reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Palestine was never Britain's to give away. The truth will set you free. Washington is Israel's most subservient colony. I'm a former Zionist and Jew, join me in uncovering the truth. Netanyahu said the 9/11 attacks swung American opinion in Israel's favor, using it to terrorize the public into supporting Middle East wars for Israel's benefit. Al-Qaeda and ISIS were created by the Mossad and CIA to justify these wars and advance Israel's goal of a Middle East empire. Israel used 10/07/2023 as justification to implement a plan for genocide against Palestinians. JFK supported Palestinian refugee rights and opposed Israel's nuclear program, leading to conflicts with Zionist leaders.

Israeli spies were detained after being caught recording the 9/11 attacks. They later admitted on television that it was their job to document the event. They were then questioned again, this time about their alleged membership in Masai. They explained that they come from a country that faces daily terror attacks and their purpose was to document the event.

There were many involved in nine eleven—the Pentagon, the executive branch, and the CIA—with prior knowledge and investments. And then there was Israel. The dancing Israelis, who posed for pictures in front of the burning towers, told the FBI that Israel now has hope that the world will understand us. Over a 100 Israelis were arrested after 9/11; they were trained in military intelligence and explosives, posing as art students with fake IDs, infiltrating government buildings. The US response was to destabilize the Middle East and to start viewing the American people as domestic terrorists. This is known as a false flag. Netanyahu has made it clear he supports Hamas, and the evidence shows that they are also a creation of the intelligence agencies. Having helped to build up Hamas, Netanyahu has now vowed to destroy it.

In 1994, a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in London, causing minor injuries but no deaths. The bomb was designed to destroy evidence and was believed to be the work of a skilled individual. A senior MI5 officer, who had access to both evidence and intelligence, concluded that Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, had orchestrated the attack themselves. The officer believed Mossad did this to pressure MI5 into increasing security around their embassy. Additionally, two innocent Palestinians involved in political campaigning were arrested, charged, and convicted for the attack, which effectively dismantled their network. This theory, although it may sound like a conspiracy, was the official position of MI5 at the time.

The transcript weaves together a compilation of statements and reporting surrounding the 9/11 attacks, Israeli involvement rumors, and related investigations. - Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said September has been good for Israel, claiming, “we're benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon and the American struggle in Iraq.” - CNN reported (and later acknowledged as false) a tape in which Osama bin Laden told his mother that something big was about to happen; bin Laden had consistently denied involvement in 9/11 and claimed Zionists were behind the attacks. Reports from Japanese, Chinese, and Indian outlets claimed bin Laden was killed in Afghanistan in 2001 and buried in an unmarked grave by his own men. There are claims from the Muslim world and some European figures that Zionist extremists staged the 9/11 attacks to ignite terrorism. - A commentator asserted that the war has targeted Israel’s Muslim enemies and is being fought and paid for with American blood, lives, and tax dollars. - A speaker argued that bin Laden, regardless of who committed the attacks, comes back to the Middle East, and urged the United States to dismantle the entire “evil empire of terrorism,” warning that without doing so, the terror network could develop nuclear capabilities and threaten the United States and its allies. - Observers described a lack of apparent shock among certain people in connection with the events, noting unusual behavior or reactions. - Five men arrested in a van were later identified as Israeli, with some connections to Israeli intelligence; they were turned over to the FBI. National security databases showed some of the men had prior Israeli intelligence or counterterrorism experience, and one admitted serving in an Israeli army anti-terrorist unit and refused a lie detector test for an extended period. A speaker emphasized loyalty to country when discussing military service. - Fox News and others reported that up to 140 Israelis had been detained prior to September 11 in an ongoing, broad investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States. Government documents described hundreds of incidents across U.S. cities that investigators said could indicate organized intelligence gathering. The “country A” in a General Accounting Office document was said to be Israel, described as conducting aggressive espionage against the U.S. despite being an ally, with Israel possessing substantial resources to achieve its collection objectives. - Investigators questioned the possibility that some Israeli agents had advanced knowledge of the attacks, suggesting there is explosive but not necessarily conclusive evidence when aggregated. A recurring theme was the question of how such agents could have known, given the events. - Allegations of foreknowledge included claims that Israeli agents were forewarned and filmed the event on Israeli television. Some individuals detained or questioned described their presence in Israel as journalists or documenters. The broader question centered on whether Israelis gathered intelligence in advance and whether it was shared or withheld. - The transcript also recounts the failure to account for certain details (e.g., passport survivals, disappearance of voice recorders) as well as assertions that anthrax letters, later linked to a U.S. Army lab, were used to deflect blame toward Muslims. - Two accounts describe a white Chevy van linked to Urban Moving Systems, a moving company whose employees were alleged to have connections to Israeli intelligence. The FBI issued a nationwide alert about the van, and two suspects were reported in custody after explosives were found in a vehicle near the George Washington Bridge. CBS reported that two suspects were in FBI custody and that the truck contained enough explosives to damage the bridge, with some accounts noting a prior alert about a van on the way to destroy the bridge. - Overall, the material presents a network of claims and investigations involving alleged Israeli espionage, foreknowledge of 9/11, intelligence operations in the United States, and specific incidents surrounding the George Washington Bridge and related arrests.

