reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker recounts the depth of the evil involved in Jeffrey Epstein’s network as described by survivors during a press conference. They explain that 14-year-old girls were told by a high school friend to come to an old man’s house, give him a massage, and he would pay $200, with a swimming pool and other enticements presented. The massage would escalate to sexual acts, and Epstein would keep their phone numbers. Through the shame and coercion, the girls were compelled to show up at his beck and call whenever he wanted. The only way they could get out of performing sexual favors was to find another girl at their high school who would take their place. One survivor broke down in tears as she admitted that she faced a choice between finding a replacement girl or returning to perform the acts, and she chose to find another girl. The speaker notes that even after it was known that these were 15-year-old girls coerced by an adult man, people still said they were sex traffickers and trafficked these women. The speaker emphasizes the realization of how evil it is for someone to make others commit evil acts and then implicate them, which made it harder for the survivors to come forward. There is discussion of why the names of the victims aren’t released. Epstein’s abuse involved billionaires who could pay off authorities and judges. After girls reached the age of consent, Epstein would traffic them to his friends, arguing that some were prostitutes who were 18 or older and thus consenting. The speaker explains that when these men had money, they could pay off police departments, cause reports to disappear, or influence judges. Many of the girls came from less affluent families, and the money paid to the families ranged from $150,000 up to $500,000, while the girl often would not testify. The men would then use defamation lawsuits to bankrupt the survivors who spoke out or tried to contest their false allegations. The process itself functions as punishment, with survivors forced to go broke just to defend their names.

Social workers in America and Europe, along with Germans in West Germany, placed hundreds of thousands of children from Christian families with 30,000 pedophiles for rape. The issue is often overlooked in national news, with gay men adopting children taken by social workers and selling them to rape gangs. The prevalence of pedophilia is highlighted, emphasizing the need to protect innocent children. The speaker also shares personal experiences and insights on the damaging effects of early sexual activity. The transcript also promotes a health supplement and discusses upcoming topics on the economy.

We've ignored the truth for too long, but it's time to face it. There's something suspicious happening, yet we choose to ignore it. The news reports it, and we just accept it without questioning. We're expected to conform and follow their perspective, but I have many unanswered questions. How can children be molested without anyone being held accountable? It's written in the testament that these children are not protected, so I'm fighting back.

The speaker identifies the main issue in the California public school system (K-12) as an epidemic of sexual abuse by teachers, coaches, and other school employees. The speaker notes that it wasn’t until 2012 that a victim could file a civil lawsuit for damages in California. Since then, the speaker’s firm has filed dozens of such lawsuits. The firm states that it alone has discovered over three fifty or three sixty perpetrators, teachers. The speaker confirms there are many more perpetrators beyond those identified by the firm because the firm does not have all of the cases.

I've been waiting for parents of child victims to speak out, but many are embarrassed and reluctant. What frustrates me the most is when I approached the high school principal about police reports regarding these incidents, and she dismissed them as unimportant. It raises the question of when she will be held accountable for her actions and inaction.

