reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: This is not just a story about violence and chaos; this is a money story. At the Government Accountability Institute, Peter Schweitzer and I followed the money to the top of what we call the protest industrial complex, Riot Inc. We found a network of NGOs—not just the Soros/Open Society network, but also the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash, and other big left-wing funders, including Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland. They’re pouring money into this ecosystem. Here are three money facts about Riot Inc. Number one: Riot Inc. has many divisions like any corporation. It doesn’t just have the Antifa boots on the ground division; it has PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a well-funded legal division to get these boots back on the ground as quickly as possible. It has investors I mentioned. Number two: We have identified dozens of radical organizations—not just decentralized Antifa groups, but dozens of radical organizations—that have received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors. These include lawyer groups and groups that advocate for calling good honest Americans fascists, etc. Number three: More than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to these very groups themselves. There was an event in Atlanta called Stop Cop City; over 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism. These groups received money for that from both the billionaire class and taxpayer money. Additionally, this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms that support Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork (which had links to the ICE facility attack), the Socialist Rifle Association, and others. Even though some groups don’t have LLCs or EIN numbers, they can still get paid. Some funding platforms are funded by this network that we call Riot Inc. Speaker 1: Do you know the name of any of the funders? Do you know the names? Because if you do, I’d like you to give them to Cash or Pam—or Christie? Speaker 0: Absolutely. Speaker 1: Or Christie? Speaker 0: Yes, we’ll do that. Speaker 1: As soon as you can. That’s all of you. Because you probably know the names after a certain period of time, you tend to find out. But these are people that do not have good intention for the country and that’s treasonous probably. So if you could, it would be very important if you could do that, it would be great. Speaker 0: it

The transcript centers on allegations that Naftali Aaron Kranz is a paid protester and that a group called GetFree recruits and deploys paid demonstrators. A journalist questions whether there is someone they can speak to, and the conversation suggests the person of interest is on the other side of a park. The speaker asserts that Naftali Aaron Kranz is “a paid protester through and through,” and that he posts on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for GetFree, a company advertising itself as a grassroots organization while paying people to protest. GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four-plus years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, and civil disobedience (which is described as experience getting arrested). Compensation is reportedly 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours per week. The speaker claims GetFree’s stated mission is to undo white supremacy, despite the assertion that Kranz and others are paid to protest. The narrative highlights Kranz’s participation in protests, including celebrating vandalism, with an example cited of “Crown Heights stay winning” after an egg was thrown at a stranger’s cyber truck and dog feces placed on it. The speaker places Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he is not leading the protest but blending in with recruits, enabling a later photo op. The claim is that this recruitment tactic blends various leftist causes to inflate the appearance of each individual cause. The speaker also states Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and was encountered at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. LinkedIn activity is cited again, with Kranz posting about paid protester roles and recruiting nationwide in Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore to expand turnout at events. When clicking a linked job posting, the contract is described as nine weeks, part-time, paying about 3,400 dollars in stipends issued biweekly, with responsibilities including recruiting and training people to drive turnout. The speaker identifies Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement and attributes a belief that George Floyd protests were a factor in Biden’s 2020 victory. The transcript connects protest NGOs to political goals, claiming donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the Department of Justice is investigating for foreign contributions. It also asserts ActBlue funds activists like Indivisible Twin Cities, which allegedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been paid protesters, receiving over 7.6 million dollars from Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. The speaker concludes with a personal note to stay away, and the journalist states they have to go.

A grand jury in the Middle District of Alabama returned an 11-count indictment charging the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with six counts of wire fraud, four counts of bank fraud, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. The indictment alleges that SPLC is a nonprofit that claims to fight white supremacy and racial hatred by reporting on extremist groups and conducting research to inform law enforcement with the goal of dismantling those groups. The indictment instead describes SPLC as “manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose” by paying sources to stoke racial hatred, rather than dismantling extremist groups. One example cited in the indictment involves SPLC paying a member of the leadership group that planned the Unite the Right protests in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017, which resulted in one death and dozens of injuries. The indictment alleges this person received approximately $270,000 over eight years. It further alleges that, between 2014 and 2023, SPLC paid at least $3 million to at least eight individuals affiliated with groups including the Ku Klux Klan, United Clans of America, National Socialist Movement, Aryan Nations Affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club, the Nationalist Socialist Party of America, Nazis, and the American Front. According to the indictment, after SPLC paid members of these extremist groups, it created work product that reported on the activities in which those members participated or contributed. The indictment states that SPLC was doing the exact opposite of what it told its donors it was doing.

"The PYM has cosponsored 450 anti West rallies in The United States." "Al Quds, one of PYM's partners, hosted the largest anti West rally in Toronto showcasing a swastika interlaced with the Star of David." "Nadia Tanus have called for the destruction of the West. To strike at the heart of empire." "Lina Assi has a history of hatred toward Western values." "Laila is a Palestinian terrorist and activist associated with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine." "Palestine Legal is a legal aid organization supporting the movement for Palestinian freedom in The US, and they've received over 2,000 requests for legal support just last year." "And guess who funds Palestine legal? None other than George Soros through the Tide Center." "The Tide Center administered 24,500,000 in USAID grants." "They landed on an NGO called Honor the Earth who specializes in dismantling settler colonialism and racial capitalism."

