reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker doubts the Democratic convention will win new voters, believing it caters to their base instead of recruiting new people. The speaker feels the Democratic party isn't interested in addressing important issues such as public safety, border security, and the handling of undocumented individuals. The speaker claims that 8,000,000 undocumented individuals were allowed in under Kamala Harris's leadership.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a staged gathering. Speaker 0 asserts that a bus has arrived to pick up people who had been dropped off in Boston to create the impression of a large crowd, claiming that those shown are not from Massachusetts and were bused in from other cities. Speaker 0 points to the people and states that none of them are locals, insisting, “See? All these people are not from Massachusetts.” Speaker 1 identifies a person in the crowd as one of the participants from the No Kings rally, and points out the individual wearing a yellow hat, asking which one she is. Speaker 0 confirms, acknowledging the presence of “the No Kings on the rally,” and continues to label the attendees in the area as “paid people.” He insists that these are all paid individuals, saying, “These are all the paid people here that get paid to work here,” and adds “Soross” in reference to funding sources, instructing others to “Get their faces” so they can recognize them when “kings comes.” He repeats that “All paid. Okay. Every one of them. Okay. You see?” The dialogue then returns to the logistical detail of the bus. Speaker 0 describes the scenario by asking, “What’s the bus? What’s From Worcester?” and Speaker 1 confirms that the group had come from Worcester. Speaker 0 reacts with acknowledgment, “They came from Worcester. Oh, my big. Good,” and Speaker 1 responds with an affirmation about Worcester’s involvement. They note that Worcester is “here coming into Boston,” indicating activity from Worcester and the broader region, with Speaker 0 remarking that “the Western” and “Worcester” are present in Boston, having “came to visit Boston from the West.” Throughout, the speakers emphasize a narrative that the crowd consists of non-locals, who were transported to create the appearance of broad support. They identify specific actors in the crowd, mention the No Kings rally, and repeatedly stress the notion that the attendees are paid and organized, while noting Worcester’s role in supplying people to the event. The exchange centers on verifying the origins of the crowd, the identity of participants, and the logistics of the bus transportation from Worcester to Boston.

Julian Castro predicted that Texas would become a Democratic state due to demographic changes and population growth from outside the state. This statement went unchallenged, reflecting a broader acceptance of such views. In 2019, Donald Trump falsely claimed he would deport many illegal immigrants. Kamala Harris responded, emphasizing that this was an attempt to alter the country's demographics. However, illegal immigrants cannot vote and should not factor into demographic considerations. Harris's stance implies that these individuals are seen as potential Democratic voters, raising questions about the implications of her beliefs. This perspective is presented as morally superior, discouraging dissent and framing opposition as immoral.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a mass and opaque operation affecting elections. They claim that the total amount involved is “way beyond anybody’s imagination” and that neither the state nor the federal government knows it. They allege that a judge would bow to the head of the “Somalian mafia,” and describe the situation as a voting block whose members will vote together. They state that if someone does something against “our community,” they will vote for that person’s opponent, asserting that there is ballot harvesting and that they have witnessed it firsthand. The implication is that the voting bloc coordinates to influence election outcomes. They describe Cedar Riverside as a major, massive apartment complex and ask how many Somalis live there, noting that there are “one complex” and “20 more just like this around the Twin Cities,” totaling “probably a 100,000 or more people.” They claim these people are all Somali and are “living rent free.” They further claim they are driving vehicles paid for by others, eating food paid for by others, and that “they’re everything they do is something that you paid for,” implying that public funds or subsidies support them. The speakers allege that an entire block will vote for a single candidate, with “one person” going to collect all the ballots. They assert there is no tracking and that there could be multiple people living in an apartment, possibly nine ballots, with someone then “collect[ing] all the ballots.” The dialogue emphasizes a coordinated effort to manipulate voting outcomes through ballot collection and bloc voting, portraying the Somali community as organized to vote as a unified force in elections while alleging widespread use of ballot harvesting and ballot collection practices.

Multiple individuals have allegedly registered to vote illegally using the speaker's home address. The speaker believes this constitutes election fraud in a crucial election. Missouri Republicans are accused of inaction regarding election integrity, implying corruption. The speaker claims Republicans had ample time to eliminate corrupt voting machines and prevent election cheating but failed to do so. Despite this, the speaker hopes the election's scale will prevent rigging.

Colorado is allegedly trying to prevent President Trump from appearing on the ballot, which the speaker attributes to leftist activist judges. They claim that Democrats resort to cheating because they know the American people are becoming aware and fed up with the situation. The speaker believes that the country is being invaded intentionally, emphasizing that it is not accidental.

The speaker criticizes the idea that black and brown people cannot obtain IDs to vote, calling it racist and a form of low expectations. They emphasize that voting in the country is easy and that they, along with their family members who served in the military, have never faced difficulties in obtaining IDs. The speaker urges others to focus on voter integrity and not let the issue be framed as a racial one. They promise to fight for the people's right to have their votes counted in Congress.

