reSee.it - Related Video Feed

When the COVID vaccine rollout began, the speaker tried to alert colleagues in their area to “serious safety signals,” but authorities reprimanded them and told them they were not allowed to say anything negative about the vaccines. Within three months of the rollout, the speaker said they began seeing “very serious side effects” in their own patients. They reported one patient who died suddenly after his shot, three people who were “clearly gonna be permanently disabled,” and “a number of others” who were seriously injured. The speaker said they sent an open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry, the British Columbia Public Health Officer, to inform her of these safety signals. They reported that Dr. Henry referred the matter to her top vaccine safety specialist, Dr. Monica Naus. According to the speaker, Dr. Naus assured them without any investigation of any of the speaker’s patients that the events were all coincidences. The speaker said they responded that they had been a family doctor for twenty-eight years, knew these people well, and that there was no other medical explanation for the “terrible disabling symptoms” the patients had. The speaker said Dr. Naus insisted the cases were coincidences and instructed them to submit vaccine injury reports. The speaker reported submitting fourteen vaccine injury reports in total. They said that public health denied each one as a coincidence, after which the speaker stopped submitting additional reports. They stated that they currently have 36 vaccine-injured patients in their practice, referring only to COVID vaccines, and described their practice as a small, one-person practice serving approximately 1,100 people. The speaker also described a second response from authorities. They said the College of Physicians and Surgeons sent a warning letter to every registered doctor, warning that if they spoke misinformation about COVID or the COVID vaccines, they would be investigated and, if necessary, face discipline. The speaker characterized this as an effective gag order to the entire medical community, stating that it communicated that the shots are safe and effective, and that doctors should not say anything to the contrary or they would be putting people at risk. The speaker said they were charged with spreading misinformation. They reported that the charges were dropped shortly before their trial, and stated that the only reason the college gave for dropping the charges was that the process had already fulfilled its purpose by acting as a deterrent to other doctors who might wish to spread misinformation.

Brooke Jackson, a former clinical trial worker, witnessed numerous instances of malfeasance and misfeasance during her time supervising the clinical trials for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. She observed needles sticking out of bags, private information displayed publicly, patients not being properly monitored, incorrect blood collection methods, and lack of informed consent. The trials were supposed to be randomized and placebo-blinded, but they were neither. The vaccine was not stored at the correct temperature, and baseline data was not collected. Additionally, the data was doctored, certifications were falsified, and fraudulent invoices were submitted to the FDA and the defense department. Jackson reported these issues to the FDA in September 2020.

Currently, there is too much convergence between the government, the National Assembly, and the general press, which is unhealthy. There needs to be checks and balances, debates, and many decisions being made are authoritarian and lack scientific substance. For example, forcing people to take an experimental vaccine without giving them a choice is unethical and goes against the principles of medical experimentation. In the future, we will look back and question how such things were allowed to happen. The communication world is starting to collide with reality, whether it's about vaccines or other issues. The vaccines were rushed and not properly evaluated, and there have been adverse effects reported. The number of complaints against the vaccines will continue to rise. It's important to understand the risks and benefits and not exaggerate the severity of the disease.

Many people who have received mRNA injections for COVID-19 may die within 3 to 5 years, even with just one dose. These mRNA vaccines were rushed into clinical trials without going through the usual testing phases. Normally, vaccines would go through phase one, phase two, and phase three trials, but these vaccines skipped phase two and went straight to phase three, which involves injecting the entire population. More than 60,000 people have died during these trials, and adverse events such as heart problems and organ failure have been reported. This is a dangerous experiment happening in real time on real people, including children and pregnant women. It is important to be honest and inform people about the risks involved.

In October 2020, the speaker was asked if Operation Warp Speed would use the expanded access use pathway to get on the market. The speaker responded that they would not be using that pathway because it requires an institutional review board (IRB) and informed consent, which they wanted to avoid due to the added complexity. The speaker expressed concern for the lack of informed consent in vaccine injuries and deaths. They mentioned that this scheme was designed to deceive professionals and took years to uncover. Both sides, including FDA staff, CDC staff, pharma staff, management, and lawyers, were aware of what they were doing.

