TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I'm running out of time. You seem to be pro-vaccine but have started a group, Children's Health Defense, which sells baby clothing with anti-vaccine messages, like "unvaxxed, unafraid" for $26. Can you assure us that your organization will stop selling these products? I have no control over that organization; I resigned from the board. You founded it just a few months ago. Are you supportive of these onesies? I support vaccines and want good science. Will you tell your organization to stop selling those items?

- it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. - 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. - when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. - There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. - They're saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.

You mentioned wanting to eliminate 600 NIH workers on day one and 2,200 from HHS. Which departments will you cut from? There are 200 political appointees that change with each administration. If you remove those, will you replace them with your appointees? President Biden changed 3,000 employees at HHS. As a potential top health official, will you commit to not firing federal employees working on food safety or cyber protection? There are 91,000 employees. So, will you ensure those working on food safety and cyber security keep their jobs? I commit not to fire anyone doing their job. Will this commitment be based on your opinion or political agenda? It will be based on my opinion. So, it seems those with differing views on vaccines may be at risk of losing their jobs.

Paul Offit said that I'm going to do everything I can to make vaccines less available and affordable, which will hurt the vaccine infrastructure in this country. I'm supposedly joining hands with Donald Trump to march into measles land. But I'm not going to take away anyone's vaccines. People should be able to get them if they want. I want to give people good science. We don't have good safety studies on almost any of the 72 vaccines mandated for children. HHS admitted there are no pre-licensing safety studies for any of them, except the COVID vaccine. We need to know the risk profiles of these products. We also don't have good data on adverse effects from the COVID vaccine, which is a crime. The CDC's surveillance system captures less than one percent of vaccine injuries. Congress and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly ordered the CDC to put together a better vaccine. We will do that right away.

All of this cannot be true. Are you lying to Congress about being pro-vaccine, or did you lie on those podcasts? We have it all on tape. Senator, that statement from the Lex Fridman podcast has been debunked. I was asked if there are safe and effective vaccines, and I said some live virus vaccines are. I also stated that no vaccine is universally safe and effective, as every medicine has individuals who may react negatively, including vaccines. I was interrupted before I could elaborate. I've clarified this multiple times, including on national TV, so bringing it up now is misleading.

The measles outbreak in Samoa resulted in 83 deaths, with volunteers from New Zealand sending tiny coffins for the children who died. The Samoan health director noted that influential figures like Robert Kennedy can sway public opinion, leading to a devastating impact on vaccination efforts. This misinformation slowed the public health response, causing unnecessary deaths. There is concern that similar misinformation could arise in the U.S. if you were confirmed as the top health official. Seventy-five Nobel Prize winners and many in the Boston medical community oppose your candidacy, fearing the consequences of your influence. Therefore, I cannot support your nomination, as it poses a dangerous risk to public health.

I made it clear that my children were immunized with childhood vaccines. Public health failed to explain that COVID vaccines are different. Childhood vaccines, like for many diseases, provide immunity after one dose by giving children the disease without the deadly consequences. The COVID vaccine wasn't designed to prevent infection. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since COVID, and we need to address these concerns. The mRNA vaccine should have been prioritized for those at high risk of severe disease, as the science and data indicated. We should have protected the elderly and those with comorbidities first. It went into young people before the elderly and nursing homes. We need to align public health actions with science and data. When we don't, we fracture trust with the American people.

President-elect Trump expressed thoughtful concerns regarding vaccine safety and scientific integrity. He indicated strong support for solar energy, which aligns with my advocacy for clean energy. I believe Trump has the potential to be an unencumbered president, free from heavy ideological constraints. During our conversation, he raised questions about current vaccine policies, emphasizing the importance of scientific integrity in ensuring vaccine efficacy and safety. He acknowledged his doubts but affirmed his pro-vaccine stance, as do I. I also confirmed my willingness to chair the commission on vaccine safety and scientific integrity.

We aim to reverse the chronic disease epidemic and restore the nation's health. The very people dictating our food production and healthcare are those who instigated the crisis in the first place. Many defending this system and pharmaceutical profits are heavily funded. I was asked to clean up corruption and conflict. If confirmed, I recognize the CDC's critical role for Georgia, our country, and global health. Concerns have been raised regarding my previous promotion of "junk science" and potential conflicts of interest due to book deals and vaccine-related lawsuits. People need assurance that I can be independent and science-based. I will support vaccine development and distribution if the evidence supports it. I am aware of vaccine safety data resources, but question the accessibility and integrity of the data.