In 1994, a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in London, suspected to be a false flag attack by Mossad. A senior Mi5 officer believed Mossad bombed their own embassy to increase security and disrupt a Palestinian support network. Two innocent Palestinians were framed for the attack, leading to their arrest and the collapse of the network. This incident had significant political implications.

Netanyahu's narrative is allegedly collapsing, with claims that the October 7 attack was a false flag operation orchestrated by the Israeli government to seize Palestinian land. An Israeli soldier testified to receiving orders to stand down and cancel patrols along the Gaza border that morning. This is compared to Larry Silverstein's alleged directive for Israelis to avoid the World Trade Center on 9/11. The claim is that the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and wars in Lebanon and Iran were pre-planned, needing only a spark, similar to the Bush administration's actions after 9/11. Israeli lawmakers are allegedly moving to punish those questioning the official narrative of October 7. Netanyahu supposedly predicted the 9/11 attacks in 1996. Joe Biden is accused of funding both sides of the conflict, similar to the Rothschilds and Prescott Bush in past wars. An Israeli intelligence member warned superiors of the attack, but was threatened. It's claimed Egypt warned Israel of an attack ten days prior, but was ignored. A former Israeli intelligence agent stated the Hamas attack had hallmarks of a planned operation to spark war for the elites.

"Israelis are not like anybody else. They killed a guy in a hotel room in Dubai, and then after they killed him, they were somehow able to lock the door from the inside of the hotel room. There's an underground" "My experience is universally negative. Universally negative. I've never had a positive encounter with Mossad." "The thing is, you know, the Israelis this was covered in the Washington Post, just a couple days after the twelve day war started." "And what the Israelis did is that they have a lot of Farsi speaking Jews in Israel. These are Iranians who are Jewish and who emigrated to Israel, and a lot of them work from Mossad and Shin Bet."

The speaker asserts that there are thousands of hours of tape that are child pornography, and the FBI is not releasing them because the tapes do not show underage people with third parties on Epstein Island; according to the speaker, “those tapes are just child porn,” and that is why they are not being released. Regarding the Epstein list, the speaker says sources in the federal government have seen documents and claim there is no Epstein list. Instead, there is a “black book of Jeffrey Epstein contact,” and most of the contacts are already public, with names such as Prince Andrew or Alan Dershowitz commonly mentioned. The speaker claims that, according to the DOJ and the FBI, there is no evidence that any of those third parties were trafficking girls to them. The speaker then references Tucker Carlson asserting that Mossad was involved, noting that this is a hot internet speculation without evidence. In addressing this, Naftali Bennett, the former Israeli prime minister, is cited as stating with 100% certainty that the accusation Epstein “worked for Israel or the Mossad running a blackmail ring is categorically and totally false.” Bennett reportedly told the speaker that the Mossad has not been active in the United States since the Jonathan Pollard scandal of 1987, when a US army contractor working for the Navy revealed classified information to the Israeli government and was imprisoned for nearly thirty years. According to Bennett, Israel has not spied on the United States since then.

