reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I don't understand why left-leaning media, which some say is predominantly Jewish, labels people as white supremacists. According to my Jewish friends, this perspective exists. But why is there a perceived animosity towards white individuals? It seems to stem from what some call "woke" culture and virtue signaling.

Black people are not to blame for issues, it was the Obama administration. Obama's adopted father was very wealthy, leaving a trust fund for him. Obama worked for a law firm that represented his father's interests. He protected BP due to his trust fund investments. Obamacare was drafted by a Republican senator with ties to insurance companies. Trump has improved black unemployment and funding for black colleges. The joke about George W. Bush and Michelle Obama's candy is based on a long-standing relationship between their families.

Real racism exists, and some argue that Black individuals can be openly racist without consequences. They express derogatory views about white people, often justifying it through historical grievances like slavery. This hypocrisy is highlighted, as many Black Americans may condemn racism while simultaneously engaging in it. Unlike white individuals, who often hold each other accountable for racist behavior, there is a tendency among Black Americans to excuse such behavior within their community. To effectively combat racism, accountability should be universal, applying to all individuals regardless of their race. The notion of "black privilege" is raised, suggesting that this lack of accountability contributes to the ongoing cycle of racism.

The speaker recounts their first interaction with their boss, Charlie, when applying for a public defender position. Lacking criminal defense experience, the speaker told Charlie he should hire him because he is Black. Charlie appeared to think the speaker was crazy.

The OJ Simpson trial was racially charged due to Rodney King and policing issues. Simpson wasn't a civil rights leader, but symbolized something for the black community. Racial tension then and now stems from America's history of persecution. Without honest discussions on race, divisions like those seen in the OJ Simpson trial will persist.

Black people sold black people; white people just paid for it. The speaker's great-great-grandmother was sold by her father to another black man, who then sold her to her husband. Slavery existed worldwide, including in the Arab, Persian, and Greek worlds, and among Europeans. Slavery is not unique to black people. Racism is given too much respect. Discrimination would still exist even in a mono-racial world; people would discriminate based on traits like eye color. As long as you are competition and a threat, someone will try to remove you, regardless of race. Conversely, if you add value, you will be appreciated, regardless of race.

White people don't understand why Black people don't "just get a job," while Black people remember slavery and Jim Crow. Similarly, white people, focused on personal pursuits, don't grasp Jewish historical oppression from pharaohs to Hitler. Jews feel perpetually threatened, remembering persecution and vowing to overcome enemies. While white people want to get along, Jews see potential anti-Semitism rooted in historical events. Blacks and Hispanics are focused on their communities, struggles, and histories, like the Mexican-American War. Jews focus on historical persecutions. White people are told to ignore these issues and focus on a "multiracial meritocracy," VR, AI, and personal pursuits, while others "go to war with Iran" and "take over the world."

Speaker 0 argues that history gets deep when examining tiny hats and slavery, claiming this was left out of history books because “the history books” are owned by “tiny hats.” They state that those who owned slaves, were slave traders and auctioneers, also owned newspapers, and played a role in creating social division. They claim it becomes interesting to uncover the exploitation of slaves and the way people were treated, noting that those who defended slavery would be exposed as supporting it, and that slave dealing was “an extremely profitable business.” They connect these ideas back to the Rothschilds, saying this is a recurring topic they have discussed, and mention Malcolm X as another figure who talked about it, urging others to look into it. Speaker 1 contends that a Black person is not antisemitic when he says that the man exploiting him in his community is white, because it is a white man who owns all the stores. They question whether it is an accident that the whites who own these stores are Jewish, and assert that if it is an accident, then the statement that “the Jew on the corner is exploiting me” is not antisemitic but merely a description of the man exploiting him.

The speaker learned they are oppressed after seeing a white woman on CNN discuss black struggle. The speaker states they believed they were having a good life until they got basic cable.

We all have racism, obviously, but not the overt kind. I think where he's had the biggest impact, though, is...

Oprah Winfrey is accused of being a slave trader due to her association with certain individuals and her school in South Africa. The speaker suggests that her power and influence in Hollywood are connected to this alleged involvement. They claim that being compromised is a requirement to reach high levels in the industry. The speaker emphasizes that this is not a complex concept to understand.

Black people are not to blame for issues, it's the Obama administration. Obama's family wealth influenced his decisions, benefiting companies like BP. Obamacare was drafted by a Republican senator with ties to healthcare. Trump's policies have led to low black unemployment and increased funding for black colleges. Bush's joke about feeding Michelle candy has a long history dating back to Obama's childhood.

