reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This bill is described as a pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents. The speaker opposes criminalizing parents for wanting to love their children.

We support Trump because he stands for America, God, and minorities. If you vote left, you'll have nothing left. If you like high gas prices, killing babies, confusion about gender, and giving money to other countries, the Democratic party isn't for you. Join us on the right side.

Speaker 0 argues that abortion is murder and frames it as a ritual akin to human sacrifice, claiming civilizations like the Incas and Vikings killed people to appease gods and gain power. They insist abortion isn’t ritualistic, reference an abortion truck outside the Democratic convention, and challenge the idea that abortion is a right, suggesting that abortion is the only right people have. They express empathy for individuals who might face pregnancy decisions, recounting childhood conversations about a 12-year-old farmworker who might be pregnant from rape, and acknowledge sadness about abortion, but insist that now abortion is “the only right you have.” Speaker 1 pushes back by denying that abortion is a ritual and emphasizes that people do not have the right to keep someone from taking a medical injection or consuming unknown products, arguing that the only right claimed is to murder one’s own children. They describe the statement as dark and urge Speaker 0 to reconsider their stance. Speaker 0 responds with a personal perspective as a father, asserting that the most important thing in life is having children and that one’s children are what will matter most. They reject the notion that jobs or material concerns are paramount and criticize the idea of just killing one’s children. They apologize to Brookie for the upset but maintain their view that abortion is grotesque and sad, noting that many people who have abortions are not happy about it. Speaker 1 contends they don’t care about what Speaker 0 says and asserts a lack of interest in further discussion. Speaker 0 elaborates on the idea that the issue is highly ideological and that the reality of abortion is often hidden behind abstractions. They argue that a human being is beheaded with a knife inside a woman, insisting that if beheading didn’t take place, that person could have led a different life, and that it is not for us to kill people simply because they are “in the way.” They warn that if it is permissible to kill children who are in the way, then the elderly or even others could be killed as well, concluding with the assertion that you can’t do that. Speaker 1 reiterates that abortion is a matter of human rights, while Speaker 0 maintains that there is no human right to kill people, insisting that killing people is the enemy of human rights and that the human right is to live. The conversation ends with an unresolved tension between preserving life and recognizing individual rights, framed by extreme positions about abortion and its moral implications.

The speaker asked for an explanation about the children's role in their beliefs. The person they were talking to explained that the children have a different perspective. They see themselves as fighting against God and view children as the closest thing to God because they are innocent and haven't been corrupted. The more a baby or young child suffers, the more they believe they are defeating God. This is their main focus and nothing else matters to them.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the sterilization of children. Speaker 0 claims that children are being sterilized and offers to show consent forms as evidence. Speaker 1 disagrees, stating that children are not being sterilized. Speaker 0 questions why protecting children from irreversible harm is considered fascist. Speaker 1 argues that without necessary care, children would be miserable and potentially suicidal. Speaker 0 requests evidence to support this claim, but Speaker 1 does not provide any. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 accusing Speaker 0 of propagating anti-LGBTQ propaganda.

I have an issue when it comes to targeting our kids and trying to change their gender. I don't care if a 40-year-old person wants to undergo gender reassignment, but I don't want to hear about it, pay for it, or be forced to acknowledge their chosen identity. Leave me alone and stay away from our children.

Showing images of abortion is considered violent, but some argue that the act itself is not. However, it is important to acknowledge the violence inflicted upon the child who could have had a chance to live. This is why I am pro-life. Instead of dwelling on our own discomfort, we should take action to reduce the abortion rate and support both the children and their mothers.

"You cannot be a practicing Catholic and be part of the current Democratic party knowing that this group is actively working for the killing of the unborn." "You cannot be part of a group or an association that's focus is to bring about moral evils." "This is why for centuries, the Catholic church has made it very clear that you cannot be a freemason because there are foundational principles of the freemasons that are contrary to the Catholic faith." "There is a moral obligation here not to be part of them regardless of whatever other good things you might think the Democratic Party is trying to bring about." "Murder is a line you cannot cross."