The speaker argues that there are fake NGOs functioning as fake charities and that arrests should be made in relation to them. The claim is that these organizations are predominantly operated by Democrats, with occasional involvement by Republicans who are supposedly kept quiet by those false charitable activities. The speaker describes this pattern as evidence of a broader “uniparty” dynamic, suggesting that both major parties are involved in a system designed to influence politics. According to the speaker, the majority of the money flows to Democrats through these NGOs. They assert that billions of dollars are given to NGOs run by Democrats, and these organizations then channel funds through a large network of additional non-governmental organizations. This network allegedly creates a “giant money laundering scheme,” to the point where the speaker states that the words NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous. Key claims highlighted include: - Existence of fake NGOs that operate as fake charities. - A call for arrests related to these fake NGOs. - Predominant involvement of Democrats in running these NGOs, with occasional Republican involvement used to quiet concerns. - A description of a uniparty dynamic, implying bipartisan collusion or alignment in this activity. - Large-scale funding (billions of dollars) flowing to NGOs run by Democrats. - A subsequent cascade through a network of additional NGOs, forming a vast money laundering scheme. - The assertion that NGO activity and money laundering are nearly interchangeable in this context. The speaker emphasizes that the overall operation constitutes a substantial financial mechanism linked to political influence, portraying the NGO network as a conduit for laundering money rather than purely charitable activity. The overall framing is that the integrity of NGOs involved in political funding is compromised by this alleged system, tying NGO activity directly to money laundering in a way that equates the two terms in the speaker’s characterization.

The conversation centers on a set of claims and observations about January 6 that orbit around Sedition Hunters, Ray Epps, and the so-called “Northwest Scaffold Commander.” The speakers discuss and link multiple pieces of information to argue that the FBI and other agencies were paying close attention to, or coordinating with, covert actor networks on that day. - The discussion opens with a reference to a John Solomon article about Sedition Hunters and claims that the FBI and Justice Department paid Sedition Hunters about $150,000 to gather evidence on January 6 protesters to help the FBI make arrests. They note the figure was reported as over $100,000 in some places and $150,000 in a House hearing, and they say the FBI/DOJ paid Sedition Hunters, the SPLC, the ADL, the Atlantic Council, DFR Lab, and Bellingcat for intelligence. - The main focus shifts to a piece titled Meet Ray Epps (December 2021) by the speakers’ interlocutor, where they argue that the “main star of the show” was not Ray Epps, but a different figure labeled Northwest Scaffold Commander (referred to as Scaffold Commander). They emphasize that Sedition Hunters’ archives identified Scaffold Commander as their number-one suspect, although he was not placed on the FBI’s most-wanted list. - They recount how, on January 8, 2021, the FBI’s most-wanted list listed Ray Epps as a top suspect in the case, with public calls for information and a cash reward. By late June 2021, a Phoenix newspaper identified him as “Reyes,” and on July 1, 2021, the FBI removed Epps from the wanted list with no explanation and no arrest. They contrast this with Scaffold Commander, who was never added to the FBI’s public wanted list for identification by the public, despite being the focal point of Sedition Hunters’ investigations. - The speakers describe Scaffold Commander as an older man with glasses, a nerdy mask, and a blue cap, who allegedly directed the breach from the Northwest scaffold overlooking the Capitol. They claim he used a bullhorn to issue commands for approximately 18 minutes to an hour and a half, from 1:00 PM to about 2:30 PM, urging the crowd with phrases like “Move forward,” “Don’t just stand there,” “Help somebody over the wall,” and “We gotta fill up the capital.” - They juxtapose these observations with the chronology of the breach: the first breach around 12:53 PM, the crowd’s advance toward the Capitol, and the moment rioters entered the building. They argue Scaffold Commander acted as a ringleader and that Ray Epps was directly beneath him in the crowd, effectively functioning as an internal participant who helped draw people toward the front. - A key point they stress is that Scaffold Commander’s high perch and commanding role align with a long-cited CIA manual from 1983, Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare, which describes a small cadre of crowd agitators operating from elevated positions to direct slogans and crowd movement. They quote and reference passages describing an “outside commando element” that stays above the crowd to observe and direct a demonstration, using high observation points to shout instructions and guide the crowd’s actions. - The speakers argue that the FBI has not acknowledged Scaffold Commander, has not included him on any public list, and has not publicly solicited identification for him, despite Sedition Hunters’ focus on him as the pivotal organizer. They suggest that internal FBI records, memos, or emails about Scaffold Commander could be highly revealing, potentially showing whether higher-ups instructed not to pursue him. - They conclude by urging the FBI and related investigators to search their internal records for “Northwest Scaffold Commander” and make any relevant documents public, implying that such records could undermine the official narrative of the event. They also frame the existence of an internal, externally guided command structure as a critical piece of the January 6 story that remains underexplored by authorities.

