TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

For every 10,000 people given a mammogram, eight will die who wouldn't have from breast cancer. There is a 52% overdiagnosis rate with mammography, meaning many are treated unnecessarily. Safer options include ultrasound, which is definitive and radiation-free, and thermograms to detect metabolic activity. The speaker questions why annual mammograms are recommended, especially for those with dense breast tissue, as radiation from mammograms can cause cancer. A Cochrane review showed a zero net effectiveness rating for mammograms in node-positive cancers. The speaker suggests ultrasound and thermograms should be the standard.

The injections target the immune system, causing damage and acting as multi-warheads designed to injure or kill people immediately, intermittently, or in the long run, potentially causing cancer. Turbo cancer occurs in people who already had cancer. The injections destroy the immune system, allowing existing cancers to progress rapidly. It takes a long time for cancer to progress and do damage because the immune system eliminates many aneuploidy cells. Cancers cannot develop quickly unless in cell culture with SV40 and no immune system. The speaker suspected, and it turned out to be true, that the injections were destroying the immune system, revealing undiagnosed cancers. Most people getting cancer suddenly and dying likely already had it. Severely disabling the immune system allows these pre-existing conditions to proliferate.

For every 10,000 people given a mammogram, eight will die who wouldn't have from breast cancer. There's a 52% overdiagnosis rate with mammography, meaning many are treated unnecessarily. Ultrasound is definitive and avoids radiation. Thermograms detect metabolic activity and blood flow, followed by ultrasound if needed. Mammogram radiation can cause breast cancer, especially in those with dense tissue. A Cochrane review showed zero net effectiveness for mammograms in node-positive cancer cases versus controls. Ultrasound and thermograms should be the standard.

This is a particularly interesting one; 'X rays are known to cause look at that. Not solve it.' They also claim, 'Also, they weaken the patient, and the patient often dies from the X-ray damage rather than from the statistics show that the patient who no longer receives the treatments live just as long or longer than those who subject themselves to all of this.' The approach proposed is to 'Treat the symptom of the tumor rather than the actual addressing the root cause.' The speaker concludes: 'This is a very powerful book that I highly recommend everybody look into.'

Cancer is not a disease but a survival mechanism to house toxins. The tumor is created to protect the body by containing toxins. Biopsies are unnecessary as treatment remains the same whether the tumor is cancerous or not. People often die from cancer treatment rather than cancer itself. The healthcare system profits from sick individuals, leading to unnecessary procedures like biopsies that can worsen the situation.

There's no such thing as biopsy spreading cancer. They say that out loud, but they have not even one scientific study to show for that, whereas I have 50 to show that they do spread cancer. They just believe so strongly and so blindly what they were told, and they're afraid of the truth because it means that for years and years and years, doctors have been killing people through biopsies. Be very careful. Never do a prostate biopsy. Never do a breast biopsy. There are better ways. You don't need the mammogram with its own radiation. You don't need biopsy to tell you if it's cancer or not. You can be 99% sure just by doing an ultrasound with a technician who knows what she is doing.

Every early cancer detection is customer creation and fraud, with no proof that it cures anyone. The cancer industry is a $300,000,000,000 industry driven by money, with each patient bringing in between $3,000,000 and $7,000,000. If a patient doesn't have cancer, they may be given it. Cancer is not an illness but an accumulation of symptoms. Cancer rates have increased from seven percent in 1900 to fifty-six percent today, and including "the thing we cannot talk about," it's ninety-two percent. The speaker claims to have cured 66,000 cancer patients.

According to the speaker, mammograms cause harm, killing eight people out of every 10,000 screened who would not have died from breast cancer otherwise. The speaker claims there is a 52% overdiagnosis rate with mammography, leading to unnecessary treatment. They suggest ultrasound, which they say is definitive and radiation-free, and thermography as safer alternatives. Thermography detects metabolic activity and blood flow, followed by ultrasound if needed. The speaker questions the yearly recommendation of mammograms, especially for women with dense breast tissue, because the radiation may cause cancer. They cite a Cochrane review indicating zero net effectiveness for mammogram screenings in node-positive cancers. The speaker recommends ultrasound and thermogram as the standard.

We all carry dormant cancers and tumors to varying degrees. The innate immune system's destruction allows these dormant tumors to become active. Once the immune system is compromised, existing weak cancer cells can proliferate unchecked, similar to antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Each cancer cell is unique, and in a weakened immune environment, those that can survive will thrive rapidly. The immune system's complexity is immense, and its overall functionality is being diminished. Notably, IgG4 levels have surged significantly in those exposed to certain injections, which may suppress the immune response to cancer cells. While the details are complex, the general principles indicate that these changes could hinder the immune system's ability to combat cancer effectively.

