TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker states they are in litigation with 18 states across 19 different lawsuits over these states’ alleged refusal to comply. They say objections raised include privacy, noting they are requesting information such as the last four digits of individuals’ Social Security numbers and whether someone is in the country legally or a citizen, which they describe as a matter of federal records. The speaker asserts that the concept of this being a privacy issue is “total nonsense,” and argues that those states have no right to be on the voter rolls. They express an expectation to win these cases, even if it takes going to the Supreme Court. The speaker indicates they started this effort earlier in the year to give states a chance and mentions targeting jurisdictions like Fulton County, Georgia, which still has custody of some ballots from the 2020 election that they would like to examine, along with a couple of other jurisdictions. They say they reached a settlement with North Carolina, which is cleaning up its voter rolls with 100,000 records that were incorrect and needed updating. They mention they waited on behalf of Wyoming’s voter ID law and helped them win a case in court against liberal efforts to push it back. The speaker outlines an overall expectation for 2026: cleaner voter rolls, with many election officials, as noted by John, doing their job after receiving these letters. They anticipate hundreds of thousands of people in some states being removed from the voter rolls correctly. The speaker notes a past hesitation to act, suggesting it was because the DOJ and some left-wing organizations would sue when states attempted to do their job, framing it as “damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” They conclude that for the remainder of this administration, they will be supporting states in cleaning their voter rolls as required by federal law and emphasize that they are just getting started.

Efforts to prevent noncitizens from voting are gaining attention, despite it being rare. Only American citizens should vote, and in Georgia, a 100% citizenship verification process revealed that about 1,600 attempted registrations could not verify citizenship and were excluded from voter rolls. A recent court case, initiated by a coalition including Stacey Abrams' New Georgia Project, upheld the right to conduct citizenship verification before adding individuals to the voter rolls. This ruling sets a precedent for other states. All officials emphasize their commitment to ensuring only U.S. citizens vote, adhering to federal laws and state regulations. It's crucial for states to enshrine this in their constitutions, as Georgia has done.

The Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit against the state's secretary of state for having 500,000 to 1.3 million ineligible voters on the rolls. The lawsuit revealed dead people and non-residents on the voter rolls, with some counties having more registered voters than eligible citizens. This highlights the need for election integrity. Republicans must address this issue before the upcoming elections to prevent cheating. It is crucial to purge voter rolls of deceased individuals to ensure fair elections. Democrats may argue otherwise, but it is clear that dead voters should not be on the rolls.

This executive order is described as the farthest reaching executive action to secure elections in the history of the republic. It aims to cut down on illegal immigrants on voter rolls by weaponizing Department of Homeland Security data and including a citizenship question on the federal voting form. The order instructs the EAC to cut federal funding to states that don't take reasonable steps to secure their elections and calls on the Department of Justice to prosecute election crimes, especially in states not in compliance with federal election law. It also aims to ensure compliance with national election day rules, investigate and prosecute foreign interference, and revoke President Biden's executive order 14019, which is claimed to have weaponized government to corrupt the election process.

Fulton County allegedly does not conduct independent searches to remove ineligible voters, such as deceased individuals, convicted felons, or those residing out of state, from voter rolls. The question is raised whether routine maintenance is performed to remove convicted felons from the voter list.

"we have sent out a number of letters to states, under two federal statutes." "We administer different statutes, Help America Vote Act and NVRA, National Voter Registration Act." "these acts have different purposes and different rules, but basically states are required to maintain certain data." "they're required to keep their voter rules generally up to date." "we're finding that a lot of states are being very sloppy, cutting corners, not doing this, certainly not doing the list maintenance required." "And too many millions of Americans today don't feel confident." "And that means it's deterring some people from voting." "We have sloppy maintenance requirements in these different states." "There are a lot of problems with this."

Some states are allowing votes to be received and counted after election day, which contradicts federal law that designates the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November as election day. This practice raises concerns about potential fraud and undermines voter confidence. Judicial Watch is currently suing Illinois and Mississippi for permitting ballots to be counted days or weeks after election day, as long as they are dated on or before that day. Judicial Watch is committed to ensuring fair and honest elections and is prepared to take necessary actions to uphold the law.