You will never be the best version of yourself if you allow other people to convince you that you can't be better because of your skin color, because of your sexual identity, because of the community you came from. You must resist those narratives at all costs if you truly wanna be successful in America.

White niceness is a tool of white supremacy. It's fake and conditional, based on how well you cater to white people. If you challenge them or talk about racism, they turn hostile. Many white people use niceness to hide their racism and make themselves look good. They see anyone who isn't nice according to white standards as an enemy. They attack and gaslight black people who speak out against racism. But the truth is, anti-black racism, systemic racism, and white supremacy are not nice. Pretending they don't exist is not nice either. There's no nice way to talk about racism. It's time to do better and stop using niceness as a cover-up.

I used to hate white people due to older generations instilling distrust in me. Media reinforced this narrative, creating a victim mentality. Growing up in a predominantly black neighborhood, I rarely encountered white people, but still felt hostility towards them.

White people need to realize that they created the concept of race to benefit themselves. Therefore, solving issues related to race is their responsibility.

White people are tired of hearing about racism and oppression. They are tired of black people's excuses for not graduating high school or raising their kids. Black kids are running all over the city with no parents because the parents let them. Black parents won't cooperate, especially black mothers. Some black mothers chase away men who want to be there for their kids with obnoxious and degrading behaviors. White people are done and getting ready to remove their support. Then black people will understand what racism and oppression is all about.

Oprah Winfrey is accused of being a slave trader due to her association with certain individuals and her school in South America. The speaker suggests that being compromised is a requirement for success in Hollywood, and implies that those at the top levels are involved in questionable activities. They emphasize that this is not a complex concept.

How did he win? It wasn't just racism, misogyny, or xenophobia. It was about 76 million people from diverse backgrounds who are tired of a system that has deceived them. Celebrity endorsements didn't sway voters. Despite the candidate's flaws, like felony and assault convictions, people prioritized their immediate struggles, like affording groceries. America is shaped by individual experiences, and it's crucial to respect everyone's perspective, regardless of political affiliation.

Black people are white people because they also hate black people. There's a civil war within the black community between black people and "niggas," and "niggas" have got to go. "Niggas" ruin everything. The worst thing about "niggas" is they want credit for things they're supposed to do, like taking care of their kids. A "nigga" will brag about things a normal man just does. They act like it's an achievement not to go to jail, but you're not supposed to go to jail. It's a low expectation.