Gabriel, an eight-year-old boy, described a pattern of abuse connected to his father, teachers, and other adults associated with his school and his family’s extended network. The interview centers on two main settings where the abuse occurred: a swimming pool in East Finchley and a school-related party, plus earlier incidents at home and with other adults. People involved - Gabriel and his family: His mother, known as Mama; his caregiver “Papa Hemp” (an adult referred to as Abraham who is described as Gabriel’s father figure and also as a father to him and his sister); his sister Emmy; his nanny Galina (also called Galina or Galina, Ukrainian/Russian family member who helps with cooking and housekeeping); other relatives such as Gabriel’s grandparents, including a Russian grandmother who lives outside England; a variety of named and unnamed extended family members. - Gabriel’s primary caregivers and household: Mama (the mother who is described as kind and supportive, who cooks, cleans, does juices, and provides money); Papa Hemp (the man Gabriel calls “dad” who does hemp juices and spends money on luxury items for Gabriel); Galina (the nanny, Ukrainian/Russian, who helps with pancakes and household tasks); Emmy (Gabriel’s sister); other adults in the household who are named less consistently. - School staff and associates: Christchurch Primary School in Hampstead where Gabriel says many teachers and staff were connected to his father. He names a number of teachers and staff by first and last names, including: - Miss Wilma (year one teacher, described as a friend of Gabriel’s father and the person who introduced him to other teachers). - Miss Forsyth (Kate Forsyth), the head teacher (Kate is her first name; Forsyth is the surname). - Miss Forsyth’s sister, also a head teacher, named Kate too (Kate Ungwyn or Ungwyn is referenced; the exact surname varies in the transcript). - Mr. Hollings (referred to as “mister Hollings,” the year four teacher who is to become Gabriel’s four-year teacher). - Miss Parsons (referred to as a leader among the teachers who knew Gabriel’s father). - Miss Clover and Miss Reese (assistants/teachers who were described as part of the staff). - Miss Wilma (again, described as a year one teacher who knew Gabriel’s father and who helped connect him with other staff). - Other staff names recur with uncertainty due to the chaotic transcript, but a broad network of teachers and school staff is repeatedly cited as being present during events. - Other adults at the events: Gabriel’s father’s friends, a man named Frank who is described as the McDonald’s manager or staff at the pool, and various parents who are named in relation to the disabled toilets incident. Key locations and settings - East Finchley Swimming Pool: Gabriel describes going there with his father (Papa Hemp) and his sister Emmy when he was about four years old. He recalls a changing room where his father and sister were present, and a disabled toilet where the abuse occurred. The pool complex is described as having a McDonald’s nearby and a McDonald’s inside the pool area itself, plus other facilities and a road and stairs near the pool. - The school and the school party: Gabriel recounts an incident on the last day of school in which a party at Christchurch Primary School involved sexual abuse. He describes a party that took place in the school, connected to a church space and school facilities, with dancing, and with teachers and parents present. He states that all the children attended the party and that many people, including teachers, parents, and his father’s friends, were involved in the abuse. He mentions a head teacher and other staff, including the year four teacher, present at the party. - Home and other settings: In the broader timeline, Gabriel refers to various other episodes including his mother’s explanations about anatomy (private parts, semen, the “white stuff” that comes out when wet or rubbed), and the risk and consequences described by his mother. He also describes exposure to alcohol, both wine and beer, provided by his father in various contexts; use of white powder to sniff; and other substances and behaviors introduced by his father and associates. Major events and claims - A pattern of sexual abuse initiated very early: Gabriel states that his father began abusing him when he was a baby or very young (one year old). He describes ongoing abuse across multiple settings, including at the pool and at home/with family friends. - The swimming pool incident: Gabriel details a recurrent pattern at the East Finchley Swimming Pool. He says his father and his father’s friends would take him and his sister into a large, multi-person disabled toilet, where they would perform sexual acts. He explains that the acts involved touching his private area, forcing him to put or be subjected to plastic Willy devices inserted into his bottom, which would bleed after removal. He says the acts occurred in the changing rooms, toilets, particularly the disabled toilet, and involved adults including his father, teachers, and parents who were there “in the disabled toilet” with him and his sister. He also mentions being taught to engage in sexual acts with other children at the pool and with other adults present. - The “plastic Willy” elements: Gabriel describes multiple “plastic willies” of different colors and sizes—bronze/dark skin color (brown), golden color, and white—for insertion into his bottom, describing the process as painful and bleeding after removal. He notes that the devices are made or bought by his father and his father’s associates; he references a person named Daniel as someone who helps make or procure the plastic toys. He emphasizes different color-coded descriptions for what he calls “brown/bronze,” “gold,” and “white.” - The teaching and social settings: Gabriel describes that his father had many connections with staff at the Christchurch Primary School, including Wilma, Forsyth (Kate), Ungwyn (Kate), Parsons, and others, suggesting that these relationships arranged or enabled the abuse. He states that the staff and parents were present at the pool events and at the school party, and that they engaged in or facilitated sexual activities with him and his sister. He describes that his father and the teachers would direct or coerce the children to participate in sexual activities, including oral sex on adults and other acts described in explicit terms. - The party day and the aftermath: The school party is described as lasting six hours and occurring during regular school hours, with a party atmosphere replacing standard lessons. Gabriel recalls being forced to engage in sexual acts at that party, being hit for crying, being injected with a sleeping injection by a nurse teacher so he would fall asleep, and being forced to participate in acts that included sexual contact with multiple adults, including his father, teachers, and other parents. He describes that his father killed babies and ate meat in a later part of the narrative about the party day, but the central focus is the party itself and the abuse that occurred there. - The “white powder” and alcohol: Gabriel recalls being given white powder to sniff by his father or adults, describing it as a substance that causes dizziness, headaches, and a “drunk” feeling. He describes European and Russian family connections as context for these experiences and mentions a green bottle with white powder in it. He also recounts receiving alcohol (white wine and red wine) from his father and feeling dizzy and headache-prone afterward, receiving tablets to alleviate symptoms. He notes that this happened when he was four years old and that his mother later admonished him not to put the white powder near his sister because it could cause babies to be born with severe problems. - The “seeds” and the white stuff: Gabriel describes the white stuff as being similar to semen in boys and having seeds that can multiply if they are brought into contact with another person or water. He explains that he was told to wash hands after handling the white stuff because the seeds can multiply, possibly causing pregnancy if transferred to another person. He emphasizes that the white substance can cause babies that might be blind, deaf, or otherwise disabled. He says his mother told him about the seeds and that it’s dangerous to expose his sister or others to the white stuff. - The self-harm and aggression: Gabriel recounts fighting with his sister, describing that following some of the episodes he engaged in violent acts toward his sister (hitting her, pulling her hair, etc.). He indicates these behaviors intensified after Abraham (Papa) moved in, and that his mother became very stressed as a consequence. He describes subsequent fear about reporting these events and the fear of retaliation by the adults involved, but then he begins to disclose earlier events. Rules and procedural notes from the interviewer - The interviewer (Steve) explains procedural rules for the interview: he is a police officer, with a partner described as Cleo who is the controller of the interview and a camera operator; there is Bethan from social services taking notes; the interview is structured to elicit truthfulness and precision, with an emphasis on avoiding guessing and on not considering Gabriel in trouble for reporting. - Gabriel is encouraged to use truthful accounts and to express himself with the language he chooses, including swear words, and the interviewer explicitly indicates that he would prefer him to supply the real terms (e.g., explicit sexual terms) to ensure accuracy in the record. - The interviewer confirms factual details like the date (11 September, a Thursday), the participants in the interview, and the structure of the interview. He also provides a mock example to illustrate truth-telling and asks Gabriel to identify lies and truths. - The interviewer clarifies that the purpose of the interview is to gather truthfully reported information about past incidents, including events that occurred at the pool, the school, and within the family network. Emotional and safety context - Gabriel communicates fear, confusion, and distress, especially around events at the pool and school. He alternates between recounting explicit acts and the broader social context of an abusive environment. He references fear of retaliation if the information is disclosed and expresses relief at having the opportunity to speak with an adult about what happened. - The narrative includes multiple references to consent, coercion, and the use of physical force to compel participation in sexual activities, as described by Gabriel. Overall content of claims - Gabriel reports extensive sexual abuse and coercion by his father, teachers, and other adults connected to the school and family circle, including forced sexual acts with both him and his sister. - He describes the use of plastic sexual devices inserted into his bottom, causing bleeding, and the performance of sexual acts in changing rooms and disabled toilets at the East Finchley Swimming Pool, in the presence of his father, teachers, and parents. - He recounts participation in a school party that involved sexual activities with multiple adults and a pattern of violence toward him for crying, as well as medical interventions (injections) to suppress crying. - He reports exposure to alcohol and illegal substances (white powder) given or introduced by his father, as well as instructions given by his mother about the dangers of the substances, including the propagation of seeds that could cause pregnancy and birth defects. - He describes a broader pattern of manipulation and complicity among adults at the school, including various named staff who allegedly knew his father and arranged or facilitated abuse. This summary condenses the key points and claims from Gabriel’s account, preserving the explicit statements and descriptions as provided in the transcript, without interpretation or judgment of the claims’ truthfulness.

