reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The food system must contribute to maintaining the 1.5-degree target set by scientists based on physics, mathematics, biology, and chemistry. The consequences of climate change are already evident and surpassing predictions made over the past 30 years.

Sea ice in the Arctic is melting rapidly, leading to the exposure of the Arctic Ocean. Scientists estimate that within the next five years, we will witness the first ice-free Arctic summer.

In 2023, global temperatures hit record highs, leading to extreme weather events worldwide. Heat waves occurred globally, even in South America during winter. Wildfires in Canada burned an area nearly 5 times the size of Switzerland. Record floods, including in Libya, caused significant damage and loss of life. A flood in New York resulted in water bursting from subway walls. Droughts affected South America and the Horn of Africa. These events highlight the impact of climate change, referred to as "global weirding" due to the noticeable changes in weather patterns experienced by people worldwide.

Agriculture is responsible for about 33% of global emissions, which could rise to 26-33%. To achieve net zero, agriculture must be a key part of the solution. With a growing population of over 8 billion, emissions from the food system alone could cause an additional 0.5 degree of warming by mid-century. A two-degree future could lead to 600 million people facing food shortages. We cannot warm the planet and expect to feed it. To maintain a 1.5-degree limit, we must reduce emissions from the food system. Scientists, based on physics, mathematics, biology, and chemistry, have warned us about the consequences, which are already happening faster and bigger than predicted.

Women and girls, especially in the global south, bear the brunt of climate change. Extreme heat poses a significant challenge, particularly for women working in the informal economy. Their jobs in fields, factories, and markets become impossible in temperatures of 40-50 degrees Celsius. The number of deaths related to climate change is alarming, with Europe alone recording 61,000 deaths due to heat last summer. Unfortunately, we don't have precise figures for Africa, Asia, and Latin America yet, but estimates suggest that out of 500,000 deaths, the majority are women and girls. Pregnant women face additional challenges in extreme heat.

The melting of Greenland's ice sheet could raise sea levels by 7 meters.

In 5 years, scientists predict the first ice-free Arctic summer. This will expose more ocean to sunlight. Because the ocean is dark, it will consume more heat from the sunlight. This accelerates melting and warming, as opposed to the ice and snow which used to reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere.

Agriculture contributes 26-33% of global emissions, making it central to achieving net zero. The world population recently surpassed 8 billion, increasing the urgency. Food system emissions alone could cause an additional 0.5 degrees of warming by mid-century. A 2-degree warming scenario could leave 600 million more people undernourished. Reducing food system emissions is crucial to keeping the 1.5-degree target alive. Scientists using physics, mathematics, biology, and chemistry have warned of consequences already being observed. These consequences are materializing faster and with greater intensity than initially predicted.

Emily Speck reports that nearly 700 sinkholes are tearing open Turkey's farmland, with the Koinya Plain—the region that grows much of Turkey's wheat—literally caving in. Close to 684 large sinkholes have been found across the Koinya Plain, and new ones are appearing every year. Scientists point to a dangerous combination of extreme drought, climate change, and decades of heavy groundwater pumping as drivers of the collapses. In the Karapanar district alone, more than 20 new sinkholes opened in the past year, some stretching as wide as 100 feet across and plunging hundreds of feet down. Researchers say the collapses have accelerated since the early 2000s, putting farms, livestock, and entire rural communities at risk. The situation is compounded by reservoirs dropping to their lowest levels in fifteen years, which experts say may cause the ground beneath Koina to continue giving way. The widening network of sinkholes threatens agricultural productivity and local livelihoods, as large swaths of arable land become unstable or unusable. The ongoing subsidence not only disrupts crop cycles but also endangers irrigation infrastructure and roads that connect communities within the plain. Experts emphasize that the phenomenon is not isolated to a single location but reflects a broader pattern across the region as groundwater extraction remains intensive and climate variability intensifies. The intersection of drought conditions, shifting precipitation patterns, and sustained pumping is linked to the emergence of more sinkholes, according to the reporting. With the region’s breadbasket status at stake, there are concerns about long-term impacts on food supply and regional economies dependent on farming and related services. As the ground continues to respond to environmental pressures and human water use, authorities and researchers are likely to monitor groundwater levels, land stability, and reservoir accounts closely. They may seek to balance agricultural needs with measures to reduce vulnerability to subsidence, while communicating ongoing developments to residents who inhabit communities within the affected areas. For AccuWeather, this is Emily Speck.

Scientists predict that within five years, we will experience the first ice-free Arctic summer. This will expose the dark ocean to more sunlight. The ocean absorbs more heat from the sunlight, accelerating melting and warming. This is because the ice and snow, which used to reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere, will be gone.

Agriculture is responsible for a significant portion of global emissions, ranging from 26% to 33%. To achieve net zero emissions, agriculture must be a central part of the solution. However, with a growing population of over 8 billion people, emissions from the food system alone are projected to cause half a degree of warming by mid-century. This could result in 600 million people not having enough food in a two-degree future. We cannot warm the planet and expect to feed it simultaneously. To maintain a 1.5-degree limit, we must reduce emissions from the food system. Scientists, based on physics, mathematics, biology, and chemistry, have warned us about the consequences of exceeding this limit, which are already becoming evident and surpassing previous predictions.