A journalist engages with a person at a park, aiming to speak to someone, and the conversation shifts to a narrative about Naftali Aaron Kranz. The speaker identifies Kranz as a paid protester through GetFree, detailing LinkedIn evidence of the arrangement. GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four or more years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, protests, and civil disobedience (the latter implying experience with arrests). Compensation is stated as 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours a week. GetFree brands itself as a grassroots organization, but Kranz and others are described as being paid to protest. The narrator asserts Kranz’s role in celebrating vandalism, citing an incident in Crown Heights where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s Cybertruck and dog feces were placed on it, describing Kranz as part of this sentiment. They place Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he was blending in with other recruits rather than leading, with the implication that field photos can be staged for later use. The claim is made that Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and the narrator reports meeting him again at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. LinkedIn activity is cited to show Kranz frequently posting about recruitment and expanding efforts to win reparations nationwide, with mentions of Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. A linked link is described as listing a nine-week contract, part-time, paying 3,400 dollars in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation and capable of recruiting and training people to drive turnout to events. Nicole Cardi is named as a figure at the top of the Get Free movement. The narrative shifts to donations, stating that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which is under Department of Justice investigation for foreign contributions. ActBlue allegedly funds activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which purportedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been reported to pay protesters, receiving over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. The speaker concludes with a personal reaction to the information, expressing a need to stay away, before the conversation ends with Speaker 0 saying they have to stand there.

Dangerous hate groups in America. Who will warn us about them? The media tell us. The Southern Poverty Law Center, based in Alabama, calls itself the premier group monitoring hate groups and other extremists. Looking at their map of hate groups, you'd think hate groups were everywhere. Apple gave them a million dollars. But donors don't know that today, the center smears good people. There is the presence of radical Islam. This Somalian woman speaks out against radical Islam. For that, the center put her on its list. Join the fight against hate and bigotry. Visit sblcenter.org. I do think that we have a problem with hate in this country. We put about 10 of these major hate groups out of business. When I first investigated the center, its leaders wouldn't talk to me. Liberal commentator Noemiki Kuntz defended them. They have a history, a long history, of fighting against extremists like the KKK. History? Yes. But they labeled skeptical Muslims like Ayaan Hirsi Ali as haters. If you have a horrible experience with religion, that's one thing. It's another thing to use those experiences as ammunition against others who are practicing their religion peacefully. But they're just speaking, criticizing it. Of course, she has the right to free speech as does the Southern Poverty Law Center has a right to push back. We can stand together against hate. The center also calls the Family Research Council a hate group. The definition of a marriage is what it's been for five thousand years. It's the union of a man and a woman. I often disagree with the council myself, but do they belong on this hate map? When they don't agree with you politically, they're gonna list you as a hater. You are haters. You hate gays. No. I don't hate gay people, and I know gay people, and I have worked with gay people. But once you become a hate group, you're a target. Developing now, word of a shooting at the Family Research Council there in Washington. One man was so enraged by what the Southern Poverty Law Center said about the Family Research Council that he went to their headquarters to kill people. A man shot the security guard in the arm. Fortunately, that guard stopped the man before he could shoot anyone else. He told the judge that he was there to kill as many of us as possible because we were a hate group. The center also smears the Ruth Institute, a Christian group that believes gays should not have an equal right to adopt children. They're not haters. I like gay people. I have no problem with gay people. The issue is what are we doing with kids and the definition of who counts as a parent. There could be cases where the best person for a particular child would be their uncle Harry and his boyfriend. You know, that could be. But we owe it to the children to give them the best we can, which generally is a married mother and father. So you're a hater. When the Southern Poverty Law Center put the Ruth Institute on its hate map, the institute's bank cut them off. We've determined that you're an organization that promotes hate, violence, harassment, and so therefore we're not doing business with you. The Ruth Institute and the Family Research Council are still on the hate list. There's no appeal, and I sure don't know how you get off. Morris Dees' salary is more than my entire annual budget. So yeah, whatever they're doing, it pays. Harper's Magazine reported that the center was the richest civil rights group in America, one that spends most of its time and money trying to make more money. They promised to stop fundraising once their endowment reached $55,000,000. But when they reached 55,000,000, they changed that to a 100,000,000, saying that would allow them to cease costly fundraising. But when they reached a 100,000,000, they didn't stop. They collected 200,000,000, then 400,000,000. Now they've got 730,000,000, yet they still smear people to raise more money. Much of which is in offshore accounts, Caymans and places like that. How do you know? Oh, we look at their September. And it says Cayman Islands? Now the Southern Poverty Law Center calls groups that simply oppose sexually explicit content in schools anti-government extremists. Moms for Liberty and Moms for America are on the hate map because they dare do things like seek school board seats to try to stop districts from disregarding opinions of parents. Give me a break. The center puts them on the hate map, but not Antifa, the hate group that beats up people on the right? The center's become a hate group itself. It's now a left-wing, money grabbing slander machine.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) allegedly brands conservatives and Christians as haters, mapping them alongside groups like the KKK. According to the speaker, the Biden administration has consulted with the SPLC on its domestic terror strategy. The SPLC is accused of exaggerating hate to raise money and branding ideological opponents as hate groups. The SPLC's "hate map" allegedly inspired an act of terror in 2012, and former staff claim the hate accusations are a profitable scam. Companies like Amazon and Eventbrite have reportedly used the map to exclude conservatives. The SPLC map includes groups like Alliance Defending Freedom, Family Research Council, Moms for Liberty, and the Center for Immigration Studies. The White House has hosted meetings with SPLC leaders and staff at least 11 times, and Biden nominated an SPLC attorney to a federal judgeship. The Biden administration has allegedly used the SPLC to target radical traditional Catholics and parental rights groups.