I want to address why I’ve chosen not to get a mammogram. In nursing school, I learned not to deeply palpate a mass due to the risk of spreading infection or causing a cancerous mass to rupture and metastasize. It doesn’t make sense to compress a lump between plates, as that could lead to further issues. Research shows that people often die from metastasis rather than the primary tumor, and cancer treatments can cause metastasis. Additionally, I’m concerned about the radiation exposure from mammograms, as breast tissue is sensitive. I prefer to live a toxic-free lifestyle and remain hopeful, despite the rising cancer rates and reports of aggressive cancers. I encourage everyone to do their own research on this topic.

Oncologist Dr. Tullio Simancini wrote the book "Cancer is a Fungus" and discovered that all his tested patients had Candida in their bodies. He achieved a 90% success rate by injecting sodium bicarbonate, an alkaline mix, directly into the cancerous area. Cancer cannot survive in an alkaline environment. A friend of mine, Dr. Emma Fields, took a patient to him in Italy, but he was under investigation and later jailed for manslaughter. My husband believes that if he had used chemotherapy instead, he wouldn't be in jail. Is it possible that some patients came to him in advanced stages and would have passed away regardless?

The mitochondria, not the nucleus, is the center of cancer. Cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease. Realizing this will massively drop death rates in just a few years. We may never completely get rid of cancer, but we can learn to live with it and keep it at bay. If we restrict the fuels that cancer needs through diet and lifestyle, and keep our mitochondria healthy, we can manage it. If we don't focus on the mitochondria, then almost 50% of people will continue to get cancer.

Speaker 0: Medicine follows a chain from diagnosis to prognosis. If the diagnosis is misdiagnosed as a genetic disease, the prognosis won’t match what’s actually happening. Speaker 1: The ultimate approach is to look under the microscope at a biopsy. People rely on staging—stage one, two, three, four—a system used for over a hundred years. There are also stage zero ideas where there might be something or nothing. Then they remove breasts, use toxins, and do aggressive treatments to some patients. They define stage four, but what does that really mean? We look at tissue removed from the body, examine it under a microscope, and assess how many mitotic figures there are and how crowded the cells are. The pathologist makes a decision, which is passed to the surgeon or oncologist to tell the patient they have this kind of disease, stage three or stage four, depending on cell crowding and mitotic figures. The problem, which has persisted for decades, is that we take a biopsy of a tumor—a section of it—and the pathologist quickly decides. Then we stick the patient with something that can actually make things worse and spread the disease. I have dozens of articles showing that biopsies from breast, colon, liver, and lung can spread the tumor through the body, creating medicine. Why? I say: don’t do anything. Don’t poke the bear. Shrink it down, make it weak, then come in and take the whole thing out. Why stick it for nothing? Just remove the whole thing after you shrink it with metabolic therapy. Then what they say is, this is not an aggressive tumor. Yes, because we shrunk it a lot. If you had stabbed it initially, it might have said it would kill you. But you have to know the biology: you don’t poke the bear; you take the food away from it. It becomes docile, you can cut it out, then follow with non-invasive imaging. We have non-invasive imaging—CT, PET, MRIs—and you can start looking at things before you poke them. If it goes away, why poke it in the first place? So we have all these tools available, but they aren’t used in the correct order or way. Once the knowledge comes out, people will realize what I’m saying and start doing things the right way.

The problem with a biopsy is this. Now it spreads all over the place. So you do spread it. But what they're not telling you is that the research is showing that if you take these drugs, you're almost guaranteeing metastasis. If you did a biopsy and or a surgery, you're gonna get metastasis. Now if you add high dose chemo, you're get metastasis. If you do radiation, you're gonna get metastasis. What they're looking at is giving you a short term reduction of the primary, and then you think, oh, I'm in remission. Nine months later, it would came back. The federal, the FDA will have approved it. Your insurance will pay for it. It's the right thing to do. And you're gonna do that. It's also part of the sales team. It's part of the sales technique.

Biopsy is the only way to diagnose cancer, but it has its drawbacks. Breaking the fibrin sheath around a tumor during a biopsy can cause it to spread. A ballerina who had a biopsy experienced the growth of little tumors around the biopsy site. A histological diagnosis is needed, where a pathologist examines the slide to determine the type of cancer. However, this diagnosis doesn't provide much help. It is also a sales technique to justify specific drugs for treatment. Research shows that biopsies, surgeries, high dose chemo, and radiation can all lead to metastasis. These treatments may provide short-term reduction of the primary tumor, but the cancer often returns later.

Mammograms can produce cancer because they involve squashing the breasts, which are very sensitive. This squashing causes pain, which indicates inflammation. Inflammation involves increased blood flow and leaking blood vessels to bring in white blood cells and oxygen. The signs of inflammation are that the area is red, hot, painful, and swollen. Mammograms irradiate inflamed, acutely injured tissue with ionizing radiation. This process is not done with prostates or testicles, only breasts. The speaker believes this is a male-dominated madness.