I wouldn't label myself as anti-vaccine, but after watching your interviews and the guests you host, I'm disappointed. I believe you are anti-science and not pro-vaccine. Supporting vaccines like MMR or pertussis doesn't change the fact that denying the science behind the COVID vaccine makes you anti-vaccine. Rejecting COVID vaccine science equates to being anti-science.

I raised concerns about investing NIH resources to re-examine the link between the measles vaccine and autism, given the extensive existing research and limited resources. It's impossible to prove a negative, and re-plowing already examined ground distracts from addressing unknown causes or solutions to the chronic disease crisis. We risk children dying from preventable diseases if we keep pretending this link is an issue. I agree that we need to address the rise in autism. While I believe the literature shows no connection between the MMR vaccine and autism, distrust in medicine exists post-pandemic. Providing good data is key to addressing concerns, but I'm unsure what constitutes "good data" when it already exists. The focus should be on pressing childhood health problems like diabetes and obesity, which should be the priorities of the NIH director.

You have raised concerns about Robert Kennedy's potential influence on vaccines and vaccine manufacturing. While you emphasize the importance of following scientific guidelines, there are fears that Kennedy could undermine access to vaccines, which could have serious consequences for children's health. Despite his assurances, there is skepticism about his commitment to supporting vaccinations. You assert that Kennedy could profit significantly while jeopardizing public health, leading to tragic outcomes for children. In response, you affirm your support for vaccines and the childhood vaccination schedule.

I will comply with all ethical guidelines. However, you are implying that I should not challenge backseat decisions. As Secretary of HHS, Robert Kennedy could undermine vaccines and their manufacturing, potentially profiting while risking children's health. I support vaccines and the childhood schedule, but I prioritize good science. You should clarify that Kennedy has undergone the same ethics review as other nominees and has signed an ethics letter regarding conflicts of interest. While concerns about his financial interests are raised, he has complied with all applicable laws. I cannot confirm if any previous nominee has made millions from suing entities they would regulate, but all nominees face scrutiny over their financial interests, and Kennedy has met the necessary requirements.

I defend public health leaders and question why cuts are bad for health at HHS. Distrust stems from conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking money from pharmaceutical companies while recommending drugs. He claims science is settled, yet approved vaccines have been recalled. I want focus on real issues: 38% of children having prediabetes. Measles deaths were high before vaccines, but chronic conditions are a bigger threat now. RFK Jr. isn't anti-vaccine but wants vaccine studies. I question why media covers measles over obesity and diabetes. Sixteen percent of COVID deaths were American, but the CDC didn't discuss metabolic links. I support measures like removing soda from SNAP, aiming for better health policies. Pharma profits from sick children, incentivizing chronic disease.

I want to clarify my stance on vaccines. First, vaccines, like all drugs, have side effects that can harm some individuals. There's no vaccine that is universally safe and effective for everyone. Vaccine injuries deserve attention, just like rare diseases. The public health community has often ignored concerns about vaccine side effects, which is disappointing. I believe vaccine manufacturers should be held legally accountable for their products, as they currently have immunity from lawsuits. Additionally, individuals must have the freedom to choose what goes into their bodies. The Nuremberg Code emphasizes informed consent, which is crucial. As president, I will ensure vaccines are safer, hold the industry accountable, and protect personal choice. If you support these ideas, visit Kennedy24.com to learn more about my plans.

There are concerns that discrediting public health officials could lead to a lack of trust in vaccines, similar to what is happening in Russia. Attacks on me are attacks on science, as everything I have said is based on scientific evidence. It is clear that science and the truth are under attack.

Kennedy's influence on public health is concerning due to his history as a science denialist and anti-vaccine activist. He promotes misinformation, claiming no vaccine is safe and effective, while asserting he supports informed choice. However, vaccines like polio and diphtheria have significantly reduced disease and death rates. His claims imply a conspiracy to hide data, which undermines public trust in health agencies. Kennedy's suggestion to eliminate departments like nutrition at the FDA reflects his conspiracy mindset rather than a constructive approach. There's skepticism about his potential confirmation for health positions, but the risk lies in his associates, who share similar anti-vaccine views, potentially gaining influence.

