reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Voters reveal the true shape of a presidential race when focus groups push past headlines and into the tempo of everyday life. Longwell explains that and the contrast between turnout and persuasion matters: Trump remains a potent turnout engine while Biden benefits from a surge of enthusiasm around Kamala Harris, which has energized the Democratic coalition from base to swing voters. She notes that anxiety about Biden’s age and doubts about Harris gave way to a broader willingness to rally behind the ticket, and that enthusiasm, not polling alone, seems to forecast engagement. She describes undecided voters as not 'low information' but late-breaking, busy people who vote in presidential years and weigh 'lesser of two evils' with cynicism. They are not necessarily undecided due to deep study; they have lives, kids, work. Focus groups reveal the persistent tension between turnout and persuasion; to win you need both; enthusiasm translates into actions like registration and donations; the role of the messenger and authenticity in persuasion is key. On methodology, she outlines how focus groups are sourced via firms with lists of voters; how Zoom opened access and transcripts; desire to make qualitative more scalable; AI could transform analysis by summarizing themes across transcripts, predicting outcomes, and identifying which messages resonate with which voters. She emphasizes centaurs: human plus machine collaboration, and warns about tone, mood, and the limits of AI in reading ambivalence. She discusses mis/disinformation and the need for truth, and discusses messenger authenticity as the core of persuasion campaigns; the risks of AI-generated testimonials. Towards politics' future, she argues the Republican Party is unlikely to return to its pre-Trump form; realignment toward a working-class, tariff-focused, isolationist posture is possible; compromise remains essential to policy, and electoral penalties for lies are needed to restore incentives. She reflects on her personal journey as a gay Republican turned focus on truth and civil discourse, the value of listening, and the hope that, despite polarization, most people share common concerns and can reconnect if we change how we frame and approach dialogue.

The episode centers on the ongoing government shutdown and the strategic maneuvering around funding, highlighting how Democrats secured funding for most agencies while DHS remained funded under negotiation. The discussion examines leverage dynamics, with lawmakers debating potential concessions on policing reforms, body cameras, and masking requirements for federal agents, framed by the base’s demand for accountability. The hosts review how media coverage, including a New York Times focus group, shapes perceptions of whether Democrats should run as progressives or moderates, while noting the evolving definition of those labels and their political implications. A key throughline is polling and projections about the 2024 to 2026 electoral landscape, including reweighted scenarios for a Trump-Kamala Harris rematch and shifting Senate odds. The conversation analyzes how voter turnout, post-2024 sentiment, and independent voters could tilt midterm outcomes, potentially producing a Democratic shift in Congress even as general disillusionment persists. The hosts compare historical midterm dynamics and consider which races might swing based on voter engagement, party branding, and the broader political climate.

Dave Rubin discusses several key topics in his July 12, 2021, episode. He critiques Vice President Kamala Harris for suggesting that rural Americans can't photocopy IDs, arguing this reflects a "soft bigotry of low expectations." He highlights massive anti-government protests in Cuba, emphasizing that demonstrators seek freedom from a communist regime, contrasting their motives with the Biden administration's framing of the protests as COVID-related. Rubin also addresses the White House's promotion of systemic racism and critical race theory in education, asserting that the administration is misleading about the teaching of American history. He criticizes CNN for its aggressive stance against unvaccinated individuals, citing calls for vaccine mandates and the potential consequences for those who choose not to comply. Rubin concludes by reflecting on the political landscape, noting the divide within the Democratic Party and the future of the GOP, while encouraging viewers to engage in discussions on these pressing issues.