In the Middle District of Alabama, a grand jury returned an 11-count indictment charging the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with six counts of wire fraud, four counts of bank fraud, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. The indictment states that the SPLC is a nonprofit entity that purports to fight white supremacy and racial hatred by reporting on extremist groups and conducting research to inform law enforcement groups in order to dismantle these groups. The indictment alleges that the SPLC was not dismantling these groups, but instead was manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred. A specific example described in the indictment involves SPLC paying a member of the leadership group that planned the Unite the Right protest in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017, which resulted in the death of one person and injured dozens more. The indictment alleges this individual received approximately $270,000 over eight years. According to the indictment, between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC paid at least $3 million to eight individuals. The indictment says these individuals were affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan, United Clans of America, National Socialist Movement, an Aryan Nations-affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club, the Nationalist Socialist Party of America, Nazis, and the American Front. The indictment further alleges that after paying members of these extremist groups, the SPLC created work product that reported on activities that the members participated in or contributed to. The indictment concludes that this was the opposite of what the SPLC told its donors it was doing.

There are concerns about the Southern Poverty Law Center labeling groups as hate groups, leading to financial consequences and even violence. The center's extensive fundraising and offshore accounts raise questions about their true intentions. They target organizations like the Family Research Council and the Ruth Institute, while overlooking violent groups like Antifa. This has led to criticism of the center becoming a left-wing slander machine.

The DOJ charged the Southern Poverty Law Center with fraud, alleging the organization misled donors and lied to financial institutions by paying members of violent extremist groups millions of dollars to act as informants. The indictment asserts that a leader of the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia “attend[ed] the event at the direction of SPLC, made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC, and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees.” SPLC interim president Brian Fair contended that the group has long used informants and called the indictment a political attack by the Trump administration. The report notes that the SPLC has claimed it was dismantling extremism by working with informants, but it questions whether the organization was “manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred.” Critics have argued that the SPLC has protected some people while targeting others, with one speaker saying, “They have made no secret of who they want to protect and who they want to destroy.” There is skepticism about the government’s theory: “Can the federal government persuade a jury that the Southern Poverty Law Center was out there funding extremism for its own purposes, manufacturing racism,” with the reporter suggesting it will be up to a court to decide, noting that “obviously, they'll have their day in court.” Historically, calls to investigate the law center have persisted. In 1995, the Montgomery Advertiser was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for articles alleging that the center was misleading donors and wasting their money. More recently, critics say that its hate watch list of extremists includes many mainstream conservatives. Tony? Jen? thank you very much.

The speaker says they “followed the money” to what they call the “protest industrial complex,” “Riot Inc.,” and identified a network of NGOs funding the ecosystem. They state the funding extends beyond the Soros/Open Society network to other funding networks, including the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, and “Foreign Cash,” along with “big, left wing” funders, including non-citizens. The speaker names Mr. Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland as an example of such funders. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, they describe Riot Inc. as having divisions similar to a corporation: not only an “Antifa boots on the ground” division, but also PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a “very well funded legal division” to “get these boots on the ground back on the streets as quickly as possible,” alongside the investors previously mentioned. Second, they claim they identified “dozens of radical organizations” that received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors, including “lawyer groups” that advocate for calling “good honest Americans fascists.” Third, they claim that more than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to “these very groups themselves.” They cite an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying more than 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism and that these groups received money from both “the billionaire class” and “taxpayer money” for that. The speaker also claims that this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms used by groups such as “Antifa,” the “John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (linked by the speaker to an attack on an ice facility), and the “Socialist Rifle Association.” They add that groups without LLCs or EIN numbers can still be paid through these crowdfunding platforms. The speaker closes by saying they will keep “following the money” and thanks the audience for leadership.