Since January 2020, election officials in one governor's state have removed 453,000 names from voter rolls. This includes 97,000 deceased voters, 56,100 felons, 15,000 duplicate registrations, and 195,000 individuals who failed to verify their address. Over the past three years, 144,000 voters who moved out of state have also been removed. New legislation allows for automatic removal of voters upon notification from another state that they've surrendered their driver's license there.

Some voter rolls in swing states contain illegal aliens because they register their address as the processing center. Software integrating property tax records with voting files reveals voters not living at legal residences. These new illegal voters are inundating voting roles, especially in swing states. In 2022, 40,000 phantom voters were exposed in Wisconsin and removed. These are people who were dead, moved out of state, don't exist, or don't live at a legal address. Challenging the address is the most efficient way to get an illegal voter off the voting roll. Certain NGO groups, such as Catholic Charities, are helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These groups don't believe in borders and feel fine registering people to vote. Dark money, evading campaign rules, tends to go to NGOs and other groups. Evidence suggests a lot of dark money is coming from Chinese-controlled groups and is trying to affect the election in favor of Kamala Harris. The Trump campaign and the RNC need to dedicate time, money, and energy to analyzing the voting file in the seven major swing states to find voters using illegal addresses and have those addresses removed.

Judicial Watch uses the National Voter Registration Act to compel states and localities to clean up voter rolls. They cite successes in California (1,200,000 names removed), New York City (nearly 450,000 names), Washington DC, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Colorado. Lawsuits are ongoing in California, Illinois, and Oregon. States are reportedly not taking basic steps to regularly clean up voter rolls. Judicial Watch's litigation has led to the removal of over 4,000,000 names from voter rolls in the last two years.

We are committed to ensuring that only U.S. citizens participate in elections, and so far, there is no evidence of noncitizen voting. However, there have been instances where noncitizens voted; this year, 135 were identified as having voted, with another 400 registered but not yet voting. Just because something is illegal doesn't mean we shouldn't have measures in place to prevent it, similar to how we maintain TSA for air travel security.

Speaker 1 outlines a plan to revisit all 50 states and 'clean up voter rolls' and 'ensure as best they can that people are citizens when they're registering to vote in a federal election.' He notes letters have been sent to states under two statutes: 'Help America Vote Act' and 'NVRA, National Voter Registration Act.' States must maintain data, keep rules up to date, and have procedures for federal registrations to safeguard citizenship. He says many states are 'sloppy, cutting corners, not doing this, certainly not doing the list maintenance required,' and not properly ensuring people are on the rolls. The goal is that 'every citizen, whatever their party, whatever their views are, they should feel confident in the outcome of the election.'

This executive order is described as the farthest-reaching executive action to secure elections in the history of the republic. It aims to cut down on illegal immigrants on voter rolls by weaponizing Department of Homeland Security data and including a citizenship question on the federal voting form. The order instructs the EAC to cut federal funding to states that don't take reasonable steps to secure their elections. It also calls on the Department of Justice to vigorously prosecute election crimes, especially in states not believed to be in compliance with federal election law. Additional measures include compliance with national election day rules, cracking down on foreign interference, and revoking President Biden's executive order 14019, which is claimed to have weaponized the government to corrupt the election process.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states are not requiring proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Governor Glenn Youngkin in Virginia issued an executive order to clean up voting rules. The Biden administration's Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to try to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern because everyone should want the law to be followed.

Judicial Watch’s legal action led to the removal of 5,000,000 names from voter rolls nationwide. Specifically, 1,000,000 names were cleaned from New York City’s rolls, 1,200,000 from Los Angeles’s rolls, and hundreds of thousands to millions of names were cleaned from Colorado, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Kentucky. The list goes on, all thanks to Judicial Watch’s heavy lifting in court. They say millions more names need to be cleaned up, and Judicial Watch is in federal court now. In the meantime, there are 5,000,000 fewer opportunities for voter fraud.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states do not require proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order to clean up the state's voting rules. The Biden-Harris administration Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern in the minds of many Americans.

A bill signed in 2006 requires using DMV data to remove non-citizens from voter rolls if they are registered. This process has been ongoing for 18 years, even under Democrat governors. When someone identifies as a non-citizen at the DMV and is registered to vote, registrars are notified and the individual is given 14 days to affirm citizenship or be removed from the voter roll. The Department of Justice ordered the process to stop 25 days before a presidential election. The governor believes this is unprecedented and indicates the DOJ is trying to achieve something other than fair elections. The governor's job is to ensure fair, accurate, and safe elections in Virginia, and he will continue to do so because he believes the Department of Justice is wrong.