The speaker delivers a stark account of a grave moral failure in British history: for decades, children across the United Kingdom, some as young as four, were groomed, trafficked, raped, beaten, tortured, drugged, impregnated, criminalized, murdered, and psychologically destroyed by organized groups. These were not isolated incidents or expressions of sexual gratification; they were sustained campaigns of exploitation against terrified, vulnerable children who were systematically trapped. Children were degraded, humiliated, and controlled through violence, threats, drugs, alcohol, and terror. They were forced to fight to carry weapons, sell drugs, and commit murder, with some made to dig their own graves. Extreme abuses are described, including petrol poured over victims and set on fire, scriptures from the Koran read during gang rapes, young children placed inside microwaves, ovens, and freezers in attempts to murder them, ouija boards used to call spirits, and animals killed in sexual acts against children. Some were passed from rapist to rapist, and not all survived; survivors faced suicide, substance abuse, or murder. The abuse extended beyond sexual exploitation, reflecting a pursuit of power and domination and the systematic destruction of a child’s sense of self. The speaker emphasizes that, years later, professionals pressured survivors to take medication or risk losing custody of their children, and victims were told they were too damaged to care for their own kids. They were removed from families, placed into the care system, and trafficked, with rapists invited into the lives and custody of the next generation. Children born from these crimes were forced into contact with their mothers’ rapists by social workers and the family courts. The professionals who should have protected them did not, and some still do not. The inquiry is exposing the scale of institutional failure: warning signs, reports, patterns, and evidence ignored or destroyed; victims dismissed as troubled, promiscuous, or consenting; children in care raped by staff and sold to gangs; parents threatened with fines or arrests for attempting to safeguard their children. The speaker notes that whistleblowers were targeted and silenced, and politics played a role. Political parties sacrificed children for votes, and leaders hesitated to confront abuse due to discomfort or concerns about appearing racist or Islamophobic. The inquiry will follow evidence into institutions, systems, cultures of silence, and places where truth has been buried, with no race, religion, profession, or agency exempt from scrutiny. Survivors are acknowledged: they were children, not to blame but failed by the system. The true scale of what happened and continues to happen is described as too large for the inquiry to fully resolve quickly; many victims may never receive justice, but the inquiry aims to be ambitious in pursuing truth. The speaker thanks MP Rupert Loh for establishing the inquiry andextends gratitude to the participants, survivors, and the team for their bravery and resilience in confronting this evil crime.