The speaker argues that America’s 250th birthday is being structured like a money laundering scheme to move U.S. tax dollars through hidden entities without public visibility. They say they did not begin investigating America’s 250 directly, but instead started with a deep dive into Brad Parscale—Trump’s former campaign manager and CEO of Clock Tower X and multiple LLCs, including Nucleus. They claim Parscale’s company, Nucleus, collects data on Americans who registered for World Cup viewing events on the lawn and for events related to the 250th, using it to sell “blue and white country propaganda.” The speaker says they found a $66,000 contract for Nucleus linked to Freedom 250. They then describe what they call the core financial structure: a birthday group run through a charity wrapper and shell entities. They claim that Trump created a birthday group called Freedom 250, but instead of running it openly under government office rules, he hid it inside a shell company he started in October 2025 named Freedom 250, and that shell company was nested within a charity. They characterize the charity as a “P.O. box” where money enters through federal grants, foreign money, and corporate money, while the public cannot see where the money goes out, “by design.” As an example, they focus on the National Parks Foundation, described as a small charity that they say received $8 million in federal grants over 16 years. They claim that in fiscal year 2026 it received $80 million in federal grants, calling it a red flag for auditors and fraud examiners. They say the speaker then looked for what changed and described a shift tied to Trump’s Freedom 250. They further claim that “$10 million” allocated for libraries and museums was quietly moved to Trump’s birthday party shell to build “freedom trucks” associated with PragerU, which they describe as a nonprofit producing “blue and white country propaganda.” The speaker claims PragerU’s CEO is a former figure associated with “IDF 8200,” described as the surveillance side comparable to the NSA. They state that for this $10 million, when grant forms asked what the taxpayer money was used for, the charity answered “zero,” likening it to receiving money without providing a receipt. The speaker says the pattern is broader than one charity, describing additional examples involving fundraising for monuments and “painting of the reflecting pond,” with what they claim is “a hundred million dollars” in grants and a similar structure of charities plus LLCs. They conclude that the structure prevents tracing where money comes from and where it goes. They argue that setting up shell LLCs nested in charities to hide tax dollars is corruption and resembles money laundering, and they reference ongoing investigations by multiple groups and a Congressional Oversight Committee. They say they plan to provide their investigation to the Congressional Oversight Committee and continue looking for more instances.

The Third Precinct has been compromised. USAID used taxpayer money for BLM ($27 million), Soros (at least $260 million), and the WEF ($68 million). Taxpayers allegedly paid for these entities to burn down cities, destroy America, launder money to Democrats, and subsidize the WEF. USAID also funded Middle East Sesame Street ($20 million) and Ukraine ($1 billion). It is claimed that the prosecutor got fired because the money was not received. These actions are described as despicable, appalling, dangerous, and Democrat propaganda via fake news. It is considered an extremely dangerous use of taxpayer funds and a threat to democracy. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Speaker 1 describes the scope of funding tracked by their organization. They state they have tracked over $60,000,000 according to the latest 990 disclosures, directed to approximately 14 groups—some national, others on the ground. Examples of groups involved include the ACLU (providing legal defense and facilitating trainings for some tactics described by Senator Corin) and Democracy Forward, Take Minnesota. Take Minnesota has reportedly received over $10,000,000 from these large NGO networks, including the Neville Roysingham network, Indivisible, National Lawyers Guild, CTUL, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Minnesota Care, Minnesota 3-5-0, Voices for Racial Justice, and others. The speaker emphasizes that the total spans at least 14 groups and more than $60,000,000 in disclosed funding. Speaker 0 asks where the money is coming from and how it flows to these groups. Speaker 1 explains that they have built a database with hundreds of thousands of rows of grants from networks such as the Soros network, Arabella Funding Network, the Neville Royce Singham Funding Network, and many others, including Tides, the Ford Foundation Network, and the Rockefeller Funding Network. These are described as massive NGOs with billions of dollars to spend on all kinds of coordinated protest or, in this case, riot activity.

Mike Benz outlines a conspiracy tied to the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and a June 2020 war game that purportedly sought “a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square,” while also needing “a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power” so they could be jailed after Trump left office. Bubba Boyd, who has written about the event since August 2020, explains that the discussion will cover the key players in TIP, the plan to subvert the 2020 election, how rigging the election and four prosecutions of Trump flow from the June 2020 conspirators’ meeting, and excerpts from a January 2020 Donald Trump speech to the World Economic Forum that allegedly signals why Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated. The publicly named sponsors of the war game are Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman of the Berggruen Institute in Los Angeles, described as the “globalist home of Silicon Valley’s anti-Trump billionaires,” with branches in Venice and Beijing and a China branch in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Michael Anton is cited as the author of a Trump national security document who criticized TIP’s war game, stating they were planning a coup against the election and publicizing the war game to normalize the idea. Brooks’s background is summarized as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, then a State Department attorney for regime change, then a Pentagon policy lawyer under Obama, while teaching at Georgetown Law. The narrative asserts she advocated impeaching Trump and a potential 25th Amendment move, and even a military coup, in a 2017 Foreign Policy piece titled “three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020,” including the sentence: “For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We’re not doing that.” The claim is that she “couldn’t wait to launch a coup against Trump,” a portrayal attributed to a New York Times editorial response. In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman allegedly convened TIP’s war game about the 2020 election and its possible aftermath, with over 100 participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and Republican and Democratic institutions. Names publicly associated with anti-Trump activity are listed, including John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Kristol, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, and other unnamed figures, all described as major players in attempts to nullify the 2016 election and overthrow the government. Benz is said to detail the TIP war games and concludes that to prevent a second Trump term, Biden would need a large victory margin to overcome fraud perceptions, with the insurrectionist scenario calling for control of the military, Black Lives Matter, and other street rioters. The narrative asserts that BLM raised about 90 million in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation, and that Mark Elias led financial filings associated with the effort. The discussion further cites Defense One articles from August 2020 that reportedly called for a military coup and a subsequent open debate within the military about accepting orders, and claims that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley “was not about to obey any order from the president.” The appendix to TIP’s report allegedly debated criminally proceeding against Trump after leaving office and wiping out his “white supremacist and extremist base,” with a quote describing the need for a strategy to challenge networks that enabled Trump’s rise and remained “imbecible to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended,” implying a path toward removing Trump’s influence even after his presidency. The transcript also notes contemporary references to Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation linked to 2022 midterms, and alleged targeting of Republican election operations and other figures by the FBI. Excerpts from Trump’s World Economic Forum address and a January 2020 speech are presented to illustrate a moral and strategic framing against globalism and “radical socialists.” The presentation ends by inviting audience support and promoting further engagement, including a free newsletter.