Dave Rubin discusses various topics, starting with his recent move and setup issues in his new studio. He expresses admiration for Bill Maher but critiques his inability to fully break away from the Democratic Party. Rubin highlights a recent episode of Maher's show featuring Barry Weiss, who criticized COVID lockdowns and their negative impact on children, noting that many conservatives have been voicing similar concerns for years. He emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the failures of the Democratic leadership, particularly regarding immigration policies and the economy under President Biden. Rubin argues that while Maher and Weiss are making valid points, they still cling to Democratic ideals, which he believes undermines their credibility. He calls for a deeper reflection on their political affiliations and urges them to recognize the consequences of their past support for Democrats. Rubin also touches on the broader implications of Biden's declining approval ratings and the potential for a significant political shift in the upcoming midterms. He concludes by encouraging viewers to engage with these issues and consider the importance of political accountability.

The episode centers on a blend of political commentary, cultural critique, and entertainment industry chatter. The hosts dissect a swirl of contemporary headlines—from the January 6 pipe bomber case and questions about the FBI’s use of cell tower data to Kamala Harris’s public perception and Jasmine Crockett’s Texas Senate bid—asking hard questions about accountability, media coverage, and political strategy. Throughout, they contrast posturing with substance, arguing that the public often receives hollow slogans rather than clear policy positions, and they probe how media narratives shape voters’ understanding of who counts as a leader. The discussion intensifies around the tension between a candidate’s charisma and their policy record, highlighting how public perception can be weaponized in high-stakes races. The tone swings between sharp critique and candid humility about how political theater interacts with real-world consequences, especially in a year full of pivotal electoral contests. Beyond politics, the interview with Zachary Levi shifts the conversation toward art, responsibility, and industry dynamics. Levi reflects on his film Not Without Hope, speaking to the harrowing realities of the four men who perished at sea and the ethical duties of portraying real people on screen. He connects the craft of storytelling to a broader critique of media consolidation, social responsibility in cinema, and the importance of keeping theaters alive as authentic communal spaces. The actors’ vivid account of filming in Malta, the challenges of underwater stunts, and the emotional duty to honor the families involved illuminate how personal experience informs creative decisions. The dialogue weaves technical details with existential reflections about anchors—symbolic burdens that weigh individuals down—and the imperative to cut them loose so audiences remember the humanity at the heart of every tragedy. The exchange also touches on the fragility of ownership in the streaming era, arguing that the cinematic experience remains a shared, culturally formative practice worth defending. Toward the end, the hosts circle back to Kennedy-era optimism and contemporary distrust in institutions, debating RFK Jr.’s reception, vaccine debates, and the broader question of how ideology and media ecosystems intersect with scientific discourse. The discussion acknowledges the complexity of modern public health policy, the role of corporate power in shaping narratives, and the responsibility of public figures to engage with truth rather than spectacle. The episode closes with gratitude for honest conversation, a renewed call to examine evidence critically, and a reminder that compelling storytelling—whether on screen or on air—still hinges on humanity, accountability, and the courage to challenge prevailing orthodoxies.

The live event features Patrick Bet-David and a crowd discussing the upcoming debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. The hosts set the stage for the debate, emphasizing the rules and the significance of the event. They discuss polling data, with Tom providing insights on the credibility of various polls, particularly the Siena poll, which shows mixed results for both candidates. Tom highlights the lack of new polls released recently, suggesting a media bias in reporting. The conversation shifts to the candidates' debate strategies, with a focus on how they will handle questions and topics without prior knowledge. The hosts express skepticism about the moderators' potential bias, recalling previous debates where Biden received less scrutiny. As the debate approaches, they discuss the candidates' standings in key states and the implications for the election. The hosts speculate on how the debate will affect public perception and voter turnout, particularly among independents and young voters. They also mention endorsements, including a surprising one from Vladimir Putin for Harris, and discuss the potential impact of celebrity endorsements, particularly from Taylor Swift. During the debate, Harris emphasizes her plans for the economy, healthcare, and women's rights, while Trump counters with claims about his previous administration's successes and criticisms of Harris's record. The discussion covers various topics, including immigration, abortion, and foreign policy, with both candidates trying to assert their positions and appeal to voters. The hosts analyze the debate performance, noting that while Harris performed better than expected, Trump maintained a strong presence. They discuss the importance of messaging and how each candidate's approach may resonate with different voter demographics. The conversation concludes with predictions about the election outcome and the potential for future debates, emphasizing the need for candidates to connect with voters on key issues. Overall, the event highlights the contrasting visions of the two candidates and the stakes involved in the upcoming election, with a focus on the importance of voter engagement and the impact of public perception on the political landscape.