- Thijs van den Brink introduces himself and is asked to confirm a past interview. He says he has interviewed many people and cannot recall details about a specific interview with Yvonne Köls regarding a child-abuse suspect vice president of the Hague court, mentioning the name Theo Huub. He offers to have the episode sent to him for refreshing his memory. The other speaker notes the exchange as unusual, suggesting it occurred under the CDA cabinets during Lubbers and was swept under the rug. - A separate speaker announces that the radio interview of Thijs van den Brink with Yvonne Köls from 2015 is on their YouTube channel, dated 19 August 2025, and invites listeners to check the text and listen. - The conversation shifts to Yvonne Köls’s 30-year-old novel about a pedosexual child judge. It is noted that it provoked strong backlash against her rather than the judge, including criticism, public opposition, and even physical intimidation. Despite this, the book is being republished. Köls explains that the case still disturbs her because the judge was never prosecuted, and the press largely gave attention to the opposing party rather than Köls or the victims. - Köls is a guest on a program. She explains the reason for reissuing the book: a new generation is interested and can engage with the topic. She mentions that the Catholic Church has taken steps internally and disrupted the system, and that investigations extended beyond the church to include child care institutions and care facilities. She states she had substantial knowledge from that period. - She reflects that at the time she could have spoken more about what she knew, but she was not heard. She notes that the children assigned to her pupils, who were also abused, were excluded from coverage by others at the time. She adds that the men involved are now 45 or 46 years old, and that the abuse occurred when the victims were between 10 and 15 years old. - The program concludes with acknowledgment that the victims have spoken.

