reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In Missouri, on February 17th, there were 78,421 registration attempts without an ID. Of those attempts, 23,253 were from dead people.

During the discussion, Speaker 1 mentions an interesting observation regarding the voter rolls. They found that 11,326 individuals who were not listed on the November 7th version of the voter rolls appeared on the December 4th version, despite showing as having voted in the recent election. Speaker 0 seeks an explanation for this discrepancy, emphasizing that they are not implying fraud but simply seeking answers. Speaker 1 admits they cannot think of a logical explanation and suggests reaching out to the county for clarification. The conversation ends there.

In Arizona, there was a request to move the voter registration date to election day, but it was moved back to October 15th due to a court case. We found 3,981 individuals who registered after October 15th but their data shows that they have already voted in this election.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada, 8,000 had non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were non-citizens. The speaker asked about voter fraud prosecutions in Nevada, to which the response was not yet.

Over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for. 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to 01/20/2020. In addition to president Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover up. Removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non citizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.

North Carolina, there are significant issues with voter registrations. Since the start of the year, there have been 499,566 total registrations. Notably, 110,462 lack information on race, sex, or ethnicity. Additionally, 149,699 do not have a North Carolina driver's license or ID, and 274,589 have no recorded birth state. This raises concerns about the integrity of the registration process.

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

We found that 66% of people are concerned about cheating in the 2024 election, with Republicans at 78%, independents at 60%, and Democrats at 50%. In a swing state poll, 18% reported receiving multiple official ballots in 2020. Additionally, 28% of mail-in voters admitted to some form of ballot fraud. Surprisingly, in a poll of likely voters, 9% were unsure or said they were not US citizens, despite voting in the previous election. Translation: Concerns about election cheating are bipartisan, with a significant number reporting receiving multiple ballots in swing states and admitting to fraud. Surprisingly, a poll of likely voters revealed a percentage who were unsure or not US citizens but had voted in the past.

Speaker 0 recounts what happened yesterday as it relates to the actual fact pattern of law and a warrant issued by a magistrate judge based on probable cause after evidence was submitted, not a Trump-appointed judge. He notes that the law enforcement process in America works this way. He argues that declarations of perfection of the 2020 election are inconsistent with what happened, and then lays out specifics. He asserts that drop boxes were “invented out of thin air,” with no basis in Georgia law. He says mobile voting units moved through Fulton County to 80% Democrat precincts, 81% Democrat precincts to be precise, and that this was not envisioned in Georgia law. He claims 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms with a first-class stamp were mailed to every registered voter in Georgia, again “nowhere envisioned in Georgia law.” He adds that if the same ballots are counted three times, the numbers should match, but they did not. Regarding the recount, he states that 3,930 double-scanned ballots were found in Fulton County alone, and thousands of those were confirmed by the state election board. He notes that Governor Kemp raised concerns from the Rossi report and that there were double-scanned ballots, but even after double scanning, the numbers did not match on the second recount, being off by eight hundred fifty ballots. He asks, “Not one person here can answer the question of how that happened.” He says ballot images were deleted and test ballots were included in the recount process, and that this was confirmed. He then discusses Democrats’ response to legitimate questions about the 2020 election. A former constituent, Derek Summerville, former FBI agent, ran data analysis with Mark Davis. They questioned the 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms (with a first-class stamp), noting that if a national change of address form was filed, forwarding could occur. They identified reasonable cause to question the validity of 39,141 of those ballots cast. They found that 160 people were registered to vote from a single UPS store, 2,138 from one church in Fulton County, and 1,391 from a shuttered 1,000-square-foot building in Fulton County. The transcript states that thousands of people remain registered to vote in Fulton County at UPS stores, storage units, pack mails, and homeless shelters that haven’t been open for over five years. Summerville and Davis filed objections to these voters, but Stacey Abrams sued them in federal court and they won—Judge Jones ruled in their favor, not Stacey Abrams. The speaker notes that since then, “twelve zero” of the 39, zero voters had been removed from the voter rolls because Summerville and Davis were correct that they were no longer eligible to vote; 9,500 had updated addresses outside Fulton County, proving that those voters were ineligible. Ultimately, 84% of the votes whose eligibility Summerville and Davis challenged were proven to have been invalid voters in the 2020 election. The speaker concludes by urging an end to the charade of the most perfect, most secure election in history and advocates cleaning up Fulton County’s voter rolls for future elections.

Recently, we discovered new information indicating that certain individuals who took part in the recent runoff election also engaged in similar behavior during the general election. Upon further investigation, we found evidence suggesting that this pattern of behavior dates back to 2018, and it is possible that it occurred in previous elections as well, such as in 2012 and 2008.