The speaker expresses disgust and accuses others of wanting to harm children by cutting off their genitals. They question how cutting off genitals can protect kids and criticize those who support it. The speaker is upset and asks others what they would like them to do. They argue that children cannot give consent and express frustration towards those who disagree. The speaker mentions the idea of killing themselves and expresses sadness at the thought.

I believe my popularity stems from my background as a former soccer player, rock singer, and economist, a combination that resonates on TV. Argentina has embraced socialist ideas for a century, so the natural rebellion is to be liberal. Young people found someone speaking about liberalism and rebelling against the status quo. Argentina began embracing socialist ideas a century ago, with the attractive but terrifying concept that "where there is a need, a right is born." Needs are infinite, but resources are finite, leading to conflict. Liberals solve this with free prices and private property, but socialists prefer state control disguised as social justice, which is unjust and involves theft. I oppose abortion due to my libertarian belief in the non-aggression principle and the right to life. Life begins at fertilization, and abortion is an aggravated murder. The Pope plays politics, showing affinity for dictators and embracing social justice, which involves theft and violates the Ten Commandments. Socialism is violent, murderous, and impoverishing. Never embrace it or the siren song of social justice. Socialists are tireless in trying to live off others, so the battle against them must be constant. **Translation to English:** I believe my popularity comes from my background as a former soccer player, rock singer, and economist, a combination that resonates on TV. Argentina has embraced socialist ideas for a century, so the natural rebellion is to be liberal. Young people found someone speaking about liberalism and rebelling against the status quo. Argentina began embracing socialist ideas a century ago, with the attractive but terrifying concept that "where there is a need, a right is born." Needs are infinite, but resources are finite, leading to conflict. Liberals solve this with free prices and private property, but socialists prefer state control disguised as social justice, which is unjust and involves theft. I oppose abortion due to my libertarian belief in the non-aggression principle and the right to life. Life begins at fertilization, and abortion is an aggravated murder. The Pope plays politics, showing affinity for dictators and embracing social justice, which involves theft and violates the Ten Commandments. Socialism is violent, murderous, and impoverishing. Never embrace it or the siren song of social justice. Socialists are tireless in trying to live off others, so the battle against them must be constant.

The speaker states they cannot support a party that wants to redefine family, which they consider the core of society. They cannot vote for laws that would allow children to mutilate their bodies, possibly without parental consent, or that would allow LGBTQ+ couples to marry. They also cannot support a party that favors parents losing custody for not affirming a child's transition, children of opposite sexes sharing bathrooms, or biological males competing against the speaker's daughter in sports. The speaker is not pushing their views on others, but sharing the reasons for their voting decision. They suggest voters should ask which party promotes values that are unbiblical and directly contradict a Christian worldview. While both parties may promote some biblical values, the speaker believes the listed issues are weightier matters and influence their vote.

I refuse to protect those who buy and abuse children. We must stop men from buying girls. We need to take a stand against this abuse. It's not okay to let offenders off lightly. We must prioritize the safety and well-being of vulnerable children. It's time to draw a line and say "enough." I urge you to vote accordingly.

We are concerned about harmful protocols for children struggling with their biological sex. We urge US medical organizations to stop promoting social affirmation, puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries for these children. Sex is biologically determined and should guide medical decisions. We reject the claim that our concerns are a minority opinion and demand a change in approach.

Children are seen as the closest to God by those who aim to defeat God. They believe that making babies suffer brings them closer to victory over God, as children are viewed as pure and uncorrupted. Their ultimate purpose is to inflict pain on God, viewing themselves as the true gods. This singular goal defines their choices and perspective on the world.

President Trump has stated he will veto a national abortion ban, viewing it as a state's rights issue. The speaker believes that if a baby can survive outside the womb, abortion is not permissible; it constitutes murder at that stage of gestation. The speaker claims the education system has instilled terror in girls and women, pushing the idea that pregnancy is the end of their lives and careers. This fear leads them to believe they must have access to abortion, even in extreme circumstances, and they will vote against any candidate who might restrict it. The speaker asserts that having children brings more joy than anything else and that it is natural to love one's children.