Weather modification programs, operated by private companies and governments across the U.S., are affecting agriculture by altering microclimates. Over 50 such programs exist, yet they lack agricultural and public oversight. International corporations are also involved in modifying weather on a large scale, often using chemicals released from the ground or aircraft. These interventions, often framed as climate change mitigation, include geoengineering techniques that introduce substances like sulfur into the atmosphere to reduce sunlight. However, this can negatively impact crop production, not just in the U.S. but globally, leading to potential reductions in agricultural yields.

Agriculture is responsible for around 33% of global emissions, making it crucial to address in order to achieve net zero. With a growing population of over 8 billion people, emissions from the food system alone are projected to cause half a degree of warming by mid-century. This could result in 600 million people not having enough to eat. We cannot warm the planet and expect to feed it simultaneously. To maintain a 1.5-degree limit, we must reduce emissions from the food system. Scientists, based on physics, mathematics, biology, and chemistry, have warned us about the consequences of not taking action. These predictions are already coming true, but at a faster and larger scale than anticipated.

Sea ice is melting rapidly in the Arctic, leading to the exposure of the Arctic Ocean. Scientists estimate that within the next five years, we will witness the first ice-free Arctic summer.

The colossal mistake of underestimating the death spreading agriculture and meat industry. Therefore the vast destruction of ecosystems by agriculture is also an important cause of abrupt climate change. Afterwards the death spreading agriculture practices will also release carbon stored in the soil. Abrupt climate change is in its turn also contributing very much to the destruction of ecosystems. In fact almost all previous mass extinctions were accomplished via the earth climate, oceanic and atmospheric systems. The speed of the change is probably a very important driver for the destruction rate of ecosystems. The faster the less nature will be able to keep up by adaptation or migration. Permaculture is the real and only way to go.

Achieving net zero emissions would lead to widespread hunger and disease as 50% of the population relies on nitrogen fertilizer for survival. Attempts to ban nitrogen fertilizer in countries like the Netherlands and Sri Lanka are seen as a misguided effort to save the earth, which does not necessarily need saving.

As the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) slows, the Northern Hemisphere cools. This cooling causes the tropical rain band to shift south. Consequently, monsoons may fail to reach regions dependent on them for up to 90% of their annual rainfall. This directly impacts food security for over two billion people.

A federal report predicted possible catastrophic warming of the Earth by the 1990s due to strong climate change. Scientists claim that if action isn't taken within the next eight or nine years, major cities worldwide could go underwater.

Agriculture contributes 26-33% of global emissions, making it crucial to achieving net zero. With a population of over 8 billion, emissions from the food system alone could cause an additional 0.5 degree of warming by mid-century. This could lead to 600 million people facing food shortages in a two-degree future. To prevent this, we must reduce emissions from the food system to keep global warming at 1.5 degrees. Scientists, based on physics, mathematics, biology, and chemistry, have warned us about the consequences of exceeding this limit. Their predictions have been coming true faster and on a larger scale than anticipated.

Scientists' warnings about mega storms, floods, droughts, ice melting, rising sea levels, stronger storms, tropical diseases, and climate migrants have been accurate. Without action, there could be 1 billion climate refugees crossing international borders in the coming decades. A few million refugees have already contributed to a wave of populist authoritarianism, and a billion could overwhelm our capacity for self-governance. People are already being displaced from their homes, and areas are becoming physiologically unlivable due to heat and humidity. These areas, currently small, could expand to include most of India, large parts of Northern South America, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Pakistan if no action is taken. The survival of our civilization is at stake.

Scientists claim the Earth's atmospheric temperature has been rising over the past 100 years, Antarctic ice sheets are melting faster, and sea levels have been rising more swiftly over the past 40 years. If correct, about 25% of Florida could be flooded in the next century, along with other low-lying areas. Climate changes could disrupt agriculture, potentially making the American farm belt too dry and shifting wheat and corn crops to Canada. Scientists attribute these changes to carbon dioxide gas, which creates a greenhouse effect by trapping heat and preventing it from rising into space. They maintain that burning coal, oil, and gas for a century has increased carbon dioxide levels, overheating the Earth. Some express concern that sufficient research isn't being conducted to determine the accuracy of these alarming assessments. Scientists are using computer models to predict the melting rate of Arctic ice and its impact on ocean levels, which could affect millions and the survival of cities.

