed or damaged. With so many fleeing attacks, Palestinians packed into makeshift shelters, many of them UN run schools, but they were not safe. More than 1,000 schools have been bombed, and Israel has destroyed most of Gaza's hospitals, including Al Shifa, where more than 400 Palestinians were killed in a raid in March 2024. - Speaker 1: We make the best weapons in the world, and we’ve got a lot of them. And we’ve given a lot to Israel, frankly. And I mean, Bibi would call me so many times, can you get me this weapon, that weapon, that weapon. Some of them I never heard of, baby, and I made them. But we’d get them here, wouldn’t we? And they are the best. They are the best. And you but you used them well. It also takes people that know how to use them, and you obviously used them very well. But so many that Israel became strong and powerful, which ultimately led to peace. That’s what led to peace. So as we celebrate today, let us remember how this nightmare of depravity and death all began. - Speaker 2: In 1948, when the land of Palestine was officially stolen and given to a group of rabid Zionists who murdered over 10,000 Palestinians. This crime against humanity was decided as early as 1917 with the Balfour Declaration, the British Crown, and Lord Rothschild of the Rothschild banking dynasty, otherwise known as the Bank of England, who when it’s all said and done, will have control over hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Palestinian oil and gas reserves. As Michael Roverero famously said, all wars are bankers’ wars. According to Benjamin Franklin, the primary catalyst for the American Revolution was the Bank of England’s Currency Act. After the revolution, a value based economy with no interest being paid to any central bank was created. But it didn’t last long. The first bank of the United States was chartered in 1791 and favored foreign stockholders over Americans. The charter ended in January 1811 followed by the war of eighteen twelve and the establishment of the second bank of the United States in 1816, which gave more power to the Bank of England. Andrew Jackson successfully killed the bank’s renewal and shortly after became the first US president targeted for assassination when Richard Lawrence drew pistols on him outside The US capital, but misfired. Laws were passed in the early eighteen sixties for the US government to issue its own currency in a value based economy as opposed to the debt based system imposed by central banks. According to an 1864 edition of the London Times, this would have made America the wealthiest nation of the world. The article warned that if a government creates its own money, it will be without debt. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world and therefore must be destroyed. In 1865, president Lincoln was assassinated, and the economy was quickly phased back to the central bank’s debt enslavement model. In 1913, the tyrannical Federal Reserve Bank and federal income tax was born. The two world wars brought Germany under the heel of the central banking cartel. Western banking institutions financed the Bolshevik revolution. In 2000, Iraq stopped selling its oil and Federal Reserve notes. In 2003, Iraq was illegally invaded by The United States and dollar based oil sales were reinstated. In Libya, Muammar Gaddafi’s gold dinar currency was making the nation rich. In 2011, The US invaded and reverted Libya’s oil sales to dollars. The Bank for International Settlements recently proposed efforts under the guise of anti money laundering that would provide scores to tokens and digital wallets including stablecoins. Digital ID, social credit scores, and a carbon tax is what the bankers are up to now. And everything else is a distraction. Today’s war is mostly psychological, and it’s being waged upon you. Greg Reese reporting. The Reiss report is now fully funded by my Substack subscribers. Subscribe today and support my work at gregreiss.substack.com.

The speaker addresses U.S. policy in the Middle East and the posture of those who support Israel, arguing strongly that supporters in the United States should cease apologizing for backing Israel. They assert there is no need for an apology, declaring, “There’s no apology to be made.” This stance frames the U.S. relationship with Israel as clear-cut and essential, offering a provocative justification for continued support. In advocating for unwavering backing, the speaker characterizes U.S. support for Israel as a decisive measure, calling it “the best $3,000,000,000 investment we make.” This claim positions aid to Israel as a strategic expenditure with substantial returns in terms of regional influence and security interests, suggesting that the economic commitment yields significant strategic benefits for the United States in the Middle East. Building on this assertion, the speaker presents a hypothetical scenario to underscore the perceived indispensability of Israel to American interests. They state, “Were there not an Israel, The United States Of America would have to invent an Israel.” This statement implies that, in the absence of an existing state in the region aligned with U.S. interests, Washington would face the dilemma of creating a state in order to protect those interests, highlighting the perceived necessity of having a stable, allied presence in the area. Further reinforcing the argument, the speaker repeats the notion of necessity with a direct formulation: “The United States would have to go out and invent an Israel.” This reiteration emphasizes the belief that Israel serves a critical role in safeguarding American regional objectives, to the extent that its existence is considered indispensable enough to warrant creation if it did not already exist. Across these points, the core message is a vehement defense of sustained U.S. support for Israel, framed as both morally clear (no apology) and practically essential (a valuable investment with strategic weight). The speaker combines a repudiation of criticism with a hypothetical justification for the centrality of Israel to American policy in the Middle East, asserting that Israel’s existence or creation is tied to protecting United States interests in the region.