The discussion centers on the 1994 London incident: a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in central London, a highly visible false flag scenario at the time. Earlier that year, there was a similar attack against a Jewish interests section in Buenos Aires, using a car bomb driven and parked outside that exploded, causing very minor injuries and no fatalities. The device was sophisticated and appeared to “eat” its forensic traces, a level of technical execution that even the IRA struggled to match. What followed was a claim by a senior MI5 officer who oversaw the investigation and had access to all evidence and intelligence (not all of which is admissible in court). In his formal assessment, he stated that Mossad, the Israeli external intelligence agency, had bombed their own embassy in a controlled explosion. He gave two reasons for this assessment. First, Israel was continually pressuring MI5 for increased security around its embassy and other interests in London, given London’s reputation at the time for providing safe haven to Arab dissidents from around the world; MI5 had argued there was no need to increase threat levels. By conducting a controlled explosion, the operation immediately achieved the desired result of heightened security and attention. Second, and crucial, two innocent Palestinians were arrested, charged, and convicted of conspiracy to cause the attack. They were active in a Palestinian support network in London and engaged in political campaigning for people in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Their arrest and conviction effectively disrupted and crippled that network, which, according to the officer, has not recovered to this day. The implication drawn is that the operation served a political purpose by dismantling a network and providing a significant strategic advantage.

The Lavonne affair was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt called Operation Susannah in 1954. Israeli elements planned attacks on British, Egyptian, and American targets, blaming them on Muslim extremists. A group of Egyptian Jews, known as Cyane, carried out the attacks. The plot was uncovered when a bomb exploded prematurely, leading to arrests and confessions. Israel tried to spin it as an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. They scapegoated the defense minister, Penhas Lavonne, to protect the real group behind the attacks. Israel later claimed that the Egyptians were tipped off. This incident strained the relationship between Egypt, America, and Britain. The video also briefly mentions the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11, questioning the official narrative.

I pay my respects to the survivors of the USS Liberty and those who believe that Israel was responsible for the attack. However, suggesting that Lyndon Baines Johnson manipulated Israel into attacking the ship for personal gain is insulting and contrary to the facts. Israeli pilots themselves questioned the order to attack the American ship, as seen in public radio transcripts. It is wrong to accuse Johnson of manipulation. Moving on, there have been instances of Israeli involvement in events like the Lavon Affair, the USS Liberty incident, and 9/11. These incidents show a pattern of false flag operations where American lives are sacrificed for Israel's benefit. Accusing Johnson of manipulation is disrespectful and unfounded.

Americans are being warned that they may be drawn into a war with Arabs, falsely believing that Muslims were responsible for a terrible event. However, the speaker claims that it was actually the Israeli Mossad, known for their cunning and ruthlessness, who orchestrated the attack and made it appear as though Arabs were to blame. This is referred to as a false flag operation. The speaker cites a US army report from the day before 9/11 as evidence of Israel's capabilities.

The Lavarn affair, known as Operation Suzanna (Susannah), was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt in 1954, with targets bombed. In the 1950s the US pressed Britain to leave the Suez Canal; Israel would not tolerate British departure. Elements within Israel planned false-flag attacks to be blamed on Muslims, code-named Susannah. Egyptian Jews known as Syanin carried out the attacks. The first bomb hit a post office in Alexandria on July 2; a phosphorus bomb exploded in Natansson’s pocket as he approached Rio Cinema on July 14, leading to his arrest and the ring’s breakup. These ad hominem attacks are a common tactic of the Zionists. For more information, read Jack Bernstein's book, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel. As the trial progressed, Israel claimed Egyptians were tipped off and scapegoated defense minister Pinhaz Levon to shield the inside group behind Susannah.