The episode centers on Trump’s post of a controversial video depicting Obama and Michelle Obama in a racist manner, which quickly triggers backlash from Republicans and scrutiny from the White House. The hosts describe the clip’s two parts: an election-fraud narrative followed by a racially charged animation, noting how some Republicans publicly pressed for deletion and apology while others defended it as a takeoff on The Lion King. They recount the White House’s initial defense blaming a staffer and explore how Trump supporters and advisers framed the post as a misstep that could erode trust in government messaging. The discussion also follows a string of reactions from lawmakers, including Tim Scott and other Senate figures, and a New York Times analysis that examines whether the president’s behavior crosses lines that require accountability. The hosts analyze how the incident fits into a broader pattern of reactive politics, media framing, and the evolving influence of social platforms on Republican strategy ahead of midterm dynamics.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing troubling poll numbers for Vice President Kamala Harris, particularly a Gallup poll indicating a Republican advantage in voter identification for the first time in 20 years. This trend suggests a potential Trump victory in the upcoming election. Kelly expresses skepticism about the implications of these numbers, noting that while they are promising for Republicans, they could change as the election approaches. Kelly and her guests from National Review, Charles C.W. Cook and Jim Geraghty, analyze the current political landscape, highlighting Harris's declining popularity and the Democratic Party's internal contradictions. They discuss how Harris's media coverage has shifted from adoration to scrutiny, particularly as she begins to articulate her policies. The conversation touches on the effectiveness of Trump’s presidency in shaping voter perceptions, with many voters viewing it as a success despite his low personal approval ratings. The discussion shifts to the Democratic Party's coalition, which Cook describes as a confusing mix of interests that may not align effectively. Geraghty points out that Harris's campaign is struggling to resonate with voters, especially in swing states like Virginia, where recent polling shows a tight race against Trump. The hosts also express concerns about the Republican get-out-the-vote efforts, noting that while there are new strategies in place, their effectiveness remains uncertain. They highlight the importance of voter engagement and the potential impact of Trump's popularity on down-ballot races. Later, Kelly introduces Nicole Shanahan, RFK Jr.'s running mate, who shares her political evolution from Democrat to independent. Shanahan criticizes the current Democratic leadership for being out of touch with the needs of everyday Americans and discusses her commitment to addressing issues like climate change through innovative, market-driven solutions rather than government intervention. Shanahan emphasizes the importance of regenerative agriculture and critiques the corporate influence on food production and health care. She expresses optimism about grassroots movements like "Make America Healthy Again," which aim to empower individuals to take control of their health and well-being. The conversation concludes with Shanahan reflecting on her experiences in elite circles and the disconnect between wealthy individuals and the struggles faced by average Americans. She advocates for a more equitable approach to health and nutrition, particularly for low-income families, and expresses her commitment to fostering positive change in California and beyond.

Dave Rubin hosts David Sacks, a tech entrepreneur and Republican figure, discussing recent political events. Sacks reflects on his experience at the Republican National Convention, noting its organization and the positive energy surrounding Trump post-assassination attempt. They analyze Biden's unexpected withdrawal from the race, highlighting the chaotic announcement and lack of clarity regarding his decision. Sacks describes the Democratic Party's maneuvering as a "coup," emphasizing the rigged primary process that sidelined other candidates like RFK Jr. and led to Kamala Harris's nomination without grassroots support. They discuss the media's role in covering up Biden's cognitive decline until the debate revealed the truth. Sacks predicts that the Democrats may struggle with internal conflicts, particularly regarding Harris's candidacy, and suggests that Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro could be a strategic VP pick. They conclude by speculating on potential surprises in the political landscape, including deteriorating situations in Ukraine and the implications for the upcoming election.