I informed Prime Minister Rishi Sunak about evidence from Dr. Josh Gutschko suggesting that Pfizer had conducted a bait and switch operation with their vaccine. The Pfizer vaccine tested on 22,000 individuals was not the same as the one rolled out globally. The change in guidelines by the MHRA on the second day of mass vaccination, requiring people to stay for 15 minutes due to the risk of anaphylactic shock, supports this claim. Anaphylactic shock occurs when there are endotoxins in the vaccines, which are present when they are cultured in Escherichia coli. This indicates that the vaccine distributed worldwide was not manufactured to the same standards as the approved one. Informed consent was therefore not possible, as people were given an untested vaccine. I am still awaiting a response from the Prime Minister regarding this crucial matter. (134 words)

The speaker points out that the COVID-19 vaccine was released to the public without undergoing animal testing, which is unusual, especially for children. The animal testing was initially started but stopped due to the animals dying. This means that the American people are essentially being used as test subjects. Despite the rising death count, businesses are considering making the experimental vaccine mandatory for employees, and this issue is being ignored.

Global governments and health authorities are ignoring the data that I see, suggesting a cover-up. I believe the vaccines are the cause, but I'm open to other explanations. This is a massive mistake for humanity, as we have administered this experimental vaccine to 5 billion people without proper human testing. The 28-day trial seems fraudulent, and I suspect data fraud at Pfizer.

I made it clear that my children were immunized with childhood vaccines. Public health failed to explain that COVID vaccines are different. Childhood vaccines, like for many diseases, provide immunity after one dose by giving children the disease without the deadly consequences. The COVID vaccine wasn't designed to prevent infection. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since COVID, and we need to address these concerns. The mRNA vaccine should have been prioritized for those at high risk of severe disease, as the science and data indicated. We should have protected the elderly and those with comorbidities first. It went into young people before the elderly and nursing homes. We need to align public health actions with science and data. When we don't, we fracture trust with the American people.

I recently heard stories of people losing their children to Pfizer injections, some experiencing immediate or gruesome deaths. The FDA knew about potential risks like cancer from as far back as 2013, but suddenly in 2020, these concerns were ignored. This seems like a premeditated crime, with regulators aware of the dangers. Military involvement in pushing these products is suspicious.

The speaker describes a committee conflict investigated by the office of inspector general and Congress, who urged change, but nothing happened. They claim medical malpractice by this group is evident in the approval of vaccines. The speaker states that in 1986 there were 11 vaccines, which increased to 69, then 92. They assert that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had a pre-licensing safety trial involving a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, resulting in a lack of understanding regarding the risk profiles of these products. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

There are alarming signals in the Covid situation that are concerning for the health of our citizens. Many people have chosen to get vaccinated based on information from the government and doctors, believing they made an informed decision. However, informed consent is only possible if the information provided by member states and authorities is accurate. Unfortunately, when governments spread misinformation, doctors cannot give proper advice and people cannot make an informed choice. The timeframe for recording adverse effects after vaccination is flawed, as reactions usually occur within the first 14 days. This disregards the risks and side effects that may arise during this crucial period. The government's policies and media campaigns promoting Covid vaccinations fail to consider these risks. It is essential to address these concerns promptly to ensure informed consent and protect public health.

After getting the shot at Shoppers, she texted me, then died 7 minutes later. I insisted the shot killed her healthy mom, but the coroner claimed it was natural causes without examining her. I knew they were lying.

I recently met someone whose 18-year-old daughter developed cancer after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. I've heard from many parents who lost children to these injections, some experiencing immediate and horrific deaths. They repeatedly share their stories with lawmakers, highlighting a significant crime that must end. The FDA was aware of the potential cancer risks associated with these vaccines, as outlined in guidance documents from 2013 and 2015. These documents instructed manufacturers to study risks like cancer, fertility issues, and cardiovascular problems, and deemed it unethical to test on healthy volunteers. Yet, by 2020, these concerns were seemingly overlooked. This raises serious suspicions about the intentions behind the vaccine rollout, suggesting a premeditated crime where regulators and the military may have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.