A new round of abuse-coverup allegations has resurfaced in federal court, this time targeting the daughter and son-in-law of church president Russell M. Nelson. The 79-page suit includes decades-old claims of sexual abuse against children as young as one year old, with the defendants identified as John and Jane Doe being Brenda Miles and her husband Richard, who are Russell M. Nelson’s daughter and son-in-law. The defense filed a 141-page motion to dismiss, denying all allegations. The plaintiffs allege that the abuse dates back to the 1980s and that after the victims came forward, church elder Neal A. Maxwell blessed them and told them to forgive and forget, and that if church leaders had taken further action with police, the abuse might not have happened. Although the LDS Church is not named as a defendant, the church issued a statement noting that allegations of interference or cover-up are baseless and offensive, adding that law enforcement investigated the matter in the 1980s and took no action against the church or its leaders. The plaintiffs’ attorney said the motive for filing now is that the alleged victims “now have a voice they want to be believed and they want justice for living with the shame and pain of what happened to them as children.” The defense argues that the statute of limitations has passed and that this is grounds for dismissal. A copy of the complaint was posted on kutv.com, fully redacted. In related discussion, a commentator described a conflict over how the church handles criticism, arguing that the only way to resolve it is through “brute force,” likening it to excommunication of critics, and asserting that the church avoids dispassionate dialogue to protect its brand. The commentator referenced Russell Nelson’s involvement in the Strengthening the Church Members Committee in the 1990s and claimed that Nelson was on that committee with James Faust. The segment also recaps a controversial personal history involving Bill Carstensen, a diagnosed child abuser who, after the church failed to discipline him, married Marilyn Brady, an employee in the church’s membership department. Brady reportedly trusted Nelson and ended up marrying Carstensen, who had abused multiple children, including a child later identified as Justin Hoyman. The report connects this to broader rumors about Nelson’s leadership and alleged shifts in church branding, noting rumors that Nelson emphasized not calling church members “Mormons” and suggesting derivations from Gordon Bowen’s influence, although no documents are provided to substantiate this claim. The segment closes by reiterating the existence of these allegations and the ongoing debate surrounding Nelson’s leadership and church branding.

The speaker reveals that pedophilia is a major issue in Hollywood, even for children. They were surrounded by pedophiles at 14, but only realized it later. Despite informing the police about abusers, the focus was on Michael Jackson. The speaker insists on others coming forward with information to share the burden. They emphasize being a victim of abuse. Translation: The speaker discusses the prevalence of pedophilia in Hollywood, sharing their own experiences and frustration with the lack of action from authorities. They urge others to speak up and share the responsibility of exposing abusers.

The speaker asserts that discussions of child abuse and child trafficking are avoided in the UK Parliament, implying that avoidance signals a problem. They claim there is no separate crime of satanic child abuse in the UK; they say it’s simply child abuse, and suggest that the Netherlands similarly erases the subject. The speaker relates local discoveries in Leicester, described as the nearest city to their area, where they found extensive child abuse linked to both historic and current politicians and to the police. They state they gave evidence against the head of police about “industrial child trafficking.” A central claim is that there is industrial-scale trafficking of children from Ukraine via Moldova to the UK for sexual abuse and organ harvesting. The speaker says this information came from two Ukrainian secret service agents who independently reported the same scheme, without knowing each other. They alleged that Ukrainian secret services collected children during the conflict in the Donbas and handed them over to UK secret services. The two informants reportedly named individuals and were appalled by the task of collecting children for trafficking. The speaker recounts that one whistleblower was killed in a cafe when a bomb was placed under his table, and the second survived a car bombing after being warned by a car park camera clip showing the explosion as he approached his car. They claim the whistleblowers named people very close to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his regime, asserting that those individuals purportedly benefit financially from the war by enabling child trafficking. Further claims include that there is more money in child trafficking and sex trafficking than in drugs or weapons because of the trafficked children’s organs. The speaker contends that the trafficking scheme involves selling the children multiple times, and that victims disappear after organs are harvested, which is why victims are not found in the end. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the alleged connection between wartime activity, Ukrainian whistleblowers, assassination attempts, and a broader network that allegedly profits from child trafficking and organ harvesting.

In the Flemish Parliament, speaking as an independent in name of Els, economic liberal and social, I listened to the September declaration by Prime Minister Jan Jambon and I wonder: has Prime Minister Jan Jambon forgotten God or not seen? Because there is no word about pedophilia in the church, in the boarding schools of Catholic institutions, while the schools fall under the authority of the Flemish government, education? Is that a taboo? Why does he not speak about it? The abuse is still ongoing, right? That is confirmed by several sources. I take as an example priest Lique Deville, who has written down all the stories of the victims, giving them a voice. I find that the stories of the victims of pedophile abuse in the church should be brought to the parliament. The pedophile priests must go to prison and the victims must be taken au sérieux. So I will request that a hearing be organized in the Flemish Parliament about the pedophilia network in the Catholic boarding schools in Flanders. I will emphasize that the ongoing abuse has been corroborated by multiple sources, and I will point to the work of priest Lique Deville, who documented the victims’ narratives to ensure they are heard. The call is for accountability of perpetrators and for formal recognition of the victims within political proceedings. The speaker asserts that the issue has not been adequately addressed in official discourse and demands a parliamentary inquiry to examine the alleged pedophilia network within Catholic institutions operated under Flemish educational authorities.

