reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There are concerns about the security of electronic voting machines, as they can potentially be hacked without detection. While there is no evidence of this happening, it cannot be proven that it hasn't or won't happen in the future. Instances of machine errors have been reported, such as recording extra votes for a candidate or subtracting votes instead of adding them. It is unknown how many instances went unnoticed and what impact they had on elections. Legislation is being proposed to require a paper trail for every electronic machine, similar to ATM receipts, to ensure transparency and allow for verification. An investigation is also being requested to assess the effectiveness of voting machines and improve election systems.

Speaker 1 discusses Christopher Krebs, former head of CISA, claiming: Krebs weaponized his position against free speech in the election context and in the context of the COVID-19 presidential memorandum, and that he might have instructed the Department of Justice and other parts of government to investigate what Krebs participated in while head of CISA. Speaker 1 asserts they did not know Krebs personally, but that he came out right after the election, which was a “rigged election, badly rigged election.” He claims the country’s outcomes included open borders and millions entering the country, and asserts that “Russia and Ukraine, that would have never happened,” and that “October 7 would have never happened,” followed by the Afghanistan withdrawal with “13 dead, but so many killed, actually. I mean, so many so many killed outside of the 13 soldiers, hundreds of people killed.” He says, “and maybe, I don’t know, never,” but mentions it, that Krebs was saying the election was great, adding that “it’s been proven that it was not only not great.” He cites lawyers and law firms signing on, “giving us hundreds of millions of dollars,” and claims the election was proven by legislatures not approving, and other forms from “the all of the different, scamming operations,” describing it as a very corrupt election in which COVID was used to cheat. Speaker 1 contends Krebs claimed, “we’ve proved this is the most secure election in the history of our country,” describing the result as a disaster. He insists they should adopt “paper ballots, same day voting, voter ID,” and proposes adding a certificate showing citizenship before voting—“a citizen piece of paper that says you’re a citizen before you can vote.” He reiterates support for voter ID, paper ballots, and same-day voting. He describes events: if you don’t have same-day voting, they change the air, move boxes, and then don’t bring the boxes back, implying a lack of safety in elections. He asserts that elections must have borders and, ideally, a free press, which he claims we do not have, calling the press dishonest. Speaker 1 concludes that Krebs is a “fraud” and a “disgrace,” and says, “We’ll find out whether or not he was right,” promising that Krebs “has a big price to pay” if the election wasn’t safe, labeling Krebs as “a bad guy.” He also states he has no idea who Krebs is, though acknowledges Krebs “was in the room at some point,” and ends by noting that the last two points are important for the country.

The speaker, a political law attorney, explains that rigging a national election in the US is not possible due to bipartisan checks and balances at multiple levels. He dismisses the idea of collaboration between parties to rig an election. He also addresses concerns about hack attacks on electoral systems, emphasizing the presence of poll watchers from both parties. The speaker criticizes Donald Trump's claims of election rigging as poor political strategy. Trump's actions are compared to past attempts by Democrats to delegitimize election results. The speaker concludes that Trump should focus on encouraging voter turnout and delivering a winning message.

We need to address issues with computer voting, as seen in Antrim County, Michigan. Despite a programming error, it was caught and corrected the same day. There is no evidence of a statewide software glitch affecting other elections. Let's focus on winning elections instead of worrying about false claims.

The speaker states they are investigating dangerous and negative consequences with the "best of the best." They claim electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and open to exploitation, allowing manipulation of vote results. This vulnerability purportedly reinforces the need for paper ballots nationwide, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

Jen Easterly, director of the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, asserts that foreign adversaries cannot change US election results. While it's difficult to claim anything is impossible, the built-in checks and balances make it highly unlikely. The resilience of the voting system, including oversight from both parties and the use of paper ballots for audits, enhances integrity. Despite concerns about misinformation, the US election infrastructure is robust and secure. Voting machines are not connected to the Internet, and state and local officials continuously work to improve security. The dedication of these officials ensures that the election process remains fair, accurate, and trustworthy, deserving our gratitude for their ongoing efforts.

We demonstrated how easily election machines can be hacked, raising concerns about the limited number of companies controlling voting technology. 43% of American voters use machines with security flaws, and some states lack a paper trail to verify results. The lack of transparency in cybersecurity practices is alarming.

To lower tensions and unite the country, we must investigate election irregularities. Allegations include ballots being backdated in Detroit, late unsealed ballots counted for Democrats, and deceased individuals voting. Whistleblowers in Nevada reported witnessing voter fraud. An election official in Georgia admitted to finding illegal and double voters on the rolls. False claims of fraud are harmful, so we must approach this issue carefully and responsibly.

A bill exists that would require states to upgrade their elections infrastructure. The best and most secure way to conduct voting is with paper ballots. Russia can't hack a piece of paper. It would be beneficial if the Republican leader would put these bills on the floor for a vote.

Do you have any doubts that Joe Biden had the necessary electoral votes to be elected president in 2020? I accept the results and acknowledge Joe Biden as president. However, from my experience as an advocate in Pennsylvania, I witnessed various issues. While I accept the outcome, I believe we should all prioritize election integrity and ensure our elections are free and fair, adhering to the rules and laws. I think that question deserves a simple yes or no, and your lengthy response suggests you weren't prepared to answer directly.

This election fraud narrative is shameful and damaging to our democracy. It's time to grow up and accept the results. The focus should be on our institutions and the trust we have in them, not on individual politicians. The actions of some, including Larry Elder and former leaders, are undermining our country. We must not normalize this behavior; it's a serious moment for America. Voter suppression and attacks on rights are real issues that affect us all. I have deep respect for the Republican Party, but I don't recognize it anymore. It's crucial to acknowledge the truth and move forward, regardless of the outcome.