I'm asking if you will agree not to sue drug companies. I'm not agreeing to that. As secretary of HHS, you could influence lawsuits in many ways, such as promoting anti-vaccine views, appointing like-minded individuals, or changing vaccine schedules and compensation rules. You could even share FDA data with law firms for their benefit. I'm asking you to commit not to financially benefit from these lawsuits while serving as secretary. I will comply with ethical guidelines. You're trying to undermine vaccines. As secretary, you could harm vaccine access while profiting from it. I support vaccines and the childhood schedule; I just want good science. Then say you won't profit from your role as secretary.

I cannot understand how anyone can recommend the mRNA vaccination and sleep well at night. They seem afraid to admit they were wrong. I want to give you a chance to address your colleagues, fellow pathologists, and medical professionals. My advice is to always question what so-called experts say. You don't need top scientists, you need experienced doctors who think critically. In the past, people died from the flu without it being turned into a pandemic or locking people away.

I ask if you intend to substitute your judgment for that of professional scientists. I won’t substitute my judgment for science. The New York Times reported on fraudulent studies by NIH regarding amyloid plaques and Alzheimer's. Are the scientists who disagree with you considered bad? The corrupt ones, like those behind the fraudulent amyloid studies. Do you have a medical degree? No. Your failed presidential campaign has raised money. How much from HHS's issues? Zero. I want to enter emails about your fundraising into the record. Without objection. You previously stated that Black people should not follow the same vaccine schedule as whites. Can you explain? Studies show Black individuals may have stronger reactions to certain antigens, suggesting they need fewer. That’s dangerous. Your views could mislead parents. Do you think science is dangerous? These are peer-reviewed studies. I yield.

If you live in Washington, it's time to hold your senator accountable. She supports appointing RFK Jr., a known anti-vaxxer, as Secretary of HHS, which could harm public health and the economy. I checked her funding sources and found significant contributions from health professionals, pharmaceuticals, insurance companies, and HMOs. This raises questions about her credibility in discussing health issues when she profits from policies that negatively impact Americans. We need to be cautious about who we elect. If you're in Washington, remember this when voting next time.

I invite Senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana to review my daughter's autopsy report. He often uses hypothetical scenarios in his speeches, but I want him to confront the reality of my 18-year-old daughter, who died due to complications from the mRNA vaccine he claims is safe. Her autopsy reveals serious health issues, including thrombosis and organ damage, leading to her death on November 9, 2022. I challenge him to face me and explain how he can still assert the vaccine's safety and disregard the value of my daughter's life.

I made it clear that my children received childhood immunizations. The issue is we failed to communicate that COVID vaccines differ significantly from childhood vaccines, which typically provide lasting immunity after one dose. The COVID vaccine was not designed to prevent infection. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since COVID, and we must address this. The mRNA vaccines should have prioritized individuals at high risk for severe disease, aligning with the scientific data. We should have protected the elderly and those in nursing homes first. Prioritizing young people in hospitals before the elderly was not following the science. Public health actions must align with scientific data to maintain the trust of the American people.

As Secretary of HHS, you could influence lawsuits related to vaccines in several ways. You might publish anti-vaccine views on government letterhead, appoint like-minded individuals to vaccine panels, or instruct the CDC to remove specific vaccines from schedules. Additionally, you could alter compensation programs to expose manufacturers to lawsuits, expand eligibility for compensation without causal evidence, and modify vaccine court processes to facilitate frivolous lawsuits. You could also share FDA data with law firms for their benefit, change vaccine labeling, and adjust claims in the vaccine injury compensation program. I urge you to commit to not having a financial stake in these lawsuits to avoid conflicts of interest. I will comply with all ethical guidelines. That's not the question. You are implying I should not serve in vaccine-related roles. No one should be misled here.

One major controversy in your candidacy is your stance on childhood vaccines, which many medical organizations deem safe and effective. An audience member highlights that vaccines have eradicated diseases like chicken pox and polio and expresses concern about your message potentially endangering public health. You clarify that you are not anti-vaccine but believe vaccines should undergo safety testing like other medications. You argue that none of the 72 mandated vaccine doses for children have been subjected to prelicensing placebo-controlled trials. You recount a meeting with Dr. Fauci, where you requested evidence of such studies, but none was provided. You assert that without these safety studies, the long-term risks of vaccines remain unknown.