Speaker 1 acknowledges that intelligence sharing between the U.S. and Israel is not total and that allies spy on each other, including domestically. Speaker 1, identifying as conservative, says this is expected because people act in their rational self-interest. Speaker 0 asks if it is in America's interest for Israel to spy on the U.S., including on the president. Speaker 1 responds that the close alliance with Israel provides huge benefits to the U.S. Speaker 0 presses on the issue of spying, asking why an American lawmaker wouldn't tell a client state that spying on the U.S. is not allowed. Speaker 0 expresses that it is weird not to say that, but Speaker 1 seems unable to.

The speaker welcomes the Prime Minister of Israel, emphasizing the unique alliance between Israel and the United States. Support for Israel in the U.S. is bipartisan and should remain so. Israel is described as a strategic ally, and the friendship between the two countries is unbreakable. American security is linked to Israel's security. The speaker asserts that America and Israel need support more than ever. The speech concludes with blessings for both Israel and the United States.

I walk with my husband, Michael, and hold hands. It's like a whole new world for me. Just walking and holding hands. Some that one of our fellow Americans for years could not do. What kind of shit is that? As you said, Americans see Israel as a reliable and stable ally in the Middle East. We share common values, defend common interests, and face common enemies. Iran sees us as one and the same, and they're right. We are together. In the Middle East today, it is clear that Israel and America stand united.

And our weapon systems we share with The United States. We're tremendously appreciative of the bipartisan support and military matters to Israel in previous years and today as well. But do you have cell phones? Any you have cell phones here? No. You're holding a piece of Israel right there. You know that? I mean, a lot of the cell phones, the medicines, the foods, you eat cherry tomatoes. You know where that was made?

Israel is praised for its moral actions despite the conflict with Palestinians. The speaker jokes about the number of Palestinians killed. They discuss the need for American support in various international arenas. Gratitude is expressed towards President Biden and the US Congress. The speaker believes that if Israel wins, it will benefit the civilized world. Personal growth is mentioned at the end.

The speaker praises the speech as a strong condemnation of Saddam's efforts to hide his weapons of mass destruction. Israel has long been aware of this and has shared intelligence with the United States. The United States has also shared some of its own intelligence with the world. Israel believes it has the right and obligation to protect its citizens.

"Israel is isolated." "Israel can't break out of the season." "We will." "Yes, we can." "We're pretty good at producing weapons." "We share intelligence with The United States." "A good chunk of your intel and our weapon systems." "We are tremendously appreciative of the bipartisan support in military matters to Israel in previous years and today as well." "You're holding a piece of Israel right there." "it's an Israeli product as there are so many other things." "This serves the betterment of for the betterment of all mankind and womankind." "We can make things." "We cherish the fact that we have the constancy of American support despite the attempts to erode it, and we'll continue to work to make sure that that continues on both sides of the aisle." "But equally, we will eventually create the independence that we need so those in Western Europe who think they can deny us things will not succeed." "We can break this siege, and we will."

The US unconditionally supports Israel with weapons, money, and diplomatic backing, unlike any other country relationship. This support is not solely strategic but driven by the powerful Israel lobby influencing US foreign policy to benefit Israel. The lobby's success in ensuring unwavering US support for Israel is remarkable.

The speaker identifies as a Gentile and not Jewish, sharing his 23andMe results: “I’m hopelessly Gentile. I am like, I am white trash.” He explains he is “Scottish and Irish” and that his love for the Jewish people grew after entering a relationship with Jesus Christ and studying the Bible. He emphasizes that “everything we have came through the Jewish people,” including the Bible and the Messiah, stating, “My Bible has come through the Jewish people. My Messiah came through the Jewish people.” He recalls being invited to speak at the Museum of Tolerance after a horrible attack on Israel, telling a Jewish audience that his material and faith trace back to the Jewish people. He warns, “Woe to the person who seeks to destroy Israel or the Jewish people,” citing God’s promise: “I will bless those that bless you, and I will curse those that curse you.” The speaker asserts that a key reason God has blessed the United States of America is because the country has stood by Israel and the Jewish people, and that this stance should continue in the future. He concludes by tying this belief to voting, saying, “When it comes to casting your vote for the next president, I’m one of the things that I’m gonna look for is a president that understands this principle, and will stand behind Israel in her future.”

The discussion centers on US support for Israel, with Speaker 0 stating that the US provides Israel with $3 billion annually in military aid, which benefits US national security through intelligence sharing, particularly from Mossad. Speaker 1 questions the cost of military actions to protect Israel and whether Israel spies on the US, including the president. Speaker 0 acknowledges that allies spy on each other and defends the alliance with Israel as beneficial for the US. The conversation shifts to AIPAC, with Speaker 1 questioning whether it lobbies on behalf of the Israeli government and why it isn't registered as a foreign lobby. Speaker 0 denies this, stating that AIPAC is an American lobby that promotes a strong US-Israeli relationship. Speaker 1 suggests AIPAC's goals are shaped by the Israeli government, while Speaker 0 denies coordination and accuses Speaker 1 of being obsessed with Israel. Speaker 1 denies being anti-Semitic and defends their right to question foreign influence on US politics.

