TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses taxation without representation in the US, highlighting how Americans pay roughly 50% of their income in various taxes. They break down the different taxes they pay, including income tax, property tax, and sales tax, showing how it adds up to nearly 50%. Despite this high tax burden, they express frustration at the lack of benefits and services they receive in return, such as affordable healthcare, nutritious food, and quality infrastructure. The speaker criticizes the government for not adequately representing the interests of taxpayers.

The speaker argues that using debt to acquire property reduces tax payments. They claim that taxes are a Marxist concept and that a progressive income tax supports communism. They mention the Boston Tea Party as an example of America being tax-free until the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The speaker believes that the harder one works and the more money they make, the higher their taxes, which they equate to communism.

Speaker 0 outlines a stance of widespread tax resistance among Americans who deem the government corrupt and unrepresentative. He states, “there were so many people, mostly American patriots, who said, I don't care what the consequences are. I will not continue to pay taxes to a corrupt government that doesn't represent me.” He claims the IRS is already down “25% from last year.” He then criticizes those who have “never worked a day in their life but yet wanna make rules for the rest of us,” arguing they “overdo themselves and kill the goose that laid the golden egg.” He describes consequences of the government’s actions as not only crashing the economy but creating a scenario where people “have a choice” between basic needs and paying taxes: “Keep a roof over your family's head or pay taxes. Feed your children or pay taxes. Live a little bit like a fucking human being or pay your fucking taxes.” He asserts that many will be unable to pay taxes this year, and those who “just up and decide fuck them and file exempt on their fucking forms” will “totally overwhelm the IRS,” including “those 80,000 gun toting Nazi motherfuckers who have been harassing us for years.” The message implies a public record of asking the IRS for the law that states a wage earner must pay taxes, and claims they cannot provide it “because it was never legal in the first place.” He elaborates that “when you work and somebody gives you money or some form of compensation, that's not profit. That's an exchange, and it was never intended to be taxes.” The consequence, he says, is that “the government's gonna self destruct. It's gonna totally overwhelm the system.” He uses imagery to argue that people should resist, saying, “let those motherfuckers try driving their car with no gas in it.” In closing, he invites audience participation: “If you like what I'm saying, give me a hell yeah and a fuck you to their paperwork.”

The speaker discusses the symbolic significance of the increase in property tax in relation to Emmanuel Macron's political philosophy. Macron aims for a society where no one owns anything, as seen through his previous actions of abolishing the wealth tax and replacing it with a real estate tax. This ideology attacks citizens' ability to establish roots and make independent financial decisions. The speaker also highlights the contradiction between the government's claim of improving purchasing power during a period of inflation and the increase in taxation. Various taxes and levies, such as those on highways, airports, airfare, eco-contributions, non-road diesel, alcohol, and more, will burden the already struggling French population.

The speaker interviews former IRS commissioner Sheldon Cohn about the tax code and voluntary compliance. They discuss the definition of income, Supreme Court decisions, and challenges the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages. Cohn asserts that the law requires filing tax returns, despite objections. The speaker questions the IRS's legal authority and highlights inconsistencies in tax enforcement. Ultimately, the speaker challenges the IRS to prove the legality of income tax laws. Translation: The speaker interviews former IRS commissioner Sheldon Cohn about the tax code and voluntary compliance. They discuss the definition of income, Supreme Court decisions, and challenges the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages. Cohn asserts that the law requires filing tax returns, despite objections. The speaker questions the IRS's legal authority and highlights inconsistencies in tax enforcement. Ultimately, the speaker challenges the IRS to prove the legality of income tax laws.

The speaker owns 12,000 rental units acquired through debt, stating that more debt leads to more property and less tax. They believe paying taxes is a Marxist idea and against American principles. According to the speaker, Marx considered a progressive income tax essential for spreading communism. They claim America was founded as a tax-free nation until the creation of the Federal Reserve and the IRS in 1913. They assert that they legally pay no taxes, while those who work harder pay higher taxes, which they equate to communism. The speaker concludes it's an American duty not to pay taxes, citing the Communist Manifesto.

The speaker discusses how the federal income tax negatively impacted Americans by shifting the government's revenue source from tariffs to taxing individuals. They argue that tariffs on international corporations would be a better revenue source, promoting American manufacturing and job growth. The speaker highlights the historical importance of tariffs and criticizes the impact of the income tax on American prosperity. They emphasize the need to educate future generations on these issues.

The speaker expresses frustration about the high taxes they have to pay. They criticize the system for taxing their entire paycheck and then taxing their spending as well. They question whether they truly own anything if they have to constantly pay taxes on it. The speaker believes that the system is just a lending system where they don't actually own anything. They warn that failure to pay taxes can result in their possessions being taken away or even imprisonment. They suggest that if someone doesn't like the system, they should leave.