The FBI is responsible for safeguarding Americans' voting rights and takes allegations of election-related violations seriously. They investigate federal election crimes, which include campaign finance crimes, voter ballot fraud, and civil rights violations. While the primary responsibility for ensuring a fair election process lies with the state and local authorities, the FBI's Washington field office collaborates with state and federal partners, engaging with law enforcement agencies and providing resources to educate about the FBI's role in elections.

Fight Voter Fraud, active in 49 states, provides free data on double-registered voters, some of whom have voted in multiple states. Voter rolls are described as a mess, with examples cited, including one individual who allegedly voted three times in North Carolina and Florida. The speaker advocates for law enforcement to prosecute egregious cases of double voting. The organization claims to have perfected methods for identifying double-registered voters, double voters, and instances of deceased individuals voting. They also address the issue of "illegals" voting. The speaker highlights a situation in Georgia where election board members verified ballot reconciliation, a process of matching voters to ballots. Democrats are allegedly suing these individuals, and the speaker suggests this is because the reconciliation rule prevents them from cheating.

42,000 people in Nevada voted multiple times, including 1,500 deceased individuals, 19,000 who didn't reside in Nevada, and 8,000 from nonexistent addresses. Additionally, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. In our state, we prosecute individuals for voting twice, which occurs about 50 times a year. Of the 130,000 instances of potential voter fraud identified in Nevada's 2020 election, there have been no prosecutions yet. It's crucial to enforce voter integrity laws. While building a fraud case can take time, an honest investigation should lead to charges. Losing the principle of one person, one vote risks authoritarianism.

The speaker states that there is no dispute: the conduct of our elections, the way government comes into power, is a national security issue, and the security of our elections is incredibly important. The speaker says they are comforted as a citizen and as someone at the Department of Justice by the fact that national security eyes are on this, as well as criminal and civil rights review. They add that, at the end of the day, as a voter themselves and someone involved in politics before taking the job, they like every citizen to vote. They note that a lot of people don’t vote, don’t have confidence, and don’t care. It is important that people have confidence in, accept the outcome of the elections, and also be more likely to vote. The speaker concludes that this is a very good thing, whoever they’re voting for.

Maine's refusal to release its voter roll information suggests that cleaning up voter rolls is not a priority. This lack of transparency raises concerns about the integrity of elections.

Speaker 0 states that California is failing to abide by the NVRA and make its voter rolls clean, giving the example of 1,000,000 voters in Los Angeles County alone. Speaker 0 claims the county of Los Angeles agreed in a consent decree. Speaker 1 interjects, saying the county agreed to adopt additional practices on maintaining voter rolls and that all lawsuits were unsuccessful. Speaker 0 responds that this is untrue and that they have won several lawsuits against California at the United States Supreme Court.

The Civil Rights Division of the DOJ provided an update on its election integrity litigation. The department announced that it sued four additional jurisdictions for not complying with federal election laws and facilitating the sharing of voter data: Georgia, the District of Columbia, Illinois, and Wisconsin. In addition, three more jurisdictions provided voluntary compliance, bringing the total to ten states that are voluntarily sharing their voter data so that the DOJ can help ensure that only American citizens vote, and that each person votes only once in federal elections per election cycle. The DOJ stated that, despite the holiday season, it will continue its work to obtain compliance from every jurisdiction or pursue lawsuits where necessary. The announcement framed the effort as part of making federal elections great again and ensuring that every citizen has confidence in them.

Alabama's Secretary of State Wes Allen ordered the removal of 3,251 noncitizens from the state's voter rolls. When asked how these noncitizens were registered, Allen stated the matter is under investigation. Of the 3,251 noncitizens, 742 were from North Alabama. The state cross-checked information against its centralized data file to identify these individuals. The information used included alien registration numbers, which are issued to immigrants intending to live permanently in the U.S. and have applied for a green card. Allen stated that only American citizens should be allowed to vote and that it is a federal offense for noncitizens to register, regardless of their legal status.