"Transgendered ideology, it's based in fraud." "We are born or we are conceived either a girl or a boy from eternity." "We are not plethora of unending gender choices." "So the whole concept that this is free choice is absolutely a lie." "Right? It isn't medical based. It isn't scientifically based." "And then we to further add insult to injury, we wanna recommend immediately that they go into a pipeline of drugs." "Children are being preyed upon, and they're being preyed upon by those who want to make them a part or a symbol of this movement, this religious cult."

One speaker suggests killing unwanted children in foster care. They ask for statistics on the percentage of foster children who are abused, molested, or enslaved. Another speaker says they would be okay with killing babies in foster care and killing children who have been abused. One speaker states that if they don't want to have a baby, they should have the choice not to, because people should still have the choice, and that the other speaker doesn't understand the magnitude of having a child.

The speaker discusses a conversation they had with someone about the mindset of those who harm children. The person explains that these individuals view the world differently and have a singular purpose: to defeat God. They believe that children are the closest thing to God because they are created in His image and have not yet been corrupted. The more pain they can inflict on a child, the greater their victory over God. This is their sole consideration.

We strongly oppose the conservatives' resistance to evidence-based programs that save lives. We must not revert to the failed ideology of the past. The consequences could be dire.

The speaker asked someone to explain the focus on children, admitting they have a problem understanding it. The explanation given was that "they" don't define children or the world the same way. Their choices are different, and everything is defined by their purpose: to defeat God. Children are seen as the closest thing on Earth to God because humans are created in God's image and haven't had time to be corrupted. Therefore, the younger you are, the closer you are to God, and the more pain inflicted on a baby or small child, the greater the victory over God. This is described as their only consideration.

We don't care about your opinions on sex or gender. Let us think for ourselves. Keep your thoughts to yourself. Remove tyrants from government. Any church supporting transgender propaganda is deceived by Satan. Follow God's word or leave the church.

Speaker 0, who identifies as Ray Gallagher: Class of '97. I made it halfway through 1995, but for some reason, I was too ill behaved to even make it through Heather Ridge. I identify as Ray Gallagher, and I'm gonna go by Ray Gallagher for the rest of the speech. So you guys had six kids raped, and the first thing you thought to do was to start to ban free speech and require driver's licenses in order to stop citizens from calling you out on your bull. Well, it's not gonna work. Speaker 1: Mister Porter, I'm Speaker 0: gonna stop. I'm gonna stop Speaker 1: you right there. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. There is nothing disruptive about the content of my free speech. Do you wanna talk about Cohen versus California? Did you stop my time? You did. Speaker 1: It is stopped. Speaker 0: I'm gonna continue. No. It didn't stop. It's still counting. I'm looking at it. It's two minutes. Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you one more chance, and then I'm gonna ask you to sit down. Speaker 0: For what? Speaker 1: To abide by our new policy. Speaker 0: You can't ban specific words. My my particular view of your policies, the fact you got all these kids raped by a transgender person and then you keep pushing transgender stuff on children, is that your policy is completely out of line with America. Now this is a transgender flag, and I would like to show you demonstrably what America and the voters think about the transgender ideology being pushed on children. So that right there is what America thinks of your transgender policy four four three. Most people don't support this garbage. Literally support chopping off appendages of children and giving them puberty blockers that make them sterile. You're a monster, all of you, the ones that vote for it support this stuff. The board is out of line. The board's policies are out of line. You guys don't know what you're doing. You're pissing everybody off.

Our agenda being unchecked may corrupt your kids. Funny, but you're right.

We strongly oppose an immediate ceasefire as it allows the killing of children. This is a war specifically targeting children.

The speaker recounts a conversation about why children are targeted. The explanation given was that "they" don't define the world or children the way "you" do. For "them," everything is defined by their all-consuming purpose: to defeat God. "They" believe the true gods are themselves and Satan. Children are seen as the closest thing on Earth to God because humans are created in God's image and haven't had time to be corrupted. Therefore, the younger you are, the closer you are to God, and the more pain inflicted on a baby or small child, the greater the victory over God. This is claimed to be their only consideration.