Mario opened by asking Professor (Speaker 1) for his initial reaction to the horrific shooting in Australia, noting Iran’s spokesperson condemned the attack. Professor 1 said the Iranians were swift to respond and suggested the western media’s speed benefits the Israeli regime; he noted early suggestions that one of the alleged culprits has a Salafi Wahhabi background, which he tied to allies of the United States and Israel, and said the Israeli regime has historically supported ISIS and Al Qaeda. He added that the immediate accusations against Iran by Israel and some Western outlets raise questions. Mario pressed Professor 1 on his tweets, asking whether he genuinely believes Mossad could be behind the Sydney attack or if he was critiquing others’ blaming Iran. Professor 1 replied that he wouldn’t put anything beyond Mossad and the Israeli regime, citing the Hannibal directive during October 7 and noting past high-profile conspiracies and investigations where insiders seemed to know more than the public. He referenced 9/11, claiming the attackers’ backgrounds and stock market movements suggested possible foreknowledge, and argued that a regime that carries out genocide could do anything. He asserted that the obsession with blaming Iran in various cases is a frequent pattern, and that the Australian media had started implying Iran’s involvement in the Sydney attack. Michael interrupted to challenge the framing, asking Professor 1 to distinguish between critiquing Israeli actions and endorsing unfounded claims about Iran. Professor 1 argued that for nearly fifty years accusations have often targeted Iran, while Israel’s actions — including genocidal traits and hospital bombings — have not faced equivalent condemnation, though he clarified he had not claimed Israel carried out every conspiracy. He asserted that ISIS and Al Qaeda were created by Western interests and Gulf regimes, and alleged U.S. and Israeli involvement in supporting extremist groups. He claimed Western policy and Saudi/Wahhabi influence underpin these groups, and argued Israeli and Western power shapes Middle East outcomes. Michael commented that the discussion should avoid knee-jerk conspiracism and noted the pattern of blaming Israel for many attacks, while acknowledging legitimate grievances against Israel’s conduct. He cited a May Washington, DC attack linked to Gaza motivations and argued this blowback results from Western support for extremist groups, including ISIS and Al Qaeda. He criticized using blanket attribution to Israel, stressing that this rhetoric crowds out rational critique of Israel and U.S. policy. He referenced Epstein as an example of alleged intelligence connections and warned activists to beware of being portrayed in compromising footage. The conversation shifted to Netanyahu’s statement blaming Australia’s recognition of a Palestinian state for the attack. Professor 1 condemned Netanyahu’s framing, calling him anti-Semitic for conflating Judaism with Zionism and arguing that Palestinians are Semites; he claimed the Israeli regime’s influence in Washington is substantial and that accusations against Iran distract from Israel’s genocide. He argued that many Jews oppose the Israeli regime, and that Zionism cannot be equated with Judaism. He reiterated that the regime’s policies, including alleged use of Wahhabism and Western support for extremists, have fueled blowback. Mario asked for final reaction on Netanyahu’s claim and the broader role of Western policy. Michael acknowledged the complexity and described Western-Israeli influence as significant, while insisting on avoiding unfounded accusations about any single actor. Professor 1 condemned terrorism in all forms but argued that the main culprits are those carrying out genocide in Palestine, with the slave-vs-oppressor framing underscoring his view of the Palestinian situation. The discussion closed with a note that both guests view Western policy and Israeli actions as central to global blowback, while cautioning against simplistic attributions of attacks to Iran or Israel without solid evidence.

Americans, be aware. There is a potential war with Arabs and the Muslim world looming. However, it is important to note that the blame for any terrible event should not be solely placed on Muslims. The Israeli Mossad, known for their cunning and ruthlessness, could potentially carry out attacks on Americans, making it appear as if Arabs were responsible. This is referred to as a false flag, and it is not just a conspiracy theory. In fact, a US army report, released the day before 9/11, warned about Israel's capabilities. Feel free to criticize me, but these are the facts presented by the US army.

The LaVon affair was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt called Operation Susannah. It aimed to sabotage the relationship between Egypt, America, and Britain by carrying out false flag attacks on British, Egyptian, and American targets. The attacks were planned by elements within Israel and blamed on Muslim extremists. A group of Egyptian Jews, known as Sayanine, was recruited for the bombings. The plot was uncovered when one of the terrorists was arrested after a bomb exploded prematurely. Israel tried to spin it as an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory and scapegoated the defense minister, Pinhas LaVon. This incident strained the relationship between America and its ally, Israel.

Americans are being misled into a war with the Muslim world, blaming them for attacks actually carried out by the Israeli Mossad. This was warned in a US army report the day before 9/11, revealing Israel's capabilities. It's a false flag operation, not a conspiracy theory. Wake up to the truth.