The transcript assembles a dense, interconnected narrative alleging extensive ties between NXIVM, the Clintons, Epstein’s network, and other elites, interwoven with QAnon theory and culture-war rhetoric. - NXIVM and Clinton connections - NXIVM attended a Hillary Clinton fundraiser, reserving three VIP tables at the front. Kirsten Gillibrand sat at one table; Nancy Salzman (NXIVM co-founder) sat at the table and was later arrested on racketeering charges along with her daughter Laura Salzman. Victims described Nancy Salzman as Ranieri’s “fiercely loyal enabler and enforcer,” who turned a blind eye to his atrocities and parroted his theories, including claims about children and adults and women’s “freedom during rape.” - Clare Bronfman illegally funneled thousands into Hillary Clinton’s campaign to buy influence. Bronfman, daughter of Edgar Bronfman (president of the World Jewish Congress), came from immense wealth and leadership in NXIVM, and was later imprisoned for her role in the organization. - The program notes that at least three NXIVM top members were Clinton Global Initiative members, including Nancy Salzman and the Bronfman sisters. NXIVM donors contributed about $29,900 to Clinton’s presidential campaign, with several first-time donors giving the maximum $2,300. The Bronfmans also tried to influence political events beyond NXIVM, including Libyan matters. - NXIVM leadership, structure, and practices - Keith Ranieri, who called himself Vanguard, cultivated a largely international circle; half of his close associates were Mexican, including Emiliano Salinas (son of former Mexican president Carlos Salinas) and Rosa Larayonco (connected to a major Mexican newspaper group). - Ranieri elevated Clare Bronfman’s former ally Mac (Allison Mack’s ally) to leadership of Jeunesse, then to DOS (Dominus Obsequious Sororium), a women’s group where branding, blackmail material, and control mechanisms were used to keep women from leaving. DOS led to a hierarchy culminating in Ranieri’s harem, with some women identified as slaves under Mac’s leadership. - Mack recruited celebrities; tweets show Mack attempting to recruit more celebrity involvement. DOS used branding of women and arranged coercive dynamics, including starvation for those who refused. - Key individuals and affiliated networks - Alison Mack emerged as a high-profile NXIVM member who admitted to involvement and expressed remorse in public statements, though some victims dispute her remorse. - The organization’s inner circle connected to notable figures and families, including ties to the Bronfman sisters, the running of Rainbow Cultural Garden centers, and connections to other elites. The Rainbow Cultural Garden centers reportedly conducted multi-language child care that drew scrutiny for potential exploitation, tying back to NXIVM leadership and to Mack. - The transcript alleges connections to powerful figures such as Richard Branson (Virgin), with Branson reportedly hosting a NXIVM event on Necker Island and being linked to Epstein’s orbit; it mentions Branson’s family ties to other elites and a broader network around Spirit Cooking, Marina Abramović, and related controversies. - Broader NXIVM-related scandals - DOS is described as a training ground for women who could be recruited into Ranieri’s harem, enabling branding, control, and coercive recruitment. - The Rainbow Cultural Garden is described as under NXIVM influence, with allegations of human experimentation on children in Albany and connections to Halliburton-like leadership and Hillary donor links. - The transcript cites Pizzagate-era claims and suggests a broader conspiracy linking NXIVM, Epstein, and other high-profile figures to trafficking, blackmail, and occult symbolism. - Epstein, trafficking, and associated figures - The transcript highlights Epstein’s network, including flight logs with Bill Clinton and Rachel Chandler, described as a child handler linked to trafficking. It asserts Chandler’s modeling agency Midland Agency (co-founded with Walter Pierce) as a front to attract minors into trafficking networks, with connections to MC Squared and Epstein’s circle. - MC Squared is presented as Epstein’s underage-model procurement agency, run by Jean-Luc Brunel, who allegedly supplied underage girls to Epstein and others; Brunel is reported dead in a Paris prison cell, with officials treating his death as suicide. - Ghislaine Maxwell is described as having been convicted and sentenced to twenty years for trafficking, with the transcript presenting victim perspectives on accountability and justice. - The document links Chandler to Marina Abramović’s spirit cooking and to public figures associated with Epstein’s island, including a claimed temple beneath the temple on Little St. James. - QAnon and public discourse - The speakers reference QAnon posts, claiming that Q dropped evidence about Epstein, Maxwell, Chandler, and other elites, including assertions that “the big arrests” are coming and that information is stored on servers (including in China). They discuss fingerprints of Q posts about “class one to 99” trafficking and suggest that information is being revealed in stages, with references to the Clinton Foundation, Mueller, and the broader “deep state.” - They present a narrative of hidden surveillance, blackmail, and “puppet masters” behind global elites, arguing that revelations are imminent and that media coverage has downplayed these issues. - Closing tone - The closing segments urge sharing the video and frame the revelations as part of a larger, ongoing exposure of “the deep state cabal” and “pedos” within politics, entertainment, and media. A concluding sequence features a dramatic, cautionary outro and a call to stay vigilant. Note: The summary preserves the transcript’s explicit assertions and naming, without evaluating their veracity or providing independent commentary.