A former IRS commissioner is interviewed about the tax code and income tax laws. He argues that the IRS code is voluntary compliance, not mandatory, and defends the IRS's actions. The interviewer challenges the legality of income tax on labor, citing Supreme Court decisions. The former commissioner dismisses the arguments and asserts the IRS's authority. The interview ends with a confrontation, revealing a lack of transparency in tax laws and enforcement. The interviewer questions the legality of income tax on wages and calls for the IRS to show the law to the public.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

The speaker argues against the idea of paying taxes, claiming that a progressive income tax is a tool for spreading Marxism and communism. They point out that America was founded as a tax-free nation, citing the Boston Tea Party in 1773. However, in 1913, the Federal Reserve and the IRS were created, leading to the introduction of taxes. The speaker believes that those who work harder and earn more money end up paying higher taxes, which they equate to communism. They assert that it is an American duty to refuse to pay taxes, referencing the Communist Manifesto as support for their stance.

Inflation is a long-standing tax used by governments to take resources from their people for centuries.

Speaker 0 argues that openly acknowledging that Americans are effectively slaves is deeply disliked by the American public, because they have long been told that the United States is the freest country in the world. The speaker asserts that this belief is incorrect, stating, “We are not the freest country in the world. We're actually the only country in the world that is asked to go to work then pay most of our money back to the government when you add it all up.” The speaker anticipates a counterpoint from listeners who think they only pay a 30 percent tax, and rejects it by saying, “No. You don't. Add up all the other tax you pay. What's that add up to?” He emphasizes that this is “the actual percentage you tax,” and notes that for almost all people, “that's over 50% if you pay tax.” The implication drawn is that a person’s work essentially funds the government, and the speaker insists that in recognizing this, one must acknowledge a form of servitude. The core conclusion presented is that if people are living to work primarily to provide the government with the majority of their money, then they are, in effect, “legitimately slaves to the government.” The speaker reiterates that people “exist to fund the government,” and wraps up with the emphatic statement, “Okay? That is not free.”

We started with a small tax revolt, but now we're taxed on everything - earning, spending, saving, investing, and even dying. We pay taxes on our commute, work, and home, which we already bought with taxed money. The more we earn, the more the government takes. Taxes are everywhere, from our morning coffee to our paycheck.

Someone questions why money is taxed multiple times. They describe a scenario where someone gives them $500 that has already been taxed. They then have to pay taxes on that $500. When they spend any of that money, they pay taxes on the item they purchase. The person they bought the item from also has to pay taxes on the money received. They suggest that every dollar is taxed repeatedly.

Speaker 0 argues that money controllers make all rules and that America has become a socialist communist country, not capitalistic, because of a central bank. He says a central bank prevents capitalism and that prosperity is created by printing dollars or injecting digits into the economy, which results in an infusion of credit rather than real manufacturing or prosperity. Speaker 1 summarizes as a money planned economy. Speaker 0 asserts that with the creation of the Federal Reserve System, the government became dependent on private banks for money, and began taxing people. He states Social Security started in 1935, issuing Social Security cards with numbers on them and deducting money from paychecks under the belief it would fund retirement. He says income tax followed, enabled by Social Security, and notes the government now takes money out automatically, implying distrust of public willingness to pay. Speaker 1 comments that the government now controls the tax payment itself and that people are effectively slaves because taxes are taken automatically. Speaker 0 contends that through the Federal Reserve System, the government has become vested in bankers who profit from taxation, and that the bankers have taken control of the government, making Republicans and Democrats essentially the same since neither party proposes shutting down the Fed or stopping taxes or addressing major American issues. Speaker 1 introduces a personal connection: Nick Rockefeller, of the Rockefeller family, who, through an attorney, discussed with Speaker 0 the banking industry’s ultimate plan. Speaker 0 claims they discussed a global banking network, asserting that central banks exist worldwide, including in Germany, England, and Italy, and that central banking is part of the Communist Manifesto. He argues that two major planks—central banking and a graduated income tax—have been adopted in the United States as part of the Communist Manifesto, integrated via the Federal Reserve System. Speaker 0 then outlines the ultimate goal: to create a one-world government run by bankers, implemented in sections via the European currency, the euro, and the European constitution. He claims there is an effort to establish a North American Union in the United States and to create a new currency called the AMERO, all contributing to a worldwide government. Speaker 0 describes a future where every person is chipped with RFID, and all money exists in those chips. He claims money could be deducted digitally from the chip by authorities, eliminating cash, effectively giving total control to the authorities. He says protesters could have their chips turned off, leaving them unable to buy food or do anything, equating this to total control over people. Speaker 1 adds that the chip would be connected to a database containing purchasing records and other personal data. Speaker 0 reiterates the goal of a one-world government controlled by the banking industry, with everyone chipped and all money stored in chips, allowing control over every financial transaction and making people slaves or serfs to the bankers.