In 1954, Israel initiated Operation Suzanna, a terrorist operation in Egypt, due to the US becoming friendlier with Egypt and influencing the British to leave the Suez Canal. The plan involved bombing Egyptian, American, and British-owned targets and blaming it on Muslim extremists to incite anger and damage relations between Egypt, America, and Britain. Egyptian Jews, referred to as Syanin, were recruited to carry out the attacks. The bombings began on July 2nd, targeting a post office in Alexandria. Further attacks occurred on July 14th, targeting US information agency libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. However, a premature explosion exposed one of the terrorists, leading to the breakup of the ring. Despite the investigation, further attacks were carried out. Following the plot's exposure, some attempted to dismiss it as an antisemitic conspiracy theory. Israel claimed Egypt was tipped off and scapegoated Defense Minister Pinhaz Levon to protect those who planned Operation Susannah. The speaker references Jack Bernstein's book and his assassination by Mossad. The speaker then compares the collapse of a building to the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11, suggesting it was a planned demolition.

Clayton discusses with Kevin Ship, a former CIA officer and author of Twilight of the Shadow Government, how false flags allegedly unfold and why they persist in public discourse. Key points: - False flags are planned for months in advance. Kevin suggests that covert operations typically identify a single boogeyman to avoid implying a broader conspiracy, arguing that a lone perpetrator allows authorities to claim “we got him” and deny wider conspiracy. - The pattern cited includes one individual who previously showed no criminal tendencies, who then commits a violent act, followed by quick attribution to a designated boogeyman, with the implication that the operation is over and left without further inquiry. - Specific incidents discussed include the Bondi Beach attack in Australia, with references to Mossad’s involvement and claims that Iran is behind the attack to push for war with Iran. The exchange questions the Australian government’s role and the relevance of Mossad’s presence in investigating the incident. - The conversation links these operations to broader intelligence ecosystem dynamics, noting a close collaboration and “frenemies” relationship between the CIA and Mossad. They describe Mossad as having a pervasive role in Middle East intelligence and describe a history of interactions where Mossad and the CIA share high-level information and sometimes operate in tandem, though at times Mossad may target the CIA as well. - The discussion points to prior examples of disinformation, such as the 9/11 events, where perceptions of evidence (e.g., a passport found near the World Trade Center) are presented as straightforward proof, while being described as an example of ineffective or misused disinformation to shape public belief. - In addressing media influence, Kevin references the CIA’s media liaison office and programs designed to influence how news is presented in the United States. He contends that “Mockingbird”-like media consolidation and complicit outlets help propagate these narratives, especially to audiences that rely primarily on television news. - The conversation notes a perceived pattern of actors or individuals appearing at multiple, unrelated events (e.g., a person claiming responsibility or being present at various incidents) as part of the alleged orchestration of false flag narratives. - They discuss the effectiveness of false flags: despite growing scrutiny and critical reporting, they argue that false flags continue to influence public perception, aided by psychological studies within intelligence communities and the reliance of many viewers on mainstream media for information. - Kevin reiterates his belief that the shadow government—particularly the CIA’s control of elected government and media propaganda programs—remains powerful, with ongoing operations designed to manipulate thinking and push narratives that serve certain geopolitical aims. He emphasizes that false flags are a recurring tactic and predict more of them in the future. - The conversation closes with Kevin urging readers to consider his book Twilight of the Shadow Government and to engage with his perspective on the CIA’s influence over media, politics, and public belief.

The speaker warns Americans that they are being manipulated into believing that a terrible event was caused by Muslims, when in reality it was orchestrated by the Israeli Mossad. This is known as a false flag operation. The speaker references a US army report from the day before 9/11, which highlights Israel's capabilities.

The speaker, a former Zionist and Jew, claims Israel orchestrated 9/11 to incite hatred against Arabs/Muslims and instigate Middle East wars for its benefit. They allege World Trade Center 7's collapse was a controlled demolition by the Israeli Mossad, with Larry Silverstein profiting from an insurance scam. Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said the 9/11 attacks swung American public opinion in Israel's favor. Al-Qaeda and ISIS were allegedly created by the Mossad and CIA to justify US wars for Israel's Middle East empire. The speaker accuses Israel of planning a genocide against Palestinians, referencing the "decisive plan." They claim the October 7th incident was Israel's "9/11," used to implement this plan. The speaker states JFK supported Palestinian refugee rights, opposed Israel's nuclear program, and wanted APAC to register as a foreign agent. His vice president, Lyndon Johnson, was allegedly loyal to Israel and shipped weapons to Zionist militias in the 1940s. JFK was reportedly furious at Israel for lying about its nuclear weapons program and threatened to withdraw support. President Eisenhower used sanctions to force Israel out of Egypt during the Suez Crisis, which LBJ opposed.