Speaker 0 recalls the release of Sound of Freedom and how it affected him personally, noting he watched it by himself and it wrecked him even though he doesn’t have kids. He asks the audience if they saw the movie, and recalls that many said no or avoided it as “too much.” He observes that now the topic is appearing in mainstream media and social platforms, and even in radio through references to the Epstein files in songs. He asks what people will do now and whether they will continue to turn a blind eye. He states that trafficking has been happening and is disgusting, demonic, and terrible. He mentions that young children are being trafficked and groomed to become traffickers, and that there are people who run them and people above them who “eat the flesh,” noting he won’t be too graphic. He then poses a core question: what are you going to do? If you are a follower of Christ, he encourages not to stay silent because that is not what the Bible says. He reiterates that children are still being trafficked, not necessarily by the same people, but involving many pedophiles and sick, twisted individuals. He ends with “So what are you gonna do? Love you all.”

I reported Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement to the FBI back in 1996. I made her role very clear to them at that time. It makes me angry that they allowed this to continue for twenty-six years. The majority of the victims you are hearing from now became victims after I made my report. Essentially, they created most of these victims by failing to act when they had the information.

Yesterday, at the Department of Justice, I spent several hours reading the unredacted files and the absolutely horrific and depraved messages exchanged among rich and powerful people across every sphere of influence. These individuals sit at the top of governments, academic institutions, giant corporations, and hold positions such as cabinet secretaries. The messages show they absolutely believed they were above the law, above morals, and immune to societal norms. They joked in these emails about pedophiles, about horrific sexual acts with young girls, and about creating spaces—entire islands even—where they could do anything they wanted and get away with it because of their wealth, power, and connections. This was a massive global sex trafficking ring with thousands of victims that we know of and thousands more that we probably don't. So when the DOJ says that there is nothing to investigate, we, the American people, must rise up. We must allow the courage and determination of the survivors who have spoken out at great risk to themselves to push us to never give up until every single one of these predators and pedophiles and predator protectors is brought to justice. It is the voices of the survivors ringing through in the darkness of all of this horror that has gotten us this far. And in speaking to so many of them myself, I know that this effort is not just for them. They're not doing this just for them. They're doing it for their girls, for their children, for other people who have been affected, to all the survivors of sexual assault everywhere across the world who are watching to see if we can get accountability right here in The United States Of America. Many rich and powerful people thought over the decades that they got away with this. They definitely did. You can see it in the emails. But as Lauren said to me the other day, the earth is shaking because every single one of them now is becoming known. And around the world, princes, ambassadors, even prime ministers are being brought down for their participation in this global sex trafficking ring.

I'm suspicious of people who jump ahead to arrest, conviction, incarceration, or execution. Let’s start with an interview. I know a lot of people have been interviewed — hundreds, in the FBI context. In a federal investigation, it’s not crazy to call somebody; it happens every single day. It happened to every relative of every J-six prisoner — got called in, “Can we come talk to you?” That’s not weird. That’s the beginning of justice: the first step in finding out what happened, punishing the guilty, exonerating the innocent, is having these conversations in the context of a federal investigation, like an FBI interview. It’s strange to see television mentions that there’s no evidence to indict someone or to call a grand jury. Why not just ask questions of the FBI? If they’re not doing that, you wonder why. Now, here’s the bigger picture you’re qualified to provide, even if I’m not. The implication in this file dump is that there are basically religious rituals, sexual in nature. That’s very common through history — temple prostitutes for a reason. There are rituals involving children underway in the United States and the West, rich and powerful people sexually abusing young people. That is very hard for a lot of people to believe or metabolize, but it feels like that’s not totally crazy; it happens. Does that happen? Absolutely. It’s so dark that it’s hard for average people — regular people just trying to live their lives — to even approach it. Even a maniac cannot put himself in the shoes of someone so depraved. Regular Americans can’t even put themselves in the shoes of a millionaire, let alone a billionaire, because they’re just trying to pay their bills and can’t — while billionaires are doing certain things that are messing everything up. So, it’s far removed from regular experience, but it’s hard to understand and believe. There’s good evidence of elements of that in various fringe investigations for a long time. I don’t say “fringe” to mean unreliable; I mean fringe to say they never gain traction with mainstream media, for whatever reason. But it’s right there in these emails and these files. It’s not entirely clear what all of it means, but there are very overt references, covert references, and mounting because people are still digging through them. These are millions of files with no effective way to sort through them the way the DOJ released them. So the evidence is mounting that we have: people turning a blind eye (reprehensible), adjacent and complicit, directly complicit, people that venture into the demonic or the truly depraved, and so on.

