reSee.it - Related Video Feed

On February 11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script, followed by 37,680 entries on March 3, and 330 entries on March 12, the day before the system was received. The EMS admin account was responsible for these actions. During an audit, having full context of the election is crucial, yet that was not the case here. Specifically, within the Dominion software used for results tallying and reporting, someone executed a command to purge all election results, successfully deleting all records and files from the NAS directory, which contained essential election data, just before the audit began.

At some point, there is a correlation between the purging of the database and the date of the audit. They both happen almost at the same time, the day before the audit. This connection requires an explanation.

The speaker questions why the post office shut down ballot imaging and stopped keeping the images for the required 6 years. They highlight that the post office only kept the images for 30 days and then resumed keeping them for 6 years once Biden became president in 2021.

I am a homeschooling mother of 5 and part of the observer group at the election. We were there to ensure everything ran smoothly. We wanted to find out the truth about the integrity of the election system. The only way to determine the accuracy of the original ballot count is by comparing the tabulator logs, CVR records, and ballot counts. However, Maricopa County admitted to deleting these logs, which raises concerns about their failure to control the election and preserve important documents.

On February 11th, a script overwrote 462 log entries. On March 3rd, the same script overwrote 37,686 log entries. On March 12th, the day before the system was received, 330 log entries were overwritten by the script. The EMS admin account performed these actions. A log file from the Dominion software for results tallying and reporting shows that someone purged all the results for the election. The action completed successfully, deleting all the files on the NAS directory, including results and images from the election. According to the transcript, an individual ran a program to clear all records in the system used to generate the official results the day before an audit started.

The speaker discusses the issue of Windows security logs being purged right before two audits were set to begin. They highlight the difficulty in determining who had access to the RTR admin account, which is shared among all accounts. The speaker questions why someone would delete all the results and records from the Dominion software, which is used for tallying and reporting election results, just before an audit. They mention that the deletion was successful and affected files on the NAS directory where election images and details were stored. Overall, the speaker emphasizes the lack of accountability and the need to understand the motives behind this action.

On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by the same script. The day before we received the system, 330 log entries were overwritten by that script. The EMS admin account was responsible for this. The challenge is that this occurred before an audit, and it deleted all the records and files related to the election. Someone deliberately ran a program to clear all the records in the system used for generating the official results.

On February 11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script, and on March 3, 37,680 log entries were also overwritten. The day before we received the system, 330 log entries were overwritten. The EMS admin account was responsible for these actions. It raises concerns about the audit's integrity, as one would expect to have complete election context for auditing. The log file from the Dominion software indicates that someone executed a command to purge all election results, successfully deleting all records and images stored in the NAS directory. This action was taken just before the audit began, which is troubling.

The speaker reveals shocking information about the deletion of the entire database directory from the d drive of the machine called EMS primary. This deletion occurred approximately 10 days before the machines were handed over to the Senate. Deleting documents after being told to preserve them can have severe legal consequences. Additionally, the main database for the election management system software, which contains all election-related data from the November 2020 general election, is missing from the EMS primary machine. This suggests that it has been removed.

The speaker questions whether purging the 2020 election database in February is a standard practice for all elections. The response is uncertain, but they promise to provide an answer. The speaker further asks why data from previous elections was still present on the databases. Again, there is no clear answer, but they assure the congressman that they will find out. The chairman mentions limited server space as a reason for making room for new election data. The speaker raises concerns about the credibility of the recorder, who had criticized Adrian Fontes, the person in charge of the 2020 election. The speaker clarifies that they had a bipartisan board overseeing the election to ensure fairness.

Is it standard practice to delete files off a server after an election? I hope not. So, you admit Maricopa County deleted files after the election? Those files were archived. The auditors initially didn’t have access to those archived files, correct? They did not subpoena those, that's right. You didn’t feel obligated to turn them over? We responded to the subpoena. It’s laughable to suggest a county could delete files in response to a subpoena. Your Twitter mentions purging the 2020 election database in February as standard practice. Can you confirm that’s done for all elections? I cannot confirm that today, but we’ll get you an answer. Why was data from prior elections still present? I don’t have an answer now, but we will provide one. The recorder will answer questions in a timely fashion, but he previously criticized Adrian Fontes, who ran the 2020 election. Yes, we had oversight from both parties during the election.

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

The Maricopa County elections team allegedly admitted they lack admin access to their voting machines, raising questions about Dominion's control. It is uncertain if ceding this access to Dominion is legal, as there may be no specific statute addressing it. However, it is implied that counties should have full access to their election systems. Dominion's admin access potentially allows them to delete or alter logs, which is a concern. The senate subpoenaed related items, seeking further clarification.