Americans, beware of being drawn into a war with Arabs by the Israeli Mossad, who can stage attacks to blame Muslims. This is known as a false flag, as detailed in a US army report released the day before 9/11. The report warned about Israel's tactics.

The speaker, a former Zionist and Jew, claims the 9/11 attacks were engineered by the Israeli Mossad, with Larry Silverstein profiting via an insurance scam facilitated by Elliot Spitzer. Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said the attacks swung American public opinion in Israel's favor, and Israel's strategic goal was to incite hatred against Arabs and Muslims to justify Middle East wars. Al Qaeda and ISIS were allegedly created by the Mossad and CIA to fabricate justifications for these wars, advancing Israel's aim to create a Middle East empire. The speaker alleges Israel has planned the genocide of Palestinians for years, referencing General Matan Vilneh's threat of a "bigger holocaust" in 2008 and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich's "decisive plan" for genocide. The 10/07/2023 incident was supposedly used to implement this plan. JFK supported Palestinian refugee rights, opposed Israel's nuclear program, and tried to force AIPAC to register as a foreign agent. His vice president, Lyndon Johnson, was primarily loyal to Israel and shipped weapons to Zionist militias in the 1948 Nakba. JFK was furious at Israel for lying about its nuclear weapons program and threatened to withdraw support unless inspections were allowed. Ben Gurion aimed to abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine. President Eisenhower sanctioned Israel during the Suez Crisis, a move opposed by LBJ.

Dan, who is challenging in a Florida congressional race as a Republican, explains why he pivoted to run. He says he believes no one in government is acting in Americans’ best interest and that leaders prioritize themselves, citing President Trump as an example of decisions driven by ego and personal gain. He contends Trump lied repeatedly, accusing him of breaking promises and failing in leadership, including claims about war outcomes and Ukraine or Iran-related decisions. Dan argues that the Obama-era or current policy on Iran, including sanctions and military moves, benefits Iran and others at America’s expense, and he asserts that “they’re negotiating still” while the other side gains concessions. He specifically asserts that Iran should not be allowed to enrich uranium without inspections and that the U.S. should maintain stricter terms. The conversation then shifts to Israel. Dan portrays Israel as an enemy, calling it a “terrorist nation” that was founded by terrorists and has engaged in terrorism since its inception. He mentions historical groups connected to Israel’s founding (Haganah, Irgun, Stern Gang) and claims their leaders became prime ministers, arguing that Israel has attacked U.S. warships and participated in false flag operations like the Lavon affair. He asserts that Israel “bombed the King David Hotel” and “poisoned Palestinian wells,” and he claims that the entire relationship with Israel is guided by terrorism and genocide, with the U.S. paying for it and being drawn into wars. The discussion becomes personal as Dan is challenged on antisemitism. He acknowledges calling an opponent “fat Jew,” which the hosts flag as antisemitic. Dan tries to differentiate between his use of that term and anti-Muslim rhetoric by noting he uses the term to describe a Jewish supremacist who “puts Israel before America,” and he claims he is not antisemitic, arguing that the term “Semite” is contested and that Palestinians are Semites as well. The hosts press about whether his rhetoric is antisemitic, especially given his claim that “Muslims are lower than dogs.” They point out that such language is Islamophobic and inappropriate, and they push on whether his words reflect antisemitism or anti-Jewish sentiment. The hosts acknowledge the difficulty of campaigning with such questions, noting that Dan’s wealth and independence from donors add a unique dimension to his campaign. Dan reiterates his stance: he dislikes racism and supremacist mindsets, specifically naming Randy Fine, whom he accuses of prioritizing a foreign nation over America. He emphasizes that he does not want to be a congressman but is running because nobody else is doing what’s best for the country; he believes leaders are self-serving and that the country needs people who would act selflessly, even relative to military service and civic duty. He concludes by asserting that he wants to help the country and presents his candidacy as a principled, unconventional effort to reform governance.