The speaker describes a family history of alleged ritualistic abuse and satanic practices, stating: “Also in worshiping the devil, participated in human sacrifice rituals rituals and cannibalism.” They assert an extensive family tree, claiming it “has gone back to, like, 1,700.” They contrast the outward appearance of their family with the reality inside, saying: “Does everyone else think it's a nice Jewish family? From the outside, appear to be a nice Jewish girl? Definitely. And you all are worshiping the devil inside the home? Right.” The speaker references broader involvement beyond their own family, noting: “There's other Jewish families across the country, not just my own family.” They describe rituals in which babies would be sacrificed and claim, “Who’s babies? There were people who bred babies in our family. No one would know about it. A lot of people were overweight, so you couldn't tell if they were pregnant or not.” They recount a childhood experience in which they were forced to participate: “When I was very young, I was forced to participate in that in which I had to sacrifice an infant. And the the purpose of sacrifice is to what? Is to bring you what? What are you sacrificing for? For power.” The response given to the question about the purpose of sacrifice is: “Power.” The speaker also discloses personal abuse within the narrative, stating: “Mhmm. I was molested. I was raped several times.” They then describe their mother’s current life and public image, asserting: “And what's your mother doing? She lives in the Chicago Metropolitan Area. She's on the Human Relations Commission of the town that she lives in, and she's an upstanding citizen. Nobody would suspect her.”

As a child, I knew Jimmy Savile was important at the hospital. He would touch me inappropriately during church services, progressing from stroking my back to putting his hands down my trousers. I tried to protect myself by wearing more clothes, even putting tampons in my bottom. The worst was when he put his whole hand in my mouth, making it hard to breathe. I felt invisible, like no one could see me. I hid in school under cupboards, feeling disgusting and blaming myself for not stopping it. I thought maybe no one else had experienced this, but I realized others might have been stronger than me to speak up.

I was subjected to ritual abuse, sex trafficking, torture, and experiments from birth to age 18. The abuse took place in a secret facility connected to the Vatican, involving electric shock, isolation, rape, and witnessing sacrifices. I was forced to make life or death decisions and endure psychological torment. Despite attempts to break me, I preserved myself internally. I share my story to expose the ongoing abuse of children by psychopathic elites and to inspire change. The trauma inflicted on us reflects societal manipulation through global rituals like 9/11 and COVID, urging us to heal, unite, and create a better future for all.

Speaker 0: When did you realize that someone finally understood the injustice done to you? Speaker 1: It was Remske Leijten, when she came to Rotterdam. She looked us in the eyes and there was a connection. I told her it would work out, but she said she wasn't sure. Then we felt a bond. We didn't know what we were getting into, but we had each other. Pieter assured us he wouldn't abandon us. I felt relieved. I gained strength, not just from them, but from God. In 2008, I collapsed from stress, but when I woke up, I felt I had a chance to live. I believed God was with me. Renske Leijten said we had a bond. I thought of it as a trinity. We started living, and there was strength. We saw light again, and that's how we moved forward.