Look for a few minutes at the Liberal Hall Of Shame for 2015 to 02/2021. Liberal MP William Amos was caught twice on house Zoom proceedings in indecent positions. Liberal MP Yasmin Rathansi was wrongfully employing her sister with taxpayers' dollars and deliberately hiding this information from Canadians. Liberal MP Ramesh Sengha was removed from the Liberal Caucus in January 2021 after he accused multiple other Liberal MPs of supporting the calisthenia movement. Liberal MP Darshan Singh Kang had to leave the Liberal Caucus in 2015 over accusations of sexual harassment. Liberal MP Nikola Di Laurio didn't show up for work for a year after he announced his resignation in 02/2018. Then the public found out, oh, he actually didn't resign. He still collected his salary as an MP even if he was working full time in a law firm in Montreal. To this today to this day, this situation has never been clearly explained by Trudeau and the Liberals. Liberal MP Raj Greywall admitted he racked up millions of dollars in debts, paying casino blackjack, and ended up resigning from the Liberal caucus in 2018 after the news came to light. Following an RCMP investigation. But after suddenly announcing he had paid off his 7 figure debts, he stayed on as a member of parliament for the rest of the parliamentary session. You may recall that mister Graywald was already under investigation by the federal ethics commissioner at the time and was later found guilty of being in violation of conflict of interest. Then there was a liberal MP Marwin Tabarro. He was allowed to run against again for the liberal party in February even though detailed allegations of sexual harassment had been made against him. After being arrested in April 2020, he remained in caucus for almost two months because the prime minister's office claimed they knew nothing about it, took a newspaper article for the liberals to kick him out of caucus. Then former Liberal MP Frank Bayless signed one of those juicy sole source contracts with the Liberal government during the COVID epidemic. He received $237,000,000. Public health agency figures disclosed that more than 90% of the 10,000 Bayless Medical Company ventilators it bought were never used in any clinic or any hospital. Sadly, these ethical lapses were even worse amongst cabinet ministers. Let me give you a few examples. Anita Anad's husband was the recipient of one of those juicy COVID contracts. LifeLabs received tens of millions of dollars of COVID contracts. They sell test kits. Anita Anad's husband, John Knowlton, is a director of LifeLabs. The LifeLabs division has received multiple contracts worth millions since Anad was elected to the parliament in 2019. Navdeep Baines was industry minister and, as such, promised to crack down on big telcos who overcharge Canadians for Internet and cell phone service. Guess what? He found a job at Rogers after leaving the government. The lobbying commissioner said she was frustrated at this, but liberals will always find loopholes that means more money for them. Then there was Bill Blair, on several occasions, lied, meddled into the work of the RCMP regarding the worst mass killing in the history of Canada in Porta Peak, Nova Scotia. While he was the president of the Treasury Board, Scott Bryson tried to block approval for the contract of a navy supply ship being built at the navy shipyard in Quebec because he was lobbied to do so by New Brunswick's powerful Irving family, owners of the rival Halifax shipyard. Minister Bryson also tried to argue there was no need for him to set up a conflict of interest screen to prevent him from participating in government decisions involving two of Atlantic Canada's wealthiest families, even though he used to chair one of their investment firms and that his spouse continued to sit on the company's board of directors. Francois Philippe Champagne owned two apartments in London, England worth millions of dollars. His mortgages were with a Chinese bank. Strange indeed for a Canadian in The UK, Canadian MP in The UK to have to go to a Chinese bank for a mortgage. Judy Foote got involved in the Frank Norman affair. I will talk about that in a bit. But what is interesting here is that she resigned for health reasons. But suddenly, her health improved, and she was rewarded with the job of lieutenant governor in Lupinland and Labrador. Steven Gebel forgot to pay his taxes, but he never forgot to travel, especially to China. This minister is running around the globe, busy lecturing Canadians, but patting Chinese or Gulf Emirates officials on the back. Catherine McKenna and John Wilkinson, his predecessors, and environment were of the same ilk, jetting around the world to lecture the common folks that they should bicycle to work. Foreign affairs minister Melanie Jolie's office staff didn't read an email that said her department was sending a representative to a Russian embassy party. So we had a representative at a party drinking vodka with the Russian officials just after Putin invaded Ukraine. Not reading their emails is a hallmark of Trudeau ministers and their staff. It was the excuse given by Bill Blair and Marco Mendocino and, of course, Justin Trudeau. When David LaMetti was turfed from cabinet, a lot of people wondered why. He had actually, after all, done much of Trudeau's bidding, we thought. Well, in the last few weeks, we learned that LaMetti canceled a verdict of first degree murder against Jacques Delisle, a former judge, even if all the experts were against this decision. Lemetti and the government refused to come clean on why he did that, even though Delisle later pleaded guilty to manslaughter. You all heard senators' nonanswers to our questions on this issue. What about Dominique Leblanc, who, despite despite connection to the powerful Irving family, was appointed to be minister of fisheries, oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard. He had to consult with the Essex commissioner for weeks in order to figure out how to stick handle around this very obvious conflict of interest. Then there was a time when minister LeBlanc flew from Moncton to Montreal and back aboard a jet owned by JD Irving Limited. Nothing to see here, folks. But when the ethics commissioner, Mario Dion, found minister LeBlanc guilty of breaking a conflict of interest act because he awarded a lucrative Arctic surf clam license to a company linked to his wife's cousin. He couldn't wiggle out of that. Speaking of Dominique Leblanc and Scott Bryson, we still don't know what their exact role was in the vice admiral Norman affair. The Liberals tried to renege on a contract for a supply