According to the speaker, there is common knowledge that 15,000 deceased individuals have voted in the election. They claim that people have been using death registers to obtain Social Security numbers and then submitting them as mail-in ballots to check if their votes were counted. Allegedly, 15,000 deceased individuals, including those born in 18/90, have voted for Joe Biden. The speaker believes that the entire process is rigged to ensure Biden's victory through mail-in ballots.

The speaker states that the data does not align with normal legal voting processes and lacks consistency. They mention that the certified data, which is also reported by the New York Times and networks, shows negative errors and fraudulent votes. They suggest that either the secretary of state's office is certifying flawed results or someone is providing them with incorrect information. They emphasize that the certified votes for Georgia contain negative swings and decrements, which are errors and do not accurately represent the state's voters. No blame is assigned, but the focus is on highlighting the discrepancies in the certification process.

The speaker criticizes the Democratic Party for potentially choosing an unqualified candidate, Suckalotta Cox, due to diversity policies. They suggest Cox lacks intelligence and capability, but may still be a contender for a high office. The speaker warns of the dangers of prioritizing diversity and inclusion over qualifications in politics.

The speaker claims that there was widespread fraud in the 2020 election, with many votes being purged and deleted. They suggest that this fraud was enough to secure a Republican victory. They criticize Joe Biden and the Democrats for opposing efforts to investigate this alleged fraud, accusing them of wanting to cancel any discussion about the election. The speaker believes that the Democrats are afraid of being caught in their wrongdoing.

The speaker questions the organic nature of rallies for figures like AOC and Kamala Harris. They claim that 84% of devices tracked at these rallies also attended nine or more Kamala Harris rallies or Antifa, BLM, pro-Hamas, or pro-Palestinian events, with 31% attending over 20. The speaker suggests this indicates paid attendance due to the travel and time commitment involved. They believe the Democratic party is artificially inflating its popularity by paying people to attend rallies and protests, creating "rally professionals."

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss immigration and migration as the central issue for their region. They express a belief that immigration policies are letting criminals into the country daily and emphasize the need for the world to know this. They note a large shift in migration patterns, with migrants coming from Central America as well as Venezuela, despite substantial U.S. aid to the region. They describe a U.S. aid strategy they call the root causes strategy, which involves giving money to support and develop the origins of migrants so people can stay where they are. Specifically, they mention pouring 4 billion dollars over four years into Central America and question whether it is effective, acknowledging the continued flow of migrants despite the aid. There is mention of how the aid is allocated: some of it goes to female prisons in Mexico to help train inmates, and there is reference to working on gender issues in Pakistan aimed at recruiting, retaining, and advancing more women in law enforcement. They raise the broader question of whether U.S. taxpayer money should be spent in other countries on these issues, noting that some people claim “women simply don’t seem to care about” certain issues. Speaker 2 frames the discussion with formal gratitude to the committee and indicates upcoming briefings on the FY 2025 budget request on the Hill, highlighting migration as a big issue for their region and asking what is being done to stop migration. The dialogue reflects uncertainty about how to respond to migration and whether the administration can or will justify the policy choices. The speakers discuss the political impact of migration and aid, suggesting that “the end all be all” solution for politics does not exist, and that the other side might gain advantages from perceived failures. They observe that the public view of migration has evolved and that attitudes toward the issue are politically consequential. There is a provocative assertion comparing criminal elements among migrants to the worst criminals in the United States, and a hypothetical claim about if the worst criminals went to Canada, billions of dollars would be sent back, implying a desire to limit illegal entries or criminal migrants. They debate how to adjust the quality of entrants, proposing that a metric change—allowing a high number of entrants only if they have no criminal records and are not in the country illegally—could alter outcomes. Finally, they discuss perceived demographic shifts in the United States, noting that traditional Americans and Latin Americans have different political leanings, with a suggestion that demographics are being shifted by migration and related policy.

The speaker asserts that misinformation and lies are already being spread, and warns of foreign interference. Drawing on experience from the Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election, the speaker claims Black people were specifically targeted with misinformation. The speaker urges listeners not to let them take their voice.

Biden consistently received high numbers of votes while Trump received none, which the speaker deems statistically impossible. They claim that the Secretary of State should be aware of this incorrect information, as it has been publicly available for months. The speaker challenges the media and anyone who denies the existence of election fraud, stating that there is evidence and those who claim otherwise are lying.