Former Labour adviser Scarlett Maguire and political commentator Amon Bogle discuss front-page claims about the grooming inquiry, framing it as sabotage by Labour and a government-controlled process. - Speaker 1 (Amon Bogle) says the Telegraph front page alleges the grooming inquiry was sabotaged by Labour, and argues the inquiry from the outset was a follow-up of a cover-up spanning three decades, noting Labour initially refused a national inquiry. He asserts the government is manipulating the inquiry by refusing victims and survivors the chance to name perpetrators as Pakistanis, and by preventing examination of religious aspects of the abuse. - Speaker 2 (Scarlett Maguire) contends the issue is not an “Asian grooming gangs” problem but a Pakistani problem in the UK, with the vast majority of perpetrators from Mirpur in Pakistan. She says two women removed themselves from the inquiry because they were being silenced by the government from looking into race. - Speaker 0 (host) remarks on the broader fear of addressing the issue, recounting community knowledge of grooming in shops, gyms, and corner shops, and says he knows the abuse continues and no one is doing anything about it. - Speaker 2 adds that the country has been too scared to discuss the perpetrators, noting that police, social workers, and care workers were afraid of being labeled racist if they spoke out. - Speaker 3 (another participant) notes that there were conflated timelines and that early on, victims faced police or social workers who could be perceived as perpetrators in some cases. He mentions Kirsty Dahmer as the person who first brought grooming cases to court and reopened cases that had been closed, stressing the difficulty of running any inquiry that listens to all parties. - Speaker 3 emphasizes the challenge of conducting an inquiry where social workers and police are involved, and argues that victims and vulnerable young women in care were abused by social workers, the men who did it, and later by the police. He underlines the horrific nature of these events and notes that what happened is still happening today. - The discussion notes the ongoing impact on young women in care, with a final, emotive remark that reading a certain girl’s book would break one’s heart, signaling the lasting harm and urgency of the issue.

Speaker 0 feels justice will begin when they are no longer seen as an object, alleging their case has been swept under the rug. They express concern that authorities seem to be hiding something by denying and canceling things, which raises alarm bells. Speaker 0 feels they have been treated like nothing since reporting the abuse, and that promises of help are being dangled and then snatched away. They state they lost childhood, mental health, and progress in life, and question why this one thing that could benefit the whole country can't be done. Speaker 0 says they didn't think they would survive the abuse, but now they are living their best life and have done everything they were told they couldn't do, including having children. However, the trauma still affects relationships, and they suffer from complex PTSD, causing instability.

Speakers honor the brave women who were victimized, insisting that no one should be above the law and that the government itself failed these women. They note there were hundreds, hundreds of women involved and that millions of girls are watching how society handles sexual abuse, while the government is keeping them from justice, healing, and peace. They urge action: the time to step up, the time to push to fight to ensure justice is now and today is why we are here, call for an official hearing on the books within our committee, and for the Department of Justice to hand over immediately all of the files within its custody, noting that some victims have not been able to access their own files. They conclude these women are still seeking justice and healing, not just regarding Epstein, but not just of Epstein, but of sexual assault across our country.

Speaker 0 describes being subjected to satanic ritual abuse, child sex trafficking, and torture from birth in 1964 until leaving in 1982, moving to the United States and changing her name. She says she was involved through her Italian family line and tortured in an underground facility in Rome with tunnels connecting to subterranean levels of the Vatican. She witnessed child sacrifice there and was trafficked from there and within the European elite. She states that satanic rituals occurred in the Vatican as well as in elite mansions, underground tunnels, and private outdoor areas. Most common forms of abuse she details include rape and gang rape; being forced to watch the torture and murder of animals and humans ranging from babies to adults; electric shock; waterboarding; being buried alive with dead bodies; being put in coffins; being defecated and urinated on; watching people be disemboweled and having their entrails placed on her; various forms of mind control; horrific experiments on herself and witnessing them on others; being locked in a freezer; being kept in cages and isolation boxes for long periods of time; and watching satanic rituals below the Vatican, including the brutalization and sacrifice of babies and children, the ritualized drinking of their blood and organs, and the summoning of demonic entities via these rituals. Her personal message for humanity asserts that the world is controlled and run by satanic pedophiles and psychopaths in the highest positions of authority and power globally. She claims all systems—media, medicine, religious institutions, education, intelligence agencies, military, global agencies, governments—have been infiltrated at the top layers by this global cult. She states that pedophilia undergirds their system and is used as blackmail and control, and that children are still being ritually abused, trafficked, and murdered in the millions today. She explains that she is sharing her testimony to stop the abuse of children and humanity, noting that these people have used trauma-based mind control and succeeded with secrecy and deception, so exposing them is paramount. They have poisoned food, water, air, bodies with pharmaceuticals and vaccines, minds with media and miseducation, and have convinced people they have authority over humanity. She contends they traumatize society with wars, terrorism, violence, weather warfare, poverty, scarcity, and engineered diseases, with an end game of genocide of most and complete enslavement of the remainder. They supposedly want open worship of Lucifer and normalization of pedophilia, and they can only succeed with compliance, consent, and cooperation. She emphasizes the need to know the truth, say no more, do inner work, heal, and restore ourselves so we can come together and co-create a better way forward.