Unobserved ballots in Allegheny County and Philadelphia raised questions about 700,000 mail-in ballots. A cyber team used public data from the Secretary of State's website, which was updated regularly. The 2.5 million ballot count post-election is now missing from the site without explanation.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker questions if any prosecutions are happening in Nevada for the 130,000 instances of voter fraud identified in the 2020 election. No prosecutions have been reported yet.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, 15,000 were registered to vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker asks if there are any ongoing prosecutions for voter fraud in Nevada, given the 130,000 instances identified in the 2020 election. The response is that there are currently no prosecutions.

We've been trying to elect good candidates in local elections but keep losing by narrow margins. After a recent election, we suspected cheating, especially after hearing claims about fraud in Detroit. While checking the voting list for a recall, I found friends who had been registered to vote without their knowledge, despite never voting. This pattern continued when I looked into my own voting history after moving to Ohio, where I was also registered back in Detroit without consent. I discovered many others in similar situations, including someone who had never voted but was used in multiple elections. We obtained a massive list of voters from the clerk's office to investigate further.

Ramin begins by noting that California said 657,000 people voted in Riverside County on Prop 50, but the registrar’s handwritten logs show 611,000 ballots came through the door—a gap of 45,896 ballots. He adds that a sheriff, sworn in with a badge and a court-issued warrant, says he’ll count those ballots himself, and the California attorney general “loses his mind” over the idea of stopping someone from counting paper. Speaker 1 clarifies the numbers: the registrar of voters’ logs show 611,428 ballots cast, while 657,322 votes were reported and certified to the secretary of state, a difference of 45,896 votes. Ramin uses a simple analogy to illustrate the discrepancy: if you squeeze 20 lemons and sell cups all afternoon, but someone later claims 28 cups were sold, eight cups exceed the supply. He says this is the gist of Riverside’s situation: 611,000 ballots entered, 657,000 votes certified, and a 45,896-vote gap, which he calls unacceptable. He emphasizes that this is not a local school board vote, but Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50, officially called the Election Rigging Response Act. Prop 50 gave Sacramento the power to overturn California’s independent redistricting commission and redraw all 52 congressional districts to benefit Democrats, with maps crafted by Democratic operatives and in effect through 2030. It passed statewide 64% to 36, with over 8,000,000 votes cast. Ramin notes that while the phantom Riverside votes did not flip the statewide result, the point is about potential partisan impact: Republicans currently hold the House by six seats, and California’s new maps are designed to flip five of those seats. He mentions representatives Kevin Kiley and Darrell Issa as examples of Republicans in districts that were redrawn to become more favorable to Democrats. If Democrats flip those seats in November 2026, they would take back the House. Buried within the election that made all of this possible is the 45,000-vote gap in a single county. He extrapolates: if Riverside County’s 7% turnout were representative of all 8,000,000 statewide votes, that could imply over 500,000 “ghost votes.” He explicitly says he is not asserting that this happened and that nobody knows, because no… (the excerpt ends abruptly).

Some changes were made before the election, and we have learned that this has been happening for about 2 years. This is a federal investigation that is uncovering more and more information. It is concerning because it seems to be a deliberate effort to not only perpetuate false claims, but also to replace certain individuals for various reasons.

During the examination, it was discovered that there were 61 groups of 200 ballots that had over 90% support for one candidate. This is unusual in a close race unless it is due to a specific geographical area. However, these groups were not specific to any particular area as they came from the central collection center for mail-in and early voting ballots. What's even more surprising is that there were 58 groups for one candidate and 3 for another that had 90% support. This suggests that someone may have sorted the ballots beforehand. The distribution of such high percentages for one candidate is not expected, and the ratio of 58 to 3 is particularly strange.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed 25% of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election and analyzed each voter record individually. They extrapolated the statistics from the first 25% to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 points out that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, and their group analyzed 25% of the mail-in ballots to arrive at the 420,987 failed signature verification number. Speaker 1 confirms this.

After the election, it was discovered that 18,000 individuals who had voted were subsequently removed from the voter rolls. These individuals were initially listed as eligible voters, but their names were later taken off the rolls.

Good morning. On Tuesday, I was informed by Krista Miller about potentially fraudulent voter registration applications. The Elections Office received around 2,500 applications close to the registration deadline, many showing the same handwriting and mismatched signatures. Investigations revealed inaccuracies in addresses and personal information, with individuals stating they did not complete these forms. The fraudulent registrations are linked to a large-scale canvassing operation that began in June, primarily in Lancaster City, but also in other areas. Preliminary findings indicate that about 60% of the applications reviewed so far are fraudulent. The investigation is ongoing, and we are coordinating with local police departments as needed.

We work for a company registering Hispanic voters. Visited a Georgia complex, found 14% noncitizens registered to vote. Georgia has 339,000 noncitizens, potentially 47,000 registered. Biden won by 12,000 votes. 2024 election at risk.

In Fulton County, Georgia, it has been acknowledged that 3,600 individual ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches being duplicated. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await the release of more information and facts regarding this matter, as it marks the start of a significant period. The voter integrity is at stake.

In Missouri, on February 17th, there were 78,421 registration attempts without an ID. Of those attempts, 23,253 were from dead people.