ship in order to give it back to the Irvings. When they got caught, they decided they would get the height ahead of vice admiral Norman. The prime minister even sent him to trial before the police had investigated its investigation. Scott Bryson and Judy Foote left their positions, and taxpayers ended up being invoiced for an undisclosed sum of money paid out to vice admiral Norman. That is a first class cover up. Marco Mendocino's case was hopeless. Conflicts of interest, emails not read, bold lies in public, pure incompetence. When you are so bad that even Justin Trudeau thinks you're bad, you've hit the bottom. Someday, I will have a speech just on Marco Mendocino's scandals. I may need my unlimited time for that. It happens that ministers organize fundraisers outside their writings, but when you represent a downtown Montreal riding, this is strange. It is even stranger if this fundraiser happens to be in New York. New York, USA. To my knowledge, that is the first, and this honor belongs to Mark Miller. Mary Anne Monsoff had to admit that she was actually not born in Afghanistan, as she had told people and led people to believe for years. Bill Morneau is another minister who was scandal prone. He started his political career with violating the Elections Act, for which he was fined. This is, after all, the same finance minister who forgot that he had and forgot to declare his villa in France in his ethics reporting. This is the same finance minister who sponsored Bill C27, which happened to increase the value of pensions sold by the minister's own company, Morneau Shepell. When the bill was tabled in the House of Commons, the value of Morneau Shepell shares joked, and minister Morneau just happened to still be holding $21,000,000 worth of shares. And as I already mentioned, his role in the We Charity scandal, when he quit, he pretended he was going to the OECD top position. No one knows for sure if this was true. One thing is true, and it's real. Taxpayers footed the bill for his failed campaign. I still have an order paper question on the true cost. Still unanswered after twenty five months, it was reported in the media that this phony campaign cost at least $11,000,000. Mary Ang was found guilty by the ethics commissioner for giving contracts to her best friend. In a Trudeau government, that means you pretend to be sorry, and that has no consequences. How about Seamus O'Regan? The government spent $180,000 defending him in a defamation suit. And do you remember Hunter Tootoo? He had to leave cabinet to deal with, sadly, addiction issues. But what was strange was when he said that Justin Trudeau had hugged him after he revealed that he had an inappropriate relationship with a staff member. Harjit Sajid was found to have lied about his role in Afghanistan. But this happy bunch knows how to organize a party sorry, a cabinet retreat. The three affordability retreats held in Charlottetown, Vancouver, and Hamilton between 2022 and August 2023 cost 1,325,000. Hey, life is better with lobster and white wine, especially when you are discussing affordability. It's not surprising to see all those ethical lapses. After all, this is the leader of an organization who sets the tone. Justin Trudeau does not believe the rules of ethics apply to him. So how could he insist that his officials, his MPs, and his ministers be any better? In 02/2015, we learned that Justin Trudeau was billing charities for speaking engagements, even as an MP. This was a First Colleagues, a sitting politician who charges people to hear him speak. When he got caught, he said he was sorry and wrote a check. A few weeks later, he was caught again. He had charged the House of Commons for expenses that had also been reimbursed by the organizations to which he spoke. Again, we had the, I'm sorry, here's a check routine. This was a preview of things to come. Who can forget the thank you for your donation comment and incident where the PM's elitist and condescending attitude was on full display when he jeered at an indigenous protester before that? Before that, we had Elbowgate when Justin Trudeau pushed aside fellow MP Ruth Ellen Brasso Brasso because he was in a hurry to vote. His time was more precious than others, and pushing aside women who get in the way is something our fake feminist prime minister does without hesitation. That was in line with Justin Trudeau's behavior in the Kokanee grope incident where he groped a female journalist. Then he said, oh my, I would not have done this had I known that the woman was a national reporter. I guess in his mind, it's more acceptable to grope a person that is not a national reporter than one that is. Now we all remember, of course, that our prime minister decided that this was indeed a lesson, not just for him, but for all of us. We all know that some people experience things differently, he said. Now let's not forget the three, four, five, maybe more incidents where Justin Trudeau wore blackface because he thought it was funny to pretend that he was black. We don't know how many times he did that because he can't re

"Black men, you gotta jump the hoops." "See, black women will tell black men that her I'm not gonna settle." "So her standards are nonnegotiable." "They go completely out the window when a white man come along." "What standards? He could be anybody. He could be a bum. He could do anything. He could be anything. He could be nothing." "Black men gotta prove that he could get out of slave status to get to her level or above." "And the but but the reality is in your mind, the only one above you is Maslow, and black men will never be William Cartwright." "Black men gotta spend a ton of money. They gotta be fine."

"Is because you can then misuse words like oppression." "There has been no oppression for the white man in this country." "You tell me which white men were dragged out of their homes." "You tell me which one of them got dragged all the way across an ocean and told that you are gonna go at work." "We are gonna steal your wives." "We are gonna rape your wives." "That didn't happen." "That is oppression." "We didn't ask to be here." "We're not the same migrants that y'all constantly come up against." "We didn't run away from home. We were stolen." "So, yeah, we are gonna sit here and be offended when you wanna sit here and act like and and and don't let it escape you that it is white men on this side of the aisle telling us, people of color on this side of the aisle, that y'all are the ones being oppressed, that y'all are the ones that are being harmed."

I don't have a culture? No, we're white, we don't have a culture.