TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Upon entering the chamber, the surprise on your face at seeing Marjorie Taylor Greene was evident. In response to her heckling, you referred to the man who allegedly killed Blake and Riley as "illegal." You acknowledged that you should have used "undocumented" instead. You contrasted your approach to immigration with Trump's, emphasizing that you won't treat anyone with disrespect. You recognize the contributions of immigrants to the country and the economy, and while you believe in controlling the border, you do not share Trump's negative views. You expressed regret for using the term "illegal."

A certain senator, Elizabeth Warren, wanted to get rid of the debt ceiling, which the speaker calls the debt extension. Many Democrats agree with this. The speaker says that Democrats gave them the debt ceiling issue just before the election, which would have had a huge impact on the election. Elizabeth Warren wanted to see the debt ceiling terminated her whole career because it's so catastrophic for the country, and the speaker always agreed with her on that. The speaker hasn't spoken to her, but thinks if asked now, she'd say no because it's their problem. The speaker believes the debt ceiling should be gotten rid of or simply extended. The current bill automatically extends it for a four-year period, which it should. The speaker agrees with Elizabeth Warren that it should be gotten rid of because it's too catastrophic.

Speaker 0 acknowledges the legislation of other members of Congress included in the chairman's legislation. They also mention Maxine Waters' important work on preserving democracy, although it is not part of this package. Speaker 0 then yields to the distinguished chairwoman of the government foreman.

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would exclude the provision that caused the harm.

I believe calling out Elon Musk directly is an effective way to confront the potentially irreversible transformation of the US government. The American public wants us to bring real weapons to this fight for democracy. It's important to push back, especially when people like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who constantly lie and undermine the integrity of congressional hearings, demand decorum. If she's going to make a mockery of hearings, we as Democrats need to match that energy. After those comments, we went into detail about Elon Musk's attempts to dismantle vital departments like Labor and Education. It's crucial to grab the public's attention, expose Elon Musk for who he is, and show that Marjorie Taylor Greene isn't a serious legislator.

I've criticized Democrats like Hakeem Jeffries before and lost followers. It's tough to criticize them in this space, even though they do a lot of bad things. I still vote for them. Please don't clip that quote.

Speaker 1 clarifies that he was not calling Trump supporters garbage, reading: "I refer to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump's supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage, which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable." "That's all I meant to say." "The comments the comments at the rally don't reflect who we are as a nation." "No." "He does not view Trump supporters or anybody who who supports Trump as garbage." He adds: "If the president has said this for more than three years now, he has said multiple times that he is a president for all. It doesn't matter if you live in a red state. It doesn't matter if you live in a blue state." "He believes that he's a president for all."

Democrats were addressed with the question, "Democrats, can you hear us?" followed by the statement, "This is your first warning. Now you can supply a little bit of a correction."

As the only doctor in the room, I feel the need to clarify that there is a clear distinction between gene therapy and an mRNA vaccine. The medical definition of gene therapy does not include mRNA vaccines. While Mr. Baudet is free to use whichever terms he prefers, it is important to correct this misinformation. Gene therapy is in a completely different stage of research compared to the development of this vaccine. Feel free to express your opinions, but I wanted to address this and set the record straight. Thank you.

We just voted for Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House. Before that, I expressed my refusal to support the rules package due to concerning language from Nancy Pelosi's Congress. The Democrats had established an office of diversity and inclusion and included gender-inclusive language that removed traditional family terms like father, mother, son, and daughter, replacing them with neutral terms. I demanded changes, and I'm pleased to announce that the language has been revised. The office of diversity and inclusion has been eliminated, and traditional family terms have been restored in the rules. Republicans are committed to upholding traditional family values, and we will ensure that biological men are not allowed in women's private spaces. We'll share the updated language for your review.

To pass my amendment, the Senate must remove Democrat leaders blocking it. I propose a vote on whether American taxpayer money should be used to fly illegal immigrants from Venezuela and Haiti into the US. President Biden has secretly flown 320,000 illegal aliens into Blue City airports in 2023. Vote against me to stop this practice. Time has expired.

The speaker accuses someone of incompetence, referencing a prior statement made on PBS where they called Joe Biden competent, which they then had to retract. The speaker objects to being insulted publicly by the chairman and claims this behavior is discourteous and outside the committee's guidelines, characterizing it as a personal shot while also criticizing Biden.

Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker McCarthy for taking credit for the single subject appropriations bills, stating that it was not his original plan. They argue against lumping together departments like Education and Labor with the military and border patrol, calling it chaotic. Speaker 0 claims that they forced the change and warns that if Speaker McCarthy continues, the appropriations process will become a sideshow controlled by lobbyists and special interests. They express frustration with how the American people have been mistreated for decades and vow to fight against it.