The speaker believes the Democratic party is attempting to destroy them because they are exposing the "entitlements fraud" that attracts and keeps illegal aliens in the US. This fraud includes Social Security, disability, and Medicaid. The speaker claims that ending this fraud would cause illegal aliens to leave, resulting in a loss of Democratic voters. The speaker alleges illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections in New York, with 600,000 registered. They also claim FEMA was paying for illegal aliens to stay in luxury hotels in New York, even after an executive order to stop it, and that New York sued the federal government to continue receiving this money. The speaker asserts that Democrats are "buying voters" by importing them, and that this is an attempt to destroy democracy. They believe that legalizing enough illegal aliens in swing states would turn them into reliably Democratic states, leading to a permanent one-party socialist state. The speaker supported Trump to prevent this outcome, which they believe would have been the "end" of America.

The speaker criticizes those who called Donald Trump racist for his stance on immigration. They argue that by voting for Democratic candidates and supporting open borders, people have allowed illegal immigrants to replace the black community. The speaker suggests that the Democratic party no longer needs the black vote and accuses them of prioritizing illegal immigrants over their own citizens.

The speaker claims that someone received 14,000,000 votes but was thrown out of office. The speaker states this action is a threat to democracy. The speaker also claims that this person hates the woman who ran instead of him and cannot stand her.

Speaker 0 warns that what you’re doing is extremely dangerous, and questions why it is dangerous. Speaker 1 challenges this by asking why it would be dangerous, and clarifies that they are not saying people are voting in certain places, but that people are currently registered to vote there. Speaker 2 interjects, referencing a recent sweep around Fulton County. Speaker 1 reiterates: they see that people are currently registered to vote in places like empty lots and homeless shelters that closed ten years ago, and asks what the other speaker would do if they became secretary of state to address that. Speaker 0 responds that the other party will have to reply to conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 counters that it is not a conspiracy, describing it as a current situation: people are currently registered to vote there, and it’s possible to purchase voter rolls for $45 to verify this. They insist they are not saying people are voting there, but that people are currently registered to vote there, and they reference Jason as the person who can verify that. They further state they will gladly take the other speaker to see if it’s true, arguing that if someone is running for secretary of state, they are in charge of maintaining the voter rolls. Speaker 0 continues to label the claim as dangerous and as conspiracy theory. Speaker 1 again emphasizes that they are not alleging people are voting there, but that people are currently registered to vote there. They reiterate that it took $45 to purchase the voter rolls, and that the same could be done for Fulton County. They mention specific locations where people are allegedly registered to vote: empty lots and a MARTA bus station, and ask whether the other speaker will address that instead of labeling it conspiracy theories. They reference the existence of a death address, 205 Elm Street Northwest, described as an empty lot that one could visit to verify the claim. They ask whether the other speaker, as an elected official who might become secretary of state, cares about ensuring clean voter rolls in a county considered one of the most important in the United States. Speaker 0 maintains that the other party’s approach is dangerous. Speaker 1 repeats the core assertion: it’s not a conspiracy, it’s a current condition where people are registered to vote in empty lots, a MARTA bus station, and other locations, and stresses that the issue is about maintaining clean voter rolls. The exchange cycles through insistence that “people are currently registered to vote there,” the availability of voter-roll data for verification, and the imperative for someone who could be secretary of state to address the integrity of the rolls rather than dismissing the claim as conspiracy theory.

The speaker asserts that misinformation and lies are already being spread, and warns of foreign interference. Drawing on experience from the Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election, the speaker claims Black people were specifically targeted with misinformation. The speaker urges listeners not to let them take their voice.

The speaker states that the idea of law enforcement intentionally allowing individuals to cross the border illegally for the purpose of voting is preposterous. The speaker believes everyone should condemn that rhetoric.

Some believe that many millennials, dreamers, and undocumented people, who contribute to the country, are fearful of voting because they worry immigration will find them and deport their families. One speaker claims that this is untrue because voting is confidential and voting rolls are not transferred for investigation. Another speaker expresses disbelief, stating that the President is questioning whether an illegal person is voting, and reminding people that only citizens can vote. The speaker believes the President is saying not to worry about being caught for illegal voting. The speaker emphasizes that undocumented people cannot vote because they are not citizens.

It seems like there are concerns about election integrity and potential fraud. The speaker mentions the Mesa Docks and dropbox, suggesting that there may be issues with these. They also criticize the reporters on TV for not being truthful. The speaker believes that if there are more votes than voters, it should not be questioned. They mention Georgia Claws and ballot mules, implying that there may be manipulation happening. The speaker accuses those in power of not caring about the truth and suggests that lawsuits are being used to delay the process. They emphasize the importance of holding those responsible accountable.

The speaker asserts that the phrase "long live the resistance" implies support for Hezbollah and Hamas. They claim these groups describe themselves as "the resistance," and those using the phrase are expressing support for them.

Around 6,000 people have been identified with switched registrations, but it doesn't mean all of them have been confirmed. They are currently under investigation. However, what's interesting is that there were groups of registered Democrats or NPAs who suddenly switched to Republican around the same time.