The video discusses the concept of being the registered keeper of a car rather than the owner, and how this relates to taxation. It explains that the legal system only deals with pieces of paper, not humans, and that individuals are tricked into thinking they are the legal entity. The video also highlights the use of legalese, a language with different interpretations from English, and how it is used to manipulate and deceive. It argues that taxation is a form of theft and extortion, and questions the government's use of tax money. The video concludes by stating that not paying taxes can lead to a sense of empowerment and adulthood.

The government can take your money with a twinkle in their eye and give it to someone else.

I'm saying, if someone can show me where my money's going and that it's not being used right, they're not my enemy. They're trying to help me out. This isn't about race; it's about them against all of us. They'll lock you up if you don't pay your taxes, basically forcing you to give them your money so they can spend it how they want. Why aren't people living? You'll kill someone over $3. We need to do better. You're not my enemy, whether you're a Democrat or a liberal. Forget race and even immigrants. We're talking about the money they force us to spend.

The speaker, a former IRS agent, shares her experience working for the IRS and her realization that the income tax system is fraudulent. She explains how the IRS uses tactics to make people believe they owe more money than they actually do. After leaving the IRS, she researched and discovered evidence that the income tax is not necessary for running the country. She also discusses the Federal Reserve and its non-federal nature, as well as the media's influence in suppressing this information. The speaker encourages people to do their own research and make informed decisions about paying taxes. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the system and taking action to bring the country back on track.

The speaker discusses Black's Law Dictionary, highlighting definitions that reveal interesting insights. For example, "person" is defined as a corporate fiction, "human" leads to "monster" meaning one unable to own property, and "job" is described as public business for private dishonest gain. The speaker questions the negative connotations of these definitions, suggesting a concerning perspective on commonly used terms.

The speaker presents a nine-point depiction of life inside a metaphorical prison that is identified as one’s country or state. First, they say you were born in a cold prison, and that this prison is your country and your state, implying that the conditions and governance you are subject to originate from where you were born. Second, they assert that you have to pay for the prison stay, with the term “prison fee” equated to taxes, indicating that financial obligations are imposed by the state as a cost of living within this system. Third, they claim you have no say in how the collected money is used, even though you are required to pay, underscoring a lack of financial sovereignty or control over public finances. Fourth, to meet the financial obligation, you must work, and the prison is described as encouraging you to buy new shiny products so that you feel better about your own impoverished existence, suggesting consumerism is used to placate residents and normalize hardship. Fifth, they state you are not allowed to exit the prison and live independently; if you attempt to do so, you will be hunted and forced to pay, indicating severe controls on mobility and harsh enforcement for those who attempt to leave. Sixth, only a few prisoners have walked far enough to see the prison wall, implying that most people are kept near the center of the system and are prevented from understanding or reaching the outer boundaries of their confinement. Seventh, the prison provides news and entertainment to prevent inmates from discovering the prison walls, meaning information and distraction are used to obscure the true nature of the enclosure. Eighth, the prison does not permit strong family bonds or robust brotherhood unless you are part of the group that runs the prison, pointing to elite insiders who control social cohesion and exclude others from meaningful communal ties. Ninth, the prison you live in is described as waking you up to a state that is sick and divided, suggesting that the system’s inherent flaws become apparent upon awareness, revealing systemic illness and internal division among residents.

The income tax is seen as unnecessary and a product of a shift in American attitudes towards government. This shift has led to an expansive welfare state and military commitments worldwide, funded by escalating taxes. While the top tax rate has decreased since 1922, the overall tax burden remains high, with government taking over 40% of the economy. The tax system creates a sense of enslavement, requiring individuals to maintain records and face severe penalties for non-compliance. The IRS operates under a presumption of guilt, forcing taxpayers to prove their innocence. Taxation is viewed as confiscation of wealth, contrary to the founding principles of America, and is deemed unnecessary in a libertarian society focused on limited government and individual freedom.

I own 12,000 rental units using debt to minimize taxes. Taxation is seen as a Marxist concept, with progressive income tax aiding communism. America was tax-free until 1913 when the IRS was established. I legally avoid taxes, while hard workers face higher taxes, resembling communism. It's our duty as Americans to resist paying taxes, as outlined in the Communist Manifesto. Translation: I own 12,000 rental units using debt to minimize taxes. Taxation is seen as a Marxist concept, with progressive income tax aiding communism. America was tax-free until 1913 when the IRS was established. I legally avoid taxes, while hard workers face higher taxes, resembling communism. It's our duty as Americans to resist paying taxes, as outlined in the Communist Manifesto.

The speaker discusses the issue of taxes and the lack of transparency in how the government uses the money. They argue that this is a sign of the United States moving towards fascism, as private corporations are increasingly running governmental operations. The speaker also mentions that pension and retirement funds are investing in these corporations, but there is no reporting back on where the money goes. They bring up the example of S&P downgrading the US Treasury in 2011 and how the Department of Justice went after them, suggesting that rating agencies can no longer rate the US Treasury due to the potential consequences.