Cancer can initially be an external fungal infection, which may become opportunistic when the body's defenses are weakened. Factors like stress, medication, and diet can contribute to this vulnerability. Sodium bicarbonate emerged as a treatment after successfully addressing psoriasis, leading to the idea that cancer might also be fungal. Administering sodium bicarbonate intravenously has shown positive results, even reviving a comatose child with brain lymphoma. While some cancers are harder to treat due to poor circulation, many, including breast and skin cancers, show high success rates with this method. To eliminate fungus, symptoms should guide treatment, and sodium bicarbonate can be used effectively. Conventional treatments like chemotherapy and radiation may shorten life, while sodium bicarbonate can be beneficial when used appropriately during surgeries.

If you suspect a small tumor, immediately put your body on a detox and cleanse your bowels. Biopsies and radiation can temporarily shrink tumors, but they also damage surrounding tissue and can cause the tumor to grow back. Cancer cells are simply damaged cells caused by extreme acidosis. To cool down acidosis, hydration is key. The term "cancer" is misleading and belongs to the medical community. Autoimmune conditions should be avoided as they weaken the body. Relying on toxic chemicals from uninformed doctors is not the solution.

Mammograms as a screening practice are not recommended because they do terrible harm. The Cochrane Collaboration also advises against mammograms. The US Preventative Services Task Force suggests mammograms for women over 50 only after a thorough discussion of the benefits and risks, highlighting overdiagnosis as a risk. Screening 2,000 women with mammograms saves one life but diagnoses 5-50 women with breast cancer they would have never known they had or died from, turning them into cancer victims. It also causes 600-1000 of the 2,000 women to undergo further testing and treatment. Mammograms rarely save lives and always do harm, so they should not be done as a screening tool.

A tumor is a bubble the body builds to collect toxins and keep them in one spot, preventing harm. Cancer is a symptom, not an illness, and is essentially your friend. A needle biopsy can release toxins into the system, causing a fast-growing, aggressive cancer that wasn't present before. Similarly, mammography, which applies 50 pounds of pressure to the breast, can cause a lymph node full of toxins to burst, leading to cancer. Each mammography raises cancer risk by two percent and can directly cause cancer due to the applied pressure.

Biopsies spread cancer, and there are 50 scientific studies to prove it. Doctors have been killing people for years through biopsies, but they blame the cancer instead of the metastasis caused by the biopsy. Therefore, one should never do a prostate or breast biopsy. There are better ways to determine if it's cancer. Mammograms are unnecessary because of their radiation. An ultrasound with a skilled technician can provide 99% certainty.

The only definitive way to diagnose cancer is through a biopsy. However, biopsies can disrupt the tumor's protective sheath, potentially causing it to spread. A patient experienced this firsthand after a biopsy led to the emergence of multiple tumors. While a histological diagnosis from a pathologist identifies the cancer type, it often serves as a justification for specific drug treatments, which are approved by the FDA and covered by insurance. Unfortunately, research indicates that these treatments, including chemotherapy and radiation, often lead to metastasis. Patients may initially feel a sense of remission, but cancer frequently returns within months.

Chemotherapy can kill any cell, not just cancer cells. If those handling chemotherapy must wear hazmat suits because it's toxic, why give it to someone already sick? It's like using napalm for an ant problem; you might kill the ants, but you'll destroy everything else, including the healthy cells. Radiation, like chemotherapy, is dangerous. X-rays have warning signs because radiation damages DNA, which can potentially cause cancer. The speaker questions why a therapy known to create cancer is used to treat cancer.

And that is going to be a tumor. When oh, oh, there we go. Worms. Those are worms inside the tumor. That's why the body walls the parasites off. It actually becomes a defense mechanism to the parasites and the eggs. So the body is not going to attack it because the immune system isn't gonna attack its own cyst or tumor. So all cysts and tumors are going to be parasites. There are reasons to believe that specific biological characteristics of malignant tumor tissues and parasite comprise the following elements, and it lists them right there. Endoparasites and malignant tumors resemble each other in many respects by reason of similar conditions under which they grow and exist. This suggests long ago the idea in regard to parasitic.

Speaker 0 argues that medical procedures can cause death or spread disease: - A colonoscopy in elderly people (60–70, completely healthy and fit) can lead to death three days later because “they poke a hole in the colon, the bacteria goes in and they are dead.” - In mammography, when something is found, the medical profession proceeds with a needle biopsy, and “pokes into something that's there to save your life.” A tumor is described as there to save your life, yet the procedure is claimed to spread illness. - The body builds a bag to store toxins in its lymph nodes; “so now they come and poke into the lymph node and what will happen is they now spread the poison that the body is collecting for ten-twenty years in the entire body and twelve days later these women are dead.” - Mammography is described as applying “50 pounds of pressure on a woman's breast.” The analogy is made: if you have a lymph node or a pimple ready to burst, applying that pressure would “burst it to give the patient the cancer.”