We followed the money to what is described as the protest industrial complex, referred to as Riot Inc., and to a network of NGOs funding it. The network includes not only the Soros/Open Society network but also the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash, and other large left-leaning funders, with some participants not citizens of the United States. Mr. Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland is cited as recognizing this international funding flow into the ecosystem. Three money facts are shared about Riot Inc. First, Riot Inc. operates like a corporation with multiple divisions beyond the visible “Antifa boots on the ground” unit, including PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a well-funded legal division designed to keep these boots on the ground on the streets as quickly as possible, in addition to the investors previously mentioned. Second, dozens of radical organizations have received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors. These include lawyer groups and other organizations that advocate for portraying good, honest Americans as fascists, among other activities. Third, more than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, with at least $4,000,000 directed to the groups themselves (not only Antifa-type groups). An example cited is an Atlanta event called Stop Cop City, where over 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism, and these groups reportedly received money from both billionaire donors and taxpayer funds. The speaker notes that this money also supports decentralized crowdfunding platforms, which facilitate funding for groups such as Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork (linked to the attack on the ice facility), and the Socialist Rifle Association. The absence of LLCs or EIN numbers for some of these groups does not prevent them from getting paid. Crowdfunding platforms are funded by the network identified as Riot Inc., enabling these groups to receive funds despite organizational formalities. The speaker concludes by thanking leadership and promising to continue following the money, emphasizing the cabinet’s leadership in this effort.

Speaker 0 frames this as “a money story” and says, at the Government Accountability Institute, they followed the money to the top of what they call the protest industrial complex, “Riot Inc.” They identified a network of NGOs beyond the Soros/Open Society network—“the Arabella funding network, the Tides funding network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash”—and other “big left wing funders” like Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland. He shares three money facts: 1) Riot Inc. “has many divisions... not just the Antifa boots on the ground division. It has PR divisions, it has marketing divisions, it has a very well funded legal division to get these boots on the ground back on the streets as quickly as possible.” 2) Dozens of radical organizations have received more than $100,000,000 from the Riot Inc. Investors, including groups that advocate for calling good honest Americans fascists. 3) More than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to these very groups themselves; Stop Cop City in Atlanta; over 60 rioters charged with domestic terrorism. These groups received money from both billionaire class and taxpayer money; money funds decentralized crowdfunding platforms; Antifa, John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork, Socialist Rifle Association; lack of LLCs or EINs doesn't mean they can't get paid. “Absolutely”—we’ll share the names of funders; “As soon as you can.” That’s all of you... “treasonous probably.”

The transcript claims the organizers “followed the money” to what they call “Riot Inc.” and its “protest industrial complex,” stating it involves a network of NGOs funded by multiple sources, including the Soros/Open Society network, the Arabella funding network, the Tides funding network, the network of Neville Roy Singham, “Foreign Cash,” and “big left wing funders.” It also says some funders “aren’t citizens of this country,” citing Mr. Hansjorg Veiss of Switzerland. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, like any corporation, Riot Inc. is described as having many divisions beyond an “anti… boots on the ground division,” including PR, marketing, and a “very well-funded legal division” intended to get “boots on the ground” back on the streets quickly. The transcript states that Riot Inc. has “investors that I mentioned.” Second, the speaker claims “dozens of radical organizations” have received “more than one hundred million dollars” from Riot Inc. investors. These organizations are described as including “lawyer groups” and groups that advocate labeling “good, honest Americans” as “fascists.” Third, the transcript claims “more than one hundred million dollars in US taxpayer funding” flowed into these funding networks, including “at least four million dollars” to “these very groups themselves.” It cites an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying “over sixty rioters were charged with domestic terrorism,” and claims these groups received money for that from both “the billionaire class as well as taxpayer money.” The transcript further claims the money helps fund “de-decentralized crowdfunding platforms,” naming groups and references such as “Antifa,” “the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (stated as having links to an attack on an ice facility), and “the Socialist Rifle Association.” It adds that some crowdfunding platforms are funded by the Riot Inc network, and asserts that lacking LLCs or EIN numbers “doesn’t mean they can’t get paid.” The speaker closes by stating they will “keep following the money” and thanking leadership.