Is it standard practice to delete files off a server after an election? I hope not. So, you admit Maricopa County deleted files after the election? Those files were archived. Initially, auditors didn’t have access to those archived files, correct? They did not subpoena those, that’s correct. It’s laughable to suggest that a county can delete files in response to a subpoena while claiming they are archived. Your Twitter mentions purging the 2020 election database in February; is that standard for all elections? I can’t confirm that today, but we’ll get you an answer. Why was data from prior elections still present? I don’t have an answer now, but we’ll provide one. The recorder will answer questions timely. You hired someone to oversee the 2020 election due to concerns about Adrian Fontes, correct? We took back responsibility for election operations to ensure oversight.

Forensic copy bit for bit of everything that was on the Mesa County computer. Just to clarify, there were two forensic images taken of the Mesa County Election server. One, before the software update. Another image taken after. Everything that had been on that drive before this update was gone. Looks like a cover up. Low risk of being caught. Low consequence if they are caught. The reason we know it was deliberate is because of Tina Peters. Are those files important to elections? Critical. The federal voting system standards are very clear that the election records that are required to audit a voting system include the digital records that are all the log files generated by that voting system, especially when it's a complex computer system.

The Windows security logs were purged right before two audits were scheduled to begin. This makes it difficult to determine who had access to the RTR admin account, which is shared among all accounts. It is unclear why someone would delete all the records and files from the Dominion software, which is used for tallying and reporting election results, the day before an audit started.

We discovered 1.7 million missing original ballot images from the 2020 election, out of 5 million ballots cast. The issue is with memory card retention rules. Memory cards in scanners hold in-person ballot images, audit logs, and records. The proposed solution is to modify the rule to comply with federal and state election record retention laws. A motion was made and passed to initiate rulemaking procedures on this matter.

On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by the same script. On 12th, 330 log entries were overwritten. The EMS admin account is responsible for this. The challenge is that this occurred before an audit, which means the full context of the election is not available. The log file shows that someone purged all the results for the election, deleting all records and files. This happened right before the audit started.

Mr. Bennett questions if it's standard practice to delete files off a server after an election. Mr. Gates says they maintained files but deleted the ones that were archived. It is revealed that Maricopa County deleted files off the server after the election, which the auditors didn't have access to initially. The auditors didn't subpoena those files, and Maricopa County claims they responded to the subpoena. Mr. Bennett finds it laughable that the county would delete files in response to a subpoena, as the subpoena requested all records related to the election. The county interpreted the subpoena differently.

- "The electoral systems of The United States can be manipulated by foreign agents or third parties." - "Are you in danger, physical danger, if your true identity is known?" - "Yes." - "We configured the transmission systems and the tally systems." - "I was the national coordinator for voting machines." - "You examined the forensic image of the election management server, that was used in the Mesa County twenty twenty election." - "In the case of Mesa, Colorado, all evidence, all log, all of that was deleted." - "We saw both images, the old one and the new one." - "And the structure changed, the structure of the program changed as compared to the version 5.5." - "Whoever gave the authorization for the system to be updated would be the person responsible for all the files that were deleted." - "It's easy to rig an election with it, and it's hard to audit."

There is a discussion about log files on two screens. One screen shows hundreds of log files from 2019 until May 22, 2021. The other screen only has three years of log files, which have mysteriously disappeared. It is mentioned that when a Dominion employee came in, the log files vanished. These files record all access to a specific machine. It is also mentioned that Dominion sent people around the country for software updates during that time. Some participants confirm this information.

The hard drive was cloned for forensic analysis, revealing deleted or altered election records. 29,000 records were affected, impacting election totals. Two forensic images were compared, showing data loss after a software update. The actions suggest a cover-up with low risk and consequences. Tina Peters' involvement indicates deliberate tampering. The missing files are crucial for elections. Translation: The hard drive was copied for investigation, uncovering changes to election records. A comparison of two images showed data loss post-update. The situation implies a cover-up with minimal risk and consequences. Tina Peters' role suggests intentional interference. The missing files are vital for elections.

We asked Fulton County for all ballot images, but only received about 518,000 for the recount, not the 380,761 from election day. The focus was on the recount, not the original election. It's unclear why the election day images are missing. Shouldn't every vote have a valid image?

On February 11th, a script overwrote 462 log entries. On March 3rd, the same script overwrote 37,686 log entries. On March 12th, the day before the system was received, 330 log entries were overwritten by the script. The EMS admin account performed these actions. A log file from the Dominion software for results tallying and reporting shows that someone purged all the results for the election. The action was completed successfully, deleting all the files on the NAS directory, which contained all the results and images from the election. An individual ran a program to clear all records in the system used to generate the official results the day before an audit started.

The Secretary of State and Dominion emphasize backing up election records, but this doesn't align with legal requirements. Election machines are supposed to be disconnected from the internet, yet evidence shows they can connect. There's a lack of training on how to ensure this disconnection. Additionally, crucial access and audit log files were deleted, preventing accountability for who accessed the system. In court, it was revealed that preserved evidence from these logs is being used against them, as the prosecution did not allow them to present their side. The indictment was structured to exclude any mention of election machines, indicating a deliberate omission in the case.