The speaker advocates for a return to paper ballots, stating Russia cannot hack them. The speaker contrasts this with Kamala Harris.

Hello everyone. I wanted to address the election results. Will you accept them? I ignored his personal attacks like "nasty woman" and accusations of being a puppet. My focus was on the serious issue of Russia's confirmed cyberattacks against Americans. It's horrifying that, even after 17 intelligence agencies confirmed this, he still refuses to admit it's true. Our country is built on laws and accepting election outcomes, regardless of how heated the campaigns are. His claims of a rigged system whenever he loses – whether it's court cases, primaries, or even Emmy awards – are a pattern of deflecting blame.

The speaker believes some amount of cheating takes place in elections, particularly with mail-in ballots and lack of proof of citizenship, making it hard to prove. Statistically unlikely events occurred, such as the use of Dominion Voting Machines in specific locations like Philadelphia and Maricopa County. The speaker advocates for paper ballots, hand-counted, citing the ease of hacking computer programs. They also support in-person voting with voter ID, which they claim is standard in almost every country with democratic elections. To effectively address fraud, the speaker suggests in-person voting with ID. Given the current situation, they believe a very large margin of victory is needed to overcome potential cheating.

For the safety and security of our nation, we should switch to paper ballots, which cost only 8% of what machines cost. These paper ballots should be watermarked to prevent cheating. Along with paper ballots, we need same-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship. Some states take weeks to finish counting votes, and in a close election, this delay is unacceptable. With paper ballots, everyone would know the results by 10 PM. I asked Elon Musk about voting systems, and he said computers aren't suitable for voting due to too many transactions happening too quickly. The most secure and fastest way to secure elections is with paper ballots. France used mail-in ballots but switched back to paper ballots and had their election results by 10:05 PM with no complaints. We're one of the only countries with mail-in voting.

The speaker states that the best investigators are pursuing election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and can be exploited to manipulate vote results. This vulnerability allegedly drives the mandate to implement paper ballots across the country, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

If an election is close, Commonwealth will win by cheating, fortifying, and stealing ballots. Elections are not perfectly clean, but changes were done in plain daylight. To improve elections, run them like other Western democracies: one-day voting, practically no absentee ballots, and stronger voter ID. This used to be more common in the U.S., but has decayed over the last 20-30 years. Results were available on election day 30-40 years ago, which no longer happens.

Democrats have long criticized the vulnerability of voting machines and the potential for hacking. They argue that all voting machines need to be examined to ensure they are secure. They specifically mention Dominion voting machines as being susceptible to hacking. They claim that these machines can be easily hacked and that the results of elections have been questioned for a long time. They also highlight the issue of outdated and vulnerable machines in some states. However, they are accused of only raising these concerns when they lose elections. Republicans have also challenged election results in the past. The overall message is that there are doubts about the integrity of elections and the influence of powerful interests.

All votes in The United States Of America are counted in The United States Of America. There is no evidence that any machine has been manipulated by a foreign power. Recounts are consistent with the initial count, confirming that the systems used in the twenty twenty election performed as expected. The American people should have 100% confidence in their vote. A lawyer representing the president claimed that Dominion voting machines ran an algorithm to take votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden. Votes in Georgia were cast on paper, counted by a machine, and recounted by hand, with consistent outcomes. If there was an algorithm flipping votes, it didn't work. The more likely explanation is that there was no algorithm and that security controls protected the systems from misbehavior.

There are numerous reasons why our elections need to be secure. People who dedicate their lives to this cause are often dismissed as conspiracy theorists and technophobes. The vendors responsible for election systems are dishonest about the state of security. This is deeply concerning, and it brings me to tears. As someone I know once said, our country is pretending to be something it's not.

America's election infrastructure is more secure than ever, thanks to extensive work by state and local officials. Voters can trust that their votes will be counted accurately. Voting machines are not connected to the Internet, 97% of ballots are paper, and there are multiple safeguards in place, including cybersecurity measures and audits. However, foreign adversaries like Russia and China are spreading disinformation to undermine confidence in the system. As the election approaches, it's crucial for Americans to recognize the potential for increased disinformation. To navigate this, they should rely on information from trusted sources, specifically state and local election officials, who are the experts on election matters.

The speaker states that there is no dispute: the conduct of our elections, the way government comes into power, is a national security issue, and the security of our elections is incredibly important. The speaker says they are comforted as a citizen and as someone at the Department of Justice by the fact that national security eyes are on this, as well as criminal and civil rights review. They add that, at the end of the day, as a voter themselves and someone involved in politics before taking the job, they like every citizen to vote. They note that a lot of people don’t vote, don’t have confidence, and don’t care. It is important that people have confidence in, accept the outcome of the elections, and also be more likely to vote. The speaker concludes that this is a very good thing, whoever they’re voting for.

Contrary to the current political narrative, the speaker emphasizes that voting machines are not connected to the internet and the Department of Homeland Security claims the 2020 election was secure. However, in 2018, there were instances of electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleting or switching votes. The speaker mentions that hackers were able to breach these machines easily, even with limited knowledge and resources. They also mention the concern of remote access software making the machines vulnerable to fraudsters and hackers. The speaker then addresses the controversy surrounding Dominion, stating that there were no switched or deleted votes involving their machines and that the company has no ties to communism or China. However, there are concerns that some machines may be connected to the internet despite being designed as closed systems.

The speaker states that the "best of the best" are investigating election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers and exploitation, allowing for the manipulation of vote results. This allegedly supports the mandate to implement paper ballots nationwide, with the goal of restoring voters' faith in election integrity.