Einar Tangin and Glenn discuss the forthcoming Xi Jinping–Donald Trump meeting and the broader strategic landscape shaping U.S.–China competition. - On the Trump–Xi meeting: Tangin expects very little substantive outcome. China’s strategy toward the United States is to keep engagement open rather than push Trump into a corner, despite Trump’s past actions and their consequences. He notes a narrow scope to be discussed in a California meeting, with Trump volunteers unprepared and pushing “the usual maximist stuff.” China is signaling that Taiwan will be a red line. Beyond that, the Chinese may accept limited concessions such as grain, gas, or oil purchases, but no sweeping arrangements. The overall takeaway: continued engagement, but not a game-changing breakthrough. - U.S. energy and global strategy: Tangin argues the United States uses energy as a tool of influence, aiming to control access and shape markets (the petrodollar legacy, strategic chokepoints). The Ukraine war has accelerated Europe’s decoupling from Russia and the U.S. seeks to expand similar dynamics in East Asia. He emphasizes that the energy game is dynamic: oil prices impact inflation, and long-term, demand destruction and a shift to alternatives (electricity, renewables) will reshape markets. He points to new energy tech and scale: batteries and storage (CATL’s battery capacity) enable large-scale decoupling from fossil fuels; China’s plans to deploy up to 50 nuclear plants at a time and to pursue commercially available fusion power could transform the energy landscape. The U.S. may face higher exploration costs and geopolitical risk in sustaining high oil output, while heavy reliance on fossil fuels could erode long-term economic viability. - Global consequences and who bears the pain: In the short term, countries without reserves (notably parts of the Global South, including India) will face fertilizer and diesel shortages during planting seasons, with potential 15–25% yield reductions and elevated inflation. Food security risks loom as energy costs ripple through fertilizer, transport, processing, and farming inputs. The analysis highlights fertilizer nitrogen production’s energy intensity and the cascading nature of energy in food supply chains. The discussion stresses that global south economies will be hit hardest early on, with food and fuel inflation compounding social and political pressure. - The Iran war and maritime strategy: The discussion connects the Persian Gulf crisis to broader blockades and maritime competition. A naval blockade approach risks escalation and confrontation with China, which has extensive trade links through ASEAN and other partners that would be harmed by disruption. Tangin notes that China cannot be easily forced into combat in Europe or the Middle East; any escalation involving tactical nuclear use would be dangerous. He suggests that Europe’s elites may push for confrontation against Russia, but the political climate and energy constraints could destabilize Western allies and push towards alternative alignments, particularly with China. - China’s strategic posture and alternative world order: Tangin emphasizes that China has a model that emphasizes no ideology between states, sovereignty, and mutual non-interference, echoing a Westphalian framework. He describes China’s global governance concept as a peer-to-peer, negotiation-centered approach, where disputes are settled at the table rather than through force. He frames China’s proposition as simple: “No more ideology between countries. Every country should be secure. Security should not depend on the insecurity of another country. Every country has the right to choose its own path of development.” This is presented as a peaceful, governance-based alternative to U.S.-led hegemony. - Europe’s strategic crossroads and the future: Europe faces existential economic strains, competitiveness challenges, and the temptation of isolationist or right-wing governance. The conversation predicts prolonged political volatility if energy prices and inflation persist, with potential swings between different leaderships. China’s strategy, in this vision, is to promote internal diversification and consumption-led growth while engaging with international partners on a governance framework that reduces the incentives for confrontation. - Concluding note: The speakers agree that Europe’s willingness to embrace China’s model, rather than clinging to a confrontational U.S.-led paradigm, could shape a more stable global order. They caution that the old order has ended, and creative destruction is underway, with China advocating a negotiated, governance-based path forward.

Scientists claim the Earth's atmospheric temperature has been rising over the past 100 years, Antarctic ice is melting faster, and sea levels have risen swiftly in the last 40 years. If correct, 25% of Florida could flood, along with other low-lying areas globally, and agriculture could be widely disrupted, potentially moving the American farm belt to Canada. These changes are blamed on carbon dioxide, which traps heat like a greenhouse. Scientists maintain that burning coal, oil, and gas for a century has increased carbon dioxide, overheating the Earth. Some political leaders support more carbon dioxide monitoring stations and share scientists' anger over Reagan administration budget cuts, hindering research to determine the accuracy of these alarming assessments. The findings could affect millions and the survival of cities.

Agriculture is responsible for a significant portion of global emissions, ranging from 26% to 33%. To achieve net zero emissions, agriculture must play a central role in the solution. However, with a growing population of over 8 billion people, emissions from the food system alone are projected to cause half a degree of warming by midcentury. This could result in 600 million people facing food insecurity in a 2-degree future. To prevent this, we need to reduce emissions from the food system and strive to keep global warming within 1.5 degrees. Scientists have warned us about the consequences of exceeding this limit based on physics, mathematics, biology, and chemistry. These predictions are already coming true, but at a faster and larger scale than anticipated.

Agriculture is responsible for about 33% of global emissions, which could increase to 26-33%. To achieve net zero, agriculture must be a key part of the solution. However, with a growing population of over 8 billion people, emissions from the food system alone could cause half a degree of warming by mid-century. This could result in 600 million people not having enough food in a two-degree future. We cannot warm the planet and expect to feed it simultaneously. To maintain a 1.5-degree limit, we must reduce emissions from the food system. Scientists have warned us about the consequences based on physics, mathematics, biology, and chemistry, and these predictions are already coming true, but at a faster and larger scale than anticipated.