A journalist asks if there’s someone who can be spoken to about hearing, and is directed to the other side of the park. The exchange turns into a broader set of allegations about a man named Naftali Aaron Kranz and the organization Get Free. The speaker claims Naftali Kranz is a paid protester through Get Free. They present LinkedIn posts recruiting for paid protesters for the company, described as Get Free’s “part time mobilization support contractor.” The speaker asserts Get Free bills itself as a grassroots organization while Naftali and others are allegedly paid to protest. They claim Get Free aims to “undo white supremacy” and that one of the best ways to do that, in Naftali’s view, is to celebrate vandalism, citing Crown Heights, where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. The speaker contends Naftali attended an abolish the police rally but was not the leader, instead blending in among other recruits, and that he works with the DSA, explaining why the speaker met him at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, the speaker says Naftali frequently posts about paid protester roles, urging people to join to “help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country,” with recruitment across Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. They describe a nine-week contract, part-time, paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation who will recruit people and train them to drive turnout at events. The speaker also says Naftali is part of Jews Against Trump and urges donations to bail funds to “bail immigrants out of concentration camps,” adding a claim that a Jewish person who calls an immigration detention center a concentration camp has a serious mental illness, and criticizing colleges like NYU, the Democrat party, and mainstream media as brainwashing. The speaker asserts Nicole Cardi is at the top of the Get Free Movement and claims she says the George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the 2020 election. They argue that protest NGO groups are about getting Democrats elected, and that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the speaker says is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. The speaker alleges ActBlue has funneled billions to activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which is said to be orchestrating resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible is claimed to have paid protesters and received over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros.

Fake NGOs are often fake charities, mostly run by Democrats, though Republicans may be involved to maintain silence. Billions of dollars are given to these Democrat-run NGOs, which then go through a network of additional NGOs. This is described as a giant money laundering scheme, where the terms NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous. Arrests are needed in this regard.

The speaker describes a months-long forensics and fraud examination of Turning Point USA’s (TPUSA) financials and operations, beginning after Charlie Kirk requested a “doge-like assessment” into TPUSA’s finances and right before Kirk was assassinated. The speaker says the IRS later indicated it would begin examining nonprofits for hiding fraud, abuse, or extremism and for determining transparency in control of money—prompting the speaker to offer the investigation to the IRS. The speaker explains fraud types in an organization context, stating that wire fraud involves electronic lying to obtain money (e.g., email or bank transfers) and mail fraud involves similar conduct via the US Mail or FedEx/UPS, adding that each instance of a detected fraudulent letter or email would constitute an additional count. The speaker claims TPUSA could face “a lot of counts” if found guilty. A “Substack” post is referenced as containing a source document for how numbers were derived. The speaker describes two main ways charities commit fraud: (1) spending money differently from what donors are told, and (2) “self-dealing” where charity funds are used for the benefit of insiders or related LLCs/entities, including through vendor payments. The speaker lists “big red flags,” focusing on a claimed “63 cents” outcome: an analysis based on TPUSA’s IRS Form 990s alleging that for every $100 donated, 63 cents goes back to students. The speaker asserts that fundraising events and their costs mean the “63 cents” is not “of $1.” The speaker further describes an alleged transfer of $57 million to TPUSA’s own endowment, stating that TPUSA lists charitable contributions and program expenses in a way that makes spending appear normal while it is not, according to the speaker’s analysis. Additional red flags include a $999,000 payment to “Clock Tower” (Clock Tower LLC), described as slightly below a threshold the speaker says triggers reporting scrutiny. The speaker says the entity formed in 2019 before receiving the payment, had no listed officers, no identifiable ownership, no employees, no website, and was dissolved a year and a half after receiving the funds; the speaker claims the payment was for a research project “nobody saw.” The speaker also alleges over $20 million in vendor payments to LLCs or entities tied to Turning Point, citing a pattern involving Stacey Sheridan forming LLCs, receiving funds, dissolving them, and repeating. The speaker claims many vendors had worked for Turning Point or had ties to it, and that in a 2024 990 TPUSA had 62 vendors making over $100,000 that were not reported because only the top five are reported, describing this as a red flag that could be obtained through subpoena or discovery. Finally, the speaker alleges TPUSA was not independently audited in 2024, pointing to Form 990 Schedule 12A and stating the answer is “no.” The speaker claims that for many years co-founder Bill Montgomery’s personal financial advisors served as auditors and were paid for bringing in business, and says this undermines claims of independent auditing. The speaker says they will work with Treasury and is planning additional analysis after receiving 2025 and 2026 990s.