The hosts discuss various topics, starting with the aftermath of Hurricane Milton in Florida, which caused significant damage and raised concerns about insurance companies reconsidering their presence in the state. They express sympathy for those affected and highlight the ongoing issues with Florida's insurance market. The conversation shifts to political discussions, including comments from the Teamsters Union president criticizing the Democratic Party for neglecting working-class interests. They touch on Trump's private communications with Putin and the perception of the economy as a crucial election issue, with Trump gaining an edge in polls. Kamala Harris's recent interview on CBS is analyzed, with the hosts criticizing her performance and the editing of her responses. They argue that she lacks substance and is not engaging, contrasting her with more dynamic political figures. The hosts express frustration over her inability to articulate a distinct vision separate from Biden. The hosts also discuss the implications of recent polling data, noting shifts in voter sentiment, particularly among demographics traditionally aligned with the Democrats. They highlight the importance of voter turnout and the potential for a significant change in the political landscape. In a lighter segment, they mention a playlist of songs chosen by terminally ill individuals for their final moments, reflecting on the emotional weight of such choices. They also discuss the absurdity of celebrity reactions to political events, particularly Keith Olbermann's call for Elon Musk's deportation. The hosts conclude with a discussion about Doug Emhoff, Kamala Harris's husband, and allegations of inappropriate behavior during his career, questioning the implications of such claims for his public image and the broader political narrative. They emphasize the need for accountability and the potential impact of personal character on political leadership.

In this Breaking Points episode, the hosts interview Tennessee state representative and congressional hopeful Afton Bane, highlighting a high-stakes, red-to-blue race in a Republican-leaning district that was reshaped during redistricting. Bane frames the contest as not only a local election but a national signal, arguing that the district’s voting patterns reflect broader discontent with the federal administration and a desire for a more people-centered economic approach. She emphasizes her independence from corporate money, contrasting herself with opponents she calls beholden to ‘puppet masters,’ and points to Tennessee’s persistent affordability and healthcare challenges as proof that the Republican trifecta has failed working people. The conversation moves to campaign strategy, with Bane describing her grassroots organizing, a focus on Medicaid expansion, and efforts to counter misinformation as essential to winning in a district where turnout and ground game will decide the result. The hosts probe the dynamics of appealing to Trump voters, and Bane defends a cross-partisan approach, condemns corporate influence, and discusses how national attention, including visits by prominent figures, may impact the race. The segment closes with practical questions about ads, resources, and turnout, underscoring the race’s tight, make-or-break momentum as voting nears.

The episode analyzes a high-stakes statewide race, focusing on the entry of a prominent liberal candidate and how her profile shifts the dynamics of support among diverse voters. The conversation examines past contenders, the strategic decisions behind launching ads, and the tension between authenticity and crafted messaging. The hosts debate whether anti-incumbent sentiment, amplified by anti-Trump energy, can translate into broad constituency gains, or whether demographic and regional realities will dampen that effect as the race moves toward the primary and beyond. They weigh prior campaigns, such as the Beto moment, and assess how a candidate’s star power, ability to trigger opposition, and willingness to clash with national figures may or may not translate into a sustainable coalition. The discussion also touches on fundraising, endorsements, and the role of national winds in determining statewide outcomes, with both hosts acknowledging that the political environment often matters more than individual biographies in predicting victory. topics otherTopics booksMentioned