"I just said this in another meeting and they said, oh, Israel is isolated. Israel can't break out of the season." "Yes, we can." "We're pretty good at producing weapons." "Like intelligence, we share both with The United States." "A good chunk a good chunk of your intel and our weapon systems." "We're tremendously appreciative of the bipartisan support and military matters to Israel in previous years and today as well." "But do you have cell phones? Any you have cell phones here? No." "You're holding a piece of Israel right there." "You know where that was made? I don't like cherry tomatoes, but it's an Israeli what can I do? It's an Israeli product, as are so many other things." "I think that is Israel's unknown contribution." "We can break this siege, and we will."

Speaker 1 acknowledges that while intelligence is shared between the U.S. and Israel, it is likely not all intelligence. They also assume that allies, including Israel, spy on the U.S., and vice versa. Speaker 1 states that conservatives recognize people act in their own self-interest. Speaker 0 asks if it is in America's interest for Israel to spy on the U.S., including on the president. Speaker 1 responds that the close alliance with Israel provides huge benefits to the U.S. Speaker 0 asks why Speaker 1 won't say that Israel is not allowed to spy on the U.S. and that they don't want to be spied on.

Speaker 0 discusses working with the Israelis, describing them as “very American” and noting that they could get into shouting matches during meetings over whose idea was best, followed by casual lunch and reconciliation. He emphasizes that Israel is a good ally that the U.S. needs to protect and support, and he asserts that CIA and Al Qaeda had worked closely together in Iraq and in Syria, and that there are times when covert action allowed meetings with the “quote unquote, enemies” to try to bring things down as CIA officers. Speaker 1 adds that most of the world has a problem with Al Qaeda and ISIS/Daesh, but there is less of a problem because the CIA worked with ISIS/Daesh and Al Qaeda. He suggests that if the CIA worked with them, it would be better to understand what they were doing, and if the plan is for the U.S. to work with them on a security agreement, which has been done with enemies before, then this has been done in concert with diplomats and other countries involved. He indicates he wouldn’t be surprised if that was happening and would call it possibly hopeful. Speaker 0 continues by noting that newspapers in the United States once celebrated Qasem Soleimani as a fighter with American troops against ISIS and Al Qaeda. He states that Soleimani “was, and now it's switched,” implying a shift in perception or policy. The overarching theme is the idea of collaboration or coordination with hostile or extremist groups in pursuit of broader strategic objectives, including countering Iran, and the possibility that such collaborations could be framed as necessary or hopeful within a complex web of alliances and covert actions. Speaker 0 ends by reiterating the shift in stance: “Now we have to go to al ISIS and Al Qaeda to go back against Iran.” This underscores a cyclical or ironic pivot in U.S. strategy, moving from partnering with certain adversaries against common threats to reengaging those same groups to counter another adversary. The dialogue presents a candid view of realpolitik, suggesting that relationships with seemingly incompatible actors and shifts in alliances occur as part of broader geopolitical objectives, with collaboration sometimes described as acceptable when it serves strategic goals, and public narratives sometimes contrasting with behind-the-scenes actions.

Israel is a critical ally and vital for their survival. Supporting them is crucial, especially with replenishing their defense systems like the Iron Dome. Our assistance helped them defend against recent attacks. It's a symbolic gesture and a biblical duty to stand with Israel. They will prevail as long as we stand by them.

Our nations, the United States and Israel, share a strong bond as we both strive to do good and be strong.

Speaker 1 acknowledges that Mossad likely doesn't share all intelligence with the U.S., just as the U.S. doesn't share everything with them, but emphasizes it's a close alliance. Speaker 1 assumes all allies, including Israel, spy on the U.S., and attributes this to people acting in their rational self-interest. When asked if it's in America's interest for Israel to spy on the U.S., including on the president, Speaker 1 states it's in America's interest to be closely allied with Israel because the U.S. gets huge benefits from it. While acknowledging the spying takes place, Speaker 1 does not express disapproval, but rather focuses on the benefits of the alliance.

Senate leaders, the Speaker of the House, and the Secretary of State were introduced, followed by the Vice President and the President. The Prime Minister of Israel spoke about the strong alliance between Israel and the US, emphasizing bipartisan support. The importance of standing with Israel for American security was highlighted. The audience was urged to support both countries. The speech ended with blessings for Israel and the US. Thank you. Translation (if needed): Senate leaders, the Speaker of the House, and the Secretary of State were introduced, followed by the Vice President and the President. The Prime Minister of Israel spoke about the strong alliance between Israel and the US, emphasizing bipartisan support. The importance of standing with Israel for American security was highlighted. The audience was urged to support both countries. The speech ended with blessings for Israel and the US. Thank you.