No vaccine has previously been released to the public without animal testing, especially for children. The animal tests were halted because the animals were dying. Now, the American public is essentially part of an experimental program, as human testing was not completed. Businesses are pushing to mandate this experimental vaccine for employment, despite a rising death count that is being overlooked.

The speaker claims a committee experienced typical conflict, but a specific conflict was particularly obvious. The Office of Inspector General and Congress investigated and urged change, but nothing happened. The speaker asserts this group committed medical malpractice by approving vaccines, increasing the number from 11 in 1986 to 69 and then 92. They state that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had pre-licensing safety trials with a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, meaning the risk profiles are unknown. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

I wrote to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak with evidence from Dr. Josh Gutschko, indicating that Pfizer carried out a bait and switch operation with their vaccine. The Pfizer vaccine tested on 22,000 individuals was not the same as the one rolled out worldwide. The MHRA changed guidelines on the second day of mass vaccination, requiring people to stay for 15 minutes due to the risk of anaphylactic shock. This shock is caused by endotoxins in vaccines, which are present when they are cultured in bacteria like Escherichia coli. The vaccine rolled out globally was not manufactured to the same standards as the approved one, meaning informed consent was not possible. I'm still awaiting a response from the Prime Minister regarding this crucial matter.

Stainless steel particles were found in Moderna vaccines in Japan, and a few people died after receiving them. The speaker questions how these particles made it into the vaccines and expresses disbelief that such a serious issue went unnoticed. They compare it to their experience in a pharmacy, where any contamination would result in losing their license. The speaker believes the vaccine is of poor quality and could be considered adulterated. They criticize the regulatory authorities for failing to ensure good manufacturing practices and highlight variations in batches and vials. The speaker suggests recalling the vaccines and reevaluating the manufacturing process. They doubt that the product can meet consistent manufacturing standards.

We were deceived with false information about the safety and effectiveness of these products. The claim that they would remain at the injection site and lymph nodes was proven false. The modified RNA in these products was said to only last a short time, but we now know it remains active in the body for weeks or even months. We were also manipulated into believing that we all needed to be vaccinated for everyone to be safe, using illegal tactics like coercion and enticement. These lies were used to justify the deployment of these experimental products, which aimed to establish a profitable vaccine platform technology.

There was a lack of transparency about vaccine side effects, leading to underreporting. Mandating vaccines was a mistake; personal choice should have been allowed since they don't prevent infection and have side effects. Translation: Lack of transparency and underreporting of side effects, along with mandating vaccines, were mistakes. Personal choice should have been allowed due to the vaccines not preventing infection and having side effects.

The speaker points out that the COVID-19 vaccine was released to the public without completing animal testing, which is unusual, especially for children. The animal testing was stopped because the animals were dying. This means that the American people are essentially being used as guinea pigs for this experimental vaccine. Despite the rising death count, businesses are considering making the vaccine mandatory for employees, which is concerning.

I made it clear that my children received childhood immunizations. The issue is we failed to communicate that COVID vaccines differ significantly from childhood vaccines, which typically provide lasting immunity after one dose. The COVID vaccine was not designed to prevent infection. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since COVID, and we must address this. The mRNA vaccines should have prioritized individuals at high risk for severe disease, aligning with the scientific data. We should have protected the elderly and those in nursing homes first. Prioritizing young people in hospitals before the elderly was not following the science. Public health actions must align with scientific data to maintain the trust of the American people.

The COVID vaccine looks different, glowing a periwinkle blue on a black background. The label placement on the vials is not standard, lacking documentation. Despite complaints, the response is that under Operation Warp Speed, deviations are allowed. Doctors and nurses do not inspect the medicine before administering it. The vaccine is shipped in dry ice due to its need for cold storage. The auditor raised concerns about the glowing liquid and low label placement, but the response was that it is acceptable under current protocols.

I exposed fake vaccine practices, refused to comply, and faced consequences. They wanted me to fake taking it to maintain appearances. The doctor was ordered to make me fake it, which angered me. This incident should have raised red flags. Despite threats, I stood by my decision, which has since been proven right.