The speaker objects to the claim that Democrats are a party of pedophiles. They state that while Democrats support children being sexualized and having transgender surgeries, and that President Biden himself supports this, this does not make them pedophiles. The speaker equates sexualizing children with what pedophiles do.

The speaker discusses a recent vote in the US House of Representatives to defund the National Endowment for Democracy, arguing that this measure is not neutral or benevolent, but a leftist enterprise. The speaker states that leftists are free to contribute to it, but insists that hardworking Americans should not be forced by the government to contribute to causes they find repugnant, including the NED. Despite this stance, the speaker notes that 81 Republican members of the House voted with all the Democrats to keep the funding stream going, funding the enterprise with federal money. The speaker contends that there should be legitimate disagreement within the Republican Party, but asserts that this issue should not be one of them. When campaigning as a Republican, the speaker says, voters expect basic precepts, including that the US government is too big and expensive because it does too many things it was never intended to do. The speaker argues that Republicans should agree that funds should not be taken from hardworking Americans and given to left-leaning enterprises that undercut everything the party stands for or purports to stand for. If viewers share the speaker’s frustration, they are urged to find out how their representative voted and raise the issue with them. The speaker anticipates that some Republicans will blame the outcome on the Senate filibuster, though they claim the Senate filibuster rule should not affect the House. The speaker argues that such blaming is severely exaggerated and emphasizes the importance of ending the zombie filibuster, calling for a speaking filibuster instead of silent or asleep filibustering. With the procedural concerns addressed, the speaker says the party should move on to implementing policies for which Republicans were elected, including reducing federal wasteful spending, ending funding for the National Endowment for Democracy, and passing the SAFE Act. The speaker describes the SAFE Act as something that “like, 80% of all Americans agree with,” which is to take steps to stop noncitizens from voting in elections. The speaker reiterates the admonition to stay true to the Republican Party and not align with another party, ending with a caution: “Don’t get on the other one. And, good heavens, don’t get on a donkey.”

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a specific vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would exclude a particular provision.

The speaker proposes an amendment to prevent the removal of monuments on Department of Interior land. They argue that Democrats are erasing culture and history, referencing George Orwell's 1984. They mention the removal of Confederate symbols in 2020, attributing it to radical activists. The speaker claims that the Democrats aim to erase history and compares it to actions in communist countries. They criticize the Democrats for accusing others of book burning while not stopping the destruction of monuments. The speaker urges colleagues to support the amendment.

The speaker mentioned the goal of getting Republicans elected. However, the gentleman was not recognized and members were reminded not to engage in personal attacks against each other.

Tim Burtchett is working on a bill to defund the Taliban, which has been in progress for over a year. Democrats have proposed four amendments. According to Burtchett, three of the amendments are acceptable, but one would undermine the bill's purpose. The outcome is uncertain, but he will provide updates. He believes the bill is based on common sense but suggests that common sense is lacking in the current environment.

The speaker states that Senator Van Halen mistakenly believes an MS-13 terrorist is his constituent, when in fact, the individual is President Bukele's constituent, citizen, and resident. The speaker emphasizes the individual is not from Maryland, but an illegal alien from El Salvador with a deportation order, who is only in the U.S. due to the Democrats' veneration of due process for illegal invaders. The speaker asserts that it is legally impermissible for him to remain in the country and that they honored the law by removing him. The speaker suggests that if the Democratic party demands the return of illegal gang members and terrorists, their support will dwindle until only MS-13 members remain as their base.

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a particular vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would avoid the provision that led to the negative impact.

I made a mistake in calling Mr. Parnas a Republican witness, he is actually your witness. I was a Republican for Trump. The committee is in recess due to votes, we will reconvene in 10 minutes.

Speaker 0 expressed disappointment with a large spending bill, claiming it increases the budget deficit. Speaker 0 connected this to the work being done by the Doge team. Speaker 1 stated that everything done on Doge gets wiped out in the first year due to the bill. Speaker 0 stated that a bill can be big or beautiful, but not both, in their opinion.

The speaker expresses agreement with someone frustrated about the country becoming "debt slaves." This individual believes Congress needs to regain the ability to say "no." Despite this agreement, the speaker is not yet prepared to abandon the current bill.

I support the bill, but I think the language needs to be clearer. Affirmations should be proactive, but they seem vague in this context. We need to ensure that parents who have no concerns about their child's mental health, but may have personal or religious conflicts with gender fluidity, are not penalized. I hope the author and the chair will work together to tighten up the language and address the concerns of those opposed to the bill.