The Rubin Report live episode centers on Super Tuesday 2020, with host Dave Rubin narrating his day-to-day schedule and the evolving dynamics of the Democratic primary. Rubin discusses voting behavior and the practical quirks of California’s early voting and party-switching options, highlighting how late endorsements and party rules influence which candidates gain momentum. He contrasts the perceived unity on the right—rooted in constitutional principles and free-market notions—with the left’s current fragmentation, characterized by a surge of socialist-leaning energy and debates over how to respond to that shift within the Democratic Party. Throughout, Rubin critiques the dynamics of party leadership, superdelegates, and brokered conventions, suggesting that the party faces a broader question about identity and direction. He also reflects on cognitive health concerns linked to Joe Biden and the implications for leadership, while observing the role of the media and online discourse in forming public perception versus traditional outlets. The discussion broadens to how communities engage with political information, the potential for younger voters to feel disaffected, and the practical realities of coalition-building inside a multi-faction landscape. In the live calls and text questions, audiences probe the systemic mechanics of elections, the nature of political accountability, and the personal responsibilities of voters and influencers in shaping democratic outcomes. Rubin emphasizes the value of civil dialogue and the importance of staying engaged in the process while acknowledging the volatility of the moment and the need for a stable, fed-and-fed system to absorb rapid shifts in public opinion. The episode weaves together on-the-ground reporting, analysis of delegate counts, and a candid exploration of how personalities, policy ideas, and institutional rules intersect to define the direction of American politics at a pivotal juncture.

Dave Rubin announces his upcoming tour, starting in West Palm Beach with Donald Trump Jr., followed by multiple cities including Clearwater, Raleigh, and Chicago, featuring various guests. He discusses the transition to a post-woke world, citing Elon Musk and a federal judge's recent decision to lift the mask mandate on planes as examples of individuals challenging the system. Rubin highlights President Biden's declining approval ratings, particularly among younger voters, attributing this to inflation and dissatisfaction with current policies. He emphasizes the importance of individual action against the "machine" and notes the growing Republican voter registration in Florida. Rubin expresses optimism about the potential for change, referencing the success of candidates like Glenn Youngkin in Virginia. He critiques the ongoing pandemic narrative and the government's response, particularly regarding lockdowns and mandates. As he prepares for his tour, he invites viewers to join him and expresses excitement about meeting fans, promising to return refreshed with new insights.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Kamala Harris's recent rise in prominence, suggesting that the media is attempting to reinvent her image while downplaying the failures of the Biden-Harris administration. She highlights a New York Magazine cover portraying Harris in a positive light, indicating a shift in narrative aimed at the 2024 election. Ben Shapiro joins the discussion, noting that recent polls show Harris closing the gap with Trump, particularly among Black, Latino, and young voters. He expresses skepticism about the sustainability of this momentum, suggesting it may be a temporary "sugar high" due to Biden's absence from the race. Shapiro emphasizes that Harris has not faced significant scrutiny yet, which could change as the election approaches. The conversation shifts to the dynamics of a potential debate between Harris and Trump, with Shapiro criticizing the narrative that Trump is afraid to debate her. He argues that the media's enthusiasm for Harris may not reflect her actual political competence, recalling her previous struggles in national campaigns. Kelly and Shapiro discuss the media's portrayal of Harris as a transformative figure, comparing her to Barack Obama, while Shapiro argues that her campaign is more reminiscent of Obama's 2012 run, marked by unpopular policies. They express concern over how Harris's lack of challenging interviews could shield her from criticism. The hosts also touch on the significance of voter turnout efforts for Republicans, especially in light of the Democrats' strong organizational skills. Shapiro points out that Republicans must adapt to mail-in voting, which has become crucial for electoral success. As the discussion continues, they analyze the implications of Harris's potential vice presidential pick, with names like Josh Shapiro and Mark Kelly being considered. They debate the importance of the pick in terms of electoral strategy and how it could influence swing states. The conversation concludes with a focus on the media's role in shaping narratives around candidates, particularly Harris's recent endorsement from Barack Obama, which they view as a calculated move to bolster her image. They express skepticism about the long-term impact of this media-driven enthusiasm and the challenges Harris may face as the election nears.